Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials
The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2020-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1489-1496 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1496 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1489 |
| container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 49 |
| creator | Kniha, K. Bock, A. Peters, F. Heitzer, M. Modabber, A. Kniha, H. Hölzle, F. Möhlhenrich, S.C. |
| description | The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398159396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502720301326</els_id><sourcerecordid>2398159396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1TAQRa0K1L4WfoAFypJN0on9khdLbKqqpUiV2MDacuwxTJQ4D9uhLat-BF_Il-DotSy7Gs3MvVe6h7F3NVQ11O35UNEwTxUHDhVsKwBxxDa1kLKEfHrFNiChLhvguxN2GuMAAFJ0u2N2IrhoeSN2G3Z3gTH9wESm0HGPJsVidoW2gzboUzHpexpHHR6KSP77iKUJ850vaNqP2qf49_EPeTcu6A2uvt8UzOxJF9rbIlHSnpYpBz8bcl7CQHqMb9hrlwe-fZpn7Nv11dfLm_L2y6fPlxe3pRFNm0rp2qbv662zpu-16KzVrXTAsaubTuvOGuNa2_R5zS9peOc6lFsEtLsO-0acsQ-H3H2Yfy65q5ooGsydPM5LVFzI7JVCtlnKD9LcMcaATu0DTbm7qkGtwNWgVuBqBa5gqzLwbHr_lL_0E9r_lmfCWfDxIMDc8hdhUNHQystSyLiVneml_H-RB5b0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398159396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kniha, K. ; Bock, A. ; Peters, F. ; Heitzer, M. ; Modabber, A. ; Kniha, H. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K. ; Bock, A. ; Peters, F. ; Heitzer, M. ; Modabber, A. ; Kniha, H. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p<0.01). The papilla deficit was significantly higher 1.64 mm (SD 1.35) around titanium compared to zirconia implants 0.92 mm (SD 0.94, p<0.01). The evaluation of the soft tissue recessions revealed no differences between implant materials, whereas titanium implants presented more visible implant shadows (p<0.01). Zirconia implants had more implants with papillae that filled the entire proximal space compared to titanium implants. Furthermore, titanium implants had a greater frequency of visible implant shadowing than the zirconia implants. Esthetic rules such as the interdental contact area and golden percentage rules did not differ significantly between the titanium and zirconia implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32362537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Crown ; Dental implant ; Dentistry ; Papilla ; Soft tissue ; Titanium ; Zirconia</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1489-1496</ispartof><rights>2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8579-2622</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32362537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kniha, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p<0.01). The papilla deficit was significantly higher 1.64 mm (SD 1.35) around titanium compared to zirconia implants 0.92 mm (SD 0.94, p<0.01). The evaluation of the soft tissue recessions revealed no differences between implant materials, whereas titanium implants presented more visible implant shadows (p<0.01). Zirconia implants had more implants with papillae that filled the entire proximal space compared to titanium implants. Furthermore, titanium implants had a greater frequency of visible implant shadowing than the zirconia implants. Esthetic rules such as the interdental contact area and golden percentage rules did not differ significantly between the titanium and zirconia implants.</description><subject>Crown</subject><subject>Dental implant</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Papilla</subject><subject>Soft tissue</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1TAQRa0K1L4WfoAFypJN0on9khdLbKqqpUiV2MDacuwxTJQ4D9uhLat-BF_Il-DotSy7Gs3MvVe6h7F3NVQ11O35UNEwTxUHDhVsKwBxxDa1kLKEfHrFNiChLhvguxN2GuMAAFJ0u2N2IrhoeSN2G3Z3gTH9wESm0HGPJsVidoW2gzboUzHpexpHHR6KSP77iKUJ850vaNqP2qf49_EPeTcu6A2uvt8UzOxJF9rbIlHSnpYpBz8bcl7CQHqMb9hrlwe-fZpn7Nv11dfLm_L2y6fPlxe3pRFNm0rp2qbv662zpu-16KzVrXTAsaubTuvOGuNa2_R5zS9peOc6lFsEtLsO-0acsQ-H3H2Yfy65q5ooGsydPM5LVFzI7JVCtlnKD9LcMcaATu0DTbm7qkGtwNWgVuBqBa5gqzLwbHr_lL_0E9r_lmfCWfDxIMDc8hdhUNHQystSyLiVneml_H-RB5b0</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Kniha, K.</creator><creator>Bock, A.</creator><creator>Peters, F.</creator><creator>Heitzer, M.</creator><creator>Modabber, A.</creator><creator>Kniha, H.</creator><creator>Hölzle, F.</creator><creator>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-2622</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</title><author>Kniha, K. ; Bock, A. ; Peters, F. ; Heitzer, M. ; Modabber, A. ; Kniha, H. ; Hölzle, F. ; Möhlhenrich, S.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9f65bb14fdcbba38dda69f02e8158aa8dccf6d5b815dda9c28f8e94e0ed78eb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Crown</topic><topic>Dental implant</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Papilla</topic><topic>Soft tissue</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kniha, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzer, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modabber, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kniha, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hölzle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kniha, K.</au><au>Bock, A.</au><au>Peters, F.</au><au>Heitzer, M.</au><au>Modabber, A.</au><au>Kniha, H.</au><au>Hölzle, F.</au><au>Möhlhenrich, S.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1489</spage><epage>1496</epage><pages>1489-1496</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this retrospective survey was to assess the esthetic aspects of adjacent zirconia and titanium implants in the anterior maxillary area. A total of 40 patients and 109 adjacent implants (17 patients with 47 titanium implants and 23 patients with 62 zirconia implants) was included. The primary aim of this survey was to assess the papillary fill (Jemt score). Additionally, further esthetic aspects were assessed. Papillae were fully present (Jemt score 3) around 39.1% of adjacent zirconia implants and 17.4% of adjacent titanium implants (p<0.01). The papilla deficit was significantly higher 1.64 mm (SD 1.35) around titanium compared to zirconia implants 0.92 mm (SD 0.94, p<0.01). The evaluation of the soft tissue recessions revealed no differences between implant materials, whereas titanium implants presented more visible implant shadows (p<0.01). Zirconia implants had more implants with papillae that filled the entire proximal space compared to titanium implants. Furthermore, titanium implants had a greater frequency of visible implant shadowing than the zirconia implants. Esthetic rules such as the interdental contact area and golden percentage rules did not differ significantly between the titanium and zirconia implants.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32362537</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-2622</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
| ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1489-1496 |
| issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398159396 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Crown Dental implant Dentistry Papilla Soft tissue Titanium Zirconia |
| title | Aesthetic aspects of adjacent maxillary single-crown implants—influence of zirconia and titanium as implant materials |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aesthetic%20aspects%20of%20adjacent%20maxillary%20single-crown%20implants%E2%80%94influence%20of%20zirconia%20and%20titanium%20as%20implant%20materials&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Kniha,%20K.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1489&rft.epage=1496&rft.pages=1489-1496&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2398159396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398159396&rft_id=info:pmid/32362537&rft_els_id=S0901502720301326&rfr_iscdi=true |