Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for 755 benign breast lesions: a prospective multicenter study

Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) of benign breast lesions (BBLs) and compare the learning curves of international radiologists (IRs) and surgeons. Methods In total, 440 patients with 755 clinicopathologically confirmed BBLs from 5 centers were prospectively en...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.5029-5038
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Qi, Li, Hang, Chen, Bao-hua, He, Guang-zhi, Wu, Xiu-ping, Wang, Li-xia, Wu, Han, Dou, Jian-ping, Han, Zhi-yu, Zhang, Jing, Yu, Xiao-ling, Yu, Jie, Liang, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5038
container_issue 9
container_start_page 5029
container_title European radiology
container_volume 30
creator Yang, Qi
Li, Hang
Chen, Bao-hua
He, Guang-zhi
Wu, Xiu-ping
Wang, Li-xia
Wu, Han
Dou, Jian-ping
Han, Zhi-yu
Zhang, Jing
Yu, Xiao-ling
Yu, Jie
Liang, Ping
description Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) of benign breast lesions (BBLs) and compare the learning curves of international radiologists (IRs) and surgeons. Methods In total, 440 patients with 755 clinicopathologically confirmed BBLs from 5 centers were prospectively enrolled from February 2014 to July 2018. Technical success, complications, volume reduction ratio (VRR), palpability, and cosmetic satisfaction after ablation were analyzed. In addition, the ablation time (AT) and energy (AE) with the number of procedures were analyzed for learning curve evaluation. Results The mean maximum diameter was 1.7 ± 0.6 cm. The complete ablation rate reached 100%, including 45.8% lesions adjacent to the skin, pectoralis, or areola. After a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the 12-month VRR of all lesions was 97.9%, and that for 1.0- to 2.0-cm and ≥ 2.0-cm lesions was 98.6% and 96.9%, respectively. A total of 55.9% of BBLs became nonpalpable (palpable in 85.7% of cases before MWA) by both the clinician and patient. The cosmetic and minimally invasive satisfaction rates were good or excellent in 98.4% and 94.5% of patients, respectively. The median AT/cm 3 and AE/cm 3 decreased as experience increased. The AE/cm 3 of the IR with 5 years of experience was lower than that of the IR with 1 year of experience and the surgeons, while the AT/cm 3 of surgeons was comparable with that of the IR with 5 years of experience at relatively mature phase. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA is a valuable technique for the treatment of BBLs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02860104) Key Points • Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has the potential to become a valuable technique for the treatment of benign breast lesions. • A skilled interventional radiologist shows a rapid improvement in mastering the technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-020-06868-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397666470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2397666470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-49081bb7afa8de550bb69306f2b4a15ec53ab274938760800f110e3518aa61fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbtuFjEQha0IRP4kvEAKZImGZmF8X9OhCAJSJJqktuzd2V8b7Q1fQHn7GDaAREExcjHfOTPjQ8glg7cMwLxLAEJAA7yWbnXb2BNyYFLwhkErn5EDWNE2xlp5Ss5SugcAy6R5QU4FF0ozZQ9ku5ty9GktS98cy9hjTzeMXcl-wbUkOo9dXH_470h9mHwe14UOa6RGKRpwGY8LDRF9ynTCVJvpPfV0i2vasMtjVc1lymOHS8ZIUy79wwV5Pvgp4cun95zcffp4e_W5ufl6_eXqw03TSclyIy20LATjB9_2qBSEoK0APfAgPVPYKeEDN7JeaDS0AANjgEKx1nvNhk6ckze7b93mW8GU3TymDqdpP8xxYY3WWhqo6Ot_0Pu1xKVu57gUUjNupawU36n6ISlFHNwWx9nHB8fA_czD7Xm4mof7lYezVfTqybqEGfs_kt8BVEDsQKqt5Yjx7-z_2D4CQVuWdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434612944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for 755 benign breast lesions: a prospective multicenter study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yang, Qi ; Li, Hang ; Chen, Bao-hua ; He, Guang-zhi ; Wu, Xiu-ping ; Wang, Li-xia ; Wu, Han ; Dou, Jian-ping ; Han, Zhi-yu ; Zhang, Jing ; Yu, Xiao-ling ; Yu, Jie ; Liang, Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi ; Li, Hang ; Chen, Bao-hua ; He, Guang-zhi ; Wu, Xiu-ping ; Wang, Li-xia ; Wu, Han ; Dou, Jian-ping ; Han, Zhi-yu ; Zhang, Jing ; Yu, Xiao-ling ; Yu, Jie ; Liang, Ping</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) of benign breast lesions (BBLs) and compare the learning curves of international radiologists (IRs) and surgeons. Methods In total, 440 patients with 755 clinicopathologically confirmed BBLs from 5 centers were prospectively enrolled from February 2014 to July 2018. Technical success, complications, volume reduction ratio (VRR), palpability, and cosmetic satisfaction after ablation were analyzed. In addition, the ablation time (AT) and energy (AE) with the number of procedures were analyzed for learning curve evaluation. Results The mean maximum diameter was 1.7 ± 0.6 cm. The complete ablation rate reached 100%, including 45.8% lesions adjacent to the skin, pectoralis, or areola. After a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the 12-month VRR of all lesions was 97.9%, and that for 1.0- to 2.0-cm and ≥ 2.0-cm lesions was 98.6% and 96.9%, respectively. A total of 55.9% of BBLs became nonpalpable (palpable in 85.7% of cases before MWA) by both the clinician and patient. The cosmetic and minimally invasive satisfaction rates were good or excellent in 98.4% and 94.5% of patients, respectively. The median AT/cm 3 and AE/cm 3 decreased as experience increased. The AE/cm 3 of the IR with 5 years of experience was lower than that of the IR with 1 year of experience and the surgeons, while the AT/cm 3 of surgeons was comparable with that of the IR with 5 years of experience at relatively mature phase. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA is a valuable technique for the treatment of BBLs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02860104) Key Points • Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has the potential to become a valuable technique for the treatment of benign breast lesions. • A skilled interventional radiologist shows a rapid improvement in mastering the technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06868-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32356159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Complications ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Learning curves ; Lesions ; Mastering ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microwave ablation ; Microwaves - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; Oncology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Radiofrequency Ablation - methods ; Radiology ; Surgeons ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.5029-5038</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2020</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-49081bb7afa8de550bb69306f2b4a15ec53ab274938760800f110e3518aa61fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-49081bb7afa8de550bb69306f2b4a15ec53ab274938760800f110e3518aa61fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-020-06868-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-020-06868-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32356159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Bao-hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guang-zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiu-ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dou, Jian-ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhi-yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xiao-ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for 755 benign breast lesions: a prospective multicenter study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) of benign breast lesions (BBLs) and compare the learning curves of international radiologists (IRs) and surgeons. Methods In total, 440 patients with 755 clinicopathologically confirmed BBLs from 5 centers were prospectively enrolled from February 2014 to July 2018. Technical success, complications, volume reduction ratio (VRR), palpability, and cosmetic satisfaction after ablation were analyzed. In addition, the ablation time (AT) and energy (AE) with the number of procedures were analyzed for learning curve evaluation. Results The mean maximum diameter was 1.7 ± 0.6 cm. The complete ablation rate reached 100%, including 45.8% lesions adjacent to the skin, pectoralis, or areola. After a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the 12-month VRR of all lesions was 97.9%, and that for 1.0- to 2.0-cm and ≥ 2.0-cm lesions was 98.6% and 96.9%, respectively. A total of 55.9% of BBLs became nonpalpable (palpable in 85.7% of cases before MWA) by both the clinician and patient. The cosmetic and minimally invasive satisfaction rates were good or excellent in 98.4% and 94.5% of patients, respectively. The median AT/cm 3 and AE/cm 3 decreased as experience increased. The AE/cm 3 of the IR with 5 years of experience was lower than that of the IR with 1 year of experience and the surgeons, while the AT/cm 3 of surgeons was comparable with that of the IR with 5 years of experience at relatively mature phase. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA is a valuable technique for the treatment of BBLs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02860104) Key Points • Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has the potential to become a valuable technique for the treatment of benign breast lesions. • A skilled interventional radiologist shows a rapid improvement in mastering the technique.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Learning curves</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Mastering</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microwave ablation</subject><subject>Microwaves - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiofrequency Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbtuFjEQha0IRP4kvEAKZImGZmF8X9OhCAJSJJqktuzd2V8b7Q1fQHn7GDaAREExcjHfOTPjQ8glg7cMwLxLAEJAA7yWbnXb2BNyYFLwhkErn5EDWNE2xlp5Ss5SugcAy6R5QU4FF0ozZQ9ku5ty9GktS98cy9hjTzeMXcl-wbUkOo9dXH_470h9mHwe14UOa6RGKRpwGY8LDRF9ynTCVJvpPfV0i2vasMtjVc1lymOHS8ZIUy79wwV5Pvgp4cun95zcffp4e_W5ufl6_eXqw03TSclyIy20LATjB9_2qBSEoK0APfAgPVPYKeEDN7JeaDS0AANjgEKx1nvNhk6ckze7b93mW8GU3TymDqdpP8xxYY3WWhqo6Ot_0Pu1xKVu57gUUjNupawU36n6ISlFHNwWx9nHB8fA_czD7Xm4mof7lYezVfTqybqEGfs_kt8BVEDsQKqt5Yjx7-z_2D4CQVuWdw</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Yang, Qi</creator><creator>Li, Hang</creator><creator>Chen, Bao-hua</creator><creator>He, Guang-zhi</creator><creator>Wu, Xiu-ping</creator><creator>Wang, Li-xia</creator><creator>Wu, Han</creator><creator>Dou, Jian-ping</creator><creator>Han, Zhi-yu</creator><creator>Zhang, Jing</creator><creator>Yu, Xiao-ling</creator><creator>Yu, Jie</creator><creator>Liang, Ping</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for 755 benign breast lesions: a prospective multicenter study</title><author>Yang, Qi ; Li, Hang ; Chen, Bao-hua ; He, Guang-zhi ; Wu, Xiu-ping ; Wang, Li-xia ; Wu, Han ; Dou, Jian-ping ; Han, Zhi-yu ; Zhang, Jing ; Yu, Xiao-ling ; Yu, Jie ; Liang, Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-49081bb7afa8de550bb69306f2b4a15ec53ab274938760800f110e3518aa61fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Learning curves</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Mastering</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microwave ablation</topic><topic>Microwaves - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiofrequency Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Bao-hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guang-zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiu-ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Li-xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dou, Jian-ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhi-yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xiao-ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Qi</au><au>Li, Hang</au><au>Chen, Bao-hua</au><au>He, Guang-zhi</au><au>Wu, Xiu-ping</au><au>Wang, Li-xia</au><au>Wu, Han</au><au>Dou, Jian-ping</au><au>Han, Zhi-yu</au><au>Zhang, Jing</au><au>Yu, Xiao-ling</au><au>Yu, Jie</au><au>Liang, Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for 755 benign breast lesions: a prospective multicenter study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>5029</spage><epage>5038</epage><pages>5029-5038</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) of benign breast lesions (BBLs) and compare the learning curves of international radiologists (IRs) and surgeons. Methods In total, 440 patients with 755 clinicopathologically confirmed BBLs from 5 centers were prospectively enrolled from February 2014 to July 2018. Technical success, complications, volume reduction ratio (VRR), palpability, and cosmetic satisfaction after ablation were analyzed. In addition, the ablation time (AT) and energy (AE) with the number of procedures were analyzed for learning curve evaluation. Results The mean maximum diameter was 1.7 ± 0.6 cm. The complete ablation rate reached 100%, including 45.8% lesions adjacent to the skin, pectoralis, or areola. After a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the 12-month VRR of all lesions was 97.9%, and that for 1.0- to 2.0-cm and ≥ 2.0-cm lesions was 98.6% and 96.9%, respectively. A total of 55.9% of BBLs became nonpalpable (palpable in 85.7% of cases before MWA) by both the clinician and patient. The cosmetic and minimally invasive satisfaction rates were good or excellent in 98.4% and 94.5% of patients, respectively. The median AT/cm 3 and AE/cm 3 decreased as experience increased. The AE/cm 3 of the IR with 5 years of experience was lower than that of the IR with 1 year of experience and the surgeons, while the AT/cm 3 of surgeons was comparable with that of the IR with 5 years of experience at relatively mature phase. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA is a valuable technique for the treatment of BBLs. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02860104) Key Points • Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has the potential to become a valuable technique for the treatment of benign breast lesions. • A skilled interventional radiologist shows a rapid improvement in mastering the technique.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32356159</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-020-06868-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2020-09, Vol.30 (9), p.5029-5038
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2397666470
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Ablation
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Complications
Diagnostic Radiology
Female
Humans
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Learning curves
Lesions
Mastering
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microwave ablation
Microwaves - therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Neuroradiology
Oncology
Patients
Prospective Studies
Radiofrequency Ablation - methods
Radiology
Surgeons
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
Ultrasound
Young Adult
title Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for 755 benign breast lesions: a prospective multicenter study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20percutaneous%20microwave%20ablation%20for%20755%20benign%20breast%20lesions:%20a%20prospective%20multicenter%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Yang,%20Qi&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5029&rft.epage=5038&rft.pages=5029-5038&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-020-06868-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2397666470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434612944&rft_id=info:pmid/32356159&rfr_iscdi=true