Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score

Background Prior research has shown that retrospectively measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions is associated with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on targeted biopsy suggesting that ADC should be measured and reported prospec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2021-01, Vol.62 (1), p.139-144
Hauptverfasser: Shaish, Hiram, Casals, Randy, Ahmed, Firas, Makkar, Jasnit, Wenske, Sven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 144
container_issue 1
container_start_page 139
container_title Acta radiologica (1987)
container_volume 62
creator Shaish, Hiram
Casals, Randy
Ahmed, Firas
Makkar, Jasnit
Wenske, Sven
description Background Prior research has shown that retrospectively measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions is associated with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on targeted biopsy suggesting that ADC should be measured and reported prospectively. Purpose To assess the impact of mandatory prospective measurement of ADC on the rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores for csPCa. Material and Methods Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US)-MRI fusion prostate biopsy from August 2018 to July 2019 and who had prospectively reported ADC were compared to control patients who did not. Rates of positivity by PI-RADS category were computed and compared using Chi-square. Multivariable regression was performed. Results In total, 126 patients (median age 65 years) with 165 prostate lesions (19, 51, 70, and 25 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively) and prospectively reported ADC values were compared to 113 control patients (median age 66 years) with 157 prostate lesions (17, 42, 64, and 34 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores were similar between the two cohorts; 11%, 25%, 55%, and 76% and 0%, 21%, 56%, and 62% for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the test and control cohorts, respectively (Chi-square P = 0.78). Multivariate logistic regression showed no significant association between the presence of prospectively measured ADC and csPCa (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.7–1.7, P = 0.82). Conclusion Prospective ADC measurement may not impact PI-RADS category assignments or positivity rates for csPCa under current guidelines. Future versions of PI-RADS may need to incorporate ADC into scoring rules to realize their potential.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0284185120915617
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2393056647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0284185120915617</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2393056647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-6947d20122023a57effdcabb22db9f539b642ba3e6cae52ab07782dd333f0fda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi1UxG4Ld06Vj72k-COON8eqFFipEoiPczSxx4urJA62U2n_EL8TR1t6QOJkeeZ9n5lXQ8hbzq451_odE7ua7xQXrOWq4foF2fKGsYrVSp2R7dqu1v6GnKf0wBgXWvFXZCOF5IIzsSW_9-MMJtPg6AiThYyWzjGkGU32jzgcacQ5xLUM8wwRp0ytd25JPkzUBHTOG79WH2FYMNFSzT-RxkJKK3UOyReSz0fqQqRm8JM3MBRw8ofJFzcU8zoyFwstP4OR9kf6ZV99vXn_jSYTIr4mLx0MCd88vRfkx4e777efqvvPH_e3N_eVES3LVdPW2ooSUzAhQemynTXQ90LYvnVKtn1Tix4kNgZQCeiZ1jthrZTSMWdBXpCrE7cs9KvEyd3ok8FhgAnDkjohW8lU09S6SNlJasruKaLr5uhHiMeOs269TvfvdYrl8om-9CPaZ8PfcxRBdRIkOGD3EJY4lbT_B_4BiwebLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2393056647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Shaish, Hiram ; Casals, Randy ; Ahmed, Firas ; Makkar, Jasnit ; Wenske, Sven</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaish, Hiram ; Casals, Randy ; Ahmed, Firas ; Makkar, Jasnit ; Wenske, Sven</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prior research has shown that retrospectively measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions is associated with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on targeted biopsy suggesting that ADC should be measured and reported prospectively. Purpose To assess the impact of mandatory prospective measurement of ADC on the rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores for csPCa. Material and Methods Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US)-MRI fusion prostate biopsy from August 2018 to July 2019 and who had prospectively reported ADC were compared to control patients who did not. Rates of positivity by PI-RADS category were computed and compared using Chi-square. Multivariable regression was performed. Results In total, 126 patients (median age 65 years) with 165 prostate lesions (19, 51, 70, and 25 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively) and prospectively reported ADC values were compared to 113 control patients (median age 66 years) with 157 prostate lesions (17, 42, 64, and 34 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores were similar between the two cohorts; 11%, 25%, 55%, and 76% and 0%, 21%, 56%, and 62% for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the test and control cohorts, respectively (Chi-square P = 0.78). Multivariate logistic regression showed no significant association between the presence of prospectively measured ADC and csPCa (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.7–1.7, P = 0.82). Conclusion Prospective ADC measurement may not impact PI-RADS category assignments or positivity rates for csPCa under current guidelines. Future versions of PI-RADS may need to incorporate ADC into scoring rules to realize their potential.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-1851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0284185120915617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32312102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multimodal Imaging - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Radiology Information Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Acta radiologica (1987), 2021-01, Vol.62 (1), p.139-144</ispartof><rights>The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-6947d20122023a57effdcabb22db9f539b642ba3e6cae52ab07782dd333f0fda3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9280-4839 ; 0000-0002-9914-528X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0284185120915617$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0284185120915617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaish, Hiram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casals, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Firas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkar, Jasnit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenske, Sven</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score</title><title>Acta radiologica (1987)</title><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><description>Background Prior research has shown that retrospectively measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions is associated with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on targeted biopsy suggesting that ADC should be measured and reported prospectively. Purpose To assess the impact of mandatory prospective measurement of ADC on the rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores for csPCa. Material and Methods Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US)-MRI fusion prostate biopsy from August 2018 to July 2019 and who had prospectively reported ADC were compared to control patients who did not. Rates of positivity by PI-RADS category were computed and compared using Chi-square. Multivariable regression was performed. Results In total, 126 patients (median age 65 years) with 165 prostate lesions (19, 51, 70, and 25 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively) and prospectively reported ADC values were compared to 113 control patients (median age 66 years) with 157 prostate lesions (17, 42, 64, and 34 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores were similar between the two cohorts; 11%, 25%, 55%, and 76% and 0%, 21%, 56%, and 62% for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the test and control cohorts, respectively (Chi-square P = 0.78). Multivariate logistic regression showed no significant association between the presence of prospectively measured ADC and csPCa (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.7–1.7, P = 0.82). Conclusion Prospective ADC measurement may not impact PI-RADS category assignments or positivity rates for csPCa under current guidelines. Future versions of PI-RADS may need to incorporate ADC into scoring rules to realize their potential.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radiology Information Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0284-1851</issn><issn>1600-0455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi1UxG4Ld06Vj72k-COON8eqFFipEoiPczSxx4urJA62U2n_EL8TR1t6QOJkeeZ9n5lXQ8hbzq451_odE7ua7xQXrOWq4foF2fKGsYrVSp2R7dqu1v6GnKf0wBgXWvFXZCOF5IIzsSW_9-MMJtPg6AiThYyWzjGkGU32jzgcacQ5xLUM8wwRp0ytd25JPkzUBHTOG79WH2FYMNFSzT-RxkJKK3UOyReSz0fqQqRm8JM3MBRw8ofJFzcU8zoyFwstP4OR9kf6ZV99vXn_jSYTIr4mLx0MCd88vRfkx4e777efqvvPH_e3N_eVES3LVdPW2ooSUzAhQemynTXQ90LYvnVKtn1Tix4kNgZQCeiZ1jthrZTSMWdBXpCrE7cs9KvEyd3ok8FhgAnDkjohW8lU09S6SNlJasruKaLr5uhHiMeOs269TvfvdYrl8om-9CPaZ8PfcxRBdRIkOGD3EJY4lbT_B_4BiwebLw</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Shaish, Hiram</creator><creator>Casals, Randy</creator><creator>Ahmed, Firas</creator><creator>Makkar, Jasnit</creator><creator>Wenske, Sven</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9280-4839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-528X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score</title><author>Shaish, Hiram ; Casals, Randy ; Ahmed, Firas ; Makkar, Jasnit ; Wenske, Sven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c290t-6947d20122023a57effdcabb22db9f539b642ba3e6cae52ab07782dd333f0fda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radiology Information Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaish, Hiram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casals, Randy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Firas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkar, Jasnit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenske, Sven</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaish, Hiram</au><au>Casals, Randy</au><au>Ahmed, Firas</au><au>Makkar, Jasnit</au><au>Wenske, Sven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score</atitle><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>139-144</pages><issn>0284-1851</issn><eissn>1600-0455</eissn><abstract>Background Prior research has shown that retrospectively measured apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions is associated with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on targeted biopsy suggesting that ADC should be measured and reported prospectively. Purpose To assess the impact of mandatory prospective measurement of ADC on the rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores for csPCa. Material and Methods Consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound (US)-MRI fusion prostate biopsy from August 2018 to July 2019 and who had prospectively reported ADC were compared to control patients who did not. Rates of positivity by PI-RADS category were computed and compared using Chi-square. Multivariable regression was performed. Results In total, 126 patients (median age 65 years) with 165 prostate lesions (19, 51, 70, and 25 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively) and prospectively reported ADC values were compared to 113 control patients (median age 66 years) with 157 prostate lesions (17, 42, 64, and 34 PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). Rates of positivity across PI-RADS scores were similar between the two cohorts; 11%, 25%, 55%, and 76% and 0%, 21%, 56%, and 62% for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the test and control cohorts, respectively (Chi-square P = 0.78). Multivariate logistic regression showed no significant association between the presence of prospectively measured ADC and csPCa (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.7–1.7, P = 0.82). Conclusion Prospective ADC measurement may not impact PI-RADS category assignments or positivity rates for csPCa under current guidelines. Future versions of PI-RADS may need to incorporate ADC into scoring rules to realize their potential.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32312102</pmid><doi>10.1177/0284185120915617</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9280-4839</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-528X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-1851
ispartof Acta radiologica (1987), 2021-01, Vol.62 (1), p.139-144
issn 0284-1851
1600-0455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2393056647
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals
subjects Aged
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging - methods
Prospective Studies
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Radiology Information Systems - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasonography - methods
title Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A46%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20mandated%20prospectively%20reported%20apparent%20diffusion%20coefficient%20values%20on%20the%20rates%20of%20positivity%20for%20clinically%20significant%20prostate%20cancer%20by%20PI-RADS%20score&rft.jtitle=Acta%20radiologica%20(1987)&rft.au=Shaish,%20Hiram&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=139-144&rft.issn=0284-1851&rft.eissn=1600-0455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0284185120915617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2393056647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2393056647&rft_id=info:pmid/32312102&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0284185120915617&rfr_iscdi=true