The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients
The increased number of emergency clinic patients causes the length of stay in the emergency department, low patient satisfaction and dismiss of real emergency patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the prediction levels of emergency clinicians according to working year on the outcome of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2020-07, Vol.38 (7), p.1463-1465 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1465 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1463 |
| container_title | The American journal of emergency medicine |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Çalis, Mustafa Sener, Kemal Kaya, Adem Sari, Sezai Polat, Mustafa Yolcu, Sadiye |
| description | The increased number of emergency clinic patients causes the length of stay in the emergency department, low patient satisfaction and dismiss of real emergency patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the prediction levels of emergency clinicians according to working year on the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients presented to the emergency department (ED).
This prospective study included patients over 18 years old. The triage of outpatients was made by a senior nurse and patients were divided into three triage categories such as green, yellow and red. Then these patients were evaluated by the emergency physician at the examination areas. Ambulance patients were directly evaluated by the emergency physician. These ambulance patients were noted as yellow or red according to triage categories. The main complaints, triage category, presentation method, vital signs, predicted outcome noted by the clinicians.
The correct prediction levels of hospitalisation (clinic/intensive care unit) were higher in clinicians whose working year is between 6 and 10 years (p 10 year group according to prediction level (p > 0.05). Prediction of dischargement was higher in 0–5 year group than 6–10 year (p 10 year (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.050 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384216132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675720301248</els_id><sourcerecordid>2419051397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9a6e8ecb485e59c31acc348e450108e6eda93e12966a255695cb11807dc30283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJaTZpv0AOxdBLL3ZnJMt_oJcS2rSw0MvehTyebWRsayvZgXz7yGzSQw85DQO_92Z4T4gbhAIBqy9DYQeeCgkSCpAFaHgjdqiVzBus8ULsoFY6r2pdX4qrGAcAxFKX78SlklKClnon3OGes1Pg3tHi_JyN_MBjzPwx44nDH57pMaPRzY6cnWNmO78u2ZI0aZKfeCO31U7dOtqZkpldHM9LYud-o1729-Lt0Y6RPzzPa3H48f1w-zPf_777dfttn5NqyiVvbcUNU1c2mnVLCi2RKhsuNSA0XHFvW8Uo26qyUuuq1dQhNlD3pEA26lp8Ptuegv-7clzM5CLxmJ5jv0Yj0xWJFSqZ0E__oYNfw5yeM7LEFjSqtk6UPFMUfIyBj-YU3GTDo0EwWw9mMFsPZuvBgDSphyT6-Gy9dhP3_yQvwSfg6xlIafOD42AipZgoFRGYFtN795r_E4FBmR0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419051397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Çalis, Mustafa ; Sener, Kemal ; Kaya, Adem ; Sari, Sezai ; Polat, Mustafa ; Yolcu, Sadiye</creator><creatorcontrib>Çalis, Mustafa ; Sener, Kemal ; Kaya, Adem ; Sari, Sezai ; Polat, Mustafa ; Yolcu, Sadiye</creatorcontrib><description>The increased number of emergency clinic patients causes the length of stay in the emergency department, low patient satisfaction and dismiss of real emergency patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the prediction levels of emergency clinicians according to working year on the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients presented to the emergency department (ED).
This prospective study included patients over 18 years old. The triage of outpatients was made by a senior nurse and patients were divided into three triage categories such as green, yellow and red. Then these patients were evaluated by the emergency physician at the examination areas. Ambulance patients were directly evaluated by the emergency physician. These ambulance patients were noted as yellow or red according to triage categories. The main complaints, triage category, presentation method, vital signs, predicted outcome noted by the clinicians.
The correct prediction levels of hospitalisation (clinic/intensive care unit) were higher in clinicians whose working year is between 6 and 10 years (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between 6–10 year and >10 year group according to prediction level (p > 0.05). Prediction of dischargement was higher in 0–5 year group than 6–10 year (p < 0.05) and >10 year (p < 0.05) group.
Experienced clinicians can make much more accurate prediction on length of stay and the prognosis of the emergency patients so crowded follow-up areas of the emergency room can be planned much more effectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32220525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulance ; Clinics ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency service ; Methods ; Outpatient ; Patient satisfaction ; Physicians ; Prediction ; Predictions ; Triage</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020-07, Vol.38 (7), p.1463-1465</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9a6e8ecb485e59c31acc348e450108e6eda93e12966a255695cb11807dc30283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9a6e8ecb485e59c31acc348e450108e6eda93e12966a255695cb11807dc30283</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9499-9262 ; 0000-0001-9529-1354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2419051397?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72340</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çalis, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sener, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sari, Sezai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yolcu, Sadiye</creatorcontrib><title>The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>The increased number of emergency clinic patients causes the length of stay in the emergency department, low patient satisfaction and dismiss of real emergency patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the prediction levels of emergency clinicians according to working year on the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients presented to the emergency department (ED).
This prospective study included patients over 18 years old. The triage of outpatients was made by a senior nurse and patients were divided into three triage categories such as green, yellow and red. Then these patients were evaluated by the emergency physician at the examination areas. Ambulance patients were directly evaluated by the emergency physician. These ambulance patients were noted as yellow or red according to triage categories. The main complaints, triage category, presentation method, vital signs, predicted outcome noted by the clinicians.
The correct prediction levels of hospitalisation (clinic/intensive care unit) were higher in clinicians whose working year is between 6 and 10 years (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between 6–10 year and >10 year group according to prediction level (p > 0.05). Prediction of dischargement was higher in 0–5 year group than 6–10 year (p < 0.05) and >10 year (p < 0.05) group.
Experienced clinicians can make much more accurate prediction on length of stay and the prognosis of the emergency patients so crowded follow-up areas of the emergency room can be planned much more effectively.</description><subject>Ambulance</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency service</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Outpatient</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Triage</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9r3DAQxUVJaTZpv0AOxdBLL3ZnJMt_oJcS2rSw0MvehTyebWRsayvZgXz7yGzSQw85DQO_92Z4T4gbhAIBqy9DYQeeCgkSCpAFaHgjdqiVzBus8ULsoFY6r2pdX4qrGAcAxFKX78SlklKClnon3OGes1Pg3tHi_JyN_MBjzPwx44nDH57pMaPRzY6cnWNmO78u2ZI0aZKfeCO31U7dOtqZkpldHM9LYud-o1729-Lt0Y6RPzzPa3H48f1w-zPf_777dfttn5NqyiVvbcUNU1c2mnVLCi2RKhsuNSA0XHFvW8Uo26qyUuuq1dQhNlD3pEA26lp8Ptuegv-7clzM5CLxmJ5jv0Yj0xWJFSqZ0E__oYNfw5yeM7LEFjSqtk6UPFMUfIyBj-YU3GTDo0EwWw9mMFsPZuvBgDSphyT6-Gy9dhP3_yQvwSfg6xlIafOD42AipZgoFRGYFtN795r_E4FBmR0</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Çalis, Mustafa</creator><creator>Sener, Kemal</creator><creator>Kaya, Adem</creator><creator>Sari, Sezai</creator><creator>Polat, Mustafa</creator><creator>Yolcu, Sadiye</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-9262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9529-1354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients</title><author>Çalis, Mustafa ; Sener, Kemal ; Kaya, Adem ; Sari, Sezai ; Polat, Mustafa ; Yolcu, Sadiye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9a6e8ecb485e59c31acc348e450108e6eda93e12966a255695cb11807dc30283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ambulance</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency service</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Outpatient</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Triage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çalis, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sener, Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Adem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sari, Sezai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yolcu, Sadiye</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çalis, Mustafa</au><au>Sener, Kemal</au><au>Kaya, Adem</au><au>Sari, Sezai</au><au>Polat, Mustafa</au><au>Yolcu, Sadiye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1463</spage><epage>1465</epage><pages>1463-1465</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>The increased number of emergency clinic patients causes the length of stay in the emergency department, low patient satisfaction and dismiss of real emergency patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the prediction levels of emergency clinicians according to working year on the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients presented to the emergency department (ED).
This prospective study included patients over 18 years old. The triage of outpatients was made by a senior nurse and patients were divided into three triage categories such as green, yellow and red. Then these patients were evaluated by the emergency physician at the examination areas. Ambulance patients were directly evaluated by the emergency physician. These ambulance patients were noted as yellow or red according to triage categories. The main complaints, triage category, presentation method, vital signs, predicted outcome noted by the clinicians.
The correct prediction levels of hospitalisation (clinic/intensive care unit) were higher in clinicians whose working year is between 6 and 10 years (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between 6–10 year and >10 year group according to prediction level (p > 0.05). Prediction of dischargement was higher in 0–5 year group than 6–10 year (p < 0.05) and >10 year (p < 0.05) group.
Experienced clinicians can make much more accurate prediction on length of stay and the prognosis of the emergency patients so crowded follow-up areas of the emergency room can be planned much more effectively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32220525</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.050</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9499-9262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9529-1354</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0735-6757 |
| ispartof | The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020-07, Vol.38 (7), p.1463-1465 |
| issn | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384216132 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
| subjects | Ambulance Clinics Emergency medical care Emergency service Methods Outpatient Patient satisfaction Physicians Prediction Predictions Triage |
| title | The prediction levels of emergency clinicians about the outcome of the ambulance patients and outpatients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T11%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prediction%20levels%20of%20emergency%20clinicians%20about%20the%20outcome%20of%20the%20ambulance%20patients%20and%20outpatients&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=%C3%87alis,%20Mustafa&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1463&rft.epage=1465&rft.pages=1463-1465&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2419051397%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419051397&rft_id=info:pmid/32220525&rft_els_id=S0735675720301248&rfr_iscdi=true |