A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval
Is fentanyl and midazolam non-inferior to pethidine and diazepam in pain relief during oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation? A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial of 170 infertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation in an assisted reproduction centre. The wome...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reproductive biomedicine online 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.653-660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 660 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 653 |
container_title | Reproductive biomedicine online |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Lai, Shui Fan Lam, Mei Ting Li, Hang Wun Raymond Ng, Ernest Hung Yu |
description | Is fentanyl and midazolam non-inferior to pethidine and diazepam in pain relief during oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation?
A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial of 170 infertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation in an assisted reproduction centre. The women were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.1 mg fentanyl and 5 mg midazolam or 25 mg pethidine and 5 mg diazepam, plus paracervical block with 10 ml 1% lignocaine. The primary outcome was abdominal pain level during retrieval assessed by linear visual analogue scale from 0–10. Secondary outcomes included vaginal pain levels during and after retrieval and postoperative abdominal pain levels and side-effects, satisfaction level, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. A pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 1 for the difference in pain levels between two groups was set.
Vaginal and abdominal pain levels during retrieval were significantly lower in the fentanyl and midazolam group compared with the pethidine and diazepam group (per-protocol analysis, vaginal pain: 1.6 versus 4.3; mean difference: –2.7, 95% CI –3.7, –1.8; P < 0.001; abdominal pain: 2.9 versus 5.2; mean difference: –2.3, 95% CI –3.3 to –1.3; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). No differences were observed in these pain levels after retrieval. Most women experienced no postoperative side-effects. The fentanyl and midazolam group had better sedation level, satisfaction level on pain relief and satisfaction on the overall retrieval procedure than the pethidine and diazepam group. No significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups.
The fentanyl and midazolam group had significantly lower vaginal and abdominal pain levels during oocyte retrieval than the pethidine and diazepam group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391971913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1472648320300742</els_id><sourcerecordid>2391971913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4c1d652417cbf533fe566827a4a9290bfa1d5e389b56141256a2de1af84c0ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhiMEohd4ARbISzYJHjtXiU1VFahUiQ2sLcce0zly7OAkRec8CM-LT0_pkpXHnn8-a_QVxTvgFXBoP-6qNE6xElzwikPFBbwozqHuRNnWA7x8rnt5Vlwsy45z6HkvXxdnUohh6GR9Xvy5YkkHGyc6oGU2bqPHcvQUbL6GGEoKDhPFROuerYm0ZyZOs04UfjKHYdVh71kmsImsPkSvJ_ab1ns243pPlgI-Ni3pA86552Jis6bAEnpCx-z2SIrR7FfMj_kLfND-TfHKab_g26fzsvjx-eb79dfy7tuX2-uru9LIpl1LrA3YthE1dGZ0jZQOm7btRadrPYiBj06DbVD2w9i0UINoWi0sgnZ9bfio5WXx4cSdU_y14bKqiRaD3uuAcVuUkAMMHQwgc1ScoibFZUno1Jxo0mmvgKujD7VTRx_q6ENxUNlHHnr_xN_GCe3zyD8BOfDpFMC85QNhUoshDAYtJTSrspH-x_8L9tyfuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391971913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lai, Shui Fan ; Lam, Mei Ting ; Li, Hang Wun Raymond ; Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Shui Fan ; Lam, Mei Ting ; Li, Hang Wun Raymond ; Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Is fentanyl and midazolam non-inferior to pethidine and diazepam in pain relief during oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation?
A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial of 170 infertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation in an assisted reproduction centre. The women were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.1 mg fentanyl and 5 mg midazolam or 25 mg pethidine and 5 mg diazepam, plus paracervical block with 10 ml 1% lignocaine. The primary outcome was abdominal pain level during retrieval assessed by linear visual analogue scale from 0–10. Secondary outcomes included vaginal pain levels during and after retrieval and postoperative abdominal pain levels and side-effects, satisfaction level, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. A pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 1 for the difference in pain levels between two groups was set.
Vaginal and abdominal pain levels during retrieval were significantly lower in the fentanyl and midazolam group compared with the pethidine and diazepam group (per-protocol analysis, vaginal pain: 1.6 versus 4.3; mean difference: –2.7, 95% CI –3.7, –1.8; P < 0.001; abdominal pain: 2.9 versus 5.2; mean difference: –2.3, 95% CI –3.3 to –1.3; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). No differences were observed in these pain levels after retrieval. Most women experienced no postoperative side-effects. The fentanyl and midazolam group had better sedation level, satisfaction level on pain relief and satisfaction on the overall retrieval procedure than the pethidine and diazepam group. No significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups.
The fentanyl and midazolam group had significantly lower vaginal and abdominal pain levels during oocyte retrieval than the pethidine and diazepam group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32299734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesics - therapeutic use ; Conscious sedation ; Conscious Sedation - methods ; Diazepam - therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Fentanyl - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Meperidine - therapeutic use ; Midazolam - therapeutic use ; Oocyte retrieval ; Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects ; Oocyte Retrieval - methods ; Pain Management ; Pain Measurement ; Pain relief ; Pain, Procedural - drug therapy ; Pain, Procedural - etiology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.653-660</ispartof><rights>2020 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4c1d652417cbf533fe566827a4a9290bfa1d5e389b56141256a2de1af84c0ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4c1d652417cbf533fe566827a4a9290bfa1d5e389b56141256a2de1af84c0ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648320300742$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Shui Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Mei Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hang Wun Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>Is fentanyl and midazolam non-inferior to pethidine and diazepam in pain relief during oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation?
A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial of 170 infertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation in an assisted reproduction centre. The women were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.1 mg fentanyl and 5 mg midazolam or 25 mg pethidine and 5 mg diazepam, plus paracervical block with 10 ml 1% lignocaine. The primary outcome was abdominal pain level during retrieval assessed by linear visual analogue scale from 0–10. Secondary outcomes included vaginal pain levels during and after retrieval and postoperative abdominal pain levels and side-effects, satisfaction level, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. A pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 1 for the difference in pain levels between two groups was set.
Vaginal and abdominal pain levels during retrieval were significantly lower in the fentanyl and midazolam group compared with the pethidine and diazepam group (per-protocol analysis, vaginal pain: 1.6 versus 4.3; mean difference: –2.7, 95% CI –3.7, –1.8; P < 0.001; abdominal pain: 2.9 versus 5.2; mean difference: –2.3, 95% CI –3.3 to –1.3; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). No differences were observed in these pain levels after retrieval. Most women experienced no postoperative side-effects. The fentanyl and midazolam group had better sedation level, satisfaction level on pain relief and satisfaction on the overall retrieval procedure than the pethidine and diazepam group. No significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups.
The fentanyl and midazolam group had significantly lower vaginal and abdominal pain levels during oocyte retrieval than the pethidine and diazepam group.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Conscious sedation</subject><subject>Conscious Sedation - methods</subject><subject>Diazepam - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meperidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Midazolam - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Oocyte retrieval</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain relief</subject><subject>Pain, Procedural - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Procedural - etiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhiMEohd4ARbISzYJHjtXiU1VFahUiQ2sLcce0zly7OAkRec8CM-LT0_pkpXHnn8-a_QVxTvgFXBoP-6qNE6xElzwikPFBbwozqHuRNnWA7x8rnt5Vlwsy45z6HkvXxdnUohh6GR9Xvy5YkkHGyc6oGU2bqPHcvQUbL6GGEoKDhPFROuerYm0ZyZOs04UfjKHYdVh71kmsImsPkSvJ_ab1ns243pPlgI-Ni3pA86552Jis6bAEnpCx-z2SIrR7FfMj_kLfND-TfHKab_g26fzsvjx-eb79dfy7tuX2-uru9LIpl1LrA3YthE1dGZ0jZQOm7btRadrPYiBj06DbVD2w9i0UINoWi0sgnZ9bfio5WXx4cSdU_y14bKqiRaD3uuAcVuUkAMMHQwgc1ScoibFZUno1Jxo0mmvgKujD7VTRx_q6ENxUNlHHnr_xN_GCe3zyD8BOfDpFMC85QNhUoshDAYtJTSrspH-x_8L9tyfuQ</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Lai, Shui Fan</creator><creator>Lam, Mei Ting</creator><creator>Li, Hang Wun Raymond</creator><creator>Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval</title><author>Lai, Shui Fan ; Lam, Mei Ting ; Li, Hang Wun Raymond ; Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e4c1d652417cbf533fe566827a4a9290bfa1d5e389b56141256a2de1af84c0ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Conscious sedation</topic><topic>Conscious Sedation - methods</topic><topic>Diazepam - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meperidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Midazolam - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Oocyte retrieval</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain relief</topic><topic>Pain, Procedural - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Procedural - etiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Shui Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Mei Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hang Wun Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Shui Fan</au><au>Lam, Mei Ting</au><au>Li, Hang Wun Raymond</au><au>Ng, Ernest Hung Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>653-660</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>Is fentanyl and midazolam non-inferior to pethidine and diazepam in pain relief during oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation?
A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial of 170 infertile women undergoing oocyte retrieval under conscious sedation in an assisted reproduction centre. The women were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.1 mg fentanyl and 5 mg midazolam or 25 mg pethidine and 5 mg diazepam, plus paracervical block with 10 ml 1% lignocaine. The primary outcome was abdominal pain level during retrieval assessed by linear visual analogue scale from 0–10. Secondary outcomes included vaginal pain levels during and after retrieval and postoperative abdominal pain levels and side-effects, satisfaction level, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. A pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 1 for the difference in pain levels between two groups was set.
Vaginal and abdominal pain levels during retrieval were significantly lower in the fentanyl and midazolam group compared with the pethidine and diazepam group (per-protocol analysis, vaginal pain: 1.6 versus 4.3; mean difference: –2.7, 95% CI –3.7, –1.8; P < 0.001; abdominal pain: 2.9 versus 5.2; mean difference: –2.3, 95% CI –3.3 to –1.3; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). No differences were observed in these pain levels after retrieval. Most women experienced no postoperative side-effects. The fentanyl and midazolam group had better sedation level, satisfaction level on pain relief and satisfaction on the overall retrieval procedure than the pethidine and diazepam group. No significant differences were found in clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups.
The fentanyl and midazolam group had significantly lower vaginal and abdominal pain levels during oocyte retrieval than the pethidine and diazepam group.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32299734</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6483 |
ispartof | Reproductive biomedicine online, 2020-05, Vol.40 (5), p.653-660 |
issn | 1472-6483 1472-6491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2391971913 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Analgesics - therapeutic use Conscious sedation Conscious Sedation - methods Diazepam - therapeutic use Double-Blind Method Drug Therapy, Combination Female Fentanyl - therapeutic use Humans Meperidine - therapeutic use Midazolam - therapeutic use Oocyte retrieval Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects Oocyte Retrieval - methods Pain Management Pain Measurement Pain relief Pain, Procedural - drug therapy Pain, Procedural - etiology Treatment Outcome |
title | A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial comparing fentanyl and midazolam with pethidine and diazepam for pain relief during oocyte retrieval |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A44%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20double-blinded%20non-inferiority%20trial%20comparing%20fentanyl%20and%20midazolam%20with%20pethidine%20and%20diazepam%20for%20pain%20relief%20during%20oocyte%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Lai,%20Shui%20Fan&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=653-660&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2391971913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391971913&rft_id=info:pmid/32299734&rft_els_id=S1472648320300742&rfr_iscdi=true |