Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study

[Display omitted] •Novel bacterial cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan films were developed.•The effects of chitosan as a bulk solution and nanoparticles were compared.•Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles provided the best antibacterial activity.•Bulk chitosan improved the mechanical propert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Carbohydrate polymers 2020-06, Vol.237, p.116167-116167, Article 116167
Hauptverfasser: Ju, Siyi, Zhang, Fenglun, Duan, Jiufang, Jiang, Jianxin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116167
container_issue
container_start_page 116167
container_title Carbohydrate polymers
container_volume 237
creator Ju, Siyi
Zhang, Fenglun
Duan, Jiufang
Jiang, Jianxin
description [Display omitted] •Novel bacterial cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan films were developed.•The effects of chitosan as a bulk solution and nanoparticles were compared.•Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles provided the best antibacterial activity.•Bulk chitosan improved the mechanical properties of the films.•Chitosan nanoparticles enhanced optical barrier properties against UV radiation. Ternary composite films containing bulk chitosan (CS) and chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) with different concentrations were prepared using bacterial cellulose/poly(vinyl alcohol) as the base film and the composites films were compared. The micromorphology and mechanical, physical, chemical, antibacterial, and optical barrier properties of the composite films were compared. CS incorporation improved the mechanical properties, as the maximum tensile strength was increased to 130.55 ± 9.42 MPa. The dense structure of CSNPs prevented water diffusion and lessened the water content of the composite membranes. The inclusion of CS and CSNPs both reduced the water solubility and water vapor permeability. CS-doped films possessed good transparency, while CSNPs had better ultraviolet-barrier properties (3.84 % of transmittance at 200–280 nm). In addition, CSNPs-embedded membranes exhibited prominent antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which were much greater than those of CS composite membranes with a maximum bacteriostatic diameter of 10.33 ± 1.55 mm.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116167
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386279287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0144861720303416</els_id><sourcerecordid>2386279287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4ebb1fb71cf0e33a00bc7bd9fa7625f137f9c2efed87a89350488ebc51a9cf483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtVARXdr-BJCPvWTxRxI7XFC14kuqxAXOlu2MtV6cOLWdVuUP9G-TJUs5MpfRPL2ZpzcPoTeUbCmh7bvD1upkphi2jLAFoy1txQu0oVJ0FeV1fYY2hNZ1JVsqztHrnA9kqZaSV-icM1ZT3nUb9LTb66RtgeR_6eLjiKPDZgV0wBZCmEPMgG0cpph9Aex8GDL2o41pikkX6PGDL3ts5vAT270vMesR67H_N4x6jJNOxdsA-T2--XNt0S3-HnAuc_94iV46HTJcnfoF-vHp4_fdl-r22-evu5vbyvK2KVUNxlBnBLWOAOeaEGOF6TunRcsaR7lwnWXgoJdCy443pJYSjG2o7qyrJb9A1-vdKcW7GXJRg89Hl3qEOGfFuGyZ6JgUC7VZqTbFnBM4NSU_6PSoKFHHDNRBnTJQxwzUmsGy9_YkMZsB-uetv09fCB9WAixG7z0kla2H0ULvE9ii-uj_I_EbbvOfDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386279287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ju, Siyi ; Zhang, Fenglun ; Duan, Jiufang ; Jiang, Jianxin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ju, Siyi ; Zhang, Fenglun ; Duan, Jiufang ; Jiang, Jianxin</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Novel bacterial cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan films were developed.•The effects of chitosan as a bulk solution and nanoparticles were compared.•Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles provided the best antibacterial activity.•Bulk chitosan improved the mechanical properties of the films.•Chitosan nanoparticles enhanced optical barrier properties against UV radiation. Ternary composite films containing bulk chitosan (CS) and chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) with different concentrations were prepared using bacterial cellulose/poly(vinyl alcohol) as the base film and the composites films were compared. The micromorphology and mechanical, physical, chemical, antibacterial, and optical barrier properties of the composite films were compared. CS incorporation improved the mechanical properties, as the maximum tensile strength was increased to 130.55 ± 9.42 MPa. The dense structure of CSNPs prevented water diffusion and lessened the water content of the composite membranes. The inclusion of CS and CSNPs both reduced the water solubility and water vapor permeability. CS-doped films possessed good transparency, while CSNPs had better ultraviolet-barrier properties (3.84 % of transmittance at 200–280 nm). In addition, CSNPs-embedded membranes exhibited prominent antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which were much greater than those of CS composite membranes with a maximum bacteriostatic diameter of 10.33 ± 1.55 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1344</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116167</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32241399</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibacterial properties ; Bacterial cellulose ; Chitosan ; Nanoparticles ; Poly(vinyl alcohol)</subject><ispartof>Carbohydrate polymers, 2020-06, Vol.237, p.116167-116167, Article 116167</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4ebb1fb71cf0e33a00bc7bd9fa7625f137f9c2efed87a89350488ebc51a9cf483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4ebb1fb71cf0e33a00bc7bd9fa7625f137f9c2efed87a89350488ebc51a9cf483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861720303416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32241399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ju, Siyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Fenglun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Jiufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jianxin</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study</title><title>Carbohydrate polymers</title><addtitle>Carbohydr Polym</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] •Novel bacterial cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan films were developed.•The effects of chitosan as a bulk solution and nanoparticles were compared.•Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles provided the best antibacterial activity.•Bulk chitosan improved the mechanical properties of the films.•Chitosan nanoparticles enhanced optical barrier properties against UV radiation. Ternary composite films containing bulk chitosan (CS) and chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) with different concentrations were prepared using bacterial cellulose/poly(vinyl alcohol) as the base film and the composites films were compared. The micromorphology and mechanical, physical, chemical, antibacterial, and optical barrier properties of the composite films were compared. CS incorporation improved the mechanical properties, as the maximum tensile strength was increased to 130.55 ± 9.42 MPa. The dense structure of CSNPs prevented water diffusion and lessened the water content of the composite membranes. The inclusion of CS and CSNPs both reduced the water solubility and water vapor permeability. CS-doped films possessed good transparency, while CSNPs had better ultraviolet-barrier properties (3.84 % of transmittance at 200–280 nm). In addition, CSNPs-embedded membranes exhibited prominent antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which were much greater than those of CS composite membranes with a maximum bacteriostatic diameter of 10.33 ± 1.55 mm.</description><subject>Antibacterial properties</subject><subject>Bacterial cellulose</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Poly(vinyl alcohol)</subject><issn>0144-8617</issn><issn>1879-1344</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtVARXdr-BJCPvWTxRxI7XFC14kuqxAXOlu2MtV6cOLWdVuUP9G-TJUs5MpfRPL2ZpzcPoTeUbCmh7bvD1upkphi2jLAFoy1txQu0oVJ0FeV1fYY2hNZ1JVsqztHrnA9kqZaSV-icM1ZT3nUb9LTb66RtgeR_6eLjiKPDZgV0wBZCmEPMgG0cpph9Aex8GDL2o41pikkX6PGDL3ts5vAT270vMesR67H_N4x6jJNOxdsA-T2--XNt0S3-HnAuc_94iV46HTJcnfoF-vHp4_fdl-r22-evu5vbyvK2KVUNxlBnBLWOAOeaEGOF6TunRcsaR7lwnWXgoJdCy443pJYSjG2o7qyrJb9A1-vdKcW7GXJRg89Hl3qEOGfFuGyZ6JgUC7VZqTbFnBM4NSU_6PSoKFHHDNRBnTJQxwzUmsGy9_YkMZsB-uetv09fCB9WAixG7z0kla2H0ULvE9ii-uj_I_EbbvOfDA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Ju, Siyi</creator><creator>Zhang, Fenglun</creator><creator>Duan, Jiufang</creator><creator>Jiang, Jianxin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study</title><author>Ju, Siyi ; Zhang, Fenglun ; Duan, Jiufang ; Jiang, Jianxin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-4ebb1fb71cf0e33a00bc7bd9fa7625f137f9c2efed87a89350488ebc51a9cf483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibacterial properties</topic><topic>Bacterial cellulose</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Poly(vinyl alcohol)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ju, Siyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Fenglun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, Jiufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jianxin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Carbohydrate polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ju, Siyi</au><au>Zhang, Fenglun</au><au>Duan, Jiufang</au><au>Jiang, Jianxin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Carbohydrate polymers</jtitle><addtitle>Carbohydr Polym</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>237</volume><spage>116167</spage><epage>116167</epage><pages>116167-116167</pages><artnum>116167</artnum><issn>0144-8617</issn><eissn>1879-1344</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Novel bacterial cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan films were developed.•The effects of chitosan as a bulk solution and nanoparticles were compared.•Incorporation of chitosan nanoparticles provided the best antibacterial activity.•Bulk chitosan improved the mechanical properties of the films.•Chitosan nanoparticles enhanced optical barrier properties against UV radiation. Ternary composite films containing bulk chitosan (CS) and chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) with different concentrations were prepared using bacterial cellulose/poly(vinyl alcohol) as the base film and the composites films were compared. The micromorphology and mechanical, physical, chemical, antibacterial, and optical barrier properties of the composite films were compared. CS incorporation improved the mechanical properties, as the maximum tensile strength was increased to 130.55 ± 9.42 MPa. The dense structure of CSNPs prevented water diffusion and lessened the water content of the composite membranes. The inclusion of CS and CSNPs both reduced the water solubility and water vapor permeability. CS-doped films possessed good transparency, while CSNPs had better ultraviolet-barrier properties (3.84 % of transmittance at 200–280 nm). In addition, CSNPs-embedded membranes exhibited prominent antibacterial properties against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which were much greater than those of CS composite membranes with a maximum bacteriostatic diameter of 10.33 ± 1.55 mm.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32241399</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116167</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8617
ispartof Carbohydrate polymers, 2020-06, Vol.237, p.116167-116167, Article 116167
issn 0144-8617
1879-1344
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2386279287
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Antibacterial properties
Bacterial cellulose
Chitosan
Nanoparticles
Poly(vinyl alcohol)
title Characterization of bacterial cellulose composite films incorporated with bulk chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles: A comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A46%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20bacterial%20cellulose%20composite%20films%20incorporated%20with%20bulk%20chitosan%20and%20chitosan%20nanoparticles:%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Carbohydrate%20polymers&rft.au=Ju,%20Siyi&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=237&rft.spage=116167&rft.epage=116167&rft.pages=116167-116167&rft.artnum=116167&rft.issn=0144-8617&rft.eissn=1879-1344&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2386279287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386279287&rft_id=info:pmid/32241399&rft_els_id=S0144861720303416&rfr_iscdi=true