PASS versus MBT™ for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: a randomized controlled trial

Growth and development might lead to anchorage loss during orthodontic treatment, such as the mesial drift of molars, the compensation characteristics of upper molars following mandibular growth, or the angulation of molars before treatment. Different anchorage reinforcement devices have been develo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthodontics 2021-02, Vol.43 (1), p.113-119
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Huizhong, Han, Bing, Jiang, Ruoping, Su, Hong, Feng, Tingting, Teng, Fei, Xu, Tianmin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 119
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title European journal of orthodontics
container_volume 43
creator Chen, Huizhong
Han, Bing
Jiang, Ruoping
Su, Hong
Feng, Tingting
Teng, Fei
Xu, Tianmin
description Growth and development might lead to anchorage loss during orthodontic treatment, such as the mesial drift of molars, the compensation characteristics of upper molars following mandibular growth, or the angulation of molars before treatment. Different anchorage reinforcement devices have been developed to prevent mechanical anchorage loss, but the anchorage loss resulting from physiological factors should also be taken into account. To explore the efficacy of a new strategy to control physiologic anchorage compared with that of the conventional straight-wire appliance. Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants of Han ethnicity were randomized into the physiologic anchorage spee-wire system (PASS) group or McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT™) straight-wire group by minimization random allocation. The eligibility criteria were patients with a Class I or II molar relationship, permanent dentition (11-35 years old), fixed appliances involving the extraction of at least two upper first premolars, and medium or maximum anchorage requirements. Pre-treatment and post-treatment dental casts were scanned into digital casts and measured using a blinded method. Mesial displacements of the upper first molars were considered as the primary outcome for evaluating anchorage control. Measurements were taken for subgroups based on age. Data from 60 participants were analysed. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups. Mesial displacement of the upper first molar (in mm) was 2.96 ± 1.52 in the PASS group and 2.70 ± 1.66 in the MBT group (P = 0.521). The variation in incisor torque was -6.94 ± 6.35 degree in the PASS group and -11.76 ± 7.65 degree in the MBT group (P = 0. 010). The incisor retraction (in mm) was 4.24 ± 1.99 and 5.67 ± 2.27 in the PASS and MBT groups, respectively (P = 0.012). Adverse effects were not documented in any patient. The study was a single-centre study. Compared with the MBT group, the PASS group without additional anchorage devices could attain well anchorage control by considering the dentoalveolar compensation of anchor teeth. This RCT was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR-TRC-13003260.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ejo/cjaa021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387255267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2387255267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-873520efa7e08b6b432ffd72bf50317f42f7f66223732e3ff7e990b7007a332a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhQdRbK2u3MssBYmdnySTuqvFP6gotK7DTXLHpiSZOpNUdO2T-Gg-iSNtXZ3L4btn8RFyytklZyM5xKUZ5ksAJvge6fMwZoEQnO2TPuMhDyKZqB45cm7JGJNJqA5JTwoRRVwlffL-PJ7N6Bqt6xx9vJ7_fH1TbSzFNVQdtKVpqNEUmnxhLLwizU3TWlPRsqHtwiIGRVlj4zwHFa0RXGfRF627okAtNIWpy08sdn-VP1tbQnVMDjRUDk-2OSAvtzfzyX0wfbp7mIynQS6SURskSkaCoQaFLMniLJRC60KJTEdMcqVDoZWOYyGkkgKl1gpHI5YpxhRIKUAOyPlmd2XNW4euTevS5VhV0KDpXCq8He9CxMqjFxs0t8Y5izpd2bIG-5Fylv6ZTr3pdGva02fb4S6rsfhnd2rlLxO3fL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387255267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PASS versus MBT™ for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chen, Huizhong ; Han, Bing ; Jiang, Ruoping ; Su, Hong ; Feng, Tingting ; Teng, Fei ; Xu, Tianmin</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huizhong ; Han, Bing ; Jiang, Ruoping ; Su, Hong ; Feng, Tingting ; Teng, Fei ; Xu, Tianmin</creatorcontrib><description>Growth and development might lead to anchorage loss during orthodontic treatment, such as the mesial drift of molars, the compensation characteristics of upper molars following mandibular growth, or the angulation of molars before treatment. Different anchorage reinforcement devices have been developed to prevent mechanical anchorage loss, but the anchorage loss resulting from physiological factors should also be taken into account. To explore the efficacy of a new strategy to control physiologic anchorage compared with that of the conventional straight-wire appliance. Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants of Han ethnicity were randomized into the physiologic anchorage spee-wire system (PASS) group or McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT™) straight-wire group by minimization random allocation. The eligibility criteria were patients with a Class I or II molar relationship, permanent dentition (11-35 years old), fixed appliances involving the extraction of at least two upper first premolars, and medium or maximum anchorage requirements. Pre-treatment and post-treatment dental casts were scanned into digital casts and measured using a blinded method. Mesial displacements of the upper first molars were considered as the primary outcome for evaluating anchorage control. Measurements were taken for subgroups based on age. Data from 60 participants were analysed. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups. Mesial displacement of the upper first molar (in mm) was 2.96 ± 1.52 in the PASS group and 2.70 ± 1.66 in the MBT group (P = 0.521). The variation in incisor torque was -6.94 ± 6.35 degree in the PASS group and -11.76 ± 7.65 degree in the MBT group (P = 0. 010). The incisor retraction (in mm) was 4.24 ± 1.99 and 5.67 ± 2.27 in the PASS and MBT groups, respectively (P = 0.012). Adverse effects were not documented in any patient. The study was a single-centre study. Compared with the MBT group, the PASS group without additional anchorage devices could attain well anchorage control by considering the dentoalveolar compensation of anchor teeth. This RCT was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR-TRC-13003260.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-5387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32255178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Dentistry</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthodontics, 2021-02, Vol.43 (1), p.113-119</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-873520efa7e08b6b432ffd72bf50317f42f7f66223732e3ff7e990b7007a332a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-873520efa7e08b6b432ffd72bf50317f42f7f66223732e3ff7e990b7007a332a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Ruoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Tianmin</creatorcontrib><title>PASS versus MBT™ for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>European journal of orthodontics</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><description>Growth and development might lead to anchorage loss during orthodontic treatment, such as the mesial drift of molars, the compensation characteristics of upper molars following mandibular growth, or the angulation of molars before treatment. Different anchorage reinforcement devices have been developed to prevent mechanical anchorage loss, but the anchorage loss resulting from physiological factors should also be taken into account. To explore the efficacy of a new strategy to control physiologic anchorage compared with that of the conventional straight-wire appliance. Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants of Han ethnicity were randomized into the physiologic anchorage spee-wire system (PASS) group or McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT™) straight-wire group by minimization random allocation. The eligibility criteria were patients with a Class I or II molar relationship, permanent dentition (11-35 years old), fixed appliances involving the extraction of at least two upper first premolars, and medium or maximum anchorage requirements. Pre-treatment and post-treatment dental casts were scanned into digital casts and measured using a blinded method. Mesial displacements of the upper first molars were considered as the primary outcome for evaluating anchorage control. Measurements were taken for subgroups based on age. Data from 60 participants were analysed. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups. Mesial displacement of the upper first molar (in mm) was 2.96 ± 1.52 in the PASS group and 2.70 ± 1.66 in the MBT group (P = 0.521). The variation in incisor torque was -6.94 ± 6.35 degree in the PASS group and -11.76 ± 7.65 degree in the MBT group (P = 0. 010). The incisor retraction (in mm) was 4.24 ± 1.99 and 5.67 ± 2.27 in the PASS and MBT groups, respectively (P = 0.012). Adverse effects were not documented in any patient. The study was a single-centre study. Compared with the MBT group, the PASS group without additional anchorage devices could attain well anchorage control by considering the dentoalveolar compensation of anchor teeth. This RCT was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR-TRC-13003260.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><issn>0141-5387</issn><issn>1460-2210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhQdRbK2u3MssBYmdnySTuqvFP6gotK7DTXLHpiSZOpNUdO2T-Gg-iSNtXZ3L4btn8RFyytklZyM5xKUZ5ksAJvge6fMwZoEQnO2TPuMhDyKZqB45cm7JGJNJqA5JTwoRRVwlffL-PJ7N6Bqt6xx9vJ7_fH1TbSzFNVQdtKVpqNEUmnxhLLwizU3TWlPRsqHtwiIGRVlj4zwHFa0RXGfRF627okAtNIWpy08sdn-VP1tbQnVMDjRUDk-2OSAvtzfzyX0wfbp7mIynQS6SURskSkaCoQaFLMniLJRC60KJTEdMcqVDoZWOYyGkkgKl1gpHI5YpxhRIKUAOyPlmd2XNW4euTevS5VhV0KDpXCq8He9CxMqjFxs0t8Y5izpd2bIG-5Fylv6ZTr3pdGva02fb4S6rsfhnd2rlLxO3fL8</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Chen, Huizhong</creator><creator>Han, Bing</creator><creator>Jiang, Ruoping</creator><creator>Su, Hong</creator><creator>Feng, Tingting</creator><creator>Teng, Fei</creator><creator>Xu, Tianmin</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>PASS versus MBT™ for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Chen, Huizhong ; Han, Bing ; Jiang, Ruoping ; Su, Hong ; Feng, Tingting ; Teng, Fei ; Xu, Tianmin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-873520efa7e08b6b432ffd72bf50317f42f7f66223732e3ff7e990b7007a332a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Ruoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Tianmin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Huizhong</au><au>Han, Bing</au><au>Jiang, Ruoping</au><au>Su, Hong</au><au>Feng, Tingting</au><au>Teng, Fei</au><au>Xu, Tianmin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PASS versus MBT™ for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthod</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>113-119</pages><issn>0141-5387</issn><eissn>1460-2210</eissn><abstract>Growth and development might lead to anchorage loss during orthodontic treatment, such as the mesial drift of molars, the compensation characteristics of upper molars following mandibular growth, or the angulation of molars before treatment. Different anchorage reinforcement devices have been developed to prevent mechanical anchorage loss, but the anchorage loss resulting from physiological factors should also be taken into account. To explore the efficacy of a new strategy to control physiologic anchorage compared with that of the conventional straight-wire appliance. Randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants of Han ethnicity were randomized into the physiologic anchorage spee-wire system (PASS) group or McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi (MBT™) straight-wire group by minimization random allocation. The eligibility criteria were patients with a Class I or II molar relationship, permanent dentition (11-35 years old), fixed appliances involving the extraction of at least two upper first premolars, and medium or maximum anchorage requirements. Pre-treatment and post-treatment dental casts were scanned into digital casts and measured using a blinded method. Mesial displacements of the upper first molars were considered as the primary outcome for evaluating anchorage control. Measurements were taken for subgroups based on age. Data from 60 participants were analysed. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between groups. Mesial displacement of the upper first molar (in mm) was 2.96 ± 1.52 in the PASS group and 2.70 ± 1.66 in the MBT group (P = 0.521). The variation in incisor torque was -6.94 ± 6.35 degree in the PASS group and -11.76 ± 7.65 degree in the MBT group (P = 0. 010). The incisor retraction (in mm) was 4.24 ± 1.99 and 5.67 ± 2.27 in the PASS and MBT groups, respectively (P = 0.012). Adverse effects were not documented in any patient. The study was a single-centre study. Compared with the MBT group, the PASS group without additional anchorage devices could attain well anchorage control by considering the dentoalveolar compensation of anchor teeth. This RCT was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR-TRC-13003260.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>32255178</pmid><doi>10.1093/ejo/cjaa021</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-5387
ispartof European journal of orthodontics, 2021-02, Vol.43 (1), p.113-119
issn 0141-5387
1460-2210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2387255267
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Dentistry
title PASS versus MBT™ for evaluation of anchorage control in three-dimensional measurements: a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A48%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PASS%20versus%20MBT%E2%84%A2%20for%20evaluation%20of%20anchorage%20control%20in%20three-dimensional%20measurements:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthodontics&rft.au=Chen,%20Huizhong&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=113-119&rft.issn=0141-5387&rft.eissn=1460-2210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ejo/cjaa021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2387255267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387255267&rft_id=info:pmid/32255178&rfr_iscdi=true