Influence of nutrients on ploidy‐specific performance in an invasive, haplodiplontic red macroalga

Worldwide, macroalgae have invaded near‐shore marine ecosystems. However, their haplodiplontic life cycles have complicated efforts to predict patterns of growth and spread, particularly since most theoretical predictions are derived from diplontic taxa (i.e., animals). To complete one revolution of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of phycology 2020-08, Vol.56 (4), p.1114-1120
Hauptverfasser: Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A., Ryan, Will H., Müller, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1120
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1114
container_title Journal of phycology
container_volume 56
creator Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A.
Ryan, Will H.
Müller, K.
description Worldwide, macroalgae have invaded near‐shore marine ecosystems. However, their haplodiplontic life cycles have complicated efforts to predict patterns of growth and spread, particularly since most theoretical predictions are derived from diplontic taxa (i.e., animals). To complete one revolution of the life cycle, two separate ploidy stages, often including separate haploid sexes, must pass through development and reproduction. In the case of the invasive, red macroalga Agarophyton vermiculophyllum, during the invasion of soft‐sediment estuaries throughout the Northern Hemisphere, diploid tetrasporophytes came to dominate all free‐floating populations and haploid gametophytes were consistently lost. The ecological hypothesis of nutrient limitation might contribute to an explanation of this pattern of tetrasporophytic dominance in free‐floating populations. Under this hypothesis, gametophytes should outperform tetrasporophytes under nutrient limited conditions, but tetrasporophytes should be better able to exploit optimal or even abundant nutrient conditions, such as in eutrophic estuaries. We sampled tetrasporophytes, male gametophytes, and female gametophytes from two sites each located on either side of the Delmarva Peninsula that separates the Chesapeake Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. We subjected apices excised from multiple thalli from each life cycle stage to a nutrient‐enriched and a nutrient‐poor seawater treatment and assessed growth and survival. While nutrient addition increased growth rates, there was no significant difference among ploidies or sexes. Gametophytes did, however, suffer higher mortality than tetrasporophytes. We discuss how nutrient‐dependent differences in growth and survival may contribute to observed patterns of tetrasporophytic dominance in soft‐sediment A. vermiculophyllum populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jpy.13011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2396853621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2396853621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-5f598f349ee0f0201eb64b9dca8f5d6ae39ad10d9349030de7e39d6aecb9fdb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijNeFr6AFNwoWM2l6TRLGbwyoAtduAppc6IZ2rQm05HZ-Qg-o09ixlEXglmcwOHjJ_kR2iP4hMRzOu0WJ4RhQtbQkHAq0qIgo3U0xJjSlOVZPkBbIUwxxqOck000YJRlBed4iPS1M3UProKkNYnrZ96Cm4WkdUlXt1YvPt7eQweVNbZKOvCm9Y1aausS5eKcq2DncJw8q-i1jcPNIvWgk0ZVvlX1k9pBG0bVAXa_7230cHF-P75KJ7eX1-OzSVoxzkjKDReFYZkAwAZTTKDMs1LoShWG61wBE0oTrEUkmGENo7hZ7qtSGF1mbBsdrnI73770EGaysaGCulYO2j5IykRecJZTEunBHzpte-_i6yTNGBZZIQSN6mil4kdC8GBk522j_EISLJfVy1i9_Ko-2v3vxL5sQP_Kn64jOF2BV1vD4v8keXP3uIr8BGOuj6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430948992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of nutrients on ploidy‐specific performance in an invasive, haplodiplontic red macroalga</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A. ; Ryan, Will H. ; Müller, K.</creator><contributor>Müller, K.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A. ; Ryan, Will H. ; Müller, K. ; Müller, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide, macroalgae have invaded near‐shore marine ecosystems. However, their haplodiplontic life cycles have complicated efforts to predict patterns of growth and spread, particularly since most theoretical predictions are derived from diplontic taxa (i.e., animals). To complete one revolution of the life cycle, two separate ploidy stages, often including separate haploid sexes, must pass through development and reproduction. In the case of the invasive, red macroalga Agarophyton vermiculophyllum, during the invasion of soft‐sediment estuaries throughout the Northern Hemisphere, diploid tetrasporophytes came to dominate all free‐floating populations and haploid gametophytes were consistently lost. The ecological hypothesis of nutrient limitation might contribute to an explanation of this pattern of tetrasporophytic dominance in free‐floating populations. Under this hypothesis, gametophytes should outperform tetrasporophytes under nutrient limited conditions, but tetrasporophytes should be better able to exploit optimal or even abundant nutrient conditions, such as in eutrophic estuaries. We sampled tetrasporophytes, male gametophytes, and female gametophytes from two sites each located on either side of the Delmarva Peninsula that separates the Chesapeake Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. We subjected apices excised from multiple thalli from each life cycle stage to a nutrient‐enriched and a nutrient‐poor seawater treatment and assessed growth and survival. While nutrient addition increased growth rates, there was no significant difference among ploidies or sexes. Gametophytes did, however, suffer higher mortality than tetrasporophytes. We discuss how nutrient‐dependent differences in growth and survival may contribute to observed patterns of tetrasporophytic dominance in soft‐sediment A. vermiculophyllum populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32348550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animals ; Atlantic Ocean ; biological invasion ; Chemical analysis ; Diploids ; Dominance ; Ecosystem ; Estuaries ; Eutrophic environments ; Eutrophic rivers ; Eutrophication ; Floating ; Gametophytes ; Gracilaria ; Growth rate ; Haploidy ; Hypotheses ; Life cycle ; Life cycles ; Marine ecosystems ; Mineral nutrients ; Northern Hemisphere ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrients ; Ploidy ; Populations ; Reproduction (biology) ; Seawater ; Seaweed ; Seaweeds ; Sediment ; Survival ; Tetrasporophytes ; Thalli ; Water analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of phycology, 2020-08, Vol.56 (4), p.1114-1120</ispartof><rights>2020 Phycological Society of America</rights><rights>2020 Phycological Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-5f598f349ee0f0201eb64b9dca8f5d6ae39ad10d9349030de7e39d6aecb9fdb43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-5f598f349ee0f0201eb64b9dca8f5d6ae39ad10d9349030de7e39d6aecb9fdb43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7324-7448</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjpy.13011$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjpy.13011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Müller, K.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Will H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of nutrients on ploidy‐specific performance in an invasive, haplodiplontic red macroalga</title><title>Journal of phycology</title><addtitle>J Phycol</addtitle><description>Worldwide, macroalgae have invaded near‐shore marine ecosystems. However, their haplodiplontic life cycles have complicated efforts to predict patterns of growth and spread, particularly since most theoretical predictions are derived from diplontic taxa (i.e., animals). To complete one revolution of the life cycle, two separate ploidy stages, often including separate haploid sexes, must pass through development and reproduction. In the case of the invasive, red macroalga Agarophyton vermiculophyllum, during the invasion of soft‐sediment estuaries throughout the Northern Hemisphere, diploid tetrasporophytes came to dominate all free‐floating populations and haploid gametophytes were consistently lost. The ecological hypothesis of nutrient limitation might contribute to an explanation of this pattern of tetrasporophytic dominance in free‐floating populations. Under this hypothesis, gametophytes should outperform tetrasporophytes under nutrient limited conditions, but tetrasporophytes should be better able to exploit optimal or even abundant nutrient conditions, such as in eutrophic estuaries. We sampled tetrasporophytes, male gametophytes, and female gametophytes from two sites each located on either side of the Delmarva Peninsula that separates the Chesapeake Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. We subjected apices excised from multiple thalli from each life cycle stage to a nutrient‐enriched and a nutrient‐poor seawater treatment and assessed growth and survival. While nutrient addition increased growth rates, there was no significant difference among ploidies or sexes. Gametophytes did, however, suffer higher mortality than tetrasporophytes. We discuss how nutrient‐dependent differences in growth and survival may contribute to observed patterns of tetrasporophytic dominance in soft‐sediment A. vermiculophyllum populations.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atlantic Ocean</subject><subject>biological invasion</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Diploids</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Eutrophic environments</subject><subject>Eutrophic rivers</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Floating</subject><subject>Gametophytes</subject><subject>Gracilaria</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Haploidy</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Life cycle</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Northern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Ploidy</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Seaweed</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tetrasporophytes</subject><subject>Thalli</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><issn>0022-3646</issn><issn>1529-8817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijNeFr6AFNwoWM2l6TRLGbwyoAtduAppc6IZ2rQm05HZ-Qg-o09ixlEXglmcwOHjJ_kR2iP4hMRzOu0WJ4RhQtbQkHAq0qIgo3U0xJjSlOVZPkBbIUwxxqOck000YJRlBed4iPS1M3UProKkNYnrZ96Cm4WkdUlXt1YvPt7eQweVNbZKOvCm9Y1aausS5eKcq2DncJw8q-i1jcPNIvWgk0ZVvlX1k9pBG0bVAXa_7230cHF-P75KJ7eX1-OzSVoxzkjKDReFYZkAwAZTTKDMs1LoShWG61wBE0oTrEUkmGENo7hZ7qtSGF1mbBsdrnI73770EGaysaGCulYO2j5IykRecJZTEunBHzpte-_i6yTNGBZZIQSN6mil4kdC8GBk522j_EISLJfVy1i9_Ko-2v3vxL5sQP_Kn64jOF2BV1vD4v8keXP3uIr8BGOuj6c</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A.</creator><creator>Ryan, Will H.</creator><creator>Müller, K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7324-7448</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Influence of nutrients on ploidy‐specific performance in an invasive, haplodiplontic red macroalga</title><author>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A. ; Ryan, Will H. ; Müller, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-5f598f349ee0f0201eb64b9dca8f5d6ae39ad10d9349030de7e39d6aecb9fdb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atlantic Ocean</topic><topic>biological invasion</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Diploids</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Eutrophic environments</topic><topic>Eutrophic rivers</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Floating</topic><topic>Gametophytes</topic><topic>Gracilaria</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Haploidy</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Life cycle</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Northern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Ploidy</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Seaweed</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tetrasporophytes</topic><topic>Thalli</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Will H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of phycology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krueger‐Hadfield, Stacy A.</au><au>Ryan, Will H.</au><au>Müller, K.</au><au>Müller, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of nutrients on ploidy‐specific performance in an invasive, haplodiplontic red macroalga</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phycology</jtitle><addtitle>J Phycol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1114</spage><epage>1120</epage><pages>1114-1120</pages><issn>0022-3646</issn><eissn>1529-8817</eissn><abstract>Worldwide, macroalgae have invaded near‐shore marine ecosystems. However, their haplodiplontic life cycles have complicated efforts to predict patterns of growth and spread, particularly since most theoretical predictions are derived from diplontic taxa (i.e., animals). To complete one revolution of the life cycle, two separate ploidy stages, often including separate haploid sexes, must pass through development and reproduction. In the case of the invasive, red macroalga Agarophyton vermiculophyllum, during the invasion of soft‐sediment estuaries throughout the Northern Hemisphere, diploid tetrasporophytes came to dominate all free‐floating populations and haploid gametophytes were consistently lost. The ecological hypothesis of nutrient limitation might contribute to an explanation of this pattern of tetrasporophytic dominance in free‐floating populations. Under this hypothesis, gametophytes should outperform tetrasporophytes under nutrient limited conditions, but tetrasporophytes should be better able to exploit optimal or even abundant nutrient conditions, such as in eutrophic estuaries. We sampled tetrasporophytes, male gametophytes, and female gametophytes from two sites each located on either side of the Delmarva Peninsula that separates the Chesapeake Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. We subjected apices excised from multiple thalli from each life cycle stage to a nutrient‐enriched and a nutrient‐poor seawater treatment and assessed growth and survival. While nutrient addition increased growth rates, there was no significant difference among ploidies or sexes. Gametophytes did, however, suffer higher mortality than tetrasporophytes. We discuss how nutrient‐dependent differences in growth and survival may contribute to observed patterns of tetrasporophytic dominance in soft‐sediment A. vermiculophyllum populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32348550</pmid><doi>10.1111/jpy.13011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7324-7448</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3646
ispartof Journal of phycology, 2020-08, Vol.56 (4), p.1114-1120
issn 0022-3646
1529-8817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2396853621
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Algae
Animals
Atlantic Ocean
biological invasion
Chemical analysis
Diploids
Dominance
Ecosystem
Estuaries
Eutrophic environments
Eutrophic rivers
Eutrophication
Floating
Gametophytes
Gracilaria
Growth rate
Haploidy
Hypotheses
Life cycle
Life cycles
Marine ecosystems
Mineral nutrients
Northern Hemisphere
Nutrient cycles
Nutrients
Ploidy
Populations
Reproduction (biology)
Seawater
Seaweed
Seaweeds
Sediment
Survival
Tetrasporophytes
Thalli
Water analysis
title Influence of nutrients on ploidy‐specific performance in an invasive, haplodiplontic red macroalga
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A58%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20nutrients%20on%20ploidy%E2%80%90specific%20performance%20in%20an%20invasive,%20haplodiplontic%20red%20macroalga&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phycology&rft.au=Krueger%E2%80%90Hadfield,%20Stacy%20A.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1114&rft.epage=1120&rft.pages=1114-1120&rft.issn=0022-3646&rft.eissn=1529-8817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpy.13011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2396853621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430948992&rft_id=info:pmid/32348550&rfr_iscdi=true