Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis
Purpose Although non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma are usually assumed to be low grade glioma (LGG), some high grade glioma (HGG) do not enhance, which may lead to a delay in biopsy and/or resection, diagnosis, and treatment initiation. Thus, there is a clear need for a large-sample study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuro-oncology 2020-05, Vol.147 (3), p.671-679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 679 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 671 |
container_title | Journal of neuro-oncology |
container_volume | 147 |
creator | Eichberg, Daniel G. Di, Long Morell, Alexis A. Shah, Ashish H. Semonche, Alexa M. Chin, Christopher N. Bhatia, Rita G. Jamshidi, Aria M. Luther, Evan M. Komotar, Ricardo J. Ivan, Michael E. |
description | Purpose
Although non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma are usually assumed to be low grade glioma (LGG), some high grade glioma (HGG) do not enhance, which may lead to a delay in biopsy and/or resection, diagnosis, and treatment initiation. Thus, there is a clear need for a large-sample study that quantifies the rate of malignant, non-enhancing gliomas.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our series of 561 consecutive surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis, 111 of which were non-enhancing, to determine the prevalence of high-grade histology in radiographically presumed LGG. Relative expression of tumor markers were also reported for non-enhancing lesions to investigate genetic correlates.
Results
We identified 561 surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis from August 2012 to July 2018 and found that 111 patients (19.8%) demonstrated non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma on preoperative MRI. Thirty-one (27.9%) of the non-enhancing lesions were classified as HGGs (WHO Grade III or IV). Non-enhancing lesions were four times more likely to be HGG in patients older than 60 years than patients younger than 35 years (41.2% vs. 11.4%, Pearson Chi
2
p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384204477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2407552254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fb786107a69838b44f5521cdf3fed5a0a12c721bfb7d635e6689d9de010031e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYNY7LP6BVxIwE03o_k7mXEnpdVCwU0FdyFvcmcmZV4y5s6g7Qfq5zT2vSp04SKEcH_nnEsOIW84e88ZMx-Qc1aziolypDKquntGNlwbWRlp5HOyYbw2lW7V92PyEvGGMaaM5C_IsRRCcNPoDbm_jF3wEDugqadjGEY6ZOeBDlNIO4d0zoAQlxAHWl5lFFIB5jF0bppuaUyxgji64lKICTCkiB8p_JohhwfbECnnnOKah4NmyeAW8E-0j4E_wzLSJSCuQH1wQ0wY8BU56t2E8Ppwn5BvF-fXZ1-qq6-fL88-XVWdNHqp-q1pas6Mq9tGNluleq0F73wve_DaMcdFZwTfFs7XUkNdN61vPbDyn5JDK0_I6d53zunHCrjYXcAOpslFSCtaIRslmFLGFPTdE_QmrTmW7axQzJRgoVWhxJ7qckLM0Ns5h53Lt5Yz-6dFu2_RlhbtQ4v2rojeHqzX7Q78X8ljbQWQewDLKA6Q_2X_x_Y3WTmrVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407552254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Eichberg, Daniel G. ; Di, Long ; Morell, Alexis A. ; Shah, Ashish H. ; Semonche, Alexa M. ; Chin, Christopher N. ; Bhatia, Rita G. ; Jamshidi, Aria M. ; Luther, Evan M. ; Komotar, Ricardo J. ; Ivan, Michael E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eichberg, Daniel G. ; Di, Long ; Morell, Alexis A. ; Shah, Ashish H. ; Semonche, Alexa M. ; Chin, Christopher N. ; Bhatia, Rita G. ; Jamshidi, Aria M. ; Luther, Evan M. ; Komotar, Ricardo J. ; Ivan, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Although non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma are usually assumed to be low grade glioma (LGG), some high grade glioma (HGG) do not enhance, which may lead to a delay in biopsy and/or resection, diagnosis, and treatment initiation. Thus, there is a clear need for a large-sample study that quantifies the rate of malignant, non-enhancing gliomas.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our series of 561 consecutive surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis, 111 of which were non-enhancing, to determine the prevalence of high-grade histology in radiographically presumed LGG. Relative expression of tumor markers were also reported for non-enhancing lesions to investigate genetic correlates.
Results
We identified 561 surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis from August 2012 to July 2018 and found that 111 patients (19.8%) demonstrated non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma on preoperative MRI. Thirty-one (27.9%) of the non-enhancing lesions were classified as HGGs (WHO Grade III or IV). Non-enhancing lesions were four times more likely to be HGG in patients older than 60 years than patients younger than 35 years (41.2% vs. 11.4%, Pearson Chi
2
p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression showed a significant inverse effect of age on the presence of IDH mutation in non-enhancing HGGs (p = 0.007).
Conclusion
A clinically significant proportion (27.9%) of non-enhancing lesions were found to be HGG on final pathologic diagnosis. Thus, in patients with good functional and health status, especially those older than 60 years, we recommend obtaining tissue diagnosis of all lesions suspected to be glioma, even those that are non-enhancing, to guide diagnosis as well as early initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-594X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32221785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical Study ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Glioma ; Glioma - diagnostic imaging ; Glioma - epidemiology ; Glioma - pathology ; Glioma - surgery ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lesions ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Oncology ; Radiation therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor markers ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020-05, Vol.147 (3), p.671-679</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fb786107a69838b44f5521cdf3fed5a0a12c721bfb7d635e6689d9de010031e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fb786107a69838b44f5521cdf3fed5a0a12c721bfb7d635e6689d9de010031e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eichberg, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morell, Alexis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Ashish H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semonche, Alexa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Christopher N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatia, Rita G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Aria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luther, Evan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komotar, Ricardo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivan, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><title>Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis</title><title>Journal of neuro-oncology</title><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Although non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma are usually assumed to be low grade glioma (LGG), some high grade glioma (HGG) do not enhance, which may lead to a delay in biopsy and/or resection, diagnosis, and treatment initiation. Thus, there is a clear need for a large-sample study that quantifies the rate of malignant, non-enhancing gliomas.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our series of 561 consecutive surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis, 111 of which were non-enhancing, to determine the prevalence of high-grade histology in radiographically presumed LGG. Relative expression of tumor markers were also reported for non-enhancing lesions to investigate genetic correlates.
Results
We identified 561 surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis from August 2012 to July 2018 and found that 111 patients (19.8%) demonstrated non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma on preoperative MRI. Thirty-one (27.9%) of the non-enhancing lesions were classified as HGGs (WHO Grade III or IV). Non-enhancing lesions were four times more likely to be HGG in patients older than 60 years than patients younger than 35 years (41.2% vs. 11.4%, Pearson Chi
2
p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression showed a significant inverse effect of age on the presence of IDH mutation in non-enhancing HGGs (p = 0.007).
Conclusion
A clinically significant proportion (27.9%) of non-enhancing lesions were found to be HGG on final pathologic diagnosis. Thus, in patients with good functional and health status, especially those older than 60 years, we recommend obtaining tissue diagnosis of all lesions suspected to be glioma, even those that are non-enhancing, to guide diagnosis as well as early initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glioma</subject><subject>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glioma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Glioma - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor markers</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0167-594X</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYNY7LP6BVxIwE03o_k7mXEnpdVCwU0FdyFvcmcmZV4y5s6g7Qfq5zT2vSp04SKEcH_nnEsOIW84e88ZMx-Qc1aziolypDKquntGNlwbWRlp5HOyYbw2lW7V92PyEvGGMaaM5C_IsRRCcNPoDbm_jF3wEDugqadjGEY6ZOeBDlNIO4d0zoAQlxAHWl5lFFIB5jF0bppuaUyxgji64lKICTCkiB8p_JohhwfbECnnnOKah4NmyeAW8E-0j4E_wzLSJSCuQH1wQ0wY8BU56t2E8Ppwn5BvF-fXZ1-qq6-fL88-XVWdNHqp-q1pas6Mq9tGNluleq0F73wve_DaMcdFZwTfFs7XUkNdN61vPbDyn5JDK0_I6d53zunHCrjYXcAOpslFSCtaIRslmFLGFPTdE_QmrTmW7axQzJRgoVWhxJ7qckLM0Ns5h53Lt5Yz-6dFu2_RlhbtQ4v2rojeHqzX7Q78X8ljbQWQewDLKA6Q_2X_x_Y3WTmrVg</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Eichberg, Daniel G.</creator><creator>Di, Long</creator><creator>Morell, Alexis A.</creator><creator>Shah, Ashish H.</creator><creator>Semonche, Alexa M.</creator><creator>Chin, Christopher N.</creator><creator>Bhatia, Rita G.</creator><creator>Jamshidi, Aria M.</creator><creator>Luther, Evan M.</creator><creator>Komotar, Ricardo J.</creator><creator>Ivan, Michael E.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis</title><author>Eichberg, Daniel G. ; Di, Long ; Morell, Alexis A. ; Shah, Ashish H. ; Semonche, Alexa M. ; Chin, Christopher N. ; Bhatia, Rita G. ; Jamshidi, Aria M. ; Luther, Evan M. ; Komotar, Ricardo J. ; Ivan, Michael E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fb786107a69838b44f5521cdf3fed5a0a12c721bfb7d635e6689d9de010031e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glioma</topic><topic>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glioma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Glioma - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor markers</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eichberg, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Long</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morell, Alexis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Ashish H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semonche, Alexa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, Christopher N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatia, Rita G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Aria M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luther, Evan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komotar, Ricardo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivan, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eichberg, Daniel G.</au><au>Di, Long</au><au>Morell, Alexis A.</au><au>Shah, Ashish H.</au><au>Semonche, Alexa M.</au><au>Chin, Christopher N.</au><au>Bhatia, Rita G.</au><au>Jamshidi, Aria M.</au><au>Luther, Evan M.</au><au>Komotar, Ricardo J.</au><au>Ivan, Michael E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurooncol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>147</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>671-679</pages><issn>0167-594X</issn><eissn>1573-7373</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Although non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma are usually assumed to be low grade glioma (LGG), some high grade glioma (HGG) do not enhance, which may lead to a delay in biopsy and/or resection, diagnosis, and treatment initiation. Thus, there is a clear need for a large-sample study that quantifies the rate of malignant, non-enhancing gliomas.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed our series of 561 consecutive surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis, 111 of which were non-enhancing, to determine the prevalence of high-grade histology in radiographically presumed LGG. Relative expression of tumor markers were also reported for non-enhancing lesions to investigate genetic correlates.
Results
We identified 561 surgically treated gliomas with tissue diagnosis from August 2012 to July 2018 and found that 111 patients (19.8%) demonstrated non-enhancing lesions suspicious for glioma on preoperative MRI. Thirty-one (27.9%) of the non-enhancing lesions were classified as HGGs (WHO Grade III or IV). Non-enhancing lesions were four times more likely to be HGG in patients older than 60 years than patients younger than 35 years (41.2% vs. 11.4%, Pearson Chi
2
p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression showed a significant inverse effect of age on the presence of IDH mutation in non-enhancing HGGs (p = 0.007).
Conclusion
A clinically significant proportion (27.9%) of non-enhancing lesions were found to be HGG on final pathologic diagnosis. Thus, in patients with good functional and health status, especially those older than 60 years, we recommend obtaining tissue diagnosis of all lesions suspected to be glioma, even those that are non-enhancing, to guide diagnosis as well as early initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32221785</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-594X |
ispartof | Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020-05, Vol.147 (3), p.671-679 |
issn | 0167-594X 1573-7373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384204477 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biopsy Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Brain Neoplasms - epidemiology Brain Neoplasms - pathology Brain Neoplasms - surgery Chemotherapy Clinical Study Diagnosis Female Glioma Glioma - diagnostic imaging Glioma - epidemiology Glioma - pathology Glioma - surgery Humans Incidence Lesions Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neurology Oncology Radiation therapy Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome Tumor markers Young Adult |
title | Incidence of high grade gliomas presenting as radiographically non-enhancing lesions: experience in 111 surgically treated non-enhancing gliomas with tissue diagnosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A42%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incidence%20of%20high%20grade%20gliomas%20presenting%20as%20radiographically%20non-enhancing%20lesions:%20experience%20in%20111%20surgically%20treated%20non-enhancing%20gliomas%20with%20tissue%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuro-oncology&rft.au=Eichberg,%20Daniel%20G.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=147&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=671-679&rft.issn=0167-594X&rft.eissn=1573-7373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11060-020-03474-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2407552254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407552254&rft_id=info:pmid/32221785&rfr_iscdi=true |