Optimizing Manufacturing and Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Implants through Precision Casting and Calcium and Phosphorus Ion Implantation? In Vivo Results of a Large-Scale Animal Trial

Uncemented implants are still associated with several major challenges, especially with regard to their manufacturing and their osseointegration. In this study, a novel manufacturing technique-an optimized form of precision casting-and a novel surface modification to promote osseointegration-calcium...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials 2020-04, Vol.13 (7), p.1670
Hauptverfasser: Jv, Wölfle-Roos, B, Katmer Amet, J, Fiedler, H, Michels, G, Kappelt, A, Ignatius, L, Dürselen, H, Reichel, Re, Brenner
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1670
container_title Materials
container_volume 13
creator Jv, Wölfle-Roos
B, Katmer Amet
J, Fiedler
H, Michels
G, Kappelt
A, Ignatius
L, Dürselen
H, Reichel
Re, Brenner
description Uncemented implants are still associated with several major challenges, especially with regard to their manufacturing and their osseointegration. In this study, a novel manufacturing technique-an optimized form of precision casting-and a novel surface modification to promote osseointegration-calcium and phosphorus ion implantation into the implant surface-were tested in vivo. Cylindrical Ti6Al4V implants were inserted bilaterally into the tibia of 110 rats. We compared two generations of cast Ti6Al4V implants (CAST 1st GEN, n = 22, and CAST 2nd GEN, n = 22) as well as cast 2nd GEN Ti6Al4V implants with calcium (CAST + CA, n = 22) and phosphorus (CAST + P, n = 22) ion implantation to standard machined Ti6Al4V implants (control, n = 22). After 4 and 12 weeks, maximal pull-out force and bone-to-implant contact rate (BIC) were measured and compared between all five groups. There was no significant difference between all five groups after 4 weeks or 12 weeks with regard to pull-out force ( > 0.05, Kruskal Wallis test). Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference of BIC after 4 weeks ( > 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test), whereas there was a trend towards a higher BIC in the CAST + P group (54.8% ± 15.2%), especially compared to the control group (38.6% ± 12.8%) after 12 weeks ( = 0.053, Kruskal-Wallis test). In this study, we found no indication of inferiority of Ti6Al4V implants cast with the optimized centrifugal precision casting technique of the second generation compared to standard Ti6Al4V implants. As the employed manufacturing process holds considerable economic potential, mainly due to a significantly decreased material demand per implant by casting near net-shape instead of milling away most of the starting ingot, its application in manufacturing uncemented implants seems promising. However, no significant advantages of calcium or phosphorus ion implantation could be observed in this study. Due to the promising results of ion implantation in previous in vitro and in vivo studies, further in vivo studies with different ion implantation conditions should be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ma13071670
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387658335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387658335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-c1ef3131c401a216f77a290fdaff6d17a70fa3d2d15a7346e51382e16eba49543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdksFu1DAQQC0EotXSCx-ALHFBSAE7TuzkAlqtKKy0aCtYeo2miZ24cuxgO5Xoh_F9eLfbUvDFM_LTmxl5EHpJyTvGavJ-BMqIoFyQJ-iU1jXPaF0UTx_FJ-gshGuSDmO0yuvn6ITlOSdUiFP0eztFPepbbXv8FeysoI2z32dgO7wNQTpto-w9RO0sdgrvNF-a4hKvx8mAjQHHwbu5H_CFl60Oe2oFId4rVmBaPY-H-GJwYRqcnwNeJ-xoOJg_4rXFl_rG4W8yzCZpUynAG_C9zL63YCReWj2CwTuvwbxAzxSYIM-O9wL9OP-0W33JNtvP69Vyk7UF4TFrqVSMMpoyCjnlSgjIa6I6UIp3VIAgCliXd7QEwQouS8qqXFIur6Coy4It0Ic77zRfjbJrpY0eTDP51Ir_1TjQzb8vVg9N724aQUXFCE2CN0eBdz9nGWIz6tBKkwaXbg5NzirBy4qxMqGv_0Ov3extGu9AlURUCVygt3dU610IXqqHZihp9hvR_N2IBL963P4Dev__7A8rG7PD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387507858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing Manufacturing and Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Implants through Precision Casting and Calcium and Phosphorus Ion Implantation? In Vivo Results of a Large-Scale Animal Trial</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Jv, Wölfle-Roos ; B, Katmer Amet ; J, Fiedler ; H, Michels ; G, Kappelt ; A, Ignatius ; L, Dürselen ; H, Reichel ; Re, Brenner</creator><creatorcontrib>Jv, Wölfle-Roos ; B, Katmer Amet ; J, Fiedler ; H, Michels ; G, Kappelt ; A, Ignatius ; L, Dürselen ; H, Reichel ; Re, Brenner</creatorcontrib><description>Uncemented implants are still associated with several major challenges, especially with regard to their manufacturing and their osseointegration. In this study, a novel manufacturing technique-an optimized form of precision casting-and a novel surface modification to promote osseointegration-calcium and phosphorus ion implantation into the implant surface-were tested in vivo. Cylindrical Ti6Al4V implants were inserted bilaterally into the tibia of 110 rats. We compared two generations of cast Ti6Al4V implants (CAST 1st GEN, n = 22, and CAST 2nd GEN, n = 22) as well as cast 2nd GEN Ti6Al4V implants with calcium (CAST + CA, n = 22) and phosphorus (CAST + P, n = 22) ion implantation to standard machined Ti6Al4V implants (control, n = 22). After 4 and 12 weeks, maximal pull-out force and bone-to-implant contact rate (BIC) were measured and compared between all five groups. There was no significant difference between all five groups after 4 weeks or 12 weeks with regard to pull-out force ( &gt; 0.05, Kruskal Wallis test). Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference of BIC after 4 weeks ( &gt; 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test), whereas there was a trend towards a higher BIC in the CAST + P group (54.8% ± 15.2%), especially compared to the control group (38.6% ± 12.8%) after 12 weeks ( = 0.053, Kruskal-Wallis test). In this study, we found no indication of inferiority of Ti6Al4V implants cast with the optimized centrifugal precision casting technique of the second generation compared to standard Ti6Al4V implants. As the employed manufacturing process holds considerable economic potential, mainly due to a significantly decreased material demand per implant by casting near net-shape instead of milling away most of the starting ingot, its application in manufacturing uncemented implants seems promising. However, no significant advantages of calcium or phosphorus ion implantation could be observed in this study. Due to the promising results of ion implantation in previous in vitro and in vivo studies, further in vivo studies with different ion implantation conditions should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma13071670</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32260177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Animals ; Biomechanics ; Calcium ; Centrifugal casting ; Cooperation ; Design ; In vivo methods and tests ; Ingot casting ; Investment casting ; Ion implantation ; Joint surgery ; Manufacturing ; Milling (machining) ; Net shape ; Phosphorus ; Solidification ; Surgical implants ; Tibia ; Titanium ; Titanium base alloys ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2020-04, Vol.13 (7), p.1670</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-c1ef3131c401a216f77a290fdaff6d17a70fa3d2d15a7346e51382e16eba49543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-c1ef3131c401a216f77a290fdaff6d17a70fa3d2d15a7346e51382e16eba49543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5470-5423 ; 0000-0002-4782-1979 ; 0000-0002-5834-3730</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178301/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178301/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32260177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jv, Wölfle-Roos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B, Katmer Amet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J, Fiedler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H, Michels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>G, Kappelt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A, Ignatius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L, Dürselen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H, Reichel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, Brenner</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing Manufacturing and Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Implants through Precision Casting and Calcium and Phosphorus Ion Implantation? In Vivo Results of a Large-Scale Animal Trial</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>Uncemented implants are still associated with several major challenges, especially with regard to their manufacturing and their osseointegration. In this study, a novel manufacturing technique-an optimized form of precision casting-and a novel surface modification to promote osseointegration-calcium and phosphorus ion implantation into the implant surface-were tested in vivo. Cylindrical Ti6Al4V implants were inserted bilaterally into the tibia of 110 rats. We compared two generations of cast Ti6Al4V implants (CAST 1st GEN, n = 22, and CAST 2nd GEN, n = 22) as well as cast 2nd GEN Ti6Al4V implants with calcium (CAST + CA, n = 22) and phosphorus (CAST + P, n = 22) ion implantation to standard machined Ti6Al4V implants (control, n = 22). After 4 and 12 weeks, maximal pull-out force and bone-to-implant contact rate (BIC) were measured and compared between all five groups. There was no significant difference between all five groups after 4 weeks or 12 weeks with regard to pull-out force ( &gt; 0.05, Kruskal Wallis test). Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference of BIC after 4 weeks ( &gt; 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test), whereas there was a trend towards a higher BIC in the CAST + P group (54.8% ± 15.2%), especially compared to the control group (38.6% ± 12.8%) after 12 weeks ( = 0.053, Kruskal-Wallis test). In this study, we found no indication of inferiority of Ti6Al4V implants cast with the optimized centrifugal precision casting technique of the second generation compared to standard Ti6Al4V implants. As the employed manufacturing process holds considerable economic potential, mainly due to a significantly decreased material demand per implant by casting near net-shape instead of milling away most of the starting ingot, its application in manufacturing uncemented implants seems promising. However, no significant advantages of calcium or phosphorus ion implantation could be observed in this study. Due to the promising results of ion implantation in previous in vitro and in vivo studies, further in vivo studies with different ion implantation conditions should be considered.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Centrifugal casting</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Ingot casting</subject><subject>Investment casting</subject><subject>Ion implantation</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Milling (machining)</subject><subject>Net shape</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Solidification</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Titanium base alloys</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdksFu1DAQQC0EotXSCx-ALHFBSAE7TuzkAlqtKKy0aCtYeo2miZ24cuxgO5Xoh_F9eLfbUvDFM_LTmxl5EHpJyTvGavJ-BMqIoFyQJ-iU1jXPaF0UTx_FJ-gshGuSDmO0yuvn6ITlOSdUiFP0eztFPepbbXv8FeysoI2z32dgO7wNQTpto-w9RO0sdgrvNF-a4hKvx8mAjQHHwbu5H_CFl60Oe2oFId4rVmBaPY-H-GJwYRqcnwNeJ-xoOJg_4rXFl_rG4W8yzCZpUynAG_C9zL63YCReWj2CwTuvwbxAzxSYIM-O9wL9OP-0W33JNtvP69Vyk7UF4TFrqVSMMpoyCjnlSgjIa6I6UIp3VIAgCliXd7QEwQouS8qqXFIur6Coy4It0Ic77zRfjbJrpY0eTDP51Ir_1TjQzb8vVg9N724aQUXFCE2CN0eBdz9nGWIz6tBKkwaXbg5NzirBy4qxMqGv_0Ov3extGu9AlURUCVygt3dU610IXqqHZihp9hvR_N2IBL963P4Dev__7A8rG7PD</recordid><startdate>20200403</startdate><enddate>20200403</enddate><creator>Jv, Wölfle-Roos</creator><creator>B, Katmer Amet</creator><creator>J, Fiedler</creator><creator>H, Michels</creator><creator>G, Kappelt</creator><creator>A, Ignatius</creator><creator>L, Dürselen</creator><creator>H, Reichel</creator><creator>Re, Brenner</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-5423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-1979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-3730</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200403</creationdate><title>Optimizing Manufacturing and Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Implants through Precision Casting and Calcium and Phosphorus Ion Implantation? In Vivo Results of a Large-Scale Animal Trial</title><author>Jv, Wölfle-Roos ; B, Katmer Amet ; J, Fiedler ; H, Michels ; G, Kappelt ; A, Ignatius ; L, Dürselen ; H, Reichel ; Re, Brenner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-c1ef3131c401a216f77a290fdaff6d17a70fa3d2d15a7346e51382e16eba49543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Centrifugal casting</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Ingot casting</topic><topic>Investment casting</topic><topic>Ion implantation</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Milling (machining)</topic><topic>Net shape</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Solidification</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Titanium base alloys</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jv, Wölfle-Roos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B, Katmer Amet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J, Fiedler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H, Michels</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>G, Kappelt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>A, Ignatius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>L, Dürselen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H, Reichel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Re, Brenner</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jv, Wölfle-Roos</au><au>B, Katmer Amet</au><au>J, Fiedler</au><au>H, Michels</au><au>G, Kappelt</au><au>A, Ignatius</au><au>L, Dürselen</au><au>H, Reichel</au><au>Re, Brenner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing Manufacturing and Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Implants through Precision Casting and Calcium and Phosphorus Ion Implantation? In Vivo Results of a Large-Scale Animal Trial</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2020-04-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1670</spage><pages>1670-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>Uncemented implants are still associated with several major challenges, especially with regard to their manufacturing and their osseointegration. In this study, a novel manufacturing technique-an optimized form of precision casting-and a novel surface modification to promote osseointegration-calcium and phosphorus ion implantation into the implant surface-were tested in vivo. Cylindrical Ti6Al4V implants were inserted bilaterally into the tibia of 110 rats. We compared two generations of cast Ti6Al4V implants (CAST 1st GEN, n = 22, and CAST 2nd GEN, n = 22) as well as cast 2nd GEN Ti6Al4V implants with calcium (CAST + CA, n = 22) and phosphorus (CAST + P, n = 22) ion implantation to standard machined Ti6Al4V implants (control, n = 22). After 4 and 12 weeks, maximal pull-out force and bone-to-implant contact rate (BIC) were measured and compared between all five groups. There was no significant difference between all five groups after 4 weeks or 12 weeks with regard to pull-out force ( &gt; 0.05, Kruskal Wallis test). Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference of BIC after 4 weeks ( &gt; 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test), whereas there was a trend towards a higher BIC in the CAST + P group (54.8% ± 15.2%), especially compared to the control group (38.6% ± 12.8%) after 12 weeks ( = 0.053, Kruskal-Wallis test). In this study, we found no indication of inferiority of Ti6Al4V implants cast with the optimized centrifugal precision casting technique of the second generation compared to standard Ti6Al4V implants. As the employed manufacturing process holds considerable economic potential, mainly due to a significantly decreased material demand per implant by casting near net-shape instead of milling away most of the starting ingot, its application in manufacturing uncemented implants seems promising. However, no significant advantages of calcium or phosphorus ion implantation could be observed in this study. Due to the promising results of ion implantation in previous in vitro and in vivo studies, further in vivo studies with different ion implantation conditions should be considered.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32260177</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma13071670</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-5423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-1979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5834-3730</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1944
ispartof Materials, 2020-04, Vol.13 (7), p.1670
issn 1996-1944
1996-1944
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387658335
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acids
Animals
Biomechanics
Calcium
Centrifugal casting
Cooperation
Design
In vivo methods and tests
Ingot casting
Investment casting
Ion implantation
Joint surgery
Manufacturing
Milling (machining)
Net shape
Phosphorus
Solidification
Surgical implants
Tibia
Titanium
Titanium base alloys
Transplants & implants
title Optimizing Manufacturing and Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V Implants through Precision Casting and Calcium and Phosphorus Ion Implantation? In Vivo Results of a Large-Scale Animal Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20Manufacturing%20and%20Osseointegration%20of%20Ti6Al4V%20Implants%20through%20Precision%20Casting%20and%20Calcium%20and%20Phosphorus%20Ion%20Implantation?%20In%20Vivo%20Results%20of%20a%20Large-Scale%20Animal%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Jv,%20W%C3%B6lfle-Roos&rft.date=2020-04-03&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1670&rft.pages=1670-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma13071670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2387658335%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387507858&rft_id=info:pmid/32260177&rfr_iscdi=true