Implementing Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions in the Republic of Moldova—a feasibility study

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN) approach in primary healthcare in the Republic of Moldova. Methods According to our published a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2020-12, Vol.30 (6), p.1146-1151
Hauptverfasser: Laatikainen, Tiina, Inglin, Laura, Collins, Dylan, Ciobanu, Angela, Curocichin, Ghenadie, Salaru, Virginia, Zatic, Tatiana, Anisei, Angela, Chiosa, Diana, Munteanu, Maria, Alexa, Zinaida, Farrington, Jill
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1151
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1146
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 30
creator Laatikainen, Tiina
Inglin, Laura
Collins, Dylan
Ciobanu, Angela
Curocichin, Ghenadie
Salaru, Virginia
Zatic, Tatiana
Anisei, Angela
Chiosa, Diana
Munteanu, Maria
Alexa, Zinaida
Farrington, Jill
description Abstract Background The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN) approach in primary healthcare in the Republic of Moldova. Methods According to our published a priori methods, 20 primary care clinics were randomized to 10 intervention and 10 control clinics. The intervention consisted of implementation of adapted WHO PEN guidelines and structured training for health workers; the control clinics continued with usual care. Data were gathered from paper-based patient records in July 2017 and August 2018 resulting in a total of 1174 and 995 patients in intervention and control clinics at baseline and 1329 and 1256 at follow-up. Pre-defined indicators describing assessment of risk factors and total cardiovascular risk, prescribing medications and treatment outcomes were calculated. Differences between baseline and follow-up as well as between intervention and control clinics were calculated using logistic and linear regression models and by assessing interaction effects. Results Improvements were seen in recording smoking status, activity to measure HbA1c among diabetes patients and achieving control in hypertension treatment. Improvement was also seen in identification of patients with hypertension or diabetes. Less improvement or even deterioration was seen in assessing total risk or prescribing statins for high-risk patients. Conclusions It is feasible to evaluate the quality and management of patients with non-communicable diseases in low-resource settings from routine data. Modest improvements in risk factor identification and management can be achieved in a relatively short period of time.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391975096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2391975096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-61631962997ed9a60ea7167a627354e98fb8807d874c8571ee8da11703defd603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhq2Kqvdtl8gSG1ik9SXxZYlKoUdqoUIgsYucZFJcHDuN40qnKx6iD9Bn6aPwJPjoHFiwYTWj0fd_GulH6JiSE0o0P4U0jak5bX8YQ7jcQnu0FGXBBfn2Iu-U0IIywXbRfoy3hJBKKraDdjljWpVM7aGHxTA6GMDP1t_ga5NFN4BDj89jXB2Nwx-DL9owDMnb1jQO8DsbwUTACz_DdL-igo_PT9bj-Tvgz5AfcrZdSa6C68K9-fXz0eA-Z2xjnZ2XOM6pWx6i7d64CEebeYC-vj__cnZRXH76sDh7e1m0XMu5EFRwqgXTWkKnjSBgJBXSCCZ5VYJWfaMUkZ2SZasqSQFUZyiVhHfQd4LwA_R67R2ncJcgzvVgYwvOGQ8hxZpxTbWsiBYZffUPehvS5PN3NSuloFW28kydrKl2CjFO0NfjZAczLWtK6lUr9bqVetNKDrzcaFMzQPcX_1NDBt6sgZDG_8l-AxBGm2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476157033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions in the Republic of Moldova—a feasibility study</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Laatikainen, Tiina ; Inglin, Laura ; Collins, Dylan ; Ciobanu, Angela ; Curocichin, Ghenadie ; Salaru, Virginia ; Zatic, Tatiana ; Anisei, Angela ; Chiosa, Diana ; Munteanu, Maria ; Alexa, Zinaida ; Farrington, Jill</creator><creatorcontrib>Laatikainen, Tiina ; Inglin, Laura ; Collins, Dylan ; Ciobanu, Angela ; Curocichin, Ghenadie ; Salaru, Virginia ; Zatic, Tatiana ; Anisei, Angela ; Chiosa, Diana ; Munteanu, Maria ; Alexa, Zinaida ; Farrington, Jill</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN) approach in primary healthcare in the Republic of Moldova. Methods According to our published a priori methods, 20 primary care clinics were randomized to 10 intervention and 10 control clinics. The intervention consisted of implementation of adapted WHO PEN guidelines and structured training for health workers; the control clinics continued with usual care. Data were gathered from paper-based patient records in July 2017 and August 2018 resulting in a total of 1174 and 995 patients in intervention and control clinics at baseline and 1329 and 1256 at follow-up. Pre-defined indicators describing assessment of risk factors and total cardiovascular risk, prescribing medications and treatment outcomes were calculated. Differences between baseline and follow-up as well as between intervention and control clinics were calculated using logistic and linear regression models and by assessing interaction effects. Results Improvements were seen in recording smoking status, activity to measure HbA1c among diabetes patients and achieving control in hypertension treatment. Improvement was also seen in identification of patients with hypertension or diabetes. Less improvement or even deterioration was seen in assessing total risk or prescribing statins for high-risk patients. Conclusions It is feasible to evaluate the quality and management of patients with non-communicable diseases in low-resource settings from routine data. Modest improvements in risk factor identification and management can be achieved in a relatively short period of time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32298428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular diseases ; Clinics ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Disease ; Evaluation ; Feasibility Studies ; Health care ; Health risks ; Health services ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hypertension - drug therapy ; Hypertension - epidemiology ; Intervention ; Medical personnel ; Medical treatment ; Moldova ; Noncommunicable Diseases - epidemiology ; Noncommunicable Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Patients ; Primary care ; Public health ; Quality ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Resource management ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Risk groups ; Risk management ; Smoking ; Statins</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2020-12, Vol.30 (6), p.1146-1151</ispartof><rights>World Health Organization, 2020. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted the Publisher permission for the reproduction of this article. 2020</rights><rights>World Health Organization, 2020. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted the Publisher permission for the reproduction of this article.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-61631962997ed9a60ea7167a627354e98fb8807d874c8571ee8da11703defd603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-61631962997ed9a60ea7167a627354e98fb8807d874c8571ee8da11703defd603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6614-4782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1598,27845,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laatikainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inglin, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciobanu, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curocichin, Ghenadie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salaru, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zatic, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anisei, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiosa, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munteanu, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexa, Zinaida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, Jill</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions in the Republic of Moldova—a feasibility study</title><title>European journal of public health</title><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN) approach in primary healthcare in the Republic of Moldova. Methods According to our published a priori methods, 20 primary care clinics were randomized to 10 intervention and 10 control clinics. The intervention consisted of implementation of adapted WHO PEN guidelines and structured training for health workers; the control clinics continued with usual care. Data were gathered from paper-based patient records in July 2017 and August 2018 resulting in a total of 1174 and 995 patients in intervention and control clinics at baseline and 1329 and 1256 at follow-up. Pre-defined indicators describing assessment of risk factors and total cardiovascular risk, prescribing medications and treatment outcomes were calculated. Differences between baseline and follow-up as well as between intervention and control clinics were calculated using logistic and linear regression models and by assessing interaction effects. Results Improvements were seen in recording smoking status, activity to measure HbA1c among diabetes patients and achieving control in hypertension treatment. Improvement was also seen in identification of patients with hypertension or diabetes. Less improvement or even deterioration was seen in assessing total risk or prescribing statins for high-risk patients. Conclusions It is feasible to evaluate the quality and management of patients with non-communicable diseases in low-resource settings from routine data. Modest improvements in risk factor identification and management can be achieved in a relatively short period of time.</description><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypertension - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Moldova</subject><subject>Noncommunicable Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Noncommunicable Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Statins</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhq2Kqvdtl8gSG1ik9SXxZYlKoUdqoUIgsYucZFJcHDuN40qnKx6iD9Bn6aPwJPjoHFiwYTWj0fd_GulH6JiSE0o0P4U0jak5bX8YQ7jcQnu0FGXBBfn2Iu-U0IIywXbRfoy3hJBKKraDdjljWpVM7aGHxTA6GMDP1t_ga5NFN4BDj89jXB2Nwx-DL9owDMnb1jQO8DsbwUTACz_DdL-igo_PT9bj-Tvgz5AfcrZdSa6C68K9-fXz0eA-Z2xjnZ2XOM6pWx6i7d64CEebeYC-vj__cnZRXH76sDh7e1m0XMu5EFRwqgXTWkKnjSBgJBXSCCZ5VYJWfaMUkZ2SZasqSQFUZyiVhHfQd4LwA_R67R2ncJcgzvVgYwvOGQ8hxZpxTbWsiBYZffUPehvS5PN3NSuloFW28kydrKl2CjFO0NfjZAczLWtK6lUr9bqVetNKDrzcaFMzQPcX_1NDBt6sgZDG_8l-AxBGm2A</recordid><startdate>20201211</startdate><enddate>20201211</enddate><creator>Laatikainen, Tiina</creator><creator>Inglin, Laura</creator><creator>Collins, Dylan</creator><creator>Ciobanu, Angela</creator><creator>Curocichin, Ghenadie</creator><creator>Salaru, Virginia</creator><creator>Zatic, Tatiana</creator><creator>Anisei, Angela</creator><creator>Chiosa, Diana</creator><creator>Munteanu, Maria</creator><creator>Alexa, Zinaida</creator><creator>Farrington, Jill</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-4782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201211</creationdate><title>Implementing Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions in the Republic of Moldova—a feasibility study</title><author>Laatikainen, Tiina ; Inglin, Laura ; Collins, Dylan ; Ciobanu, Angela ; Curocichin, Ghenadie ; Salaru, Virginia ; Zatic, Tatiana ; Anisei, Angela ; Chiosa, Diana ; Munteanu, Maria ; Alexa, Zinaida ; Farrington, Jill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-61631962997ed9a60ea7167a627354e98fb8807d874c8571ee8da11703defd603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypertension - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Moldova</topic><topic>Noncommunicable Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Noncommunicable Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Statins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laatikainen, Tiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inglin, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciobanu, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curocichin, Ghenadie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salaru, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zatic, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anisei, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiosa, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munteanu, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexa, Zinaida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrington, Jill</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laatikainen, Tiina</au><au>Inglin, Laura</au><au>Collins, Dylan</au><au>Ciobanu, Angela</au><au>Curocichin, Ghenadie</au><au>Salaru, Virginia</au><au>Zatic, Tatiana</au><au>Anisei, Angela</au><au>Chiosa, Diana</au><au>Munteanu, Maria</au><au>Alexa, Zinaida</au><au>Farrington, Jill</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions in the Republic of Moldova—a feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-12-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1146</spage><epage>1151</epage><pages>1146-1151</pages><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN) approach in primary healthcare in the Republic of Moldova. Methods According to our published a priori methods, 20 primary care clinics were randomized to 10 intervention and 10 control clinics. The intervention consisted of implementation of adapted WHO PEN guidelines and structured training for health workers; the control clinics continued with usual care. Data were gathered from paper-based patient records in July 2017 and August 2018 resulting in a total of 1174 and 995 patients in intervention and control clinics at baseline and 1329 and 1256 at follow-up. Pre-defined indicators describing assessment of risk factors and total cardiovascular risk, prescribing medications and treatment outcomes were calculated. Differences between baseline and follow-up as well as between intervention and control clinics were calculated using logistic and linear regression models and by assessing interaction effects. Results Improvements were seen in recording smoking status, activity to measure HbA1c among diabetes patients and achieving control in hypertension treatment. Improvement was also seen in identification of patients with hypertension or diabetes. Less improvement or even deterioration was seen in assessing total risk or prescribing statins for high-risk patients. Conclusions It is feasible to evaluate the quality and management of patients with non-communicable diseases in low-resource settings from routine data. Modest improvements in risk factor identification and management can be achieved in a relatively short period of time.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32298428</pmid><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-4782</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2020-12, Vol.30 (6), p.1146-1151
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391975096
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Cardiovascular diseases
Clinics
Delivery of Health Care
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Disease
Evaluation
Feasibility Studies
Health care
Health risks
Health services
Humans
Hypertension
Hypertension - drug therapy
Hypertension - epidemiology
Intervention
Medical personnel
Medical treatment
Moldova
Noncommunicable Diseases - epidemiology
Noncommunicable Diseases - prevention & control
Patients
Primary care
Public health
Quality
Regression analysis
Regression models
Resource management
Risk analysis
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Risk groups
Risk management
Smoking
Statins
title Implementing Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Interventions in the Republic of Moldova—a feasibility study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20Package%20of%20Essential%20Non-communicable%20Disease%20Interventions%C2%A0in%20the%20Republic%20of%20Moldova%E2%80%94a%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Laatikainen,%20Tiina&rft.date=2020-12-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1146&rft.epage=1151&rft.pages=1146-1151&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2391975096%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476157033&rft_id=info:pmid/32298428&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckaa037&rfr_iscdi=true