A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings

Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On thes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Frailty & Aging 2020-02, Vol.9 (2), p.101-106
Hauptverfasser: Maggio, M, Barbolini, M, Longobucco, Y, Barbieri, L, Benedetti, C, Bono, F, Cacciapuoti, I, Donatini, A, Iezzi, E, Papini, D, Rodelli, P M, Tagliaferri, S, Moro, M L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101
container_title Journal of Frailty & Aging
container_volume 9
creator Maggio, M
Barbolini, M
Longobucco, Y
Barbieri, L
Benedetti, C
Bono, F
Cacciapuoti, I
Donatini, A
Iezzi, E
Papini, D
Rodelli, P M
Tagliaferri, S
Moro, M L
description Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community. - to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects. Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy. Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community. We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale. 95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%. Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.
doi_str_mv 10.14283/jfa.2019.41
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387646388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933096806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2e7649ba8dda9bd7dd10b87eceaaa8a83dbd031ee5e4c5b30549558a34995d6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0T1PwzAQBmALgQABGzOyxMJAir-S2GxV1QISgkqU2XLiC6Ry42CnSP33uBQYmOzhubPvXoTOKRlRwSS_WTZmxAhVI0H30DFjJc8EJ2p_ey9IRrmgR-gsxiUhhFFBSiEP0RFnLFdUimPUj_GT_wSHF9473PiAh3fAUxPcBj9Y6Ia2aWsztL7DvsGzYFo3bHDb4amzsEVz8L2DW7xIZeO-d786kXloVyZs8MQEwC8wDG33Fk_RQWNchLOf8wS9zqaLyX32-Hz3MBk_ZjXPyyFjUBZCVUZaa1RlS2spqWQJNRhjpJHcVpZwCpCDqPOKk1yoPJeGC6VyW1h-gq52ffvgP9YQB71qYw3OmQ78OmrGZXqh4FImevmPLv06dOl3mimetllIUiR1vVN18DEGaHS_m09Tor_D0CkMvQ1DC5r4xU_TdbUC-4d_V8-_AJpphGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933096806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Maggio, M ; Barbolini, M ; Longobucco, Y ; Barbieri, L ; Benedetti, C ; Bono, F ; Cacciapuoti, I ; Donatini, A ; Iezzi, E ; Papini, D ; Rodelli, P M ; Tagliaferri, S ; Moro, M L</creator><creatorcontrib>Maggio, M ; Barbolini, M ; Longobucco, Y ; Barbieri, L ; Benedetti, C ; Bono, F ; Cacciapuoti, I ; Donatini, A ; Iezzi, E ; Papini, D ; Rodelli, P M ; Tagliaferri, S ; Moro, M L</creatorcontrib><description>Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community. - to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects. Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy. Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community. We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale. 95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%. Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2260-1341</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2273-4309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2273-4309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2019.41</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32259184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Checklists ; Clinical assessment ; Community ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disability ; Early Diagnosis ; Family physicians ; Female ; Frail ; Frail Elderly ; Frailty ; Frailty - diagnosis ; Gait ; Geriatric assessment ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics ; Health facilities ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Italy ; Loneliness ; Male ; Mini-Mental State Examination ; Older people ; Patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Systematic review ; Teams ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of Frailty &amp; Aging, 2020-02, Vol.9 (2), p.101-106</ispartof><rights>Serdi and Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2e7649ba8dda9bd7dd10b87eceaaa8a83dbd031ee5e4c5b30549558a34995d6d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933096806?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21388,21390,27923,27924,30998,33529,33530,33743,33744,34004,34005,43658,43804,43952,64384,64386,64388,72340</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32259184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maggio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbolini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longobucco, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bono, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciapuoti, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donatini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iezzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodelli, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moro, M L</creatorcontrib><title>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</title><title>Journal of Frailty &amp; Aging</title><addtitle>J Frailty Aging</addtitle><description>Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community. - to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects. Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy. Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community. We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale. 95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%. Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Checklists</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Frailty - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Geriatric assessment</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mini-Mental State Examination</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>2260-1341</issn><issn>2273-4309</issn><issn>2273-4309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0T1PwzAQBmALgQABGzOyxMJAir-S2GxV1QISgkqU2XLiC6Ry42CnSP33uBQYmOzhubPvXoTOKRlRwSS_WTZmxAhVI0H30DFjJc8EJ2p_ey9IRrmgR-gsxiUhhFFBSiEP0RFnLFdUimPUj_GT_wSHF9473PiAh3fAUxPcBj9Y6Ia2aWsztL7DvsGzYFo3bHDb4amzsEVz8L2DW7xIZeO-d786kXloVyZs8MQEwC8wDG33Fk_RQWNchLOf8wS9zqaLyX32-Hz3MBk_ZjXPyyFjUBZCVUZaa1RlS2spqWQJNRhjpJHcVpZwCpCDqPOKk1yoPJeGC6VyW1h-gq52ffvgP9YQB71qYw3OmQ78OmrGZXqh4FImevmPLv06dOl3mimetllIUiR1vVN18DEGaHS_m09Tor_D0CkMvQ1DC5r4xU_TdbUC-4d_V8-_AJpphGw</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Maggio, M</creator><creator>Barbolini, M</creator><creator>Longobucco, Y</creator><creator>Barbieri, L</creator><creator>Benedetti, C</creator><creator>Bono, F</creator><creator>Cacciapuoti, I</creator><creator>Donatini, A</creator><creator>Iezzi, E</creator><creator>Papini, D</creator><creator>Rodelli, P M</creator><creator>Tagliaferri, S</creator><creator>Moro, M L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</title><author>Maggio, M ; Barbolini, M ; Longobucco, Y ; Barbieri, L ; Benedetti, C ; Bono, F ; Cacciapuoti, I ; Donatini, A ; Iezzi, E ; Papini, D ; Rodelli, P M ; Tagliaferri, S ; Moro, M L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2e7649ba8dda9bd7dd10b87eceaaa8a83dbd031ee5e4c5b30549558a34995d6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Checklists</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Frailty - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Geriatric assessment</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mini-Mental State Examination</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbolini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longobucco, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bono, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciapuoti, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donatini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iezzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodelli, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moro, M L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Frailty &amp; Aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggio, M</au><au>Barbolini, M</au><au>Longobucco, Y</au><au>Barbieri, L</au><au>Benedetti, C</au><au>Bono, F</au><au>Cacciapuoti, I</au><au>Donatini, A</au><au>Iezzi, E</au><au>Papini, D</au><au>Rodelli, P M</au><au>Tagliaferri, S</au><au>Moro, M L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Frailty &amp; Aging</jtitle><addtitle>J Frailty Aging</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>101-106</pages><issn>2260-1341</issn><issn>2273-4309</issn><eissn>2273-4309</eissn><abstract>Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community. - to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects. Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy. Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community. We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale. 95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%. Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>32259184</pmid><doi>10.14283/jfa.2019.41</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2260-1341
ispartof Journal of Frailty & Aging, 2020-02, Vol.9 (2), p.101-106
issn 2260-1341
2273-4309
2273-4309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387646388
source MEDLINE; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Checklists
Clinical assessment
Community
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disability
Early Diagnosis
Family physicians
Female
Frail
Frail Elderly
Frailty
Frailty - diagnosis
Gait
Geriatric assessment
Geriatric Assessment - methods
Geriatrics
Health facilities
Humans
Interdisciplinary aspects
Italy
Loneliness
Male
Mini-Mental State Examination
Older people
Patients
Predictive Value of Tests
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Systematic review
Teams
Validation studies
Validity
Women
title A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A06%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Novel%20Tool%20for%20the%20Early%20Identification%20of%20Frailty%20in%20Elderly%20People:%20The%20Application%20in%20Primary%20Care%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Frailty%20&%20Aging&rft.au=Maggio,%20M&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=101-106&rft.issn=2260-1341&rft.eissn=2273-4309&rft_id=info:doi/10.14283/jfa.2019.41&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933096806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933096806&rft_id=info:pmid/32259184&rfr_iscdi=true