Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties

Neonatal invasive infections caused by Escherichia coli K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and anti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.121-1207
Hauptverfasser: Khazaei, Zohreh, Ghorbani, Parvin, Namaei, Mohammad Hasan, Rezaei, Yasaman, Yousefi, Masoud
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1207
container_issue 10
container_start_page 121
container_title Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)
container_volume 26
creator Khazaei, Zohreh
Ghorbani, Parvin
Namaei, Mohammad Hasan
Rezaei, Yasaman
Yousefi, Masoud
description Neonatal invasive infections caused by Escherichia coli K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of E. coli K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of E. coli isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the E. coli K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants ( fimH , hlyF , ibeA , and iucC ) in the E. coli strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal E. coli K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal E. coli colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against E. coli K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the E. coli K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the fimH (90.9% vs. 60.7%) and iucC (90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the E. coli non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that E. coli K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by E. coli K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset E. coli neonatal infection and comorbidity.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/mdr.2020.0006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397680959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2397680959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQCMEoqVw5Ioscekly_gjTsJttWqhohIV4uMYTZzJ1lViL7ZTCX4FPxlHWzhw4WTLevMkzyuKlxw2HJr2zTyEjQABGwDQj4pT3kpeNko1j_Mdal1q0aqT4lmMd5mouJZPixMpZKVEpU6LXzeB7nEiZ4j5kV1Ec0vBmluLzPjJsg-cfSKT_D3urcOJ7fzknf2JyXrHtrN3e5YNe4cusW9-JsesY1cB3Vv21YblKL7EbAiRoRvY1iXbW5-syeJoY8KVuAn-QCFZis-LJyNOkV48nGfFl8uLz7v35fXHd1e77XVppK5SSZUaOGANQgyASmowUqHI_xICmpGMkFhJGIUE7IHXEjUfKlH3Sgiq88BZcX70HoL_vlBM3WyjoWlCR36JnZBtrRtoqzajr_9B7_wS8jYypVTdasFBZ6o8Uib4GAON3SHYGcOPjkO3pupyqm5N1a2pMv_qwbr0Mw1_6T9tMiCPwPqMzk2W-ryj_2h_AzbooDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447962106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Khazaei, Zohreh ; Ghorbani, Parvin ; Namaei, Mohammad Hasan ; Rezaei, Yasaman ; Yousefi, Masoud</creator><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, Zohreh ; Ghorbani, Parvin ; Namaei, Mohammad Hasan ; Rezaei, Yasaman ; Yousefi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><description>Neonatal invasive infections caused by Escherichia coli K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of E. coli K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of E. coli isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the E. coli K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants ( fimH , hlyF , ibeA , and iucC ) in the E. coli strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal E. coli K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal E. coli colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against E. coli K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the E. coli K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the fimH (90.9% vs. 60.7%) and iucC (90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the E. coli non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that E. coli K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by E. coli K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset E. coli neonatal infection and comorbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-8448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32354254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Age ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Ceftazidime ; Ciprofloxacin ; Colonization ; Drug resistance ; E coli ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Gentamicin ; Health problems ; Imipenem ; Neonates ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Pregnancy ; Prophylaxis ; Rectum ; Resistance factors ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Vagina ; Virulence ; Virulence factors</subject><ispartof>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.121-1207</ispartof><rights>2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32354254$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, Zohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, Parvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</title><title>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Microb Drug Resist</addtitle><description>Neonatal invasive infections caused by Escherichia coli K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of E. coli K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of E. coli isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the E. coli K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants ( fimH , hlyF , ibeA , and iucC ) in the E. coli strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal E. coli K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal E. coli colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against E. coli K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the E. coli K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the fimH (90.9% vs. 60.7%) and iucC (90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the E. coli non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that E. coli K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by E. coli K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset E. coli neonatal infection and comorbidity.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Ceftazidime</subject><subject>Ciprofloxacin</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Gentamicin</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Imipenem</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Resistance factors</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><subject>Virulence factors</subject><issn>1076-6294</issn><issn>1931-8448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQCMEoqVw5Ioscekly_gjTsJttWqhohIV4uMYTZzJ1lViL7ZTCX4FPxlHWzhw4WTLevMkzyuKlxw2HJr2zTyEjQABGwDQj4pT3kpeNko1j_Mdal1q0aqT4lmMd5mouJZPixMpZKVEpU6LXzeB7nEiZ4j5kV1Ec0vBmluLzPjJsg-cfSKT_D3urcOJ7fzknf2JyXrHtrN3e5YNe4cusW9-JsesY1cB3Vv21YblKL7EbAiRoRvY1iXbW5-syeJoY8KVuAn-QCFZis-LJyNOkV48nGfFl8uLz7v35fXHd1e77XVppK5SSZUaOGANQgyASmowUqHI_xICmpGMkFhJGIUE7IHXEjUfKlH3Sgiq88BZcX70HoL_vlBM3WyjoWlCR36JnZBtrRtoqzajr_9B7_wS8jYypVTdasFBZ6o8Uib4GAON3SHYGcOPjkO3pupyqm5N1a2pMv_qwbr0Mw1_6T9tMiCPwPqMzk2W-ryj_2h_AzbooDM</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Khazaei, Zohreh</creator><creator>Ghorbani, Parvin</creator><creator>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</creator><creator>Rezaei, Yasaman</creator><creator>Yousefi, Masoud</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</title><author>Khazaei, Zohreh ; Ghorbani, Parvin ; Namaei, Mohammad Hasan ; Rezaei, Yasaman ; Yousefi, Masoud</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e54d10a7022d0a4360c34a22352208fec23a530f230ab0173a61d527b422e7a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Ceftazidime</topic><topic>Ciprofloxacin</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Gentamicin</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Imipenem</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Resistance factors</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><topic>Virulence factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, Zohreh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghorbani, Parvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezaei, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Masoud</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khazaei, Zohreh</au><au>Ghorbani, Parvin</au><au>Namaei, Mohammad Hasan</au><au>Rezaei, Yasaman</au><au>Yousefi, Masoud</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties</atitle><jtitle>Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Microb Drug Resist</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>1207</epage><pages>121-1207</pages><issn>1076-6294</issn><eissn>1931-8448</eissn><abstract>Neonatal invasive infections caused by Escherichia coli K1 are still major health problems and effective preventive strategies at the maternal level can be a concern. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of rectovaginal colonization, related risk factors, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance properties of E. coli K1 among pregnant women. In this cross-sectional study, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected from 400 pregnant women. The identification of E. coli isolates was performed by microbiological tests. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to identify the E. coli K1 strains. The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion. Two duplex PCR assays were developed separately to detect genes encoding virulence determinants ( fimH , hlyF , ibeA , and iucC ) in the E. coli strains. The vaginal and rectal maternal E. coli K1 colonization rates were 3.7% and 19.25%, respectively. There is no significant association between demographic–obstetric factors and vaginal E. coli colonization in pregnant women. The most effective antibiotics against E. coli K1 strains were imipenem, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. In our study, the E. coli K1 strains were significantly more likely to possess the fimH (90.9% vs. 60.7%) and iucC (90.9% vs. 53.6%) than the E. coli non-K1 strains. This study demonstrates that E. coli K1 seems to be more virulent than non-K1 strains. Our findings highlight the importance of screening pregnant women for vaginal colonization by E. coli K1 and of the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset E. coli neonatal infection and comorbidity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>32354254</pmid><doi>10.1089/mdr.2020.0006</doi><tpages>1087</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-6294
ispartof Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2020-10, Vol.26 (10), p.121-1207
issn 1076-6294
1931-8448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397680959
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Ceftazidime
Ciprofloxacin
Colonization
Drug resistance
E coli
Epidemiology
Escherichia coli
Gentamicin
Health problems
Imipenem
Neonates
Polymerase chain reaction
Pregnancy
Prophylaxis
Rectum
Resistance factors
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Vagina
Virulence
Virulence factors
title Prevalence of Escherichia coli K1 Rectovaginal Colonization Among Pregnant Women in Iran: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A53%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20Escherichia%20coli%20K1%20Rectovaginal%20Colonization%20Among%20Pregnant%20Women%20in%20Iran:%20Virulence%20Factors%20and%20Antibiotic%20Resistance%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Microbial%20drug%20resistance%20(Larchmont,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Khazaei,%20Zohreh&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=1207&rft.pages=121-1207&rft.issn=1076-6294&rft.eissn=1931-8448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/mdr.2020.0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2397680959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447962106&rft_id=info:pmid/32354254&rfr_iscdi=true