Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties
Neonatal invasive infections caused by Escherichia coli K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and anti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.121-1207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1207 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Khazaei, Zohreh Ghorbani, Parvin Namaei, Mohammad Hasan Rezaei, Yasaman Yousefi, Masoud |
description | Neonatal invasive infections caused by
Escherichia coli
K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of
E. coli
K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of
E. coli
isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the
E. coli
K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants (
fimH
,
hlyF
,
ibeA
, and
iucC
) in the
E. coli
strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal
E. coli
K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal
E. coli
colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against
E. coli
K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the
E. coli
K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the
fimH
(90.9% vs. 60.7%) and
iucC
(90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the
E. coli
non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that
E. coli
K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by
E. coli
K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset
E. coli
neonatal infection and comorbidity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/mdr.2020.0006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397680959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2397680959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQCMEoqVw5Ioscekly_gjTsJttWqhohIV4uMYTZzJ1lViL7ZTCX4FPxlHWzhw4WTLevMkzyuKlxw2HJr2zTyEjQABGwDQj4pT3kpeNko1j_Mdal1q0aqT4lmMd5mouJZPixMpZKVEpU6LXzeB7nEiZ4j5kV1Ec0vBmluLzPjJsg-cfSKT_D3urcOJ7fzknf2JyXrHtrN3e5YNe4cusW9-JsesY1cB3Vv21YblKL7EbAiRoRvY1iXbW5-syeJoY8KVuAn-QCFZis-LJyNOkV48nGfFl8uLz7v35fXHd1e77XVppK5SSZUaOGANQgyASmowUqHI_xICmpGMkFhJGIUE7IHXEjUfKlH3Sgiq88BZcX70HoL_vlBM3WyjoWlCR36JnZBtrRtoqzajr_9B7_wS8jYypVTdasFBZ6o8Uib4GAON3SHYGcOPjkO3pupyqm5N1a2pMv_qwbr0Mw1_6T9tMiCPwPqMzk2W-ryj_2h_AzbooDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447962106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Khazaei, Zohreh ; Ghorbani, Parvin ; Namaei, Mohammad Hasan ; Rezaei, Yasaman ; Yousefi, Masoud</creator><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, Zohreh ; Ghorbani, Parvin ; Namaei, Mohammad Hasan ; Rezaei, Yasaman ; Yousefi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><description>Neonatal invasive infections caused by
Escherichia coli
K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of
E. coli
K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of
E. coli
isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the
E. coli
K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants (
fimH
,
hlyF
,
ibeA
, and
iucC
) in the
E. coli
strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal
E. coli
K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal
E. coli
colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against
E. coli
K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the
E. coli
K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the
fimH
(90.9% vs. 60.7%) and
iucC
(90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the
E. coli
non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that
E. coli
K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by
E. coli
K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset
E. coli
neonatal infection and comorbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-8448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32354254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Age ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Ceftazidime ; Ciprofloxacin ; Colonization ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Gentamicin ; Health problems ; Imipenem ; Neonates ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Pregnancy ; Prophylaxis ; Rectum ; Resistance factors ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Vagina ; Virulence ; Virulence factors</subject><ispartof>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.121-1207</ispartof><rights>2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, Zohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, Parvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</title><title>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Microb Drug Resist</addtitle><description>Neonatal invasive infections caused by
Escherichia coli
K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of
E. coli
K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of
E. coli
isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the
E. coli
K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants (
fimH
,
hlyF
,
ibeA
, and
iucC
) in the
E. coli
strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal
E. coli
K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal
E. coli
colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against
E. coli
K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the
E. coli
K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the
fimH
(90.9% vs. 60.7%) and
iucC
(90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the
E. coli
non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that
E. coli
K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by
E. coli
K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset
E. coli
neonatal infection and comorbidity.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Ceftazidime</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Gentamicin</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Imipenem</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Resistance factors</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><subject>Virulence factors</subject><issn>1076-6294</issn><issn>1931-8448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQCMEoqVw5Ioscekly_gjTsJttWqhohIV4uMYTZzJ1lViL7ZTCX4FPxlHWzhw4WTLevMkzyuKlxw2HJr2zTyEjQABGwDQj4pT3kpeNko1j_Mdal1q0aqT4lmMd5mouJZPixMpZKVEpU6LXzeB7nEiZ4j5kV1Ec0vBmluLzPjJsg-cfSKT_D3urcOJ7fzknf2JyXrHtrN3e5YNe4cusW9-JsesY1cB3Vv21YblKL7EbAiRoRvY1iXbW5-syeJoY8KVuAn-QCFZis-LJyNOkV48nGfFl8uLz7v35fXHd1e77XVppK5SSZUaOGANQgyASmowUqHI_xICmpGMkFhJGIUE7IHXEjUfKlH3Sgiq88BZcX70HoL_vlBM3WyjoWlCR36JnZBtrRtoqzajr_9B7_wS8jYypVTdasFBZ6o8Uib4GAON3SHYGcOPjkO3pupyqm5N1a2pMv_qwbr0Mw1_6T9tMiCPwPqMzk2W-ryj_2h_AzbooDM</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Khazaei, Zohreh</creator><creator>Ghorbani, Parvin</creator><creator>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</creator><creator>Rezaei, Yasaman</creator><creator>Yousefi, Masoud</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</title><author>Khazaei, Zohreh ; Ghorbani, Parvin ; Namaei, Mohammad Hasan ; Rezaei, Yasaman ; Yousefi, Masoud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Ceftazidime</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Gentamicin</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Imipenem</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Resistance factors</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><topic>Virulence factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, Zohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, Parvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khazaei, Zohreh</au><au>Ghorbani, Parvin</au><au>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</au><au>Rezaei, Yasaman</au><au>Yousefi, Masoud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</atitle><jtitle>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Microb Drug Resist</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>1207</epage><pages>121-1207</pages><issn>1076-6294</issn><eissn>1931-8448</eissn><abstract>Neonatal invasive infections caused by
Escherichia coli
K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of
E. coli
K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of
E. coli
isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the
E. coli
K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants (
fimH
,
hlyF
,
ibeA
, and
iucC
) in the
E. coli
strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal
E. coli
K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal
E. coli
colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against
E. coli
K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the
E. coli
K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the
fimH
(90.9% vs. 60.7%) and
iucC
(90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the
E. coli
non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that
E. coli
K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by
E. coli
K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset
E. coli
neonatal infection and comorbidity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>32354254</pmid><doi>10.1089/mdr.2020.0006</doi><tpages>1087</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-6294 |
ispartof | Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.121-1207 |
issn | 1076-6294 1931-8448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397680959 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Age Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics Antiinfectives and antibacterials Ceftazidime Ciprofloxacin Colonization Drug resistance E coli Epidemiology Escherichia coli Gentamicin Health problems Imipenem Neonates Polymerase chain reaction Pregnancy Prophylaxis Rectum Resistance factors Risk analysis Risk factors Vagina Virulence Virulence factors |
title | Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A53%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20K1%20Rectovaginal%20Colonization%20Among%20Pregnant%20Women%20in%20Iran:%20Virulence%20Factors%20and%20Antibiotic%20Resistance%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Microbial%20drug%20resistance%20(Larchmont,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Khazaei,%20Zohreh&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=1207&rft.pages=121-1207&rft.issn=1076-6294&rft.eissn=1931-8448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/mdr.2020.0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2397680959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447962106&rft_id=info:pmid/32354254&rfr_iscdi=true |