Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients
Purpose Due to a reported dose–response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, a greater interest in dose intensification on small boost volume arises. Considering the need of an appropriate target movements evaluation, this retrospective study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiologia medica 2021, Vol.126 (1), p.147-154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Radiologia medica |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Rosa, Consuelo Caravatta, Luciana Di Tommaso, Monica Fasciolo, David Gasparini, Lucrezia Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina Augurio, Antonietta Vinciguerra, Annamaria Vecchi, Claudio Genovesi, Domenico |
description | Purpose
Due to a reported dose–response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, a greater interest in dose intensification on small boost volume arises. Considering the need of an appropriate target movements evaluation, this retrospective study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for GTV and mesorectum organ motion (OM) evaluation, in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, in prone and supine position.
Methods
Thirty-two LARC patients were analyzed. GTV and mesorectum were delineated on MRI co-registrated with CT simulation. GTV and mesorectum OM was estimated on all CBCTs, performed during treatment, co-registrated with CT simulation. OM evaluation was obtained, as mean shift in left and right (L–R), postero–anterior (P–A) and cranio–caudal (Cr–C) directions. Volumes variability was calculated by DICE index.
Results
A total of 296 CBCTs were analyzed. Mean shifts of the GTV and mesorectum in prone position were − 0.16 cm and 0.15 cm in L–R direction, 0.28 cm and − 0.40 cm in P–A direction, and 0.14 cm and − 0.21 cm, in Cr–C direction; for supine position the mean shifts of the GTV were − 0.10 cm and 0.17 cm in R–L direction, 0.26 cm and − 0.23 cm in A–P direction, 0.09 cm and − 0.11 cm in Cr–C direction. Mean DICE index for GTV and mesorectum was 0.74 and 0.86, in prone position, and 0.78 and 0.89 in supine position, respectively.
Conclusion
GTV and mesorectum OM was less than 4 mm in all directions in both positions, with a 1 mm less deviation in supine position. CBCTs resulted effective for OM assessment, and it could be an appropriate method for the implementation on an intensification treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11547-020-01193-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2390652058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390652058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-762bd130eabc6fca3f42c802821248ca31d90887eb8721c9561b3bbb7c2656283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPJCEUhYlxou3jD8zCkLhxw3iBKqCWk46vxGQ2zpoARfW0qYISqkzaXy9t-0hm4Qpu7nfOvbkHoZ8UflEAeZkprStJgAEBShtOXvbQgiomiGgU30cLAM6J4oIdoqOcHwEqoNAcoEPOWCOhEQvULmPwxHozYBeHcZ58i6c4xFUy478N7mLCMa1MwEOc1jFg_2z62bx91wH30Zm-32DTPpvgijR5N5keu22V8FhAH6Z8gn50ps_-9P09Rn-vrx6Wt-T-z83d8vc9cVzWE5GC2ZZy8MY60TnDu4o5BUwxyipVato2oJT0VklGXVMLarm1VjomasEUP0YXO98xxafZ50kP6-x835vg45w14w2ImkG9Rc__Qx_jnELZTpdZsqok51uK7SiXYs7Jd3pM68GkjaagtxnoXQa6ZKDfMtAvRXT2bj3bwbefko-jF4DvgFxaYeXT1-xvbF8BOy6Sjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487447338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Rosa, Consuelo ; Caravatta, Luciana ; Di Tommaso, Monica ; Fasciolo, David ; Gasparini, Lucrezia ; Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina ; Augurio, Antonietta ; Vinciguerra, Annamaria ; Vecchi, Claudio ; Genovesi, Domenico</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Consuelo ; Caravatta, Luciana ; Di Tommaso, Monica ; Fasciolo, David ; Gasparini, Lucrezia ; Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina ; Augurio, Antonietta ; Vinciguerra, Annamaria ; Vecchi, Claudio ; Genovesi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Due to a reported dose–response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, a greater interest in dose intensification on small boost volume arises. Considering the need of an appropriate target movements evaluation, this retrospective study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for GTV and mesorectum organ motion (OM) evaluation, in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, in prone and supine position.
Methods
Thirty-two LARC patients were analyzed. GTV and mesorectum were delineated on MRI co-registrated with CT simulation. GTV and mesorectum OM was estimated on all CBCTs, performed during treatment, co-registrated with CT simulation. OM evaluation was obtained, as mean shift in left and right (L–R), postero–anterior (P–A) and cranio–caudal (Cr–C) directions. Volumes variability was calculated by DICE index.
Results
A total of 296 CBCTs were analyzed. Mean shifts of the GTV and mesorectum in prone position were − 0.16 cm and 0.15 cm in L–R direction, 0.28 cm and − 0.40 cm in P–A direction, and 0.14 cm and − 0.21 cm, in Cr–C direction; for supine position the mean shifts of the GTV were − 0.10 cm and 0.17 cm in R–L direction, 0.26 cm and − 0.23 cm in A–P direction, 0.09 cm and − 0.11 cm in Cr–C direction. Mean DICE index for GTV and mesorectum was 0.74 and 0.86, in prone position, and 0.78 and 0.89 in supine position, respectively.
Conclusion
GTV and mesorectum OM was less than 4 mm in all directions in both positions, with a 1 mm less deviation in supine position. CBCTs resulted effective for OM assessment, and it could be an appropriate method for the implementation on an intensification treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1826-6983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01193-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32297096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milan: Springer Milan</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amplification ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Interventional Radiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neuroradiology ; Organ Motion ; Patient Positioning ; Prone position ; Radiation therapy ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Supine position ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Radiologia medica, 2021, Vol.126 (1), p.147-154</ispartof><rights>Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2020</rights><rights>Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-762bd130eabc6fca3f42c802821248ca31d90887eb8721c9561b3bbb7c2656283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-762bd130eabc6fca3f42c802821248ca31d90887eb8721c9561b3bbb7c2656283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11547-020-01193-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11547-020-01193-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Consuelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caravatta, Luciana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Tommaso, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasciolo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparini, Lucrezia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augurio, Antonietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinciguerra, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovesi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><title>Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients</title><title>Radiologia medica</title><addtitle>Radiol med</addtitle><addtitle>Radiol Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
Due to a reported dose–response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, a greater interest in dose intensification on small boost volume arises. Considering the need of an appropriate target movements evaluation, this retrospective study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for GTV and mesorectum organ motion (OM) evaluation, in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, in prone and supine position.
Methods
Thirty-two LARC patients were analyzed. GTV and mesorectum were delineated on MRI co-registrated with CT simulation. GTV and mesorectum OM was estimated on all CBCTs, performed during treatment, co-registrated with CT simulation. OM evaluation was obtained, as mean shift in left and right (L–R), postero–anterior (P–A) and cranio–caudal (Cr–C) directions. Volumes variability was calculated by DICE index.
Results
A total of 296 CBCTs were analyzed. Mean shifts of the GTV and mesorectum in prone position were − 0.16 cm and 0.15 cm in L–R direction, 0.28 cm and − 0.40 cm in P–A direction, and 0.14 cm and − 0.21 cm, in Cr–C direction; for supine position the mean shifts of the GTV were − 0.10 cm and 0.17 cm in R–L direction, 0.26 cm and − 0.23 cm in A–P direction, 0.09 cm and − 0.11 cm in Cr–C direction. Mean DICE index for GTV and mesorectum was 0.74 and 0.86, in prone position, and 0.78 and 0.89 in supine position, respectively.
Conclusion
GTV and mesorectum OM was less than 4 mm in all directions in both positions, with a 1 mm less deviation in supine position. CBCTs resulted effective for OM assessment, and it could be an appropriate method for the implementation on an intensification treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Organ Motion</subject><subject>Patient Positioning</subject><subject>Prone position</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Supine position</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0033-8362</issn><issn>1826-6983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPJCEUhYlxou3jD8zCkLhxw3iBKqCWk46vxGQ2zpoARfW0qYISqkzaXy9t-0hm4Qpu7nfOvbkHoZ8UflEAeZkprStJgAEBShtOXvbQgiomiGgU30cLAM6J4oIdoqOcHwEqoNAcoEPOWCOhEQvULmPwxHozYBeHcZ58i6c4xFUy478N7mLCMa1MwEOc1jFg_2z62bx91wH30Zm-32DTPpvgijR5N5keu22V8FhAH6Z8gn50ps_-9P09Rn-vrx6Wt-T-z83d8vc9cVzWE5GC2ZZy8MY60TnDu4o5BUwxyipVato2oJT0VklGXVMLarm1VjomasEUP0YXO98xxafZ50kP6-x835vg45w14w2ImkG9Rc__Qx_jnELZTpdZsqok51uK7SiXYs7Jd3pM68GkjaagtxnoXQa6ZKDfMtAvRXT2bj3bwbefko-jF4DvgFxaYeXT1-xvbF8BOy6Sjg</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Rosa, Consuelo</creator><creator>Caravatta, Luciana</creator><creator>Di Tommaso, Monica</creator><creator>Fasciolo, David</creator><creator>Gasparini, Lucrezia</creator><creator>Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina</creator><creator>Augurio, Antonietta</creator><creator>Vinciguerra, Annamaria</creator><creator>Vecchi, Claudio</creator><creator>Genovesi, Domenico</creator><general>Springer Milan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients</title><author>Rosa, Consuelo ; Caravatta, Luciana ; Di Tommaso, Monica ; Fasciolo, David ; Gasparini, Lucrezia ; Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina ; Augurio, Antonietta ; Vinciguerra, Annamaria ; Vecchi, Claudio ; Genovesi, Domenico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-762bd130eabc6fca3f42c802821248ca31d90887eb8721c9561b3bbb7c2656283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Organ Motion</topic><topic>Patient Positioning</topic><topic>Prone position</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Supine position</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Consuelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caravatta, Luciana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Tommaso, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasciolo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparini, Lucrezia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augurio, Antonietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinciguerra, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vecchi, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovesi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiologia medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosa, Consuelo</au><au>Caravatta, Luciana</au><au>Di Tommaso, Monica</au><au>Fasciolo, David</au><au>Gasparini, Lucrezia</au><au>Di Guglielmo, Fiorella Cristina</au><au>Augurio, Antonietta</au><au>Vinciguerra, Annamaria</au><au>Vecchi, Claudio</au><au>Genovesi, Domenico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Radiologia medica</jtitle><stitle>Radiol med</stitle><addtitle>Radiol Med</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>147-154</pages><issn>0033-8362</issn><eissn>1826-6983</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Due to a reported dose–response relationship in rectal cancer radiotherapy, a greater interest in dose intensification on small boost volume arises. Considering the need of an appropriate target movements evaluation, this retrospective study aimed to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for GTV and mesorectum organ motion (OM) evaluation, in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, in prone and supine position.
Methods
Thirty-two LARC patients were analyzed. GTV and mesorectum were delineated on MRI co-registrated with CT simulation. GTV and mesorectum OM was estimated on all CBCTs, performed during treatment, co-registrated with CT simulation. OM evaluation was obtained, as mean shift in left and right (L–R), postero–anterior (P–A) and cranio–caudal (Cr–C) directions. Volumes variability was calculated by DICE index.
Results
A total of 296 CBCTs were analyzed. Mean shifts of the GTV and mesorectum in prone position were − 0.16 cm and 0.15 cm in L–R direction, 0.28 cm and − 0.40 cm in P–A direction, and 0.14 cm and − 0.21 cm, in Cr–C direction; for supine position the mean shifts of the GTV were − 0.10 cm and 0.17 cm in R–L direction, 0.26 cm and − 0.23 cm in A–P direction, 0.09 cm and − 0.11 cm in Cr–C direction. Mean DICE index for GTV and mesorectum was 0.74 and 0.86, in prone position, and 0.78 and 0.89 in supine position, respectively.
Conclusion
GTV and mesorectum OM was less than 4 mm in all directions in both positions, with a 1 mm less deviation in supine position. CBCTs resulted effective for OM assessment, and it could be an appropriate method for the implementation on an intensification treatment.</abstract><cop>Milan</cop><pub>Springer Milan</pub><pmid>32297096</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11547-020-01193-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8362 |
ispartof | Radiologia medica, 2021, Vol.126 (1), p.147-154 |
issn | 0033-8362 1826-6983 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2390652058 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amplification Cancer Computed tomography Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods Diagnostic Radiology Evaluation Female Humans Imaging Interventional Radiology Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy Neuroradiology Organ Motion Patient Positioning Prone position Radiation therapy Radiology Radiotherapy Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Rectal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Supine position Ultrasound |
title | Cone-beam computed tomography for organ motion evaluation in locally advanced rectal cancer patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cone-beam%20computed%20tomography%20for%20organ%20motion%20evaluation%20in%20locally%20advanced%20rectal%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Radiologia%20medica&rft.au=Rosa,%20Consuelo&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=147-154&rft.issn=0033-8362&rft.eissn=1826-6983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11547-020-01193-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2390652058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487447338&rft_id=info:pmid/32297096&rfr_iscdi=true |