EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE
Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic source...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2019-01, Vol.238, p.701 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 701 |
container_title | WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment |
container_volume | 238 |
creator | RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA GAGANA, SHAMANNA |
description | Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2495/SC190601 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2389767448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2389767448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1371-6c9951731f18b54045aa85ad418150797eeb9abdb5dfa9fbf40b3d9c2ff4ffde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0FLwzAcxYMoOObAj5Cjl2r-TdI0x5B1XSEuZW3F20jaBAbVTeu-v8V5eu_wfo_3EHoE8pwyyV8aDZJkBG7QAgSjCeUMbv98ljCWv9-j1TQdPWGcAqcpWSBdvCnTqbayO2w3WNtE29faNm2xxhtVaGVwY7p1WWBV16bS12S1w6rcV7ozbbcvHtBddOMUVv-6RN2maPU2MbacCZOcgQpIsl5KDoJChNxzNo9wLuduYJADJ0KKELx0fvB8iE5GHxnxdJB9GiOLcQh0iZ6uvefv09clTD-Hj-PUh3F0n-F0mQ4pzaXIxHyU_gL1fkep</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389767448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA ; SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A ; VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA ; GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creator><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA ; SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A ; VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA ; GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creatorcontrib><description>Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-448X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2495/SC190601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Southampton: W I T Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Animal manures ; Carbon content ; Composting ; Composts ; Contamination ; Crop growth ; Crop residues ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Evaluation ; Fertilizers ; Field tests ; Manures ; Nutrient content ; Nutrient sources ; Nutrients ; Organic farming ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Productivity ; Rural communities ; Sludge ; Soil contamination ; Soil improvement ; Soil organic matter ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; Soils ; Water scarcity</subject><ispartof>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2019-01, Vol.238, p.701</ispartof><rights>2019. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.witpress.com/elibrary .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creatorcontrib><title>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</title><title>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</title><description>Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Animal manures</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrient sources</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><issn>1746-448X</issn><issn>1743-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0FLwzAcxYMoOObAj5Cjl2r-TdI0x5B1XSEuZW3F20jaBAbVTeu-v8V5eu_wfo_3EHoE8pwyyV8aDZJkBG7QAgSjCeUMbv98ljCWv9-j1TQdPWGcAqcpWSBdvCnTqbayO2w3WNtE29faNm2xxhtVaGVwY7p1WWBV16bS12S1w6rcV7ozbbcvHtBddOMUVv-6RN2maPU2MbacCZOcgQpIsl5KDoJChNxzNo9wLuduYJADJ0KKELx0fvB8iE5GHxnxdJB9GiOLcQh0iZ6uvefv09clTD-Hj-PUh3F0n-F0mQ4pzaXIxHyU_gL1fkep</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</creator><creator>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</creator><creator>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</creator><creator>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creator><general>W I T Press</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</title><author>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA ; SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A ; VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA ; GAGANA, SHAMANNA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1371-6c9951731f18b54045aa85ad418150797eeb9abdb5dfa9fbf40b3d9c2ff4ffde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Animal manures</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrient sources</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</au><au>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</au><au>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</au><au>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</atitle><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>238</volume><spage>701</spage><pages>701-</pages><issn>1746-448X</issn><eissn>1743-3541</eissn><abstract>Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.</abstract><cop>Southampton</cop><pub>W I T Press</pub><doi>10.2495/SC190601</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1746-448X |
ispartof | WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2019-01, Vol.238, p.701 |
issn | 1746-448X 1743-3541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2389767448 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Agrochemicals Animal manures Carbon content Composting Composts Contamination Crop growth Crop residues Crop yield Crops Evaluation Fertilizers Field tests Manures Nutrient content Nutrient sources Nutrients Organic farming Organic matter Organic soils Productivity Rural communities Sludge Soil contamination Soil improvement Soil organic matter Soil properties Soil quality Soils Water scarcity |
title | EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A15%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVALUATION%20OF%20CO-COMPOSTED%20FAECAL%20SLUDGE%20APPLICATION%20IN%20AGRICULTURE&rft.jtitle=WIT%20Transactions%20on%20Ecology%20and%20the%20Environment&rft.au=RAMAKRISHNA%20GIRIJA&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=238&rft.spage=701&rft.pages=701-&rft.issn=1746-448X&rft.eissn=1743-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.2495/SC190601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2389767448%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389767448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |