Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems
[Display omitted] •Curing potential of composites with 0–40wt% of bioactive glass was evaluated.•Experimental composite series were prepared based on Bis-EMA and UDMA resins.•Bis-EMA series showed direct polymerization inhibition by bioactive glass.•No direct polymerization inhibition was identified...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 2020-06, Vol.36 (6), p.711-723 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 723 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 711 |
| container_title | Dental materials |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Par, Matej Spanovic, Nika Mohn, Dirk Attin, Thomas Tauböck, Tobias T. Tarle, Zrinka |
| description | [Display omitted]
•Curing potential of composites with 0–40wt% of bioactive glass was evaluated.•Experimental composite series were prepared based on Bis-EMA and UDMA resins.•Bis-EMA series showed direct polymerization inhibition by bioactive glass.•No direct polymerization inhibition was identified in UDMA series.•UDMA series demonstrated markedly better curing potential than Bis-EMA series.
To evaluate the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure of two experimental light-curable bioactive glass (BG)-containing composite series based on different resin systems.
Experimental composite series based on either Bis-EMA or UDMA resin were prepared. Each series contained 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40wt% of BG 45S5. Reinforcing fillers were added up to a total filler load of 70wt%. The degree of conversion was evaluated using Raman spectroscopy, while light transmittance was measured using visible light spectroscopy. The depth of cure was estimated from the degree of conversion data and using the ISO 4049 scraping test.
Replacement of reinforcing fillers with BG can diminish the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure. The effect of BG on the aforementioned properties was highly variable between the experimental series. While in the Bis-EMA series, the degree of conversion was significantly impaired by BG, all of the composites in the UDMA series attained clinically acceptable degree of conversion values. The reduction of the degree of conversion in the Bis-EMA series occurred independently of the changes in light transmittance. The UDMA series showed better light transmittance and consequently higher depth of cure than the Bis-EMA series. The depth of cure for all composites in the UDMA series was above 2mm.
While the Bis-EMA series demonstrated clinically acceptable curing potential only for 0–10wt% of BG loading, an excellent curing potential in the UDMA series was observed for a wide range (0–40wt%) of BG loadings. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.015 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2396861414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0109564120300701</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440684545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-745cbc350345568f6bbf5089b135bcf00e4b56f0416360a3f4df4f348b30c8683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUQCMEokPhDxCyxIZNwnX8mIQF0jCUh1TEhq4t27kuHiXxYDst_QM-G7cpLFiwshfnHlv3VNVzCg0FKl8fmgHnrMemhRYaYA1Q8aDa0G7b1wD99mG1AQp9LSSnJ9WTlA4AwNuePq5OWMt43227TfVrv0Q_X5JjyMXm9UiCI_jziNFPd3oSMfmZ2DAdQ_IZE3F-HHEg1z5_J8YHbbO_QnI56pTekN0dqaNPYSYG8zXiTN75VJ992RE9D-TifbkYnYphNaeblHFKT6tHTo8Jn92fp9XFh7Nv-0_1-dePn_e789pyJnO95cIaywQwLoTsnDTGCeh6Q5kw1gEgN0I64FQyCZo5PjjuGO8MA9vJjp1Wr1bvMYYfC6asJp8sjqOeMSxJtayXnaSc8oK-_Ac9hCXO5Xeq5RxkxwUXheIrZWNIKaJTx7I7HW8UBXVbSh3UWkrdllLAVClVxl7cyxcz4fB36E-aArxdASzbuPIYVbIeZ4uDj2izGoL__wu_AaB2poo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440684545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Par, Matej ; Spanovic, Nika ; Mohn, Dirk ; Attin, Thomas ; Tauböck, Tobias T. ; Tarle, Zrinka</creator><creatorcontrib>Par, Matej ; Spanovic, Nika ; Mohn, Dirk ; Attin, Thomas ; Tauböck, Tobias T. ; Tarle, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Curing potential of composites with 0–40wt% of bioactive glass was evaluated.•Experimental composite series were prepared based on Bis-EMA and UDMA resins.•Bis-EMA series showed direct polymerization inhibition by bioactive glass.•No direct polymerization inhibition was identified in UDMA series.•UDMA series demonstrated markedly better curing potential than Bis-EMA series.
To evaluate the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure of two experimental light-curable bioactive glass (BG)-containing composite series based on different resin systems.
Experimental composite series based on either Bis-EMA or UDMA resin were prepared. Each series contained 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40wt% of BG 45S5. Reinforcing fillers were added up to a total filler load of 70wt%. The degree of conversion was evaluated using Raman spectroscopy, while light transmittance was measured using visible light spectroscopy. The depth of cure was estimated from the degree of conversion data and using the ISO 4049 scraping test.
Replacement of reinforcing fillers with BG can diminish the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure. The effect of BG on the aforementioned properties was highly variable between the experimental series. While in the Bis-EMA series, the degree of conversion was significantly impaired by BG, all of the composites in the UDMA series attained clinically acceptable degree of conversion values. The reduction of the degree of conversion in the Bis-EMA series occurred independently of the changes in light transmittance. The UDMA series showed better light transmittance and consequently higher depth of cure than the Bis-EMA series. The depth of cure for all composites in the UDMA series was above 2mm.
While the Bis-EMA series demonstrated clinically acceptable curing potential only for 0–10wt% of BG loading, an excellent curing potential in the UDMA series was observed for a wide range (0–40wt%) of BG loadings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32349878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bioactive composites ; Bioactive glass 45S5 ; Bioglass ; Biological activity ; Composite materials ; Conversion ; Curing ; Degree of conversion ; Dentistry ; Depth of cure ; Evaluation ; Experimental composites ; Fillers ; Light ; Light transmittance ; Polymer matrix composites ; Raman spectroscopy ; Resins ; Spectroscopy ; Spectrum analysis ; Systems analysis ; Transmittance</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2020-06, Vol.36 (6), p.711-723</ispartof><rights>2020 The Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-745cbc350345568f6bbf5089b135bcf00e4b56f0416360a3f4df4f348b30c8683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-745cbc350345568f6bbf5089b135bcf00e4b56f0416360a3f4df4f348b30c8683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564120300701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32349878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Par, Matej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanovic, Nika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauböck, Tobias T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarle, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><title>Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Curing potential of composites with 0–40wt% of bioactive glass was evaluated.•Experimental composite series were prepared based on Bis-EMA and UDMA resins.•Bis-EMA series showed direct polymerization inhibition by bioactive glass.•No direct polymerization inhibition was identified in UDMA series.•UDMA series demonstrated markedly better curing potential than Bis-EMA series.
To evaluate the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure of two experimental light-curable bioactive glass (BG)-containing composite series based on different resin systems.
Experimental composite series based on either Bis-EMA or UDMA resin were prepared. Each series contained 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40wt% of BG 45S5. Reinforcing fillers were added up to a total filler load of 70wt%. The degree of conversion was evaluated using Raman spectroscopy, while light transmittance was measured using visible light spectroscopy. The depth of cure was estimated from the degree of conversion data and using the ISO 4049 scraping test.
Replacement of reinforcing fillers with BG can diminish the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure. The effect of BG on the aforementioned properties was highly variable between the experimental series. While in the Bis-EMA series, the degree of conversion was significantly impaired by BG, all of the composites in the UDMA series attained clinically acceptable degree of conversion values. The reduction of the degree of conversion in the Bis-EMA series occurred independently of the changes in light transmittance. The UDMA series showed better light transmittance and consequently higher depth of cure than the Bis-EMA series. The depth of cure for all composites in the UDMA series was above 2mm.
While the Bis-EMA series demonstrated clinically acceptable curing potential only for 0–10wt% of BG loading, an excellent curing potential in the UDMA series was observed for a wide range (0–40wt%) of BG loadings.</description><subject>Bioactive composites</subject><subject>Bioactive glass 45S5</subject><subject>Bioglass</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Curing</subject><subject>Degree of conversion</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Depth of cure</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experimental composites</subject><subject>Fillers</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light transmittance</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Transmittance</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUQCMEokPhDxCyxIZNwnX8mIQF0jCUh1TEhq4t27kuHiXxYDst_QM-G7cpLFiwshfnHlv3VNVzCg0FKl8fmgHnrMemhRYaYA1Q8aDa0G7b1wD99mG1AQp9LSSnJ9WTlA4AwNuePq5OWMt43227TfVrv0Q_X5JjyMXm9UiCI_jziNFPd3oSMfmZ2DAdQ_IZE3F-HHEg1z5_J8YHbbO_QnI56pTekN0dqaNPYSYG8zXiTN75VJ992RE9D-TifbkYnYphNaeblHFKT6tHTo8Jn92fp9XFh7Nv-0_1-dePn_e789pyJnO95cIaywQwLoTsnDTGCeh6Q5kw1gEgN0I64FQyCZo5PjjuGO8MA9vJjp1Wr1bvMYYfC6asJp8sjqOeMSxJtayXnaSc8oK-_Ac9hCXO5Xeq5RxkxwUXheIrZWNIKaJTx7I7HW8UBXVbSh3UWkrdllLAVClVxl7cyxcz4fB36E-aArxdASzbuPIYVbIeZ4uDj2izGoL__wu_AaB2poo</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Par, Matej</creator><creator>Spanovic, Nika</creator><creator>Mohn, Dirk</creator><creator>Attin, Thomas</creator><creator>Tauböck, Tobias T.</creator><creator>Tarle, Zrinka</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems</title><author>Par, Matej ; Spanovic, Nika ; Mohn, Dirk ; Attin, Thomas ; Tauböck, Tobias T. ; Tarle, Zrinka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-745cbc350345568f6bbf5089b135bcf00e4b56f0416360a3f4df4f348b30c8683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bioactive composites</topic><topic>Bioactive glass 45S5</topic><topic>Bioglass</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Curing</topic><topic>Degree of conversion</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Depth of cure</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experimental composites</topic><topic>Fillers</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light transmittance</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Transmittance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Par, Matej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spanovic, Nika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attin, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauböck, Tobias T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarle, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Par, Matej</au><au>Spanovic, Nika</au><au>Mohn, Dirk</au><au>Attin, Thomas</au><au>Tauböck, Tobias T.</au><au>Tarle, Zrinka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>711-723</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Curing potential of composites with 0–40wt% of bioactive glass was evaluated.•Experimental composite series were prepared based on Bis-EMA and UDMA resins.•Bis-EMA series showed direct polymerization inhibition by bioactive glass.•No direct polymerization inhibition was identified in UDMA series.•UDMA series demonstrated markedly better curing potential than Bis-EMA series.
To evaluate the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure of two experimental light-curable bioactive glass (BG)-containing composite series based on different resin systems.
Experimental composite series based on either Bis-EMA or UDMA resin were prepared. Each series contained 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40wt% of BG 45S5. Reinforcing fillers were added up to a total filler load of 70wt%. The degree of conversion was evaluated using Raman spectroscopy, while light transmittance was measured using visible light spectroscopy. The depth of cure was estimated from the degree of conversion data and using the ISO 4049 scraping test.
Replacement of reinforcing fillers with BG can diminish the degree of conversion, light transmittance, and depth of cure. The effect of BG on the aforementioned properties was highly variable between the experimental series. While in the Bis-EMA series, the degree of conversion was significantly impaired by BG, all of the composites in the UDMA series attained clinically acceptable degree of conversion values. The reduction of the degree of conversion in the Bis-EMA series occurred independently of the changes in light transmittance. The UDMA series showed better light transmittance and consequently higher depth of cure than the Bis-EMA series. The depth of cure for all composites in the UDMA series was above 2mm.
While the Bis-EMA series demonstrated clinically acceptable curing potential only for 0–10wt% of BG loading, an excellent curing potential in the UDMA series was observed for a wide range (0–40wt%) of BG loadings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32349878</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.015</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
| ispartof | Dental materials, 2020-06, Vol.36 (6), p.711-723 |
| issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2396861414 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Bioactive composites Bioactive glass 45S5 Bioglass Biological activity Composite materials Conversion Curing Degree of conversion Dentistry Depth of cure Evaluation Experimental composites Fillers Light Light transmittance Polymer matrix composites Raman spectroscopy Resins Spectroscopy Spectrum analysis Systems analysis Transmittance |
| title | Curing potential of experimental resin composites filled with bioactive glass: A comparison between Bis-EMA and UDMA based resin systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A12%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Curing%20potential%20of%20experimental%20resin%20composites%20filled%20with%20bioactive%20glass:%20A%20comparison%20between%20Bis-EMA%20and%20UDMA%20based%20resin%20systems&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Par,%20Matej&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=711-723&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440684545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440684545&rft_id=info:pmid/32349878&rft_els_id=S0109564120300701&rfr_iscdi=true |