Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal vs robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: Assessment of short‐ and long‐term outcomes

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal vs robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: Assessment of short‐ and long‐term outcomes

Background In this study, we aimed to compare short‐ and long‐term outcomes between laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (L‐TEP) and robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R‐TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Methods Patients were classified into two groups: L‐TEP and R‐TAPP. The groups were case‐matched...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery 2020-08, Vol.16 (4), p.e2111-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Aghayeva, Afag, Benlice, Cigdem, Bilgin, Ismail A., Bengur, Fuat B., Bas, Mustafa, Kirbiyik, Ebru, Aytac, Erman, Baca, Bilgi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Body size
Demographics
groin pain
hernia recurrence
Hernias
Hospital costs
laparoscopic TEP
Laparoscopy
robotic TAPP
Robotics
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In this study, we aimed to compare short‐ and long‐term outcomes between laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (L‐TEP) and robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (R‐TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. Methods Patients were classified into two groups: L‐TEP and R‐TAPP. The groups were case‐matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Results Out of 86 patients, 43 patients were matched in each group based on the study criteria. Demographics were comparable between the groups. Operative time was significantly longer for the R‐TAPP compared to L‐TEP (129.1 ± 47.2 min vs 92.5 ± 28.3 min; P 
ISSN:1478-5951
1478-596X
DOI:10.1002/rcs.2111