Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity
Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel–Ziv–Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2020-06, Vol.238 (6), p.1411-1422 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1422 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1411 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 238 |
creator | Castellano, Marta Ibañez-Soria, David Kroupi, Eleni Acedo, Javier Campolo, Michela Soria-Frisch, Aureli Valls-Sole, Josep Verma, Ajay Ruffini, Giulio |
description | Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel–Ziv–Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions between task, endogenous and exogenous oscillations. In a cross-over study, EEG was recorded from thirty participants engaged in a change-of-speed detection task while receiving multichannel tACS over the visual cortex at 10 Hz, 70 Hz and a control condition. In each session, tACS was applied intermittently during 5 s events interleaved with EEG recordings over multiple trials. We found that, with respect to control, stimulation at 10 Hz (
tACS
10
) enhanced both
α
and
γ
power,
γ
-LZW complexity and
γ
but not
α
phase locking value with respect to tACS onset (
α
-PLV,
γ
-PLV), and increased reaction time (RT).
tACS
70
increased RT with little impact on other metrics. As trials associated with larger
γ
-power (and lower
γ
-LZW) predicted shorter RT, we argue that
tACS
10
produces a disruption of functionally relevant fast oscillations through an increase in
α
-band power, slowing behavioural responses and increasing the complexity of gamma oscillations. Our study highlights the complex interaction between tACS and endogenous brain dynamics, and suggests the use of algorithmic complexity inspired metrics to characterize cortical dynamics in a behaviorally relevant timescale. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398620307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A626344719</galeid><sourcerecordid>A626344719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-39fe8cfe47015934156ae4dd2d3d989414067d620bf223fad54862f42f375ce63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFDEYhYModlv9A15IQJB6MTVfk5m5XBY_FhYEaxG8CWk-tqkzyTTJSNtfb6ZbrSsigYS8POfwcjgAvMDoBCPUvE0IEYIrRFCF6rbct4_AAjNKKowRfwwWCGFWsRZ3B-Awpcv5Sxv0FBxQQnmDGVuAs7XPJg4uZ-MzzMvVKdRTdH4LJfzh0iR7mGX6Dt0wSpUT9GaKZRaScn0vsws-Qek13Hz7ClUYxt5cu3zzDDyxsk_m-f17BM7ev_uy-lhtPn1Yr5abStWoyRXtrGmVNaxBuO4owzWXhmlNNNVd2zHMEG80J-jcEkKt1DVrObGMWNrUynB6BI53vmMMV5NJWQwuKVM28yZMSRDaFQGiqCnoq7_QyzBFX7YThOE5NcrJA7WVvRHO25CjVLOpWHLCKWMN7gp18g-qHG0Gp4I31pX5nuDNnqAw2VznrZxSEuvTz_vs6z_YCyP7fJFCP91lvQ-SHahiSCkaK8boBhlvBEZiLojYFUSUgoi7gojbInp5H8N0Phj9W_KrEQWgOyCNcw1MfMjpP7Y_Ad64wd0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2411432362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Castellano, Marta ; Ibañez-Soria, David ; Kroupi, Eleni ; Acedo, Javier ; Campolo, Michela ; Soria-Frisch, Aureli ; Valls-Sole, Josep ; Verma, Ajay ; Ruffini, Giulio</creator><creatorcontrib>Castellano, Marta ; Ibañez-Soria, David ; Kroupi, Eleni ; Acedo, Javier ; Campolo, Michela ; Soria-Frisch, Aureli ; Valls-Sole, Josep ; Verma, Ajay ; Ruffini, Giulio</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel–Ziv–Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions between task, endogenous and exogenous oscillations. In a cross-over study, EEG was recorded from thirty participants engaged in a change-of-speed detection task while receiving multichannel tACS over the visual cortex at 10 Hz, 70 Hz and a control condition. In each session, tACS was applied intermittently during 5 s events interleaved with EEG recordings over multiple trials. We found that, with respect to control, stimulation at 10 Hz (
tACS
10
) enhanced both
α
and
γ
power,
γ
-LZW complexity and
γ
but not
α
phase locking value with respect to tACS onset (
α
-PLV,
γ
-PLV), and increased reaction time (RT).
tACS
70
increased RT with little impact on other metrics. As trials associated with larger
γ
-power (and lower
γ
-LZW) predicted shorter RT, we argue that
tACS
10
produces a disruption of functionally relevant fast oscillations through an increase in
α
-band power, slowing behavioural responses and increasing the complexity of gamma oscillations. Our study highlights the complex interaction between tACS and endogenous brain dynamics, and suggests the use of algorithmic complexity inspired metrics to characterize cortical dynamics in a behaviorally relevant timescale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32367144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain research ; Brain Waves - physiology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cross-Over Studies ; Double-Blind Method ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Frequency dependence ; Humans ; Male ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Oscillations ; Reaction time task ; Research Article ; Sleep ; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ; Visual cortex ; Visual Cortex - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2020-06, Vol.238 (6), p.1411-1422</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-39fe8cfe47015934156ae4dd2d3d989414067d620bf223fad54862f42f375ce63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-39fe8cfe47015934156ae4dd2d3d989414067d620bf223fad54862f42f375ce63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3084-0177</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32367144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castellano, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibañez-Soria, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroupi, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acedo, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campolo, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soria-Frisch, Aureli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valls-Sole, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffini, Giulio</creatorcontrib><title>Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel–Ziv–Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions between task, endogenous and exogenous oscillations. In a cross-over study, EEG was recorded from thirty participants engaged in a change-of-speed detection task while receiving multichannel tACS over the visual cortex at 10 Hz, 70 Hz and a control condition. In each session, tACS was applied intermittently during 5 s events interleaved with EEG recordings over multiple trials. We found that, with respect to control, stimulation at 10 Hz (
tACS
10
) enhanced both
α
and
γ
power,
γ
-LZW complexity and
γ
but not
α
phase locking value with respect to tACS onset (
α
-PLV,
γ
-PLV), and increased reaction time (RT).
tACS
70
increased RT with little impact on other metrics. As trials associated with larger
γ
-power (and lower
γ
-LZW) predicted shorter RT, we argue that
tACS
10
produces a disruption of functionally relevant fast oscillations through an increase in
α
-band power, slowing behavioural responses and increasing the complexity of gamma oscillations. Our study highlights the complex interaction between tACS and endogenous brain dynamics, and suggests the use of algorithmic complexity inspired metrics to characterize cortical dynamics in a behaviorally relevant timescale.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Brain Waves - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frequency dependence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Oscillations</subject><subject>Reaction time task</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation</subject><subject>Visual cortex</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFDEYhYModlv9A15IQJB6MTVfk5m5XBY_FhYEaxG8CWk-tqkzyTTJSNtfb6ZbrSsigYS8POfwcjgAvMDoBCPUvE0IEYIrRFCF6rbct4_AAjNKKowRfwwWCGFWsRZ3B-Awpcv5Sxv0FBxQQnmDGVuAs7XPJg4uZ-MzzMvVKdRTdH4LJfzh0iR7mGX6Dt0wSpUT9GaKZRaScn0vsws-Qek13Hz7ClUYxt5cu3zzDDyxsk_m-f17BM7ev_uy-lhtPn1Yr5abStWoyRXtrGmVNaxBuO4owzWXhmlNNNVd2zHMEG80J-jcEkKt1DVrObGMWNrUynB6BI53vmMMV5NJWQwuKVM28yZMSRDaFQGiqCnoq7_QyzBFX7YThOE5NcrJA7WVvRHO25CjVLOpWHLCKWMN7gp18g-qHG0Gp4I31pX5nuDNnqAw2VznrZxSEuvTz_vs6z_YCyP7fJFCP91lvQ-SHahiSCkaK8boBhlvBEZiLojYFUSUgoi7gojbInp5H8N0Phj9W_KrEQWgOyCNcw1MfMjpP7Y_Ad64wd0</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Castellano, Marta</creator><creator>Ibañez-Soria, David</creator><creator>Kroupi, Eleni</creator><creator>Acedo, Javier</creator><creator>Campolo, Michela</creator><creator>Soria-Frisch, Aureli</creator><creator>Valls-Sole, Josep</creator><creator>Verma, Ajay</creator><creator>Ruffini, Giulio</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0177</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity</title><author>Castellano, Marta ; Ibañez-Soria, David ; Kroupi, Eleni ; Acedo, Javier ; Campolo, Michela ; Soria-Frisch, Aureli ; Valls-Sole, Josep ; Verma, Ajay ; Ruffini, Giulio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-39fe8cfe47015934156ae4dd2d3d989414067d620bf223fad54862f42f375ce63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Brain Waves - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frequency dependence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Oscillations</topic><topic>Reaction time task</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation</topic><topic>Visual cortex</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castellano, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibañez-Soria, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroupi, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acedo, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campolo, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soria-Frisch, Aureli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valls-Sole, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruffini, Giulio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castellano, Marta</au><au>Ibañez-Soria, David</au><au>Kroupi, Eleni</au><au>Acedo, Javier</au><au>Campolo, Michela</au><au>Soria-Frisch, Aureli</au><au>Valls-Sole, Josep</au><au>Verma, Ajay</au><au>Ruffini, Giulio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>238</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1411</spage><epage>1422</epage><pages>1411-1422</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel–Ziv–Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions between task, endogenous and exogenous oscillations. In a cross-over study, EEG was recorded from thirty participants engaged in a change-of-speed detection task while receiving multichannel tACS over the visual cortex at 10 Hz, 70 Hz and a control condition. In each session, tACS was applied intermittently during 5 s events interleaved with EEG recordings over multiple trials. We found that, with respect to control, stimulation at 10 Hz (
tACS
10
) enhanced both
α
and
γ
power,
γ
-LZW complexity and
γ
but not
α
phase locking value with respect to tACS onset (
α
-PLV,
γ
-PLV), and increased reaction time (RT).
tACS
70
increased RT with little impact on other metrics. As trials associated with larger
γ
-power (and lower
γ
-LZW) predicted shorter RT, we argue that
tACS
10
produces a disruption of functionally relevant fast oscillations through an increase in
α
-band power, slowing behavioural responses and increasing the complexity of gamma oscillations. Our study highlights the complex interaction between tACS and endogenous brain dynamics, and suggests the use of algorithmic complexity inspired metrics to characterize cortical dynamics in a behaviorally relevant timescale.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32367144</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-0177</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2020-06, Vol.238 (6), p.1411-1422 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398620307 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Algorithms Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain research Brain Waves - physiology Cognition & reasoning Cross-Over Studies Double-Blind Method EEG Electroencephalography Female Frequency dependence Humans Male Neurology Neurosciences Oscillations Reaction time task Research Article Sleep Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Visual cortex Visual Cortex - physiology Young Adult |
title | Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intermittent%20tACS%20during%20a%20visual%20task%20impacts%20neural%20oscillations%20and%20LZW%20complexity&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Castellano,%20Marta&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=238&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1411&rft.epage=1422&rft.pages=1411-1422&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA626344719%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2411432362&rft_id=info:pmid/32367144&rft_galeid=A626344719&rfr_iscdi=true |