EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE

Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic source...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2019-01, Vol.238, p.701
Hauptverfasser: RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA, SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A, VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA, GAGANA, SHAMANNA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 701
container_title WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
container_volume 238
creator RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA
SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A
VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA
GAGANA, SHAMANNA
description Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.
doi_str_mv 10.2495/SC190601
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2389767448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2389767448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1371-6c9951731f18b54045aa85ad418150797eeb9abdb5dfa9fbf40b3d9c2ff4ffde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0FLwzAcxYMoOObAj5Cjl2r-TdI0x5B1XSEuZW3F20jaBAbVTeu-v8V5eu_wfo_3EHoE8pwyyV8aDZJkBG7QAgSjCeUMbv98ljCWv9-j1TQdPWGcAqcpWSBdvCnTqbayO2w3WNtE29faNm2xxhtVaGVwY7p1WWBV16bS12S1w6rcV7ozbbcvHtBddOMUVv-6RN2maPU2MbacCZOcgQpIsl5KDoJChNxzNo9wLuduYJADJ0KKELx0fvB8iE5GHxnxdJB9GiOLcQh0iZ6uvefv09clTD-Hj-PUh3F0n-F0mQ4pzaXIxHyU_gL1fkep</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389767448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA ; SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A ; VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA ; GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creator><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA ; SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A ; VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA ; GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creatorcontrib><description>Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-448X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-3541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2495/SC190601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Southampton: W I T Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Animal manures ; Carbon content ; Composting ; Composts ; Contamination ; Crop growth ; Crop residues ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Evaluation ; Fertilizers ; Field tests ; Manures ; Nutrient content ; Nutrient sources ; Nutrients ; Organic farming ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Productivity ; Rural communities ; Sludge ; Soil contamination ; Soil improvement ; Soil organic matter ; Soil properties ; Soil quality ; Soils ; Water scarcity</subject><ispartof>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2019-01, Vol.238, p.701</ispartof><rights>2019. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.witpress.com/elibrary .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creatorcontrib><title>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</title><title>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</title><description>Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Animal manures</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrient sources</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil improvement</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><issn>1746-448X</issn><issn>1743-3541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0FLwzAcxYMoOObAj5Cjl2r-TdI0x5B1XSEuZW3F20jaBAbVTeu-v8V5eu_wfo_3EHoE8pwyyV8aDZJkBG7QAgSjCeUMbv98ljCWv9-j1TQdPWGcAqcpWSBdvCnTqbayO2w3WNtE29faNm2xxhtVaGVwY7p1WWBV16bS12S1w6rcV7ozbbcvHtBddOMUVv-6RN2maPU2MbacCZOcgQpIsl5KDoJChNxzNo9wLuduYJADJ0KKELx0fvB8iE5GHxnxdJB9GiOLcQh0iZ6uvefv09clTD-Hj-PUh3F0n-F0mQ4pzaXIxHyU_gL1fkep</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</creator><creator>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</creator><creator>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</creator><creator>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creator><general>W I T Press</general><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</title><author>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA ; SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A ; VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA ; GAGANA, SHAMANNA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1371-6c9951731f18b54045aa85ad418150797eeb9abdb5dfa9fbf40b3d9c2ff4ffde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Animal manures</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrient sources</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil improvement</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAMAKRISHNA GIRIJA</au><au>SHETTIGAR, NITHIN A</au><au>VENKATASWAMY RAMASWAMY RAMAKRISHNA PARAMA</au><au>GAGANA, SHAMANNA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE</atitle><jtitle>WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>238</volume><spage>701</spage><pages>701-</pages><issn>1746-448X</issn><eissn>1743-3541</eissn><abstract>Water scarcity, increasing cost of inputs and poor soil quality are major reasons for decreasing agricultural productivity in India. It is therefore critical to optimize soil organic matter, which is vital for enhanced soil quality to improve productivity. Considering that some of the organic sources like farmyard manure, crop residues, green manure, etc. are dwindling as well as the negative implications of chemical fertilisers, we need to consider alternative sources. In this context, a study was conducted to evaluate the application of co-composted faecal sludge (FS) as an alternative; and to provide scientific evidence through field experiments about the potential for co-compost application in agriculture. An agricultural trial was conducted for two cropping seasons. The co-composted FS was one of the nutrient sources used in the trial. Nutrient-balanced final co-compost was produced as faecal sludge is rich in nitrogen; municipal wet waste is rich in carbon content. Randomised Block Design method was followed, and the application of five treatments with four replications per treatment was undertaken. Treatments comprised four types of nutrient sources – namely, treated faecal sludge, cocomposted FS (co-compost), farmyard manure, chemical fertilizers and control. The findings of the study showed that the yield obtained from crops grown under co-composted FS was higher than the other four treatments. The parameters for crop growth and development were better for co-compost applied crops. Further, the produce grown under co-composted FS was free from pathogen contamination. The study showcased the potential of co-composted FS as a nutrient source vis-à-vis other sources considered for the trial. The study showed that reusing co-composted FS in agriculture can benefit the farming community by enhancing soil productivity there by increasing crop yield. The study also highlights the need for further research to assess the impact of co-composted FS application on crop nutrient content and weed menace.</abstract><cop>Southampton</cop><pub>W I T Press</pub><doi>10.2495/SC190601</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1746-448X
ispartof WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2019-01, Vol.238, p.701
issn 1746-448X
1743-3541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2389767448
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Agrochemicals
Animal manures
Carbon content
Composting
Composts
Contamination
Crop growth
Crop residues
Crop yield
Crops
Evaluation
Fertilizers
Field tests
Manures
Nutrient content
Nutrient sources
Nutrients
Organic farming
Organic matter
Organic soils
Productivity
Rural communities
Sludge
Soil contamination
Soil improvement
Soil organic matter
Soil properties
Soil quality
Soils
Water scarcity
title EVALUATION OF CO-COMPOSTED FAECAL SLUDGE APPLICATION IN AGRICULTURE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A15%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVALUATION%20OF%20CO-COMPOSTED%20FAECAL%20SLUDGE%20APPLICATION%20IN%20AGRICULTURE&rft.jtitle=WIT%20Transactions%20on%20Ecology%20and%20the%20Environment&rft.au=RAMAKRISHNA%20GIRIJA&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=238&rft.spage=701&rft.pages=701-&rft.issn=1746-448X&rft.eissn=1743-3541&rft_id=info:doi/10.2495/SC190601&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2389767448%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389767448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true