Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia

Purpose Evaluation of clinical and radiological effects of the therapeutic outcome of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for patients with chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain in a single-center prospective longitudinal study i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiologia medica 2021, Vol.126 (1), p.124-132
Hauptverfasser: Tortora, Fabio, Negro, Alberto, Russo, Camilla, Cirillo, Sossio, Caranci, Ferdinando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 124
container_title Radiologia medica
container_volume 126
creator Tortora, Fabio
Negro, Alberto
Russo, Camilla
Cirillo, Sossio
Caranci, Ferdinando
description Purpose Evaluation of clinical and radiological effects of the therapeutic outcome of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for patients with chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain in a single-center prospective longitudinal study in order to evaluate predictive factors of safety and therapeutic success. Materials and methods Thirty patients, from 2016 to 2018, were enrolled (age: 42–80 aa, 66.7% men and 33.3% females) with low back pain, lumbosciatalgia and/or lumbocruralgia, resistant to previous medical and physical treatments for a period not 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398622356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487447625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-11d1d7b36e65792ecb2480617df70ab7bb6a70e40be632cdf832f2877727d1f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EIkvgBSiQJRoKJvgyY89WCK24SZGggNry5XjjaMZebA_S5m1403h3A0gpUrnwd_7Pxz9CLym5oITId4XSoZcdYaQjlFHW3TxCKzoy0Yn1yB-jFSGcdyMX7Aw9K-WakJ5Qsn6KzjjjQnI6rtCfzVVOMVgcYs3aVm0mwNMym1S0zXrCWbtgl0lnvNMhvsWh4HoFGbDGGWZw-_f4-zIVcEcy-Qy_Foh2j2sGXWeIFevo8O_UQqHmZpqTCz5YXUOKBSd_yDsqm8OlXA7SlCre6ridgn6OnnjdBC_uznP089PHH5sv3eW3z183Hy47y-VQO0odddJwAWKQawbWsH4kgkrnJdFGGiO0JNATA4Iz6_zImWejlJJJR73k5-jNKXeXU1uhVDWHYmGadIS0FMX4ehSM8UE09PU99DotObbXqSaVfS8FGxrFTpTNqZQMXu1ymHXeK0rUoUB1KlC1AtWxQHXThl7dRS-m_e6_kb-NNYCfgNKu4hbyf_cDsbfzlKnJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487447625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Tortora, Fabio ; Negro, Alberto ; Russo, Camilla ; Cirillo, Sossio ; Caranci, Ferdinando</creator><creatorcontrib>Tortora, Fabio ; Negro, Alberto ; Russo, Camilla ; Cirillo, Sossio ; Caranci, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Evaluation of clinical and radiological effects of the therapeutic outcome of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for patients with chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain in a single-center prospective longitudinal study in order to evaluate predictive factors of safety and therapeutic success. Materials and methods Thirty patients, from 2016 to 2018, were enrolled (age: 42–80 aa, 66.7% men and 33.3% females) with low back pain, lumbosciatalgia and/or lumbocruralgia, resistant to previous medical and physical treatments for a period not &lt; 3 months, failure of surgical and chemiodiscolysis with ozone oxygen therapy. Each patient was subjected to a clinical evaluation (antalgic walking, sensitive deficit, interviews with specific questionnaires: ODI, RDQ,VAS) and to a radiological evaluation with MRI examination, before and 30 days after the CT-guided PRF treatment. Measurements of the thickness of the involved and not involved DRG were taken using common postprocessing software of MRI examinations in order to have measurement parameters for comparison. We analyzed the clinical course using the paired samples T test in order to evaluate modification for each clinical and radiological parameter (statistical significance p  &lt; 0.05). Results Significant improvements of the clinical outcomes with a good resolution of the pain symptoms (VAS evaluation: The score fell from 68.47 to 39.17 with a difference of 29.3 and a reduction of the 42.79% in the perceived pain, p  = 0.00000152). The thickness of DRG falls from an average media of 0.586–0.448 cm ( p  = 0.000085), with a difference of 0.138 cm and a percentage reduction of 22.30%. Conclusions PRF treatment of the DRG may be considered for patients with chronic severe lumbosacral radicular pain refractory to conventional medical management when other noninvasive or surgical procedures fail. It is minimally invasive, inexpensive and simple to perform with no complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1826-6983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32367318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Correlation analysis ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Evaluation ; Female ; Ganglia ; Ganglia, Spinal ; Health services ; Humans ; Imaging ; Interventional Radiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Lumbosacral Region ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; Pain ; Pain Management - methods ; Parameter modification ; Prospective Studies ; Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods ; Radiculopathy - diagnostic imaging ; Radiculopathy - therapy ; Radio frequency ; Radiography, Interventional ; Radiology ; Statistical methods ; Thickness ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Radiologia medica, 2021, Vol.126 (1), p.124-132</ispartof><rights>Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2020</rights><rights>Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-11d1d7b36e65792ecb2480617df70ab7bb6a70e40be632cdf832f2877727d1f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-11d1d7b36e65792ecb2480617df70ab7bb6a70e40be632cdf832f2877727d1f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7904-1563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32367318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tortora, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negro, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, Sossio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caranci, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia</title><title>Radiologia medica</title><addtitle>Radiol med</addtitle><addtitle>Radiol Med</addtitle><description>Purpose Evaluation of clinical and radiological effects of the therapeutic outcome of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for patients with chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain in a single-center prospective longitudinal study in order to evaluate predictive factors of safety and therapeutic success. Materials and methods Thirty patients, from 2016 to 2018, were enrolled (age: 42–80 aa, 66.7% men and 33.3% females) with low back pain, lumbosciatalgia and/or lumbocruralgia, resistant to previous medical and physical treatments for a period not &lt; 3 months, failure of surgical and chemiodiscolysis with ozone oxygen therapy. Each patient was subjected to a clinical evaluation (antalgic walking, sensitive deficit, interviews with specific questionnaires: ODI, RDQ,VAS) and to a radiological evaluation with MRI examination, before and 30 days after the CT-guided PRF treatment. Measurements of the thickness of the involved and not involved DRG were taken using common postprocessing software of MRI examinations in order to have measurement parameters for comparison. We analyzed the clinical course using the paired samples T test in order to evaluate modification for each clinical and radiological parameter (statistical significance p  &lt; 0.05). Results Significant improvements of the clinical outcomes with a good resolution of the pain symptoms (VAS evaluation: The score fell from 68.47 to 39.17 with a difference of 29.3 and a reduction of the 42.79% in the perceived pain, p  = 0.00000152). The thickness of DRG falls from an average media of 0.586–0.448 cm ( p  = 0.000085), with a difference of 0.138 cm and a percentage reduction of 22.30%. Conclusions PRF treatment of the DRG may be considered for patients with chronic severe lumbosacral radicular pain refractory to conventional medical management when other noninvasive or surgical procedures fail. It is minimally invasive, inexpensive and simple to perform with no complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganglia</subject><subject>Ganglia, Spinal</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Parameter modification</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods</subject><subject>Radiculopathy - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiculopathy - therapy</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0033-8362</issn><issn>1826-6983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtuFDEUhi0EIkvgBSiQJRoKJvgyY89WCK24SZGggNry5XjjaMZebA_S5m1403h3A0gpUrnwd_7Pxz9CLym5oITId4XSoZcdYaQjlFHW3TxCKzoy0Yn1yB-jFSGcdyMX7Aw9K-WakJ5Qsn6KzjjjQnI6rtCfzVVOMVgcYs3aVm0mwNMym1S0zXrCWbtgl0lnvNMhvsWh4HoFGbDGGWZw-_f4-zIVcEcy-Qy_Foh2j2sGXWeIFevo8O_UQqHmZpqTCz5YXUOKBSd_yDsqm8OlXA7SlCre6ridgn6OnnjdBC_uznP089PHH5sv3eW3z183Hy47y-VQO0odddJwAWKQawbWsH4kgkrnJdFGGiO0JNATA4Iz6_zImWejlJJJR73k5-jNKXeXU1uhVDWHYmGadIS0FMX4ehSM8UE09PU99DotObbXqSaVfS8FGxrFTpTNqZQMXu1ymHXeK0rUoUB1KlC1AtWxQHXThl7dRS-m_e6_kb-NNYCfgNKu4hbyf_cDsbfzlKnJ</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Tortora, Fabio</creator><creator>Negro, Alberto</creator><creator>Russo, Camilla</creator><creator>Cirillo, Sossio</creator><creator>Caranci, Ferdinando</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-1563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia</title><author>Tortora, Fabio ; Negro, Alberto ; Russo, Camilla ; Cirillo, Sossio ; Caranci, Ferdinando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-11d1d7b36e65792ecb2480617df70ab7bb6a70e40be632cdf832f2877727d1f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganglia</topic><topic>Ganglia, Spinal</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Parameter modification</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods</topic><topic>Radiculopathy - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiculopathy - therapy</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tortora, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negro, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirillo, Sossio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caranci, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiologia medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tortora, Fabio</au><au>Negro, Alberto</au><au>Russo, Camilla</au><au>Cirillo, Sossio</au><au>Caranci, Ferdinando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia</atitle><jtitle>Radiologia medica</jtitle><stitle>Radiol med</stitle><addtitle>Radiol Med</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>124-132</pages><issn>0033-8362</issn><eissn>1826-6983</eissn><abstract>Purpose Evaluation of clinical and radiological effects of the therapeutic outcome of CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for patients with chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain in a single-center prospective longitudinal study in order to evaluate predictive factors of safety and therapeutic success. Materials and methods Thirty patients, from 2016 to 2018, were enrolled (age: 42–80 aa, 66.7% men and 33.3% females) with low back pain, lumbosciatalgia and/or lumbocruralgia, resistant to previous medical and physical treatments for a period not &lt; 3 months, failure of surgical and chemiodiscolysis with ozone oxygen therapy. Each patient was subjected to a clinical evaluation (antalgic walking, sensitive deficit, interviews with specific questionnaires: ODI, RDQ,VAS) and to a radiological evaluation with MRI examination, before and 30 days after the CT-guided PRF treatment. Measurements of the thickness of the involved and not involved DRG were taken using common postprocessing software of MRI examinations in order to have measurement parameters for comparison. We analyzed the clinical course using the paired samples T test in order to evaluate modification for each clinical and radiological parameter (statistical significance p  &lt; 0.05). Results Significant improvements of the clinical outcomes with a good resolution of the pain symptoms (VAS evaluation: The score fell from 68.47 to 39.17 with a difference of 29.3 and a reduction of the 42.79% in the perceived pain, p  = 0.00000152). The thickness of DRG falls from an average media of 0.586–0.448 cm ( p  = 0.000085), with a difference of 0.138 cm and a percentage reduction of 22.30%. Conclusions PRF treatment of the DRG may be considered for patients with chronic severe lumbosacral radicular pain refractory to conventional medical management when other noninvasive or surgical procedures fail. It is minimally invasive, inexpensive and simple to perform with no complications.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>32367318</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-1563</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8362
ispartof Radiologia medica, 2021, Vol.126 (1), p.124-132
issn 0033-8362
1826-6983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398622356
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Correlation analysis
Diagnostic Radiology
Evaluation
Female
Ganglia
Ganglia, Spinal
Health services
Humans
Imaging
Interventional Radiology
Longitudinal Studies
Low Back Pain - diagnostic imaging
Low Back Pain - therapy
Lumbosacral Region
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neuroradiology
Pain
Pain Management - methods
Parameter modification
Prospective Studies
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment - methods
Radiculopathy - diagnostic imaging
Radiculopathy - therapy
Radio frequency
Radiography, Interventional
Radiology
Statistical methods
Thickness
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasound
title Chronic intractable lumbosacral radicular pain, is there a remedy? Pulsed radiofrequency treatment and volumetric modifications of the lumbar dorsal root ganglia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20intractable%20lumbosacral%20radicular%20pain,%20is%20there%20a%20remedy?%20Pulsed%20radiofrequency%20treatment%20and%20volumetric%20modifications%20of%20the%20lumbar%20dorsal%20root%20ganglia&rft.jtitle=Radiologia%20medica&rft.au=Tortora,%20Fabio&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=124-132&rft.issn=0033-8362&rft.eissn=1826-6983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11547-020-01212-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487447625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487447625&rft_id=info:pmid/32367318&rfr_iscdi=true