Variability Between Direct and Indirect Targeting of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus

Preoperative thalamic targeting methods have historically relied on indirect targeting techniques that do not fully account for variances in anatomy or for thalamic atrophy in epilepsy. We aimed to address variability noted between traditional indirect targeting and direct targeting methods for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2020-07, Vol.139, p.e70-e77
Hauptverfasser: Grewal, Sanjeet S., Middlebrooks, Erik H., Okromelidze, Lela, Gosden, Grant P., Tatum, William O., Lundstrom, Brian N., Worrell, Gregory A., Wharen, Robert E., Van Gompel, Jamie J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e77
container_issue
container_start_page e70
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 139
creator Grewal, Sanjeet S.
Middlebrooks, Erik H.
Okromelidze, Lela
Gosden, Grant P.
Tatum, William O.
Lundstrom, Brian N.
Worrell, Gregory A.
Wharen, Robert E.
Van Gompel, Jamie J.
description Preoperative thalamic targeting methods have historically relied on indirect targeting techniques that do not fully account for variances in anatomy or for thalamic atrophy in epilepsy. We aimed to address variability noted between traditional indirect targeting and direct targeting methods for the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT). Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing ANT deep brain stimulator placement were evaluated (30 thalamic nuclei). Direct ANT targeting was performed using a fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery sequence and compared with standard stereotactic coordinates. Thalamic volumes were calculated for each patient, and degree of thalamic volume loss was assessed compared with matched control subjects. Vertex analysis was performed to assess shape changes in the thalamus compared with age- and sex-matched subjects. There was significant variation between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and z-axis on both sides. On the left, the direct target was located at y = 2 ± 1.3 mm and z = 9.3 ± 1.8 mm (both P = 0.02). On the right, the direct target was located at y = 2.9 ± 1.8 mm and z = 9.2 ± 2 mm (both P ≤ 0.0003). There was no significant difference in the x-coordinate on either side (P > 0.5). Additionally, there was a correlation between thalamic volume and difference between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and the z-axis. We showed a significant difference in direct and indirect targeting in the y-axis and z-axis when targeting the ANT for deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. This difference is correlated to thalamic volume, with a larger difference noted in patients with thalamic atrophy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391972500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875020305787</els_id><sourcerecordid>2391972500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3bfe8f9c9a43da536f42a276fcb1823a1f4937adf11ed5184b20f5bf3c46feed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EolXpD7BAWbJp8COJE4lNKa9KFWwKEivLccatq8QpdkLVvydVSpfMZmau7lxpDkLXBIcEk-RuE-4stCHFFIeYdRo_Q0OS8nSS8iQ7P80xHqCx9xvcFSNRytklGjDKMOWMDtHXp3RG5qY0zT54gGYHYINH40A1gbRFMLdFvyylW0Fj7CqoddCsIZjaBpypXfDWqhJa_6cv17KUVeuv0IWWpYfxsY_Qx_PTcvY6Wby_zGfTxUSxOGkmLNeQ6kxlMmKFjFmiIyopT7TKSUqZJDrKGJeFJgSKmKRRTrGOc81UlGiAgo3QbZ-7dfV3C74RlfEKylJaqFsvKMtIxmncvT9CtLcqV3vvQIutM5V0e0GwOFAVG3GgKg5UBWadxrujm2N-m1dQnE7-GHaG-94A3Zc_BpzwyoBV0JMTRW3-y_8FgkGJPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391972500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability Between Direct and Indirect Targeting of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Grewal, Sanjeet S. ; Middlebrooks, Erik H. ; Okromelidze, Lela ; Gosden, Grant P. ; Tatum, William O. ; Lundstrom, Brian N. ; Worrell, Gregory A. ; Wharen, Robert E. ; Van Gompel, Jamie J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Sanjeet S. ; Middlebrooks, Erik H. ; Okromelidze, Lela ; Gosden, Grant P. ; Tatum, William O. ; Lundstrom, Brian N. ; Worrell, Gregory A. ; Wharen, Robert E. ; Van Gompel, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative thalamic targeting methods have historically relied on indirect targeting techniques that do not fully account for variances in anatomy or for thalamic atrophy in epilepsy. We aimed to address variability noted between traditional indirect targeting and direct targeting methods for the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT). Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing ANT deep brain stimulator placement were evaluated (30 thalamic nuclei). Direct ANT targeting was performed using a fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery sequence and compared with standard stereotactic coordinates. Thalamic volumes were calculated for each patient, and degree of thalamic volume loss was assessed compared with matched control subjects. Vertex analysis was performed to assess shape changes in the thalamus compared with age- and sex-matched subjects. There was significant variation between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and z-axis on both sides. On the left, the direct target was located at y = 2 ± 1.3 mm and z = 9.3 ± 1.8 mm (both P = 0.02). On the right, the direct target was located at y = 2.9 ± 1.8 mm and z = 9.2 ± 2 mm (both P ≤ 0.0003). There was no significant difference in the x-coordinate on either side (P &gt; 0.5). Additionally, there was a correlation between thalamic volume and difference between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and the z-axis. We showed a significant difference in direct and indirect targeting in the y-axis and z-axis when targeting the ANT for deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. This difference is correlated to thalamic volume, with a larger difference noted in patients with thalamic atrophy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32302732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ANT ; Anterior nucleus thalamus ; Deep brain stimulation ; Direct targeting</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2020-07, Vol.139, p.e70-e77</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3bfe8f9c9a43da536f42a276fcb1823a1f4937adf11ed5184b20f5bf3c46feed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3bfe8f9c9a43da536f42a276fcb1823a1f4937adf11ed5184b20f5bf3c46feed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4307-7062 ; 0000-0002-4418-9605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875020305787$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32302732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Sanjeet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middlebrooks, Erik H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okromelidze, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosden, Grant P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatum, William O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundstrom, Brian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrell, Gregory A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wharen, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gompel, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><title>Variability Between Direct and Indirect Targeting of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Preoperative thalamic targeting methods have historically relied on indirect targeting techniques that do not fully account for variances in anatomy or for thalamic atrophy in epilepsy. We aimed to address variability noted between traditional indirect targeting and direct targeting methods for the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT). Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing ANT deep brain stimulator placement were evaluated (30 thalamic nuclei). Direct ANT targeting was performed using a fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery sequence and compared with standard stereotactic coordinates. Thalamic volumes were calculated for each patient, and degree of thalamic volume loss was assessed compared with matched control subjects. Vertex analysis was performed to assess shape changes in the thalamus compared with age- and sex-matched subjects. There was significant variation between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and z-axis on both sides. On the left, the direct target was located at y = 2 ± 1.3 mm and z = 9.3 ± 1.8 mm (both P = 0.02). On the right, the direct target was located at y = 2.9 ± 1.8 mm and z = 9.2 ± 2 mm (both P ≤ 0.0003). There was no significant difference in the x-coordinate on either side (P &gt; 0.5). Additionally, there was a correlation between thalamic volume and difference between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and the z-axis. We showed a significant difference in direct and indirect targeting in the y-axis and z-axis when targeting the ANT for deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. This difference is correlated to thalamic volume, with a larger difference noted in patients with thalamic atrophy.</description><subject>ANT</subject><subject>Anterior nucleus thalamus</subject><subject>Deep brain stimulation</subject><subject>Direct targeting</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EolXpD7BAWbJp8COJE4lNKa9KFWwKEivLccatq8QpdkLVvydVSpfMZmau7lxpDkLXBIcEk-RuE-4stCHFFIeYdRo_Q0OS8nSS8iQ7P80xHqCx9xvcFSNRytklGjDKMOWMDtHXp3RG5qY0zT54gGYHYINH40A1gbRFMLdFvyylW0Fj7CqoddCsIZjaBpypXfDWqhJa_6cv17KUVeuv0IWWpYfxsY_Qx_PTcvY6Wby_zGfTxUSxOGkmLNeQ6kxlMmKFjFmiIyopT7TKSUqZJDrKGJeFJgSKmKRRTrGOc81UlGiAgo3QbZ-7dfV3C74RlfEKylJaqFsvKMtIxmncvT9CtLcqV3vvQIutM5V0e0GwOFAVG3GgKg5UBWadxrujm2N-m1dQnE7-GHaG-94A3Zc_BpzwyoBV0JMTRW3-y_8FgkGJPg</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Grewal, Sanjeet S.</creator><creator>Middlebrooks, Erik H.</creator><creator>Okromelidze, Lela</creator><creator>Gosden, Grant P.</creator><creator>Tatum, William O.</creator><creator>Lundstrom, Brian N.</creator><creator>Worrell, Gregory A.</creator><creator>Wharen, Robert E.</creator><creator>Van Gompel, Jamie J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4307-7062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-9605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Variability Between Direct and Indirect Targeting of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus</title><author>Grewal, Sanjeet S. ; Middlebrooks, Erik H. ; Okromelidze, Lela ; Gosden, Grant P. ; Tatum, William O. ; Lundstrom, Brian N. ; Worrell, Gregory A. ; Wharen, Robert E. ; Van Gompel, Jamie J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-3bfe8f9c9a43da536f42a276fcb1823a1f4937adf11ed5184b20f5bf3c46feed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ANT</topic><topic>Anterior nucleus thalamus</topic><topic>Deep brain stimulation</topic><topic>Direct targeting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Sanjeet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middlebrooks, Erik H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okromelidze, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosden, Grant P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatum, William O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundstrom, Brian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrell, Gregory A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wharen, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gompel, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grewal, Sanjeet S.</au><au>Middlebrooks, Erik H.</au><au>Okromelidze, Lela</au><au>Gosden, Grant P.</au><au>Tatum, William O.</au><au>Lundstrom, Brian N.</au><au>Worrell, Gregory A.</au><au>Wharen, Robert E.</au><au>Van Gompel, Jamie J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability Between Direct and Indirect Targeting of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>139</volume><spage>e70</spage><epage>e77</epage><pages>e70-e77</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Preoperative thalamic targeting methods have historically relied on indirect targeting techniques that do not fully account for variances in anatomy or for thalamic atrophy in epilepsy. We aimed to address variability noted between traditional indirect targeting and direct targeting methods for the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT). Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing ANT deep brain stimulator placement were evaluated (30 thalamic nuclei). Direct ANT targeting was performed using a fast gray matter acquisition T1 inversion recovery sequence and compared with standard stereotactic coordinates. Thalamic volumes were calculated for each patient, and degree of thalamic volume loss was assessed compared with matched control subjects. Vertex analysis was performed to assess shape changes in the thalamus compared with age- and sex-matched subjects. There was significant variation between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and z-axis on both sides. On the left, the direct target was located at y = 2 ± 1.3 mm and z = 9.3 ± 1.8 mm (both P = 0.02). On the right, the direct target was located at y = 2.9 ± 1.8 mm and z = 9.2 ± 2 mm (both P ≤ 0.0003). There was no significant difference in the x-coordinate on either side (P &gt; 0.5). Additionally, there was a correlation between thalamic volume and difference between direct and indirect targets in the y-axis and the z-axis. We showed a significant difference in direct and indirect targeting in the y-axis and z-axis when targeting the ANT for deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. This difference is correlated to thalamic volume, with a larger difference noted in patients with thalamic atrophy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32302732</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.107</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4307-7062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-9605</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2020-07, Vol.139, p.e70-e77
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391972500
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ANT
Anterior nucleus thalamus
Deep brain stimulation
Direct targeting
title Variability Between Direct and Indirect Targeting of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T12%3A40%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20Between%20Direct%20and%20Indirect%20Targeting%20of%20the%20Anterior%20Nucleus%20of%20the%20Thalamus&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Grewal,%20Sanjeet%20S.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=139&rft.spage=e70&rft.epage=e77&rft.pages=e70-e77&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2391972500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391972500&rft_id=info:pmid/32302732&rft_els_id=S1878875020305787&rfr_iscdi=true