Appraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water

Land spreading of dairy soiled water (DSW) may result in pollution of ground and surface waters. Treatment of DSW through sludge-supernatant separation using chemical coagulants is a potential option to reduce the negative environmental impacts of DSW. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2020-08, Vol.267, p.110567-110567, Article 110567
Hauptverfasser: Mohamed, A.Y.A., Siggins, A., Healy, M.G., Ó hUallacháin, D., Fenton, O., Tuohy, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110567
container_issue
container_start_page 110567
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 267
creator Mohamed, A.Y.A.
Siggins, A.
Healy, M.G.
Ó hUallacháin, D.
Fenton, O.
Tuohy, P.
description Land spreading of dairy soiled water (DSW) may result in pollution of ground and surface waters. Treatment of DSW through sludge-supernatant separation using chemical coagulants is a potential option to reduce the negative environmental impacts of DSW. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the effectiveness of three chemical coagulants – poly-aluminium chloride (PACl), ferric chloride (FeCl3) and alum – in improving effluent quality, and (2) assess the properties of the sludge that is generated as by-product from the process for its suitability for land application. Taking into consideration optimum doses to minimize pollutants (turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and E. coli), optimum mixing times and cost, FeCl3 was the best performing coagulant. Generated sludges had higher nutrient content and fewer E. coli than raw DSW, and did not display any evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. using germination tests. The study discussed the results in a sustainable farm management context, and suggested that the effluent (supernatant) from the treatments may be recycled to wash farm yards, saving water. In parallel, the sludge portion can be applied to amend soil properties with no adverse impacts on the grass growth, providing an agronomic value as an organic fertilizer, and reducing the risk of nutrient losses. This management approach could minimize the overall net cost compared to land application of raw DSW. •Chemical coagulants showed significant removal of turbidity, COD, TP, TN, and E. coli.•Full removal and inactivation of Escherichia coli was achieved by ferric chloride.•No evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. caused by sludges.•Effluent from the coagulant treatment could be recycled for yard wash-down.•This management approach could minimize the cost compared to land application of DSW.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110567
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398157711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479720305004</els_id><sourcerecordid>2398157711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-87d671708a22028fb7b808a4e161f7e524f4f3a44ec8e6f6cdb360de2b190b713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAURi0EotPCTwB5yYIMfiR2skJVBQWpEhtYW459TT0kdrhOWs2_J2GGbllZvjrffRxC3nC254yrD4f9AdLDaNNeMLHWOGuUfkZ2nHVN1SrJnpMdk4xXte70Bbks5cAYk4Lrl-RCCqlqLrodwetpQhuLHahNnqJNv2L6SXOgUx6OlR2WMaa4jNTdDxmjh_c0AGJ0T4W_uY2jISOd74HOCHYeIc1bG28jHmnJcQBPH-0M-Iq8CHYo8Pr8XpEfnz99v_lS3X27_XpzfVe5dbW5arVXmmvWWrFe2IZe9-36qYErHjQ0og51kLauwbWggnK-l4p5ED3vWK-5vCLvTn0nzL8XKLMZY3EwDDZBXooRsmt5ozXf0OaEOsylIAQzYRwtHg1nZtNtDuas22y6zUn3mnt7HrH0I_in1D-_K_DxBMB66EMENMVFSA58RHCz8Tn-Z8QfhWSUeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398157711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mohamed, A.Y.A. ; Siggins, A. ; Healy, M.G. ; Ó hUallacháin, D. ; Fenton, O. ; Tuohy, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A.Y.A. ; Siggins, A. ; Healy, M.G. ; Ó hUallacháin, D. ; Fenton, O. ; Tuohy, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Land spreading of dairy soiled water (DSW) may result in pollution of ground and surface waters. Treatment of DSW through sludge-supernatant separation using chemical coagulants is a potential option to reduce the negative environmental impacts of DSW. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the effectiveness of three chemical coagulants – poly-aluminium chloride (PACl), ferric chloride (FeCl3) and alum – in improving effluent quality, and (2) assess the properties of the sludge that is generated as by-product from the process for its suitability for land application. Taking into consideration optimum doses to minimize pollutants (turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and E. coli), optimum mixing times and cost, FeCl3 was the best performing coagulant. Generated sludges had higher nutrient content and fewer E. coli than raw DSW, and did not display any evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. using germination tests. The study discussed the results in a sustainable farm management context, and suggested that the effluent (supernatant) from the treatments may be recycled to wash farm yards, saving water. In parallel, the sludge portion can be applied to amend soil properties with no adverse impacts on the grass growth, providing an agronomic value as an organic fertilizer, and reducing the risk of nutrient losses. This management approach could minimize the overall net cost compared to land application of raw DSW. •Chemical coagulants showed significant removal of turbidity, COD, TP, TN, and E. coli.•Full removal and inactivation of Escherichia coli was achieved by ferric chloride.•No evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. caused by sludges.•Effluent from the coagulant treatment could be recycled for yard wash-down.•This management approach could minimize the cost compared to land application of DSW.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32364129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural wastewater treatment ; Alum Compounds ; Aluminum Chloride ; Chlorides ; Coagulation ; Dairy soiled water ; Ecology ; Escherichia coli ; Ferric Compounds ; Phytotoxicity ; Soil ; Soil science ; Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2020-08, Vol.267, p.110567-110567, Article 110567</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-87d671708a22028fb7b808a4e161f7e524f4f3a44ec8e6f6cdb360de2b190b713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-87d671708a22028fb7b808a4e161f7e524f4f3a44ec8e6f6cdb360de2b190b713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32364129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A.Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siggins, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ó hUallacháin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuohy, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Appraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Land spreading of dairy soiled water (DSW) may result in pollution of ground and surface waters. Treatment of DSW through sludge-supernatant separation using chemical coagulants is a potential option to reduce the negative environmental impacts of DSW. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the effectiveness of three chemical coagulants – poly-aluminium chloride (PACl), ferric chloride (FeCl3) and alum – in improving effluent quality, and (2) assess the properties of the sludge that is generated as by-product from the process for its suitability for land application. Taking into consideration optimum doses to minimize pollutants (turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and E. coli), optimum mixing times and cost, FeCl3 was the best performing coagulant. Generated sludges had higher nutrient content and fewer E. coli than raw DSW, and did not display any evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. using germination tests. The study discussed the results in a sustainable farm management context, and suggested that the effluent (supernatant) from the treatments may be recycled to wash farm yards, saving water. In parallel, the sludge portion can be applied to amend soil properties with no adverse impacts on the grass growth, providing an agronomic value as an organic fertilizer, and reducing the risk of nutrient losses. This management approach could minimize the overall net cost compared to land application of raw DSW. •Chemical coagulants showed significant removal of turbidity, COD, TP, TN, and E. coli.•Full removal and inactivation of Escherichia coli was achieved by ferric chloride.•No evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. caused by sludges.•Effluent from the coagulant treatment could be recycled for yard wash-down.•This management approach could minimize the cost compared to land application of DSW.</description><subject>Agricultural wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Alum Compounds</subject><subject>Aluminum Chloride</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Dairy soiled water</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Ferric Compounds</subject><subject>Phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAURi0EotPCTwB5yYIMfiR2skJVBQWpEhtYW459TT0kdrhOWs2_J2GGbllZvjrffRxC3nC254yrD4f9AdLDaNNeMLHWOGuUfkZ2nHVN1SrJnpMdk4xXte70Bbks5cAYk4Lrl-RCCqlqLrodwetpQhuLHahNnqJNv2L6SXOgUx6OlR2WMaa4jNTdDxmjh_c0AGJ0T4W_uY2jISOd74HOCHYeIc1bG28jHmnJcQBPH-0M-Iq8CHYo8Pr8XpEfnz99v_lS3X27_XpzfVe5dbW5arVXmmvWWrFe2IZe9-36qYErHjQ0og51kLauwbWggnK-l4p5ED3vWK-5vCLvTn0nzL8XKLMZY3EwDDZBXooRsmt5ozXf0OaEOsylIAQzYRwtHg1nZtNtDuas22y6zUn3mnt7HrH0I_in1D-_K_DxBMB66EMENMVFSA58RHCz8Tn-Z8QfhWSUeQ</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Mohamed, A.Y.A.</creator><creator>Siggins, A.</creator><creator>Healy, M.G.</creator><creator>Ó hUallacháin, D.</creator><creator>Fenton, O.</creator><creator>Tuohy, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Appraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water</title><author>Mohamed, A.Y.A. ; Siggins, A. ; Healy, M.G. ; Ó hUallacháin, D. ; Fenton, O. ; Tuohy, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-87d671708a22028fb7b808a4e161f7e524f4f3a44ec8e6f6cdb360de2b190b713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Alum Compounds</topic><topic>Aluminum Chloride</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Dairy soiled water</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Ferric Compounds</topic><topic>Phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, A.Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siggins, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ó hUallacháin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuohy, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohamed, A.Y.A.</au><au>Siggins, A.</au><au>Healy, M.G.</au><au>Ó hUallacháin, D.</au><au>Fenton, O.</au><au>Tuohy, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>110567</spage><epage>110567</epage><pages>110567-110567</pages><artnum>110567</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Land spreading of dairy soiled water (DSW) may result in pollution of ground and surface waters. Treatment of DSW through sludge-supernatant separation using chemical coagulants is a potential option to reduce the negative environmental impacts of DSW. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the effectiveness of three chemical coagulants – poly-aluminium chloride (PACl), ferric chloride (FeCl3) and alum – in improving effluent quality, and (2) assess the properties of the sludge that is generated as by-product from the process for its suitability for land application. Taking into consideration optimum doses to minimize pollutants (turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and E. coli), optimum mixing times and cost, FeCl3 was the best performing coagulant. Generated sludges had higher nutrient content and fewer E. coli than raw DSW, and did not display any evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. using germination tests. The study discussed the results in a sustainable farm management context, and suggested that the effluent (supernatant) from the treatments may be recycled to wash farm yards, saving water. In parallel, the sludge portion can be applied to amend soil properties with no adverse impacts on the grass growth, providing an agronomic value as an organic fertilizer, and reducing the risk of nutrient losses. This management approach could minimize the overall net cost compared to land application of raw DSW. •Chemical coagulants showed significant removal of turbidity, COD, TP, TN, and E. coli.•Full removal and inactivation of Escherichia coli was achieved by ferric chloride.•No evidence of phytotoxicity to the growth of Lolium perenne L. caused by sludges.•Effluent from the coagulant treatment could be recycled for yard wash-down.•This management approach could minimize the cost compared to land application of DSW.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32364129</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110567</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2020-08, Vol.267, p.110567-110567, Article 110567
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398157711
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agricultural wastewater treatment
Alum Compounds
Aluminum Chloride
Chlorides
Coagulation
Dairy soiled water
Ecology
Escherichia coli
Ferric Compounds
Phytotoxicity
Soil
Soil science
Waste Disposal, Fluid
title Appraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A14%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appraisal%20and%20ranking%20of%20poly-aluminium%20chloride,%20ferric%20chloride%20and%20alum%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20dairy%20soiled%20water&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Mohamed,%20A.Y.A.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=110567&rft.epage=110567&rft.pages=110567-110567&rft.artnum=110567&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2398157711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398157711&rft_id=info:pmid/32364129&rft_els_id=S0301479720305004&rfr_iscdi=true