Uptake and Engagement of Activities to Promote Native Species in Private Gardens
Activities undertaken by householders in their gardens have huge potential to enhance city-wide biodiversity, but programs aimed at activating householders require an understanding of the factors encouraging or acting as barriers to the uptake of different kinds of activities. We provided 42 househo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental management (New York) 2020-07, Vol.66 (1), p.42-55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 42 |
container_title | Environmental management (New York) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | van Heezik, Yolanda Freeman, Claire Davidson, Katherine Lewis, Blake |
description | Activities undertaken by householders in their gardens have huge potential to enhance city-wide biodiversity, but programs aimed at activating householders require an understanding of the factors encouraging or acting as barriers to the uptake of different kinds of activities. We provided 42 householders with two species-enhancing activities, selected from six possibilities, free-of-charge (to remove the barrier of initial cost). We collected socio-demographic data as well as information on knowledge of common urban species, pro-environmental behaviors and nature connectedness. We monitored ongoing engagement at two time points: 1 and 6 months. Characteristics of householders opting for different activities varied in terms of their degree of environmental engagement, their knowledge about common species, and the size of their gardens; e.g., bird feeders and bee planters were popular with people who did not know the names of common species and were not particularly engaged in pro-environmental activities respectively, whereas lizard habitat creation was attractive to people who were already engaged in wildlife gardening activities. Cost to continue with activities was a significant barrier for some people, but most householders were willing to practice relatively inexpensive activities in small spaces. Esthetics was an important factor to be considered when enhancing invertebrate habitat (e.g., bug hotels are more attractive than log piles, and planters for bees contain colorful flowers). A commonly cited barrier was lack of information about wildlife-friendly activities, despite much being available online. Most participants (85%) talked about their activities with others, potentially acting as influencers and shifting social norms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00267-020-01294-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2395259127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407501933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a8dd62956382cd6af87ca73cbefad15ef866998543d86f4281aff64e524d45bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMotlZfwIUMuHEzmv_JLEupVRAtaMFdSCc3ZWpnpiYzBd_e1FYFF64u5Jz73fAhdE7wNcE4uwkYU5mlmOIUE5rzVBygPuGMphHnh6iPmeQpEfS1h05CWGKMmVLiGPUYZUwxTPtoOlu35g0SU9tkXC_MAiqo26RxybBoy03ZlhCStkmmvqmaFpJHE18heV5DsSVlHUm5MZFMjLdQh1N05MwqwNl-DtDsdvwyuksfnib3o-FDWrBMtKlR1kqaC8kULaw0TmWFyVgxB2csEeCUlHmuBGdWScepIsY5yUFQbrmYz9kAXe1y17557yC0uipDAauVqaHpgqYsF1TkhGZRvfyjLpvO1_F3mnKcCUxyxqJFd1bhmxA8OL32ZWX8hyZYb_vWu7517Ft_9a1FXLrYR3fzCuzPynfBUWA7IURUL8D_3v4n9hOdTYn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407501933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uptake and Engagement of Activities to Promote Native Species in Private Gardens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>van Heezik, Yolanda ; Freeman, Claire ; Davidson, Katherine ; Lewis, Blake</creator><creatorcontrib>van Heezik, Yolanda ; Freeman, Claire ; Davidson, Katherine ; Lewis, Blake</creatorcontrib><description>Activities undertaken by householders in their gardens have huge potential to enhance city-wide biodiversity, but programs aimed at activating householders require an understanding of the factors encouraging or acting as barriers to the uptake of different kinds of activities. We provided 42 householders with two species-enhancing activities, selected from six possibilities, free-of-charge (to remove the barrier of initial cost). We collected socio-demographic data as well as information on knowledge of common urban species, pro-environmental behaviors and nature connectedness. We monitored ongoing engagement at two time points: 1 and 6 months. Characteristics of householders opting for different activities varied in terms of their degree of environmental engagement, their knowledge about common species, and the size of their gardens; e.g., bird feeders and bee planters were popular with people who did not know the names of common species and were not particularly engaged in pro-environmental activities respectively, whereas lizard habitat creation was attractive to people who were already engaged in wildlife gardening activities. Cost to continue with activities was a significant barrier for some people, but most householders were willing to practice relatively inexpensive activities in small spaces. Esthetics was an important factor to be considered when enhancing invertebrate habitat (e.g., bug hotels are more attractive than log piles, and planters for bees contain colorful flowers). A commonly cited barrier was lack of information about wildlife-friendly activities, despite much being available online. Most participants (85%) talked about their activities with others, potentially acting as influencers and shifting social norms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01294-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32338302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Attitudes ; Bees ; Behavior ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Cities ; Containers ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Environmental behavior ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Feeders ; Flowers ; Forestry Management ; Gardening ; Gardens ; Gardens & gardening ; Hotels ; Indigenous species ; Influence ; Invertebrates ; Management decisions ; Native species ; Nature Conservation ; Norms ; Social norms ; Success ; Vegetation ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Wildlife ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2020-07, Vol.66 (1), p.42-55</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a8dd62956382cd6af87ca73cbefad15ef866998543d86f4281aff64e524d45bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a8dd62956382cd6af87ca73cbefad15ef866998543d86f4281aff64e524d45bb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0494-5311</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-020-01294-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-020-01294-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32338302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Heezik, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Blake</creatorcontrib><title>Uptake and Engagement of Activities to Promote Native Species in Private Gardens</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Activities undertaken by householders in their gardens have huge potential to enhance city-wide biodiversity, but programs aimed at activating householders require an understanding of the factors encouraging or acting as barriers to the uptake of different kinds of activities. We provided 42 householders with two species-enhancing activities, selected from six possibilities, free-of-charge (to remove the barrier of initial cost). We collected socio-demographic data as well as information on knowledge of common urban species, pro-environmental behaviors and nature connectedness. We monitored ongoing engagement at two time points: 1 and 6 months. Characteristics of householders opting for different activities varied in terms of their degree of environmental engagement, their knowledge about common species, and the size of their gardens; e.g., bird feeders and bee planters were popular with people who did not know the names of common species and were not particularly engaged in pro-environmental activities respectively, whereas lizard habitat creation was attractive to people who were already engaged in wildlife gardening activities. Cost to continue with activities was a significant barrier for some people, but most householders were willing to practice relatively inexpensive activities in small spaces. Esthetics was an important factor to be considered when enhancing invertebrate habitat (e.g., bug hotels are more attractive than log piles, and planters for bees contain colorful flowers). A commonly cited barrier was lack of information about wildlife-friendly activities, despite much being available online. Most participants (85%) talked about their activities with others, potentially acting as influencers and shifting social norms.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental behavior</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Feeders</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Gardening</subject><subject>Gardens</subject><subject>Gardens & gardening</subject><subject>Hotels</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMotlZfwIUMuHEzmv_JLEupVRAtaMFdSCc3ZWpnpiYzBd_e1FYFF64u5Jz73fAhdE7wNcE4uwkYU5mlmOIUE5rzVBygPuGMphHnh6iPmeQpEfS1h05CWGKMmVLiGPUYZUwxTPtoOlu35g0SU9tkXC_MAiqo26RxybBoy03ZlhCStkmmvqmaFpJHE18heV5DsSVlHUm5MZFMjLdQh1N05MwqwNl-DtDsdvwyuksfnib3o-FDWrBMtKlR1kqaC8kULaw0TmWFyVgxB2csEeCUlHmuBGdWScepIsY5yUFQbrmYz9kAXe1y17557yC0uipDAauVqaHpgqYsF1TkhGZRvfyjLpvO1_F3mnKcCUxyxqJFd1bhmxA8OL32ZWX8hyZYb_vWu7517Ft_9a1FXLrYR3fzCuzPynfBUWA7IURUL8D_3v4n9hOdTYn0</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>van Heezik, Yolanda</creator><creator>Freeman, Claire</creator><creator>Davidson, Katherine</creator><creator>Lewis, Blake</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-5311</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Uptake and Engagement of Activities to Promote Native Species in Private Gardens</title><author>van Heezik, Yolanda ; Freeman, Claire ; Davidson, Katherine ; Lewis, Blake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a8dd62956382cd6af87ca73cbefad15ef866998543d86f4281aff64e524d45bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental behavior</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Feeders</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Gardening</topic><topic>Gardens</topic><topic>Gardens & gardening</topic><topic>Hotels</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Heezik, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Blake</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Heezik, Yolanda</au><au>Freeman, Claire</au><au>Davidson, Katherine</au><au>Lewis, Blake</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uptake and Engagement of Activities to Promote Native Species in Private Gardens</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>42-55</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>Activities undertaken by householders in their gardens have huge potential to enhance city-wide biodiversity, but programs aimed at activating householders require an understanding of the factors encouraging or acting as barriers to the uptake of different kinds of activities. We provided 42 householders with two species-enhancing activities, selected from six possibilities, free-of-charge (to remove the barrier of initial cost). We collected socio-demographic data as well as information on knowledge of common urban species, pro-environmental behaviors and nature connectedness. We monitored ongoing engagement at two time points: 1 and 6 months. Characteristics of householders opting for different activities varied in terms of their degree of environmental engagement, their knowledge about common species, and the size of their gardens; e.g., bird feeders and bee planters were popular with people who did not know the names of common species and were not particularly engaged in pro-environmental activities respectively, whereas lizard habitat creation was attractive to people who were already engaged in wildlife gardening activities. Cost to continue with activities was a significant barrier for some people, but most householders were willing to practice relatively inexpensive activities in small spaces. Esthetics was an important factor to be considered when enhancing invertebrate habitat (e.g., bug hotels are more attractive than log piles, and planters for bees contain colorful flowers). A commonly cited barrier was lack of information about wildlife-friendly activities, despite much being available online. Most participants (85%) talked about their activities with others, potentially acting as influencers and shifting social norms.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32338302</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-020-01294-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-5311</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-152X |
ispartof | Environmental management (New York), 2020-07, Vol.66 (1), p.42-55 |
issn | 0364-152X 1432-1009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2395259127 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animals Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Attitudes Bees Behavior Biodiversity Birds Cities Containers Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecosystem Environment Environmental behavior Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Feeders Flowers Forestry Management Gardening Gardens Gardens & gardening Hotels Indigenous species Influence Invertebrates Management decisions Native species Nature Conservation Norms Social norms Success Vegetation Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control Wildlife Wildlife habitats |
title | Uptake and Engagement of Activities to Promote Native Species in Private Gardens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A32%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uptake%20and%20Engagement%20of%20Activities%20to%20Promote%20Native%20Species%20in%20Private%20Gardens&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=van%20Heezik,%20Yolanda&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=42-55&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-020-01294-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407501933%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407501933&rft_id=info:pmid/32338302&rfr_iscdi=true |