Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016

To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Yea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2020-08, Vol.142, p.49-54
Hauptverfasser: Wingate, Jonathan, Joyner, Byron, Sweet, Robert M., Hagedorn, Judith C., Johnsen, Niels V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue
container_start_page 49
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 142
creator Wingate, Jonathan
Joyner, Byron
Sweet, Robert M.
Hagedorn, Judith C.
Johnsen, Niels V.
description To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Year (AY) 2009-2010 to 2016-2017. Cases were stratified into the 4 ACGME categories – general urology, endourology, oncology, and reconstruction. Linear regression models analyzed the association between training year, volume, and type of cases performed. Inter-resident variability in case exposure was calculated by the difference between the ACGME reported 10th and 90th percentiles. During the study period, the mean number of cases performed per resident was 1092 (standard deviation 32.7). Although there was no significant change in total case volume, there were changes within case categories. Endoscopic, retroperitoneal oncology, and male reconstruction case volume all increased significantly (Δ20.1%, Δ 5.1%, Δ 8.2%, respectively, all P < .05). This was balanced with a concomitant decrease in pelvic oncology and female reconstruction cases (Δ 10.0% and Δ 14.5%, respectively, both P < .05). There was a 27.8% increase in laparoscopic/robotic cases (P < .001). The ratio difference between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile ranged from a low of 2.5 for retroperitoneal oncology cases to a high of 5.2 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. From AY2009-2010 to 2016-2017, residency case volume has remained constant, but there has been a change in types of cases performed and proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. Significant variability of inter-resident operative experience was noted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2395260183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429520304441</els_id><sourcerecordid>2395260183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1c675289db692fce03fbee353dd1147fbbcf59edfe4bd20ed6855ec05a5fe43b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFuEzEQhi0EoqHwCCAfuewytmMn5oKiqC2VgiJVba_Wrj1bHO2ug-0NCk-PSwJXTiONvpl_5iPkPYOaAVOfdvUUQx-ejjUHDjXwGubsBZkxyReV1lq-JDMADdWca3lB3qS0AwCl1OI1uRBcCAlLOSO_bseMsbrD5B2OmT420Tet730-Uj_Shz8Z3tLtHmOT_QHpuklIH0M_DZjo9oCR3vsBP9MVvcODx580dDR_R7pa33y7OtGb8JTodQwD5eUkmkOpTL0lr7qmT_juXC_Jw_XV_fprtdne3K5Xm8oKJXPFrFpIvtSuVZp3FkF0LaKQwjnG5ouubW0nNboO563jgE4tpUQLspGlJVpxST6e9u5j-DFhymbwyWLfNyOGKRkutOQK2FIUVJ5QG0NKETuzj35o4tEwMM_azc6ctZtn7Qa4KdrL3IdzxNQO6P5N_fVcgC8nAMujxVI0yXocLTof0Wbjgv9PxG-GSZWG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2395260183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wingate, Jonathan ; Joyner, Byron ; Sweet, Robert M. ; Hagedorn, Judith C. ; Johnsen, Niels V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Jonathan ; Joyner, Byron ; Sweet, Robert M. ; Hagedorn, Judith C. ; Johnsen, Niels V.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Year (AY) 2009-2010 to 2016-2017. Cases were stratified into the 4 ACGME categories – general urology, endourology, oncology, and reconstruction. Linear regression models analyzed the association between training year, volume, and type of cases performed. Inter-resident variability in case exposure was calculated by the difference between the ACGME reported 10th and 90th percentiles. During the study period, the mean number of cases performed per resident was 1092 (standard deviation 32.7). Although there was no significant change in total case volume, there were changes within case categories. Endoscopic, retroperitoneal oncology, and male reconstruction case volume all increased significantly (Δ20.1%, Δ 5.1%, Δ 8.2%, respectively, all P &lt; .05). This was balanced with a concomitant decrease in pelvic oncology and female reconstruction cases (Δ 10.0% and Δ 14.5%, respectively, both P &lt; .05). There was a 27.8% increase in laparoscopic/robotic cases (P &lt; .001). The ratio difference between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile ranged from a low of 2.5 for retroperitoneal oncology cases to a high of 5.2 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. From AY2009-2010 to 2016-2017, residency case volume has remained constant, but there has been a change in types of cases performed and proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. Significant variability of inter-resident operative experience was noted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32335085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Education, Medical - standards ; Education, Medical, Graduate - trends ; Female ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Laparoscopy - standards ; Lithotripsy - standards ; Male ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - standards ; Regression Analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retroperitoneal Space - surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards ; Surgeons ; Surgical Oncology - education ; Surgical Oncology - standards ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Urologists ; Urology - education ; Urology - standards</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2020-08, Vol.142, p.49-54</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1c675289db692fce03fbee353dd1147fbbcf59edfe4bd20ed6855ec05a5fe43b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1c675289db692fce03fbee353dd1147fbbcf59edfe4bd20ed6855ec05a5fe43b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32335085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyner, Byron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagedorn, Judith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Niels V.</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Year (AY) 2009-2010 to 2016-2017. Cases were stratified into the 4 ACGME categories – general urology, endourology, oncology, and reconstruction. Linear regression models analyzed the association between training year, volume, and type of cases performed. Inter-resident variability in case exposure was calculated by the difference between the ACGME reported 10th and 90th percentiles. During the study period, the mean number of cases performed per resident was 1092 (standard deviation 32.7). Although there was no significant change in total case volume, there were changes within case categories. Endoscopic, retroperitoneal oncology, and male reconstruction case volume all increased significantly (Δ20.1%, Δ 5.1%, Δ 8.2%, respectively, all P &lt; .05). This was balanced with a concomitant decrease in pelvic oncology and female reconstruction cases (Δ 10.0% and Δ 14.5%, respectively, both P &lt; .05). There was a 27.8% increase in laparoscopic/robotic cases (P &lt; .001). The ratio difference between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile ranged from a low of 2.5 for retroperitoneal oncology cases to a high of 5.2 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. From AY2009-2010 to 2016-2017, residency case volume has remained constant, but there has been a change in types of cases performed and proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. Significant variability of inter-resident operative experience was noted.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Education, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - standards</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retroperitoneal Space - surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology - education</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology - standards</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Urologists</subject><subject>Urology - education</subject><subject>Urology - standards</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFuEzEQhi0EoqHwCCAfuewytmMn5oKiqC2VgiJVba_Wrj1bHO2ug-0NCk-PSwJXTiONvpl_5iPkPYOaAVOfdvUUQx-ejjUHDjXwGubsBZkxyReV1lq-JDMADdWca3lB3qS0AwCl1OI1uRBcCAlLOSO_bseMsbrD5B2OmT420Tet730-Uj_Shz8Z3tLtHmOT_QHpuklIH0M_DZjo9oCR3vsBP9MVvcODx580dDR_R7pa33y7OtGb8JTodQwD5eUkmkOpTL0lr7qmT_juXC_Jw_XV_fprtdne3K5Xm8oKJXPFrFpIvtSuVZp3FkF0LaKQwjnG5ouubW0nNboO563jgE4tpUQLspGlJVpxST6e9u5j-DFhymbwyWLfNyOGKRkutOQK2FIUVJ5QG0NKETuzj35o4tEwMM_azc6ctZtn7Qa4KdrL3IdzxNQO6P5N_fVcgC8nAMujxVI0yXocLTof0Wbjgv9PxG-GSZWG</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Wingate, Jonathan</creator><creator>Joyner, Byron</creator><creator>Sweet, Robert M.</creator><creator>Hagedorn, Judith C.</creator><creator>Johnsen, Niels V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016</title><author>Wingate, Jonathan ; Joyner, Byron ; Sweet, Robert M. ; Hagedorn, Judith C. ; Johnsen, Niels V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-1c675289db692fce03fbee353dd1147fbbcf59edfe4bd20ed6855ec05a5fe43b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Education, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - standards</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retroperitoneal Space - surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology - education</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology - standards</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Urologists</topic><topic>Urology - education</topic><topic>Urology - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wingate, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyner, Byron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweet, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagedorn, Judith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnsen, Niels V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wingate, Jonathan</au><au>Joyner, Byron</au><au>Sweet, Robert M.</au><au>Hagedorn, Judith C.</au><au>Johnsen, Niels V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>49</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>49-54</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To assess the effect of the changing landscape of urologic residency education and training on resident operative exposure and inter-resident variability. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs for graduating urology chief residents were reviewed from Academic Year (AY) 2009-2010 to 2016-2017. Cases were stratified into the 4 ACGME categories – general urology, endourology, oncology, and reconstruction. Linear regression models analyzed the association between training year, volume, and type of cases performed. Inter-resident variability in case exposure was calculated by the difference between the ACGME reported 10th and 90th percentiles. During the study period, the mean number of cases performed per resident was 1092 (standard deviation 32.7). Although there was no significant change in total case volume, there were changes within case categories. Endoscopic, retroperitoneal oncology, and male reconstruction case volume all increased significantly (Δ20.1%, Δ 5.1%, Δ 8.2%, respectively, all P &lt; .05). This was balanced with a concomitant decrease in pelvic oncology and female reconstruction cases (Δ 10.0% and Δ 14.5%, respectively, both P &lt; .05). There was a 27.8% increase in laparoscopic/robotic cases (P &lt; .001). The ratio difference between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile ranged from a low of 2.5 for retroperitoneal oncology cases to a high of 5.2 for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. From AY2009-2010 to 2016-2017, residency case volume has remained constant, but there has been a change in types of cases performed and proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. Significant variability of inter-resident operative experience was noted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32335085</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.041</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2020-08, Vol.142, p.49-54
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2395260183
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Accreditation
Clinical Competence - standards
Education, Medical - standards
Education, Medical, Graduate - trends
Female
General Surgery - education
Humans
Internship and Residency
Laparoscopy - standards
Lithotripsy - standards
Male
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - standards
Regression Analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Retroperitoneal Space - surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures - standards
Surgeons
Surgical Oncology - education
Surgical Oncology - standards
Treatment Outcome
United States
Urologists
Urology - education
Urology - standards
title Inter-Resident Variability in Urologic Operative Case Volumes Over Time: A Review of the ACGME Case Logs From 2009 to 2016
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A08%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-Resident%20Variability%20in%20Urologic%20Operative%20Case%20Volumes%20Over%20Time:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20ACGME%20Case%20Logs%20From%202009%20to%202016&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Wingate,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=49-54&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2395260183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2395260183&rft_id=info:pmid/32335085&rft_els_id=S0090429520304441&rfr_iscdi=true