A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings
Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On thes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Frailty & Aging 2020-02, Vol.9 (2), p.101-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Journal of Frailty & Aging |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Maggio, M Barbolini, M Longobucco, Y Barbieri, L Benedetti, C Bono, F Cacciapuoti, I Donatini, A Iezzi, E Papini, D Rodelli, P M Tagliaferri, S Moro, M L |
description | Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community.
- to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects.
Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy.
Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community.
We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale.
95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%.
Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14283/jfa.2019.41 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387646388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2933096806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2e7649ba8dda9bd7dd10b87eceaaa8a83dbd031ee5e4c5b30549558a34995d6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0T1PwzAQBmALgQABGzOyxMJAir-S2GxV1QISgkqU2XLiC6Ry42CnSP33uBQYmOzhubPvXoTOKRlRwSS_WTZmxAhVI0H30DFjJc8EJ2p_ey9IRrmgR-gsxiUhhFFBSiEP0RFnLFdUimPUj_GT_wSHF9473PiAh3fAUxPcBj9Y6Ia2aWsztL7DvsGzYFo3bHDb4amzsEVz8L2DW7xIZeO-d786kXloVyZs8MQEwC8wDG33Fk_RQWNchLOf8wS9zqaLyX32-Hz3MBk_ZjXPyyFjUBZCVUZaa1RlS2spqWQJNRhjpJHcVpZwCpCDqPOKk1yoPJeGC6VyW1h-gq52ffvgP9YQB71qYw3OmQ78OmrGZXqh4FImevmPLv06dOl3mimetllIUiR1vVN18DEGaHS_m09Tor_D0CkMvQ1DC5r4xU_TdbUC-4d_V8-_AJpphGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933096806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Maggio, M ; Barbolini, M ; Longobucco, Y ; Barbieri, L ; Benedetti, C ; Bono, F ; Cacciapuoti, I ; Donatini, A ; Iezzi, E ; Papini, D ; Rodelli, P M ; Tagliaferri, S ; Moro, M L</creator><creatorcontrib>Maggio, M ; Barbolini, M ; Longobucco, Y ; Barbieri, L ; Benedetti, C ; Bono, F ; Cacciapuoti, I ; Donatini, A ; Iezzi, E ; Papini, D ; Rodelli, P M ; Tagliaferri, S ; Moro, M L</creatorcontrib><description>Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community.
- to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects.
Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy.
Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community.
We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale.
95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%.
Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2260-1341</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2273-4309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2273-4309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2019.41</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32259184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Checklists ; Clinical assessment ; Community ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disability ; Early Diagnosis ; Family physicians ; Female ; Frail ; Frail Elderly ; Frailty ; Frailty - diagnosis ; Gait ; Geriatric assessment ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Geriatrics ; Health facilities ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Italy ; Loneliness ; Male ; Mini-Mental State Examination ; Older people ; Patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Systematic review ; Teams ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of Frailty & Aging, 2020-02, Vol.9 (2), p.101-106</ispartof><rights>Serdi and Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2e7649ba8dda9bd7dd10b87eceaaa8a83dbd031ee5e4c5b30549558a34995d6d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2933096806?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21388,21390,27923,27924,30998,33529,33530,33743,33744,34004,34005,43658,43804,43952,64384,64386,64388,72340</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32259184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maggio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbolini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longobucco, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bono, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciapuoti, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donatini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iezzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodelli, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moro, M L</creatorcontrib><title>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</title><title>Journal of Frailty & Aging</title><addtitle>J Frailty Aging</addtitle><description>Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community.
- to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects.
Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy.
Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community.
We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale.
95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%.
Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Checklists</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Frailty - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Geriatric assessment</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Loneliness</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mini-Mental State Examination</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>2260-1341</issn><issn>2273-4309</issn><issn>2273-4309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0T1PwzAQBmALgQABGzOyxMJAir-S2GxV1QISgkqU2XLiC6Ry42CnSP33uBQYmOzhubPvXoTOKRlRwSS_WTZmxAhVI0H30DFjJc8EJ2p_ey9IRrmgR-gsxiUhhFFBSiEP0RFnLFdUimPUj_GT_wSHF9473PiAh3fAUxPcBj9Y6Ia2aWsztL7DvsGzYFo3bHDb4amzsEVz8L2DW7xIZeO-d786kXloVyZs8MQEwC8wDG33Fk_RQWNchLOf8wS9zqaLyX32-Hz3MBk_ZjXPyyFjUBZCVUZaa1RlS2spqWQJNRhjpJHcVpZwCpCDqPOKk1yoPJeGC6VyW1h-gq52ffvgP9YQB71qYw3OmQ78OmrGZXqh4FImevmPLv06dOl3mimetllIUiR1vVN18DEGaHS_m09Tor_D0CkMvQ1DC5r4xU_TdbUC-4d_V8-_AJpphGw</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Maggio, M</creator><creator>Barbolini, M</creator><creator>Longobucco, Y</creator><creator>Barbieri, L</creator><creator>Benedetti, C</creator><creator>Bono, F</creator><creator>Cacciapuoti, I</creator><creator>Donatini, A</creator><creator>Iezzi, E</creator><creator>Papini, D</creator><creator>Rodelli, P M</creator><creator>Tagliaferri, S</creator><creator>Moro, M L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</title><author>Maggio, M ; Barbolini, M ; Longobucco, Y ; Barbieri, L ; Benedetti, C ; Bono, F ; Cacciapuoti, I ; Donatini, A ; Iezzi, E ; Papini, D ; Rodelli, P M ; Tagliaferri, S ; Moro, M L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-2e7649ba8dda9bd7dd10b87eceaaa8a83dbd031ee5e4c5b30549558a34995d6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Checklists</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Frailty - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Geriatric assessment</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Loneliness</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mini-Mental State Examination</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggio, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbolini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longobucco, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedetti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bono, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacciapuoti, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donatini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iezzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodelli, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moro, M L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Frailty & Aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggio, M</au><au>Barbolini, M</au><au>Longobucco, Y</au><au>Barbieri, L</au><au>Benedetti, C</au><au>Bono, F</au><au>Cacciapuoti, I</au><au>Donatini, A</au><au>Iezzi, E</au><au>Papini, D</au><au>Rodelli, P M</au><au>Tagliaferri, S</au><au>Moro, M L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Frailty & Aging</jtitle><addtitle>J Frailty Aging</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>101-106</pages><issn>2260-1341</issn><issn>2273-4309</issn><eissn>2273-4309</eissn><abstract>Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community.
- to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects.
Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy.
Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community.
We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale.
95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%.
Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>32259184</pmid><doi>10.14283/jfa.2019.41</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2260-1341 |
ispartof | Journal of Frailty & Aging, 2020-02, Vol.9 (2), p.101-106 |
issn | 2260-1341 2273-4309 2273-4309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387646388 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Checklists Clinical assessment Community Cross-Sectional Studies Disability Early Diagnosis Family physicians Female Frail Frail Elderly Frailty Frailty - diagnosis Gait Geriatric assessment Geriatric Assessment - methods Geriatrics Health facilities Humans Interdisciplinary aspects Italy Loneliness Male Mini-Mental State Examination Older people Patients Predictive Value of Tests Primary care Primary Health Care Systematic review Teams Validation studies Validity Women |
title | A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A06%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Novel%20Tool%20for%20the%20Early%20Identification%20of%20Frailty%20in%20Elderly%20People:%20The%20Application%20in%20Primary%20Care%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Frailty%20&%20Aging&rft.au=Maggio,%20M&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=101-106&rft.issn=2260-1341&rft.eissn=2273-4309&rft_id=info:doi/10.14283/jfa.2019.41&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933096806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933096806&rft_id=info:pmid/32259184&rfr_iscdi=true |