Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management
The choice of surgical or non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures remains controversial. Earlier trials documented multiple complications of surgical treatment and recommended a non-surgical approach, while more recent trials have shown superior outcomes of surgical compared with non...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2020-07, Vol.58 (6), p.625-631 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 631 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 625 |
| container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Alyahya, A. Bin Ahmed, A. Nusair, Y. Ababtain, R. Alhussain, A. Alshafei, A. |
| description | The choice of surgical or non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures remains controversial. Earlier trials documented multiple complications of surgical treatment and recommended a non-surgical approach, while more recent trials have shown superior outcomes of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment in some cases. In this paper we systematically review the systematic reviews on the topic that were published before January 2019 and which followed the PRISMA statement, and propose an algorithm for the management of these fractures. Two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria of the current review, both of which showed better outcome from surgical than non-surgical treatment. We propose an algorithm based on the feasibility of fixation, ability to restore joint and occlusal function, and ensure adequate healing, and consider patient-associated factors that facilitate decision-making. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.014 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386280607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266435620300991</els_id><sourcerecordid>2386280607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-90b81000f3ffc94994c2bbe59bf82c4ae9d3f80f416f535212b6d31be85d03443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3DAQgC1UxC60v6BSlWMvScevbFKJQ7UCWgnEBc6W7YypV0m8tZOi_fd42S2XSpxmNPrm9RHymUJFgdbfNpXZhCFVDBhUwCug4oQsqeSspK2AD2QJrK5LwWW9IOcpbQBAMirPyIIzJqRcrZYk3Omx82budSxsGLvdPnFR22mO-L3QRdqlCQc9eVtE_OvxuQju_2Iq8phMb2PYhoQ57Z9C9NPvoXAhFoMe9RMOOE4fyanTfcJPx3hBHq-vHtY_y9v7m1_rH7el5bKdyhZMQ_O9jjtnW9G2wjJjULbGNcwKjW3HXQNO0NpJnr9ipu44NdjIDrgQ_IJ8PczNF_2ZMU1q8Mli3-sRw5wU403NGqhhlVF-QG0MKUV0ahv9oONOUVB702qjXk2rvWkFXGXTuevLccFsBuzeev6pzcDlAcD8ZnYUVbIeR4udj2gn1QX_7oIX6daSEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386280607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alyahya, A. ; Bin Ahmed, A. ; Nusair, Y. ; Ababtain, R. ; Alhussain, A. ; Alshafei, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alyahya, A. ; Bin Ahmed, A. ; Nusair, Y. ; Ababtain, R. ; Alhussain, A. ; Alshafei, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The choice of surgical or non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures remains controversial. Earlier trials documented multiple complications of surgical treatment and recommended a non-surgical approach, while more recent trials have shown superior outcomes of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment in some cases. In this paper we systematically review the systematic reviews on the topic that were published before January 2019 and which followed the PRISMA statement, and propose an algorithm for the management of these fractures. Two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria of the current review, both of which showed better outcome from surgical than non-surgical treatment. We propose an algorithm based on the feasibility of fixation, ability to restore joint and occlusal function, and ensure adequate healing, and consider patient-associated factors that facilitate decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32245577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Mandibular Condyle ; Mandibular Condyle fracture ; Mandibular Fractures ; Non-surgical treatment ; Open and closed treatment ; Surgical treatment ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-07, Vol.58 (6), p.625-631</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-90b81000f3ffc94994c2bbe59bf82c4ae9d3f80f416f535212b6d31be85d03443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-90b81000f3ffc94994c2bbe59bf82c4ae9d3f80f416f535212b6d31be85d03443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4991-9486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435620300991$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alyahya, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Ahmed, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nusair, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ababtain, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhussain, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshafei, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The choice of surgical or non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures remains controversial. Earlier trials documented multiple complications of surgical treatment and recommended a non-surgical approach, while more recent trials have shown superior outcomes of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment in some cases. In this paper we systematically review the systematic reviews on the topic that were published before January 2019 and which followed the PRISMA statement, and propose an algorithm for the management of these fractures. Two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria of the current review, both of which showed better outcome from surgical than non-surgical treatment. We propose an algorithm based on the feasibility of fixation, ability to restore joint and occlusal function, and ensure adequate healing, and consider patient-associated factors that facilitate decision-making.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle fracture</subject><subject>Mandibular Fractures</subject><subject>Non-surgical treatment</subject><subject>Open and closed treatment</subject><subject>Surgical treatment</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtP3DAQgC1UxC60v6BSlWMvScevbFKJQ7UCWgnEBc6W7YypV0m8tZOi_fd42S2XSpxmNPrm9RHymUJFgdbfNpXZhCFVDBhUwCug4oQsqeSspK2AD2QJrK5LwWW9IOcpbQBAMirPyIIzJqRcrZYk3Omx82budSxsGLvdPnFR22mO-L3QRdqlCQc9eVtE_OvxuQju_2Iq8phMb2PYhoQ57Z9C9NPvoXAhFoMe9RMOOE4fyanTfcJPx3hBHq-vHtY_y9v7m1_rH7el5bKdyhZMQ_O9jjtnW9G2wjJjULbGNcwKjW3HXQNO0NpJnr9ipu44NdjIDrgQ_IJ8PczNF_2ZMU1q8Mli3-sRw5wU403NGqhhlVF-QG0MKUV0ahv9oONOUVB702qjXk2rvWkFXGXTuevLccFsBuzeev6pzcDlAcD8ZnYUVbIeR4udj2gn1QX_7oIX6daSEQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Alyahya, A.</creator><creator>Bin Ahmed, A.</creator><creator>Nusair, Y.</creator><creator>Ababtain, R.</creator><creator>Alhussain, A.</creator><creator>Alshafei, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-9486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management</title><author>Alyahya, A. ; Bin Ahmed, A. ; Nusair, Y. ; Ababtain, R. ; Alhussain, A. ; Alshafei, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-90b81000f3ffc94994c2bbe59bf82c4ae9d3f80f416f535212b6d31be85d03443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle fracture</topic><topic>Mandibular Fractures</topic><topic>Non-surgical treatment</topic><topic>Open and closed treatment</topic><topic>Surgical treatment</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alyahya, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bin Ahmed, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nusair, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ababtain, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhussain, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alshafei, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alyahya, A.</au><au>Bin Ahmed, A.</au><au>Nusair, Y.</au><au>Ababtain, R.</au><au>Alhussain, A.</au><au>Alshafei, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>625-631</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>The choice of surgical or non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures remains controversial. Earlier trials documented multiple complications of surgical treatment and recommended a non-surgical approach, while more recent trials have shown superior outcomes of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment in some cases. In this paper we systematically review the systematic reviews on the topic that were published before January 2019 and which followed the PRISMA statement, and propose an algorithm for the management of these fractures. Two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria of the current review, both of which showed better outcome from surgical than non-surgical treatment. We propose an algorithm based on the feasibility of fixation, ability to restore joint and occlusal function, and ensure adequate healing, and consider patient-associated factors that facilitate decision-making.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32245577</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.014</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-9486</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
| ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2020-07, Vol.58 (6), p.625-631 |
| issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386280607 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Algorithms Fracture Fixation, Internal Humans Mandibular Condyle Mandibular Condyle fracture Mandibular Fractures Non-surgical treatment Open and closed treatment Surgical treatment Systematic review Systematic Reviews as Topic Wound Healing |
| title | Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T15%3A52%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mandibular%20condylar%20fracture:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20systematic%20reviews%20and%20a%20proposed%20algorithm%20for%20management&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Alyahya,%20A.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=625-631&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2386280607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386280607&rft_id=info:pmid/32245577&rft_els_id=S0266435620300991&rfr_iscdi=true |