Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hilotherapy for Postoperative Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain After Rhinoplasty

Edema and ecchymosis are among the most important morbidities after rhinoplasty. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hilotherapy application compared with traditional ice applications after rhinoplasty in terms of periorbital edema, ecchymosis, and pain. A total of 60 pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2020-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1628.e1-1628.e5
Hauptverfasser: Hanci, Deniz, Üstün, Onur, Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem, Göker, Ayşe Enise, Karaketir, Semih, Uyar, Yavuz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1628.e5
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1628.e1
container_title Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 78
creator Hanci, Deniz
Üstün, Onur
Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem
Göker, Ayşe Enise
Karaketir, Semih
Uyar, Yavuz
description Edema and ecchymosis are among the most important morbidities after rhinoplasty. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hilotherapy application compared with traditional ice applications after rhinoplasty in terms of periorbital edema, ecchymosis, and pain. A total of 60 patients (35 women and 25 men) had undergone primary rhinoplasty with the same surgeon. In the postoperative period, 30 patients in the study group received continuous cooling at 15°C using Hilotherm (Hilotherm GmbH, Argenbühl-Eisenharz, Germany), and 30 patients in the control group were treated with conventional cryotherapy with ice packs. Both treatments started within 45 minutes after the end of the surgery and were maintained for 24 hours. For the following 1 week, the patients were examined for edema, ecchymosis, and pain. When the postoperative periorbital region was evaluated for mean edema and mean ecchymosis for 7 days, less edema and less ecchymosis were detected in the Hilotherm group compared with that observed in the ice pack group (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398154203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239120303268</els_id><sourcerecordid>2398154203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4bb6e9d7d196250f436205a29a48f480ef3586e2b2a362c808be4e0103db1d663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVpaZy0L9BD0bGHrDuSVvIaegnBbQqBhtKehVYaYZnd1VaSDfv2lXHaY2CEGOmbH-Yj5AODNQOmPh_WhzjmNQcOaxC1-CuyYlKwRoIUr8kK-KZruNiyK3Kd8wGAMblRb8mV4EJBPSsSdiczHE0JcaLR07JHuvM-WGOXc_8QhljfkpkX6mOiTzGXONe-hFMlHY7mlu6s3S9jzCHfUjM5-mTCRO98wUR_7sMU58Hksrwjb7wZMr5_vm_I76-7X_cPzeOPb9_v7x4bK6QqTdv3Crdu49hWcQm-FYqDNHxr2s63HaAXslPIe27qj-2g67FFYCBcz5xS4oZ8uuTOKf45Yi56DNniMJgJ4zHr6qNjsuUgKsovqE0x54RezymMJi2agT4r1gd9VqzPijWIWrwOfXzOP_Yjuv8j_5xW4MsFwLrlKWDS2QacLLqQ0BbtYngp_y-_a4zG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2398154203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hilotherapy for Postoperative Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain After Rhinoplasty</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hanci, Deniz ; Üstün, Onur ; Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem ; Göker, Ayşe Enise ; Karaketir, Semih ; Uyar, Yavuz</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanci, Deniz ; Üstün, Onur ; Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem ; Göker, Ayşe Enise ; Karaketir, Semih ; Uyar, Yavuz</creatorcontrib><description>Edema and ecchymosis are among the most important morbidities after rhinoplasty. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hilotherapy application compared with traditional ice applications after rhinoplasty in terms of periorbital edema, ecchymosis, and pain. A total of 60 patients (35 women and 25 men) had undergone primary rhinoplasty with the same surgeon. In the postoperative period, 30 patients in the study group received continuous cooling at 15°C using Hilotherm (Hilotherm GmbH, Argenbühl-Eisenharz, Germany), and 30 patients in the control group were treated with conventional cryotherapy with ice packs. Both treatments started within 45 minutes after the end of the surgery and were maintained for 24 hours. For the following 1 week, the patients were examined for edema, ecchymosis, and pain. When the postoperative periorbital region was evaluated for mean edema and mean ecchymosis for 7 days, less edema and less ecchymosis were detected in the Hilotherm group compared with that observed in the ice pack group (P &lt; .001). When the mean pain scores were compared both morning and evening for 7 days, less pain had been recorded with Hilotherm application compared with ice application (P &lt; .001). Hilotherapy is a useful method to prevent postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and pain compared with traditional ice application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32360236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Dentistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1628.e1-1628.e5</ispartof><rights>2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4bb6e9d7d196250f436205a29a48f480ef3586e2b2a362c808be4e0103db1d663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4bb6e9d7d196250f436205a29a48f480ef3586e2b2a362c808be4e0103db1d663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6645-7105</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32360236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanci, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üstün, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göker, Ayşe Enise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karaketir, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyar, Yavuz</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hilotherapy for Postoperative Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain After Rhinoplasty</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Edema and ecchymosis are among the most important morbidities after rhinoplasty. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hilotherapy application compared with traditional ice applications after rhinoplasty in terms of periorbital edema, ecchymosis, and pain. A total of 60 patients (35 women and 25 men) had undergone primary rhinoplasty with the same surgeon. In the postoperative period, 30 patients in the study group received continuous cooling at 15°C using Hilotherm (Hilotherm GmbH, Argenbühl-Eisenharz, Germany), and 30 patients in the control group were treated with conventional cryotherapy with ice packs. Both treatments started within 45 minutes after the end of the surgery and were maintained for 24 hours. For the following 1 week, the patients were examined for edema, ecchymosis, and pain. When the postoperative periorbital region was evaluated for mean edema and mean ecchymosis for 7 days, less edema and less ecchymosis were detected in the Hilotherm group compared with that observed in the ice pack group (P &lt; .001). When the mean pain scores were compared both morning and evening for 7 days, less pain had been recorded with Hilotherm application compared with ice application (P &lt; .001). Hilotherapy is a useful method to prevent postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and pain compared with traditional ice application.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVpaZy0L9BD0bGHrDuSVvIaegnBbQqBhtKehVYaYZnd1VaSDfv2lXHaY2CEGOmbH-Yj5AODNQOmPh_WhzjmNQcOaxC1-CuyYlKwRoIUr8kK-KZruNiyK3Kd8wGAMblRb8mV4EJBPSsSdiczHE0JcaLR07JHuvM-WGOXc_8QhljfkpkX6mOiTzGXONe-hFMlHY7mlu6s3S9jzCHfUjM5-mTCRO98wUR_7sMU58Hksrwjb7wZMr5_vm_I76-7X_cPzeOPb9_v7x4bK6QqTdv3Crdu49hWcQm-FYqDNHxr2s63HaAXslPIe27qj-2g67FFYCBcz5xS4oZ8uuTOKf45Yi56DNniMJgJ4zHr6qNjsuUgKsovqE0x54RezymMJi2agT4r1gd9VqzPijWIWrwOfXzOP_Yjuv8j_5xW4MsFwLrlKWDS2QacLLqQ0BbtYngp_y-_a4zG</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Hanci, Deniz</creator><creator>Üstün, Onur</creator><creator>Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem</creator><creator>Göker, Ayşe Enise</creator><creator>Karaketir, Semih</creator><creator>Uyar, Yavuz</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6645-7105</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hilotherapy for Postoperative Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain After Rhinoplasty</title><author>Hanci, Deniz ; Üstün, Onur ; Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem ; Göker, Ayşe Enise ; Karaketir, Semih ; Uyar, Yavuz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4bb6e9d7d196250f436205a29a48f480ef3586e2b2a362c808be4e0103db1d663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanci, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Üstün, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göker, Ayşe Enise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karaketir, Semih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyar, Yavuz</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanci, Deniz</au><au>Üstün, Onur</au><au>Yılmazer, Ayça Başkadem</au><au>Göker, Ayşe Enise</au><au>Karaketir, Semih</au><au>Uyar, Yavuz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hilotherapy for Postoperative Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain After Rhinoplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1628.e1</spage><epage>1628.e5</epage><pages>1628.e1-1628.e5</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><abstract>Edema and ecchymosis are among the most important morbidities after rhinoplasty. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of hilotherapy application compared with traditional ice applications after rhinoplasty in terms of periorbital edema, ecchymosis, and pain. A total of 60 patients (35 women and 25 men) had undergone primary rhinoplasty with the same surgeon. In the postoperative period, 30 patients in the study group received continuous cooling at 15°C using Hilotherm (Hilotherm GmbH, Argenbühl-Eisenharz, Germany), and 30 patients in the control group were treated with conventional cryotherapy with ice packs. Both treatments started within 45 minutes after the end of the surgery and were maintained for 24 hours. For the following 1 week, the patients were examined for edema, ecchymosis, and pain. When the postoperative periorbital region was evaluated for mean edema and mean ecchymosis for 7 days, less edema and less ecchymosis were detected in the Hilotherm group compared with that observed in the ice pack group (P &lt; .001). When the mean pain scores were compared both morning and evening for 7 days, less pain had been recorded with Hilotherm application compared with ice application (P &lt; .001). Hilotherapy is a useful method to prevent postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and pain compared with traditional ice application.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32360236</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.032</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6645-7105</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2391
ispartof Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2020-09, Vol.78 (9), p.1628.e1-1628.e5
issn 0278-2391
1531-5053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2398154203
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Dentistry
title Evaluation of the Efficacy of Hilotherapy for Postoperative Edema, Ecchymosis, and Pain After Rhinoplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T04%3A53%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Hilotherapy%20for%20Postoperative%20Edema,%20Ecchymosis,%20and%20Pain%20After%20Rhinoplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Hanci,%20Deniz&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1628.e1&rft.epage=1628.e5&rft.pages=1628.e1-1628.e5&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2398154203%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2398154203&rft_id=info:pmid/32360236&rft_els_id=S0278239120303268&rfr_iscdi=true