Why is pulmonary vein isolation not enough for vagal denervation in all cases?
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause vagal response during radiofrequency application or increase on heart rate after ablation. All those responses are related to inadvertent ablation effect on ganglionated plexi. In the present case, we aimed to explain why vagal response effects of PVI are not...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2020-05, Vol.43 (5), p.520-523 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 523 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 520 |
| container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Aksu, Tolga Guler, Tumer Erdem Bozyel, Serdar Yalin, Kivanc Gopinathannair, Rakesh |
| description | Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause vagal response during radiofrequency application or increase on heart rate after ablation. All those responses are related to inadvertent ablation effect on ganglionated plexi. In the present case, we aimed to explain why vagal response effects of PVI are not same in all cases. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pace.13922 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2394241402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402359837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3162-b9b3ec8d49a0ab47a19d38ab238884697b33da0d00ceaead663a00a4fd2eda863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgitbLxgeQgBsRpuY202QlUryBqAvFZTgzOa0j6aROOpW-vamjLlyYzYGcj5_DT8ghZ0Oe3tkcKhxyaYTYIAOeK5ZpnptNMmBcjTIttdkhuzG-McYKpvJtsiOFFErofEDuX15XtI503vlZaKBd0SXWTfoJHhZ1aGgTFhSb0E1f6SS0dAlT8NRhg-2yB0mD97SCiPF8n2xNwEc8-J575Pnq8ml8k909XN-OL-6ySvJCZKUpJVbaKQMMSjUCbpzUUAqptVaFGZVSOmCOsQoBwRWFBMZATZxAB7qQe-Skz5234b3DuLCzOlboPTQYumiFNEoorphI9PgPfQtd26TrrFjvc6PlKKnTXlVtiLHFiZ239Sz1YTmz65btumX71XLCR9-RXTlD90t_ak2A9-Cj9rj6J8o-Xowv-9BPJHSGxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2402359837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why is pulmonary vein isolation not enough for vagal denervation in all cases?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Aksu, Tolga ; Guler, Tumer Erdem ; Bozyel, Serdar ; Yalin, Kivanc ; Gopinathannair, Rakesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Aksu, Tolga ; Guler, Tumer Erdem ; Bozyel, Serdar ; Yalin, Kivanc ; Gopinathannair, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><description>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause vagal response during radiofrequency application or increase on heart rate after ablation. All those responses are related to inadvertent ablation effect on ganglionated plexi. In the present case, we aimed to explain why vagal response effects of PVI are not same in all cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.13922</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32324285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>ablation ; Adult ; atrial fibrillation ; bradycardia ; Bradycardia - surgery ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; cardioneuroablation ; Catheter Ablation ; Denervation ; Electrocardiography ; Epicardial Mapping ; Female ; Ganglia, Autonomic - surgery ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Pulmonary Veins - surgery ; syncope ; vagal syndromes ; Vagus nerve ; Vagus Nerve - physiopathology ; Vagus Nerve - surgery</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2020-05, Vol.43 (5), p.520-523</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3162-b9b3ec8d49a0ab47a19d38ab238884697b33da0d00ceaead663a00a4fd2eda863</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8061-9660 ; 0000-0001-5602-0711 ; 0000-0003-4611-3687</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpace.13922$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpace.13922$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32324285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aksu, Tolga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler, Tumer Erdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozyel, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalin, Kivanc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopinathannair, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><title>Why is pulmonary vein isolation not enough for vagal denervation in all cases?</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause vagal response during radiofrequency application or increase on heart rate after ablation. All those responses are related to inadvertent ablation effect on ganglionated plexi. In the present case, we aimed to explain why vagal response effects of PVI are not same in all cases.</description><subject>ablation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>bradycardia</subject><subject>Bradycardia - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>cardioneuroablation</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation</subject><subject>Denervation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Epicardial Mapping</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganglia, Autonomic - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pulmonary Veins - surgery</subject><subject>syncope</subject><subject>vagal syndromes</subject><subject>Vagus nerve</subject><subject>Vagus Nerve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Vagus Nerve - surgery</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgitbLxgeQgBsRpuY202QlUryBqAvFZTgzOa0j6aROOpW-vamjLlyYzYGcj5_DT8ghZ0Oe3tkcKhxyaYTYIAOeK5ZpnptNMmBcjTIttdkhuzG-McYKpvJtsiOFFErofEDuX15XtI503vlZaKBd0SXWTfoJHhZ1aGgTFhSb0E1f6SS0dAlT8NRhg-2yB0mD97SCiPF8n2xNwEc8-J575Pnq8ml8k909XN-OL-6ySvJCZKUpJVbaKQMMSjUCbpzUUAqptVaFGZVSOmCOsQoBwRWFBMZATZxAB7qQe-Skz5234b3DuLCzOlboPTQYumiFNEoorphI9PgPfQtd26TrrFjvc6PlKKnTXlVtiLHFiZ239Sz1YTmz65btumX71XLCR9-RXTlD90t_ak2A9-Cj9rj6J8o-Xowv-9BPJHSGxg</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Aksu, Tolga</creator><creator>Guler, Tumer Erdem</creator><creator>Bozyel, Serdar</creator><creator>Yalin, Kivanc</creator><creator>Gopinathannair, Rakesh</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-9660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-0711</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-3687</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Why is pulmonary vein isolation not enough for vagal denervation in all cases?</title><author>Aksu, Tolga ; Guler, Tumer Erdem ; Bozyel, Serdar ; Yalin, Kivanc ; Gopinathannair, Rakesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3162-b9b3ec8d49a0ab47a19d38ab238884697b33da0d00ceaead663a00a4fd2eda863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ablation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>bradycardia</topic><topic>Bradycardia - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>cardioneuroablation</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation</topic><topic>Denervation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Epicardial Mapping</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganglia, Autonomic - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pulmonary Veins - surgery</topic><topic>syncope</topic><topic>vagal syndromes</topic><topic>Vagus nerve</topic><topic>Vagus Nerve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Vagus Nerve - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aksu, Tolga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guler, Tumer Erdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozyel, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yalin, Kivanc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopinathannair, Rakesh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aksu, Tolga</au><au>Guler, Tumer Erdem</au><au>Bozyel, Serdar</au><au>Yalin, Kivanc</au><au>Gopinathannair, Rakesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why is pulmonary vein isolation not enough for vagal denervation in all cases?</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>523</epage><pages>520-523</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may cause vagal response during radiofrequency application or increase on heart rate after ablation. All those responses are related to inadvertent ablation effect on ganglionated plexi. In the present case, we aimed to explain why vagal response effects of PVI are not same in all cases.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32324285</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.13922</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-9660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-0711</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-3687</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
| ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2020-05, Vol.43 (5), p.520-523 |
| issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2394241402 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | ablation Adult atrial fibrillation bradycardia Bradycardia - surgery Cardiac arrhythmia cardioneuroablation Catheter Ablation Denervation Electrocardiography Epicardial Mapping Female Ganglia, Autonomic - surgery Heart Rate Humans Pulmonary Veins - surgery syncope vagal syndromes Vagus nerve Vagus Nerve - physiopathology Vagus Nerve - surgery |
| title | Why is pulmonary vein isolation not enough for vagal denervation in all cases? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A00%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20is%20pulmonary%20vein%20isolation%20not%20enough%20for%20vagal%20denervation%20in%20all%20cases?&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Aksu,%20Tolga&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=523&rft.pages=520-523&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.13922&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402359837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2402359837&rft_id=info:pmid/32324285&rfr_iscdi=true |