The circulatory system of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931—Lacunar function and a reconsideration of the “open vs. closed system” debate
The morphology of hemolymph circulatory systems has been studied in many arthropod groups over the past decades. In most cases, however, the focus of these studies has been the vascular system, while its counterpart, the lacunar system, has often been neglected. To further understanding of the inter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of morphology (1931) 2020-04, Vol.281 (4-5), p.500-512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 512 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4-5 |
container_start_page | 500 |
container_title | Journal of morphology (1931) |
container_volume | 281 |
creator | Göpel, Torben Wirkner, Christian S. |
description | The morphology of hemolymph circulatory systems has been studied in many arthropod groups over the past decades. In most cases, however, the focus of these studies has been the vascular system, while its counterpart, the lacunar system, has often been neglected. To further understanding of the interrelationships between these two complementary subsystems, we investigated both, the hemolymph vascular system and the hemolymph lacunar system, of the decapod Penaeus vannamei using 3D‐imaging techniques (micro‐computed tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy) in combination with 3D reconstruction. Major parts of the vascular and lacunar system are described. Our insights into their morphology are used to derive functional conclusions for a model illustrating the interrelationships between the two subsystems. The morphology of and the functional interaction between the vascular and lacunar systems are discussed in the context of the debate on “open vs. closed circulatory systems.”
The morphology of the hemolymph circulatory system of the decapod Penaeus vannamei is investigated. As well as the complex vascular system, distinct lacunae are investigated three‐dimensionally and interpreted on a functional level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmor.21117 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386285723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2386285723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-6b3c5427847a12ebe0e8e55b6737865ea058311dec6a429ca42f43b5624c049a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQQC1EVRbohR-AfESIbP0R28mxoEJBW4Eqeo4mzkQEJfbWTrba2545c4Q_t7-kgd322MuMNHp6Iz1CjjibcsbE58fOh6ngnJsdMuEsN0mqM7NLJkxqkQgl1B7Zj_GRMZbnin8ke1KIVCspJuTp_gGpbYIdWuh9WNK4jD121Nf0Dh3gEOkCnIMOG3ruvcMzynPJ16vnGdjBQaD14GzfeEfBVRRoQOtdbCoM8H4dRf34Yr168XN0dBGn1LY-YrX9tF690gpL6PGQfKihjfhpuw_Iz8uv9xffktnt1fXFl1lipVYm0aW0KhUmSw1wgSUyzFCpUhtpMq0QmMok5xVaDanI7TjqVJZKi9SyNAd5QE423nnwvwaMfdE10WLbgkM_xELITItMGSFH9HSD2uBjDFgX89B0EJYFZ8Vb--KtffHefoSPt96h7LD6h_6NPQJ8A_xuWlz-R1XcfL_9sZH-AbhXki4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386285723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The circulatory system of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931—Lacunar function and a reconsideration of the “open vs. closed system” debate</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Göpel, Torben ; Wirkner, Christian S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Göpel, Torben ; Wirkner, Christian S.</creatorcontrib><description>The morphology of hemolymph circulatory systems has been studied in many arthropod groups over the past decades. In most cases, however, the focus of these studies has been the vascular system, while its counterpart, the lacunar system, has often been neglected. To further understanding of the interrelationships between these two complementary subsystems, we investigated both, the hemolymph vascular system and the hemolymph lacunar system, of the decapod Penaeus vannamei using 3D‐imaging techniques (micro‐computed tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy) in combination with 3D reconstruction. Major parts of the vascular and lacunar system are described. Our insights into their morphology are used to derive functional conclusions for a model illustrating the interrelationships between the two subsystems. The morphology of and the functional interaction between the vascular and lacunar systems are discussed in the context of the debate on “open vs. closed circulatory systems.”
The morphology of the hemolymph circulatory system of the decapod Penaeus vannamei is investigated. As well as the complex vascular system, distinct lacunae are investigated three‐dimensionally and interpreted on a functional level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32246532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Arthropoda ; circulatory system ; Decapoda ; function ; morphology</subject><ispartof>Journal of morphology (1931), 2020-04, Vol.281 (4-5), p.500-512</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of Morphology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-6b3c5427847a12ebe0e8e55b6737865ea058311dec6a429ca42f43b5624c049a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-6b3c5427847a12ebe0e8e55b6737865ea058311dec6a429ca42f43b5624c049a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6726-6319 ; 0000-0001-9528-5106</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmor.21117$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmor.21117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32246532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Göpel, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirkner, Christian S.</creatorcontrib><title>The circulatory system of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931—Lacunar function and a reconsideration of the “open vs. closed system” debate</title><title>Journal of morphology (1931)</title><addtitle>J Morphol</addtitle><description>The morphology of hemolymph circulatory systems has been studied in many arthropod groups over the past decades. In most cases, however, the focus of these studies has been the vascular system, while its counterpart, the lacunar system, has often been neglected. To further understanding of the interrelationships between these two complementary subsystems, we investigated both, the hemolymph vascular system and the hemolymph lacunar system, of the decapod Penaeus vannamei using 3D‐imaging techniques (micro‐computed tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy) in combination with 3D reconstruction. Major parts of the vascular and lacunar system are described. Our insights into their morphology are used to derive functional conclusions for a model illustrating the interrelationships between the two subsystems. The morphology of and the functional interaction between the vascular and lacunar systems are discussed in the context of the debate on “open vs. closed circulatory systems.”
The morphology of the hemolymph circulatory system of the decapod Penaeus vannamei is investigated. As well as the complex vascular system, distinct lacunae are investigated three‐dimensionally and interpreted on a functional level.</description><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>circulatory system</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>function</subject><subject>morphology</subject><issn>0362-2525</issn><issn>1097-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQQC1EVRbohR-AfESIbP0R28mxoEJBW4Eqeo4mzkQEJfbWTrba2545c4Q_t7-kgd322MuMNHp6Iz1CjjibcsbE58fOh6ngnJsdMuEsN0mqM7NLJkxqkQgl1B7Zj_GRMZbnin8ke1KIVCspJuTp_gGpbYIdWuh9WNK4jD121Nf0Dh3gEOkCnIMOG3ruvcMzynPJ16vnGdjBQaD14GzfeEfBVRRoQOtdbCoM8H4dRf34Yr168XN0dBGn1LY-YrX9tF690gpL6PGQfKihjfhpuw_Iz8uv9xffktnt1fXFl1lipVYm0aW0KhUmSw1wgSUyzFCpUhtpMq0QmMok5xVaDanI7TjqVJZKi9SyNAd5QE423nnwvwaMfdE10WLbgkM_xELITItMGSFH9HSD2uBjDFgX89B0EJYFZ8Vb--KtffHefoSPt96h7LD6h_6NPQJ8A_xuWlz-R1XcfL_9sZH-AbhXki4</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Göpel, Torben</creator><creator>Wirkner, Christian S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-6319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-5106</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>The circulatory system of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931—Lacunar function and a reconsideration of the “open vs. closed system” debate</title><author>Göpel, Torben ; Wirkner, Christian S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3657-6b3c5427847a12ebe0e8e55b6737865ea058311dec6a429ca42f43b5624c049a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>circulatory system</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>function</topic><topic>morphology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Göpel, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirkner, Christian S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of morphology (1931)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Göpel, Torben</au><au>Wirkner, Christian S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The circulatory system of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931—Lacunar function and a reconsideration of the “open vs. closed system” debate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of morphology (1931)</jtitle><addtitle>J Morphol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>281</volume><issue>4-5</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>500-512</pages><issn>0362-2525</issn><eissn>1097-4687</eissn><abstract>The morphology of hemolymph circulatory systems has been studied in many arthropod groups over the past decades. In most cases, however, the focus of these studies has been the vascular system, while its counterpart, the lacunar system, has often been neglected. To further understanding of the interrelationships between these two complementary subsystems, we investigated both, the hemolymph vascular system and the hemolymph lacunar system, of the decapod Penaeus vannamei using 3D‐imaging techniques (micro‐computed tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy) in combination with 3D reconstruction. Major parts of the vascular and lacunar system are described. Our insights into their morphology are used to derive functional conclusions for a model illustrating the interrelationships between the two subsystems. The morphology of and the functional interaction between the vascular and lacunar systems are discussed in the context of the debate on “open vs. closed circulatory systems.”
The morphology of the hemolymph circulatory system of the decapod Penaeus vannamei is investigated. As well as the complex vascular system, distinct lacunae are investigated three‐dimensionally and interpreted on a functional level.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32246532</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmor.21117</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-6319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-5106</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-2525 |
ispartof | Journal of morphology (1931), 2020-04, Vol.281 (4-5), p.500-512 |
issn | 0362-2525 1097-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386285723 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Arthropoda circulatory system Decapoda function morphology |
title | The circulatory system of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931—Lacunar function and a reconsideration of the “open vs. closed system” debate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20circulatory%20system%20of%20Penaeus%20vannamei%20Boone,%201931%E2%80%94Lacunar%20function%20and%20a%20reconsideration%20of%20the%20%E2%80%9Copen%20vs.%20closed%20system%E2%80%9D%20debate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20morphology%20(1931)&rft.au=G%C3%B6pel,%20Torben&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=281&rft.issue=4-5&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=500-512&rft.issn=0362-2525&rft.eissn=1097-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmor.21117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2386285723%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386285723&rft_id=info:pmid/32246532&rfr_iscdi=true |