Neurophysiological investigations of drug resistant epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation to differentiate responders from non‐responders

Background and purpose In patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE), up to a third of patients will eventually not respond to the therapy. As VNS therapy requires surgery for device implantation, prediction of response prior to surgery is desirable. It is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of neurology 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1178-1189
Hauptverfasser: Hödl, S., Carrette, S., Meurs, A., Carrette, E., Mertens, A., Gadeyne, S., Goossens, L., Dewaele, F., Bouckaert, C., Dauwe, I., Proesmans, S., Raedt, R., Boon, P., Vonck, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1189
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1178
container_title European journal of neurology
container_volume 27
creator Hödl, S.
Carrette, S.
Meurs, A.
Carrette, E.
Mertens, A.
Gadeyne, S.
Goossens, L.
Dewaele, F.
Bouckaert, C.
Dauwe, I.
Proesmans, S.
Raedt, R.
Boon, P.
Vonck, K.
description Background and purpose In patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE), up to a third of patients will eventually not respond to the therapy. As VNS therapy requires surgery for device implantation, prediction of response prior to surgery is desirable. It is hypothesized that neurophysiological investigations related to the mechanisms of action of VNS may help to differentiate VNS responders from non‐responders prior to the initiation of therapy. Methods In a prospective series of DRE patients, polysomnography, heart rate variability (HRV) and cognitive event related potentials were recorded. Polysomnography and HRV were repeated after 1 year of treatment with VNS. Polysomnography, HRV and cognitive event related potentials were compared between VNS responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non‐responders. Results Fifteen out of 30 patients became VNS responders after 1 year of VNS treatment. Prior to treatment with VNS, the amount of deep sleep (NREM 3), the HRV high frequency (HF) power and the P3b amplitude were significantly different in responders compared to non‐responders (P = 0.007; P = 0.001; P = 0.03). Conclusion Three neurophysiological parameters, NREM 3, HRV HF and P3b amplitude, were found to be significantly different in DRE patients who became responders to VNS treatment prior to initiation of their treatment with VNS. These non‐invasive recordings may be used as characteristics for response in future studies and help avoid unsuccessful implantations. Mechanistically these findings may be related to changes in brain regions involved in the so‐called vagal afferent network.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ene.14270
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2392461417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416186481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b75cb864399b4c44dd15b6da1e0fb651ed27aacce184cc9882e7d83aa71ff7023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhyNERf_AgRdAlrjAIa3HdhLvEVULRaraC5wtxx5vXSV2sJOt9tZH4AF4Op4Et1tAQsIXW6PPn2bmV1WvgZ5COWcY8BQE6-iz6ghEK2vgHJ6XN2-gboDCYXWc8y2llHWMvqgOOeNAOWuPqh9XuKQ43eyyj0PceKMH4sMW8-w3evYxZBIdsWnZkITZ51mHmeDkB5zyjkwFwTBnMifUM1py5-cbstWbJZOAaYukeMZleDSRORLrncNUvviCPxinGCymTFyKIwkx_Lz__rf6sjpwesj46uk-qb5-XH85v6gvrz99Pv9wWRsuJa37rjG9bAVfrXphhLAWmr61GpC6vm0ALeu0NgZBCmNWUjLsrORad-BcRxk_qd7tvVOK35Yyuxp9NjgMOmBcsmJ8xUQLArqCvv0HvY1LCqU7xQS0UNqQUKj3e8qkmHNCp6bkR512Cqh6iEyVyNRjZIV982Rc-hHtH_J3RgU42wN3Zeu7_5vU-mq9V_4CN-qmRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416186481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neurophysiological investigations of drug resistant epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation to differentiate responders from non‐responders</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hödl, S. ; Carrette, S. ; Meurs, A. ; Carrette, E. ; Mertens, A. ; Gadeyne, S. ; Goossens, L. ; Dewaele, F. ; Bouckaert, C. ; Dauwe, I. ; Proesmans, S. ; Raedt, R. ; Boon, P. ; Vonck, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hödl, S. ; Carrette, S. ; Meurs, A. ; Carrette, E. ; Mertens, A. ; Gadeyne, S. ; Goossens, L. ; Dewaele, F. ; Bouckaert, C. ; Dauwe, I. ; Proesmans, S. ; Raedt, R. ; Boon, P. ; Vonck, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose In patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE), up to a third of patients will eventually not respond to the therapy. As VNS therapy requires surgery for device implantation, prediction of response prior to surgery is desirable. It is hypothesized that neurophysiological investigations related to the mechanisms of action of VNS may help to differentiate VNS responders from non‐responders prior to the initiation of therapy. Methods In a prospective series of DRE patients, polysomnography, heart rate variability (HRV) and cognitive event related potentials were recorded. Polysomnography and HRV were repeated after 1 year of treatment with VNS. Polysomnography, HRV and cognitive event related potentials were compared between VNS responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non‐responders. Results Fifteen out of 30 patients became VNS responders after 1 year of VNS treatment. Prior to treatment with VNS, the amount of deep sleep (NREM 3), the HRV high frequency (HF) power and the P3b amplitude were significantly different in responders compared to non‐responders (P = 0.007; P = 0.001; P = 0.03). Conclusion Three neurophysiological parameters, NREM 3, HRV HF and P3b amplitude, were found to be significantly different in DRE patients who became responders to VNS treatment prior to initiation of their treatment with VNS. These non‐invasive recordings may be used as characteristics for response in future studies and help avoid unsuccessful implantations. Mechanistically these findings may be related to changes in brain regions involved in the so‐called vagal afferent network.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-5101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ene.14270</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32310326</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Amplitudes ; Cognitive ability ; Drug resistance ; Epilepsy ; Event-related potentials ; Heart rate ; heart rate variability ; Implantation ; neurostimulation ; NREM sleep ; P3 evoked potential ; Patients ; polysomnography ; Seizures ; Sensory neurons ; Sleep ; Stimulation ; Surgery ; Therapy ; Vagus nerve</subject><ispartof>European journal of neurology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1178-1189</ispartof><rights>2020 European Academy of Neurology</rights><rights>2020 European Academy of Neurology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 European Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b75cb864399b4c44dd15b6da1e0fb651ed27aacce184cc9882e7d83aa71ff7023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b75cb864399b4c44dd15b6da1e0fb651ed27aacce184cc9882e7d83aa71ff7023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0621-9129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fene.14270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fene.14270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32310326$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hödl, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrette, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurs, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrette, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadeyne, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewaele, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauwe, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proesmans, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raedt, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonck, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Neurophysiological investigations of drug resistant epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation to differentiate responders from non‐responders</title><title>European journal of neurology</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><description>Background and purpose In patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE), up to a third of patients will eventually not respond to the therapy. As VNS therapy requires surgery for device implantation, prediction of response prior to surgery is desirable. It is hypothesized that neurophysiological investigations related to the mechanisms of action of VNS may help to differentiate VNS responders from non‐responders prior to the initiation of therapy. Methods In a prospective series of DRE patients, polysomnography, heart rate variability (HRV) and cognitive event related potentials were recorded. Polysomnography and HRV were repeated after 1 year of treatment with VNS. Polysomnography, HRV and cognitive event related potentials were compared between VNS responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non‐responders. Results Fifteen out of 30 patients became VNS responders after 1 year of VNS treatment. Prior to treatment with VNS, the amount of deep sleep (NREM 3), the HRV high frequency (HF) power and the P3b amplitude were significantly different in responders compared to non‐responders (P = 0.007; P = 0.001; P = 0.03). Conclusion Three neurophysiological parameters, NREM 3, HRV HF and P3b amplitude, were found to be significantly different in DRE patients who became responders to VNS treatment prior to initiation of their treatment with VNS. These non‐invasive recordings may be used as characteristics for response in future studies and help avoid unsuccessful implantations. Mechanistically these findings may be related to changes in brain regions involved in the so‐called vagal afferent network.</description><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>heart rate variability</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>neurostimulation</subject><subject>NREM sleep</subject><subject>P3 evoked potential</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>polysomnography</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>Sensory neurons</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Vagus nerve</subject><issn>1351-5101</issn><issn>1468-1331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhyNERf_AgRdAlrjAIa3HdhLvEVULRaraC5wtxx5vXSV2sJOt9tZH4AF4Op4Et1tAQsIXW6PPn2bmV1WvgZ5COWcY8BQE6-iz6ghEK2vgHJ6XN2-gboDCYXWc8y2llHWMvqgOOeNAOWuPqh9XuKQ43eyyj0PceKMH4sMW8-w3evYxZBIdsWnZkITZ51mHmeDkB5zyjkwFwTBnMifUM1py5-cbstWbJZOAaYukeMZleDSRORLrncNUvviCPxinGCymTFyKIwkx_Lz__rf6sjpwesj46uk-qb5-XH85v6gvrz99Pv9wWRsuJa37rjG9bAVfrXphhLAWmr61GpC6vm0ALeu0NgZBCmNWUjLsrORad-BcRxk_qd7tvVOK35Yyuxp9NjgMOmBcsmJ8xUQLArqCvv0HvY1LCqU7xQS0UNqQUKj3e8qkmHNCp6bkR512Cqh6iEyVyNRjZIV982Rc-hHtH_J3RgU42wN3Zeu7_5vU-mq9V_4CN-qmRQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Hödl, S.</creator><creator>Carrette, S.</creator><creator>Meurs, A.</creator><creator>Carrette, E.</creator><creator>Mertens, A.</creator><creator>Gadeyne, S.</creator><creator>Goossens, L.</creator><creator>Dewaele, F.</creator><creator>Bouckaert, C.</creator><creator>Dauwe, I.</creator><creator>Proesmans, S.</creator><creator>Raedt, R.</creator><creator>Boon, P.</creator><creator>Vonck, K.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0621-9129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Neurophysiological investigations of drug resistant epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation to differentiate responders from non‐responders</title><author>Hödl, S. ; Carrette, S. ; Meurs, A. ; Carrette, E. ; Mertens, A. ; Gadeyne, S. ; Goossens, L. ; Dewaele, F. ; Bouckaert, C. ; Dauwe, I. ; Proesmans, S. ; Raedt, R. ; Boon, P. ; Vonck, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b75cb864399b4c44dd15b6da1e0fb651ed27aacce184cc9882e7d83aa71ff7023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>heart rate variability</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>neurostimulation</topic><topic>NREM sleep</topic><topic>P3 evoked potential</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>polysomnography</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>Sensory neurons</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Vagus nerve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hödl, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrette, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurs, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrette, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertens, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadeyne, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goossens, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewaele, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouckaert, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauwe, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proesmans, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raedt, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boon, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonck, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hödl, S.</au><au>Carrette, S.</au><au>Meurs, A.</au><au>Carrette, E.</au><au>Mertens, A.</au><au>Gadeyne, S.</au><au>Goossens, L.</au><au>Dewaele, F.</au><au>Bouckaert, C.</au><au>Dauwe, I.</au><au>Proesmans, S.</au><au>Raedt, R.</au><au>Boon, P.</au><au>Vonck, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neurophysiological investigations of drug resistant epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation to differentiate responders from non‐responders</atitle><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1178</spage><epage>1189</epage><pages>1178-1189</pages><issn>1351-5101</issn><eissn>1468-1331</eissn><abstract>Background and purpose In patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for drug resistant epilepsy (DRE), up to a third of patients will eventually not respond to the therapy. As VNS therapy requires surgery for device implantation, prediction of response prior to surgery is desirable. It is hypothesized that neurophysiological investigations related to the mechanisms of action of VNS may help to differentiate VNS responders from non‐responders prior to the initiation of therapy. Methods In a prospective series of DRE patients, polysomnography, heart rate variability (HRV) and cognitive event related potentials were recorded. Polysomnography and HRV were repeated after 1 year of treatment with VNS. Polysomnography, HRV and cognitive event related potentials were compared between VNS responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and non‐responders. Results Fifteen out of 30 patients became VNS responders after 1 year of VNS treatment. Prior to treatment with VNS, the amount of deep sleep (NREM 3), the HRV high frequency (HF) power and the P3b amplitude were significantly different in responders compared to non‐responders (P = 0.007; P = 0.001; P = 0.03). Conclusion Three neurophysiological parameters, NREM 3, HRV HF and P3b amplitude, were found to be significantly different in DRE patients who became responders to VNS treatment prior to initiation of their treatment with VNS. These non‐invasive recordings may be used as characteristics for response in future studies and help avoid unsuccessful implantations. Mechanistically these findings may be related to changes in brain regions involved in the so‐called vagal afferent network.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32310326</pmid><doi>10.1111/ene.14270</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0621-9129</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-5101
ispartof European journal of neurology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.1178-1189
issn 1351-5101
1468-1331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2392461417
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Amplitudes
Cognitive ability
Drug resistance
Epilepsy
Event-related potentials
Heart rate
heart rate variability
Implantation
neurostimulation
NREM sleep
P3 evoked potential
Patients
polysomnography
Seizures
Sensory neurons
Sleep
Stimulation
Surgery
Therapy
Vagus nerve
title Neurophysiological investigations of drug resistant epilepsy patients treated with vagus nerve stimulation to differentiate responders from non‐responders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A06%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurophysiological%20investigations%20of%20drug%20resistant%20epilepsy%20patients%20treated%20with%20vagus%20nerve%20stimulation%20to%20differentiate%20responders%20from%20non%E2%80%90responders&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=H%C3%B6dl,%20S.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1178&rft.epage=1189&rft.pages=1178-1189&rft.issn=1351-5101&rft.eissn=1468-1331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ene.14270&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416186481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416186481&rft_id=info:pmid/32310326&rfr_iscdi=true