Alu Methylation and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis

The association between Alu methylation and risk of cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate this issue. PubMed and Web of Science up to December 31, 2018, and the reference lists of studies, as well as those presented in relevant meta-analyses and reviews were systema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of the medical sciences 2020-05, Vol.359 (5), p.271-280
Hauptverfasser: Ye, Ding, Jiang, Danjie, Zhang, Xinhan, Mao, Yingying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 5
container_start_page 271
container_title The American journal of the medical sciences
container_volume 359
creator Ye, Ding
Jiang, Danjie
Zhang, Xinhan
Mao, Yingying
description The association between Alu methylation and risk of cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate this issue. PubMed and Web of Science up to December 31, 2018, and the reference lists of studies, as well as those presented in relevant meta-analyses and reviews were systematically searched. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in Alu methylation level between cases and controls were pooled using random effects model and assessed heterogeneity between strata by stratified factors using meta-regression model. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were also conducted. Twenty-five articles, including 2719 cases and 3018 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The significant difference in Alu methylation level between cancer cases and controls was greater in tissue (SMD = −1.89, 95% CI: −2.72, −1.05) than blood (SMD = −0.46, 95% CI: −0.82, −0.09), and heterogeneity was found in materials (P = 0.038). In tissue samples, Alu hypomethylation was found in carcinoma (SMD = −2.50, 95% CI: −3.51, −1.48), while not in non-carcinoma. The inverse associations were consistently found in subgroups stratified by data sources and quality score in tissue samples, and publication year was considered to be the potential source of between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, reduced Alu methylation level was found in the European subgroup, detection method of SIRPH and COBRA, and original data source in blood samples. Alu hypomethylation was associated with increased risk of cancer, which could be a potential biomarker for cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.03.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2388000351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002962920300756</els_id><sourcerecordid>2388000351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-df01ae521421e29b407349ae81bfb241eb97944bd2e9e45581bc6a0d6e17d7c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozvj4BYJ06ab15tFHBBfD4AsUQXQd0vaWyUzaatI6zL8346hLs7nkcM5J7kfIGYWEAs0ul4lul61PGDBIgCcAbI9MacqLmEkJ-2QKQYplxuSEHHm_BKCsoPyQTDhjWSEFnRI-s2P0hMNiY_Vg-i7SXR29GL-K-iaa665CdxXNtg4d607bjTf-hBw02no8_ZnH5O325nV-Hz8-3z3MZ49xJUCIuG6AakwZFYwik6WAnAupsaBlUzJBsZS5FKKsGUoUaRr0KtNQZ0jzOq9yfkwudr3vrv8Y0Q-qNb5Ca3WH_egV40URVuQpDVa-s1au995ho96dabXbKApqS0st1TcttaWlgKuAJqTOfx4Yyxbrv8wvnmAQO8O6twM6v7LjGp1aoLbDIlSEIwSNt52Qhkv8rYTY9S6Ggc6nCQlfGQwsa-OwGlTdm3__9QWxOYj1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388000351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alu Methylation and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ye, Ding ; Jiang, Danjie ; Zhang, Xinhan ; Mao, Yingying</creator><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding ; Jiang, Danjie ; Zhang, Xinhan ; Mao, Yingying</creatorcontrib><description>The association between Alu methylation and risk of cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate this issue. PubMed and Web of Science up to December 31, 2018, and the reference lists of studies, as well as those presented in relevant meta-analyses and reviews were systematically searched. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in Alu methylation level between cases and controls were pooled using random effects model and assessed heterogeneity between strata by stratified factors using meta-regression model. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were also conducted. Twenty-five articles, including 2719 cases and 3018 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The significant difference in Alu methylation level between cancer cases and controls was greater in tissue (SMD = −1.89, 95% CI: −2.72, −1.05) than blood (SMD = −0.46, 95% CI: −0.82, −0.09), and heterogeneity was found in materials (P = 0.038). In tissue samples, Alu hypomethylation was found in carcinoma (SMD = −2.50, 95% CI: −3.51, −1.48), while not in non-carcinoma. The inverse associations were consistently found in subgroups stratified by data sources and quality score in tissue samples, and publication year was considered to be the potential source of between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, reduced Alu methylation level was found in the European subgroup, detection method of SIRPH and COBRA, and original data source in blood samples. Alu hypomethylation was associated with increased risk of cancer, which could be a potential biomarker for cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-2990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32268941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alu methylation ; Blood ; Cancer ; Meta-analysis ; Tissue</subject><ispartof>The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020-05, Vol.359 (5), p.271-280</ispartof><rights>2020 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-df01ae521421e29b407349ae81bfb241eb97944bd2e9e45581bc6a0d6e17d7c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-df01ae521421e29b407349ae81bfb241eb97944bd2e9e45581bc6a0d6e17d7c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6654-7832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Danjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xinhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yingying</creatorcontrib><title>Alu Methylation and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis</title><title>The American journal of the medical sciences</title><addtitle>Am J Med Sci</addtitle><description>The association between Alu methylation and risk of cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate this issue. PubMed and Web of Science up to December 31, 2018, and the reference lists of studies, as well as those presented in relevant meta-analyses and reviews were systematically searched. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in Alu methylation level between cases and controls were pooled using random effects model and assessed heterogeneity between strata by stratified factors using meta-regression model. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were also conducted. Twenty-five articles, including 2719 cases and 3018 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The significant difference in Alu methylation level between cancer cases and controls was greater in tissue (SMD = −1.89, 95% CI: −2.72, −1.05) than blood (SMD = −0.46, 95% CI: −0.82, −0.09), and heterogeneity was found in materials (P = 0.038). In tissue samples, Alu hypomethylation was found in carcinoma (SMD = −2.50, 95% CI: −3.51, −1.48), while not in non-carcinoma. The inverse associations were consistently found in subgroups stratified by data sources and quality score in tissue samples, and publication year was considered to be the potential source of between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, reduced Alu methylation level was found in the European subgroup, detection method of SIRPH and COBRA, and original data source in blood samples. Alu hypomethylation was associated with increased risk of cancer, which could be a potential biomarker for cancer.</description><subject>Alu methylation</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Tissue</subject><issn>0002-9629</issn><issn>1538-2990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozvj4BYJ06ab15tFHBBfD4AsUQXQd0vaWyUzaatI6zL8346hLs7nkcM5J7kfIGYWEAs0ul4lul61PGDBIgCcAbI9MacqLmEkJ-2QKQYplxuSEHHm_BKCsoPyQTDhjWSEFnRI-s2P0hMNiY_Vg-i7SXR29GL-K-iaa665CdxXNtg4d607bjTf-hBw02no8_ZnH5O325nV-Hz8-3z3MZ49xJUCIuG6AakwZFYwik6WAnAupsaBlUzJBsZS5FKKsGUoUaRr0KtNQZ0jzOq9yfkwudr3vrv8Y0Q-qNb5Ca3WH_egV40URVuQpDVa-s1au995ho96dabXbKApqS0st1TcttaWlgKuAJqTOfx4Yyxbrv8wvnmAQO8O6twM6v7LjGp1aoLbDIlSEIwSNt52Qhkv8rYTY9S6Ggc6nCQlfGQwsa-OwGlTdm3__9QWxOYj1</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Ye, Ding</creator><creator>Jiang, Danjie</creator><creator>Zhang, Xinhan</creator><creator>Mao, Yingying</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Copyright by the Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6654-7832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Alu Methylation and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis</title><author>Ye, Ding ; Jiang, Danjie ; Zhang, Xinhan ; Mao, Yingying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4044-df01ae521421e29b407349ae81bfb241eb97944bd2e9e45581bc6a0d6e17d7c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alu methylation</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Tissue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Danjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xinhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Yingying</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of the medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ye, Ding</au><au>Jiang, Danjie</au><au>Zhang, Xinhan</au><au>Mao, Yingying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alu Methylation and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of the medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>359</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>271-280</pages><issn>0002-9629</issn><eissn>1538-2990</eissn><abstract>The association between Alu methylation and risk of cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate this issue. PubMed and Web of Science up to December 31, 2018, and the reference lists of studies, as well as those presented in relevant meta-analyses and reviews were systematically searched. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in Alu methylation level between cases and controls were pooled using random effects model and assessed heterogeneity between strata by stratified factors using meta-regression model. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias test were also conducted. Twenty-five articles, including 2719 cases and 3018 controls were included in the meta-analysis. The significant difference in Alu methylation level between cancer cases and controls was greater in tissue (SMD = −1.89, 95% CI: −2.72, −1.05) than blood (SMD = −0.46, 95% CI: −0.82, −0.09), and heterogeneity was found in materials (P = 0.038). In tissue samples, Alu hypomethylation was found in carcinoma (SMD = −2.50, 95% CI: −3.51, −1.48), while not in non-carcinoma. The inverse associations were consistently found in subgroups stratified by data sources and quality score in tissue samples, and publication year was considered to be the potential source of between-study heterogeneity. Moreover, reduced Alu methylation level was found in the European subgroup, detection method of SIRPH and COBRA, and original data source in blood samples. Alu hypomethylation was associated with increased risk of cancer, which could be a potential biomarker for cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32268941</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjms.2020.03.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6654-7832</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9629
ispartof The American journal of the medical sciences, 2020-05, Vol.359 (5), p.271-280
issn 0002-9629
1538-2990
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2388000351
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Alu methylation
Blood
Cancer
Meta-analysis
Tissue
title Alu Methylation and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A42%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alu%20Methylation%20and%20Risk%20of%20Cancer:%20A%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20the%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Ye,%20Ding&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=359&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=271-280&rft.issn=0002-9629&rft.eissn=1538-2990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2388000351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388000351&rft_id=info:pmid/32268941&rft_els_id=S0002962920300756&rfr_iscdi=true