Behavioral niche partitioning reexamined: Do behavioral differences predict dietary differences in warblers?

Behavioral niche partitioning is an important and widely assumed mechanism for the coexistence of ecologically similar species. Here we assessed this mechanism by testing its core assumption, that evolved differences in foraging behavior correspond with differences in resources consumed. We combined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2020-08, Vol.101 (8), p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Kent, Cody M., Sherry, Thomas W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 101
creator Kent, Cody M.
Sherry, Thomas W.
description Behavioral niche partitioning is an important and widely assumed mechanism for the coexistence of ecologically similar species. Here we assessed this mechanism by testing its core assumption, that evolved differences in foraging behavior correspond with differences in resources consumed. We combined data on foraging behavior, available prey, and observed diets of five coexisting species of New World wood warblers (Parulidae), a system that has been foundational to our understanding of behavioral niche partitioning. Consistent with past work, we found that the five species differed markedly in their foraging behavior, enough that some species pairs hardly overlapped at all in foraging microhabitat. In contrast, the birds overlapped highly in diet, while exhibiting small, interpretable differences in resource use. The high overlap resulted mostly from all five species consuming numerous ants, a prey source that moves between microhabitats. To test the prediction that the large differences in foraging behavior explain the small dietary differences, we generated expected diets based on available prey and foraging microhabitat use. Consistent with niche partitioning as a coexistence mechanism, we found that the small dietary differences were explained by a combination of foraging microhabitat and available prey, but this pattern was driven by only a small number of prey taxa. Thus, we found mixed support for behavioral niche partitioning. Our results indicate that foraging behavior among these bird species helps explain subtle variation in diet, potentially facilitating coexistence. However, our results also revealed a weak relationship between foraging behavior and resource partitioning. Consequently, studies that rely solely on foraging behavior may greatly overestimate the degree of niche differentiation leading to erroneous conclusions. Overall, this study calls into question how and why these differences in foraging behavior evolved, and what role if any they play in facilitating coexistence.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.3077
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391976505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26936984</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26936984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3717-1b07e3da6b4fda438c3c342a70ad0a2dcd76ccdd9618133642c3f11094b191a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLAzEUhuEgiq1V8A8oBTfdTE1yMslkqaVeoOBGF65CJsnYlLnUpKP23zultYJgNtk8vBw-hM4JHhOM6bUz6zFgIQ5Qn0iQiSQCH6I-xoQmkqdZD53EuMDdIyw7Rj2ggBml0EejWzfXH74JuhzW3szdcKnDyq98U_v6bRic-9KVr509RUeFLqM72_0D9HI3fZ48JLOn-8fJzSwxIIhISI6FA6t5zgqrGWQGDDCqBdYWa2qNFdwYayUnGQHgjBooCMGS5UQSTWGARtvuMjTvrYsrVfloXFnq2jVtVBQkkYKnOO3o1R-6aNpQd9cpymiHaCrxb9CEJsbgCrUMvtJhrQhWm_VUt57arNfRy12wzStn9_Bnrg4kW_DpS7f-N6Smk9dd8GLrF3HVhL2nXAKXGYNvD1d_zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429762590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral niche partitioning reexamined: Do behavioral differences predict dietary differences in warblers?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Online service)</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Kent, Cody M. ; Sherry, Thomas W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kent, Cody M. ; Sherry, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><description>Behavioral niche partitioning is an important and widely assumed mechanism for the coexistence of ecologically similar species. Here we assessed this mechanism by testing its core assumption, that evolved differences in foraging behavior correspond with differences in resources consumed. We combined data on foraging behavior, available prey, and observed diets of five coexisting species of New World wood warblers (Parulidae), a system that has been foundational to our understanding of behavioral niche partitioning. Consistent with past work, we found that the five species differed markedly in their foraging behavior, enough that some species pairs hardly overlapped at all in foraging microhabitat. In contrast, the birds overlapped highly in diet, while exhibiting small, interpretable differences in resource use. The high overlap resulted mostly from all five species consuming numerous ants, a prey source that moves between microhabitats. To test the prediction that the large differences in foraging behavior explain the small dietary differences, we generated expected diets based on available prey and foraging microhabitat use. Consistent with niche partitioning as a coexistence mechanism, we found that the small dietary differences were explained by a combination of foraging microhabitat and available prey, but this pattern was driven by only a small number of prey taxa. Thus, we found mixed support for behavioral niche partitioning. Our results indicate that foraging behavior among these bird species helps explain subtle variation in diet, potentially facilitating coexistence. However, our results also revealed a weak relationship between foraging behavior and resource partitioning. Consequently, studies that rely solely on foraging behavior may greatly overestimate the degree of niche differentiation leading to erroneous conclusions. Overall, this study calls into question how and why these differences in foraging behavior evolved, and what role if any they play in facilitating coexistence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32304223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Ants ; available prey ; Birds ; Coexistence ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Feeding Behavior ; foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitats ; niche ; Niche overlap ; Niches ; Partitioning ; Parulidae ; Predatory Behavior ; Prey ; Resource partitioning ; Songbirds ; Species</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2020-08, Vol.101 (8), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2020 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2020 Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3717-1b07e3da6b4fda438c3c342a70ad0a2dcd76ccdd9618133642c3f11094b191a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3717-1b07e3da6b4fda438c3c342a70ad0a2dcd76ccdd9618133642c3f11094b191a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6764-8050</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26936984$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26936984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32304223$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kent, Cody M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherry, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral niche partitioning reexamined: Do behavioral differences predict dietary differences in warblers?</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>Behavioral niche partitioning is an important and widely assumed mechanism for the coexistence of ecologically similar species. Here we assessed this mechanism by testing its core assumption, that evolved differences in foraging behavior correspond with differences in resources consumed. We combined data on foraging behavior, available prey, and observed diets of five coexisting species of New World wood warblers (Parulidae), a system that has been foundational to our understanding of behavioral niche partitioning. Consistent with past work, we found that the five species differed markedly in their foraging behavior, enough that some species pairs hardly overlapped at all in foraging microhabitat. In contrast, the birds overlapped highly in diet, while exhibiting small, interpretable differences in resource use. The high overlap resulted mostly from all five species consuming numerous ants, a prey source that moves between microhabitats. To test the prediction that the large differences in foraging behavior explain the small dietary differences, we generated expected diets based on available prey and foraging microhabitat use. Consistent with niche partitioning as a coexistence mechanism, we found that the small dietary differences were explained by a combination of foraging microhabitat and available prey, but this pattern was driven by only a small number of prey taxa. Thus, we found mixed support for behavioral niche partitioning. Our results indicate that foraging behavior among these bird species helps explain subtle variation in diet, potentially facilitating coexistence. However, our results also revealed a weak relationship between foraging behavior and resource partitioning. Consequently, studies that rely solely on foraging behavior may greatly overestimate the degree of niche differentiation leading to erroneous conclusions. Overall, this study calls into question how and why these differences in foraging behavior evolved, and what role if any they play in facilitating coexistence.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants</subject><subject>available prey</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>niche</subject><subject>Niche overlap</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Parulidae</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Resource partitioning</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Species</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLAzEUhuEgiq1V8A8oBTfdTE1yMslkqaVeoOBGF65CJsnYlLnUpKP23zultYJgNtk8vBw-hM4JHhOM6bUz6zFgIQ5Qn0iQiSQCH6I-xoQmkqdZD53EuMDdIyw7Rj2ggBml0EejWzfXH74JuhzW3szdcKnDyq98U_v6bRic-9KVr509RUeFLqM72_0D9HI3fZ48JLOn-8fJzSwxIIhISI6FA6t5zgqrGWQGDDCqBdYWa2qNFdwYayUnGQHgjBooCMGS5UQSTWGARtvuMjTvrYsrVfloXFnq2jVtVBQkkYKnOO3o1R-6aNpQd9cpymiHaCrxb9CEJsbgCrUMvtJhrQhWm_VUt57arNfRy12wzStn9_Bnrg4kW_DpS7f-N6Smk9dd8GLrF3HVhL2nXAKXGYNvD1d_zQ</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Kent, Cody M.</creator><creator>Sherry, Thomas W.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-8050</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Behavioral niche partitioning reexamined</title><author>Kent, Cody M. ; Sherry, Thomas W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3717-1b07e3da6b4fda438c3c342a70ad0a2dcd76ccdd9618133642c3f11094b191a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants</topic><topic>available prey</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>niche</topic><topic>Niche overlap</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Parulidae</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Resource partitioning</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kent, Cody M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherry, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kent, Cody M.</au><au>Sherry, Thomas W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral niche partitioning reexamined: Do behavioral differences predict dietary differences in warblers?</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Behavioral niche partitioning is an important and widely assumed mechanism for the coexistence of ecologically similar species. Here we assessed this mechanism by testing its core assumption, that evolved differences in foraging behavior correspond with differences in resources consumed. We combined data on foraging behavior, available prey, and observed diets of five coexisting species of New World wood warblers (Parulidae), a system that has been foundational to our understanding of behavioral niche partitioning. Consistent with past work, we found that the five species differed markedly in their foraging behavior, enough that some species pairs hardly overlapped at all in foraging microhabitat. In contrast, the birds overlapped highly in diet, while exhibiting small, interpretable differences in resource use. The high overlap resulted mostly from all five species consuming numerous ants, a prey source that moves between microhabitats. To test the prediction that the large differences in foraging behavior explain the small dietary differences, we generated expected diets based on available prey and foraging microhabitat use. Consistent with niche partitioning as a coexistence mechanism, we found that the small dietary differences were explained by a combination of foraging microhabitat and available prey, but this pattern was driven by only a small number of prey taxa. Thus, we found mixed support for behavioral niche partitioning. Our results indicate that foraging behavior among these bird species helps explain subtle variation in diet, potentially facilitating coexistence. However, our results also revealed a weak relationship between foraging behavior and resource partitioning. Consequently, studies that rely solely on foraging behavior may greatly overestimate the degree of niche differentiation leading to erroneous conclusions. Overall, this study calls into question how and why these differences in foraging behavior evolved, and what role if any they play in facilitating coexistence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32304223</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.3077</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6764-8050</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2020-08, Vol.101 (8), p.1-10
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391976505
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library (Online service); JSTOR
subjects Animal behavior
Animals
Ants
available prey
Birds
Coexistence
Diet
Diet - veterinary
Feeding Behavior
foraging
Foraging behavior
Habitat utilization
Habitats
Microenvironments
Microhabitats
niche
Niche overlap
Niches
Partitioning
Parulidae
Predatory Behavior
Prey
Resource partitioning
Songbirds
Species
title Behavioral niche partitioning reexamined: Do behavioral differences predict dietary differences in warblers?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A26%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20niche%20partitioning%20reexamined:%20Do%20behavioral%20differences%20predict%20dietary%20differences%20in%20warblers?&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Kent,%20Cody%20M.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.3077&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26936984%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429762590&rft_id=info:pmid/32304223&rft_jstor_id=26936984&rfr_iscdi=true