Radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of component fit in subtle knee pain after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose To determine the component fit by radiography or computed tomography after total knee arthroplasty and the relation of imaging with clinical examination of residual knee pain. Methods The study was conducted in 172 patients with residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-06, Vol.28 (6), p.2015-2022
Hauptverfasser: Simsek, Mehmet Emin, Gursoy, Safa, Akkaya, Mustafa, Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa, Bozkurt, Murat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2022
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2015
container_title Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
container_volume 28
creator Simsek, Mehmet Emin
Gursoy, Safa
Akkaya, Mustafa
Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa
Bozkurt, Murat
description Purpose To determine the component fit by radiography or computed tomography after total knee arthroplasty and the relation of imaging with clinical examination of residual knee pain. Methods The study was conducted in 172 patients with residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The patients were examined to determine whether they experienced pain upon palpation at nine regions surrounding the tibial and femoral components, and the results were noted. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain scale score forms were completed for all patients. Radiologic evaluation was performed using computed tomography and anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs to determine component overhang/underhang status at these nine regions. Overhang, underhang, and cortical fit groups were created based on the position of the component at the bone margin. A statistical relationship was sought between the clinical scores and the values measured to determine which imaging method showed the best correlation with clinical scores. Consistency of CT and Rx measurements was compared using the McNemar–Bowker test. Comparisons between groups were made using Student’s t test for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results Computed tomography and radiographic measurements were similar in the medial, anterior, and lateral tibial regions. However, no similarities were observed in the anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial and distal-lateral aspects of the femur. Statistical relationships among decreased clinical scores, pain with palpation, and the presence of overhang/underhang were only observed in the medial tibial region for imaging using radiography. A statistically significant relationship was observed in the medial, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial region of the femur for imaging based on computed tomography. Conclusions Radiography could only aid in assessing the component fit in the anteromedial, medial, and lateral regions of the tibia in patients with residual knee pain following knee arthroplasty, but it was not sufficient in comparison with computed tomography in six other regions. Level of evidence Prospective study, level of evidence II.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00167-020-05940-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384204069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2384204069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8aab6a1a2e5c5d58a89690e6418bd7f6412123ddd7d375f2e47f1bdaaf1773b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFjEQh4Mo9m31C3iQgBcvq5M_u9k9SqlaKAii5zC7mbRb903WJCv02xu7VcGDpwkzz_wm8DD2QsAbAWDeZgDRmQYkNNAOGhrziB2EVqoxSpvH7ACDlo2EtjthpznfAtSnHp6yEyWlFJ2GA1s_o5vjdcL1JnNMxEMsPG_ez9NMoXAfE6cfuGxY5hh49HyKxzWG-9lc-BwqPZaF-LdAxFesDfSFEi-x4LJ3MZWbFNcFc7l7xp54XDI9f6hn7Ov7iy_nH5urTx8uz99dNZMybWl6xLFDgZLaqXVtj_3QDUCdFv3ojK9VCqmcc8ZV3kvSxovRIXphjBp7dcZe77lrit83ysUe5zzRsmCguGUrVa8laOiGir76B72NWwr1d1ZqMFLUo22l5E5NKeacyNs1zUdMd1aA_eXD7j5s9WHvfVhTl14-RG_jkdyfld8CKqB2INdRuKb09_Z_Yn8CZsmW0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407214185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of component fit in subtle knee pain after total knee arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Simsek, Mehmet Emin ; Gursoy, Safa ; Akkaya, Mustafa ; Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa ; Bozkurt, Murat</creator><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Mehmet Emin ; Gursoy, Safa ; Akkaya, Mustafa ; Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa ; Bozkurt, Murat</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine the component fit by radiography or computed tomography after total knee arthroplasty and the relation of imaging with clinical examination of residual knee pain. Methods The study was conducted in 172 patients with residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The patients were examined to determine whether they experienced pain upon palpation at nine regions surrounding the tibial and femoral components, and the results were noted. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain scale score forms were completed for all patients. Radiologic evaluation was performed using computed tomography and anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs to determine component overhang/underhang status at these nine regions. Overhang, underhang, and cortical fit groups were created based on the position of the component at the bone margin. A statistical relationship was sought between the clinical scores and the values measured to determine which imaging method showed the best correlation with clinical scores. Consistency of CT and Rx measurements was compared using the McNemar–Bowker test. Comparisons between groups were made using Student’s t test for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results Computed tomography and radiographic measurements were similar in the medial, anterior, and lateral tibial regions. However, no similarities were observed in the anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial and distal-lateral aspects of the femur. Statistical relationships among decreased clinical scores, pain with palpation, and the presence of overhang/underhang were only observed in the medial tibial region for imaging using radiography. A statistically significant relationship was observed in the medial, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial region of the femur for imaging based on computed tomography. Conclusions Radiography could only aid in assessing the component fit in the anteromedial, medial, and lateral regions of the tibia in patients with residual knee pain following knee arthroplasty, but it was not sufficient in comparison with computed tomography in six other regions. Level of evidence Prospective study, level of evidence II.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05940-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32221640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty (knee) ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Biomedical materials ; Computed tomography ; Correlation analysis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Femoral components ; Femur ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee - surgery ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Pain ; Pain - diagnostic imaging ; Pain - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Radiographs ; Radiography ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics ; Surgical implants ; Tibia ; Tibia - surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-06, Vol.28 (6), p.2015-2022</ispartof><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2020</rights><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8aab6a1a2e5c5d58a89690e6418bd7f6412123ddd7d375f2e47f1bdaaf1773b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8aab6a1a2e5c5d58a89690e6418bd7f6412123ddd7d375f2e47f1bdaaf1773b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8160-5375</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00167-020-05940-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-020-05940-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32221640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Mehmet Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursoy, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkaya, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozkurt, Murat</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of component fit in subtle knee pain after total knee arthroplasty</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine the component fit by radiography or computed tomography after total knee arthroplasty and the relation of imaging with clinical examination of residual knee pain. Methods The study was conducted in 172 patients with residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The patients were examined to determine whether they experienced pain upon palpation at nine regions surrounding the tibial and femoral components, and the results were noted. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain scale score forms were completed for all patients. Radiologic evaluation was performed using computed tomography and anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs to determine component overhang/underhang status at these nine regions. Overhang, underhang, and cortical fit groups were created based on the position of the component at the bone margin. A statistical relationship was sought between the clinical scores and the values measured to determine which imaging method showed the best correlation with clinical scores. Consistency of CT and Rx measurements was compared using the McNemar–Bowker test. Comparisons between groups were made using Student’s t test for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results Computed tomography and radiographic measurements were similar in the medial, anterior, and lateral tibial regions. However, no similarities were observed in the anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial and distal-lateral aspects of the femur. Statistical relationships among decreased clinical scores, pain with palpation, and the presence of overhang/underhang were only observed in the medial tibial region for imaging using radiography. A statistically significant relationship was observed in the medial, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial region of the femur for imaging based on computed tomography. Conclusions Radiography could only aid in assessing the component fit in the anteromedial, medial, and lateral regions of the tibia in patients with residual knee pain following knee arthroplasty, but it was not sufficient in comparison with computed tomography in six other regions. Level of evidence Prospective study, level of evidence II.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral components</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pain - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFjEQh4Mo9m31C3iQgBcvq5M_u9k9SqlaKAii5zC7mbRb903WJCv02xu7VcGDpwkzz_wm8DD2QsAbAWDeZgDRmQYkNNAOGhrziB2EVqoxSpvH7ACDlo2EtjthpznfAtSnHp6yEyWlFJ2GA1s_o5vjdcL1JnNMxEMsPG_ez9NMoXAfE6cfuGxY5hh49HyKxzWG-9lc-BwqPZaF-LdAxFesDfSFEi-x4LJ3MZWbFNcFc7l7xp54XDI9f6hn7Ov7iy_nH5urTx8uz99dNZMybWl6xLFDgZLaqXVtj_3QDUCdFv3ojK9VCqmcc8ZV3kvSxovRIXphjBp7dcZe77lrit83ysUe5zzRsmCguGUrVa8laOiGir76B72NWwr1d1ZqMFLUo22l5E5NKeacyNs1zUdMd1aA_eXD7j5s9WHvfVhTl14-RG_jkdyfld8CKqB2INdRuKb09_Z_Yn8CZsmW0Q</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Simsek, Mehmet Emin</creator><creator>Gursoy, Safa</creator><creator>Akkaya, Mustafa</creator><creator>Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa</creator><creator>Bozkurt, Murat</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8160-5375</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of component fit in subtle knee pain after total knee arthroplasty</title><author>Simsek, Mehmet Emin ; Gursoy, Safa ; Akkaya, Mustafa ; Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa ; Bozkurt, Murat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-8aab6a1a2e5c5d58a89690e6418bd7f6412123ddd7d375f2e47f1bdaaf1773b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral components</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pain - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Mehmet Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursoy, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkaya, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozkurt, Murat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simsek, Mehmet Emin</au><au>Gursoy, Safa</au><au>Akkaya, Mustafa</au><au>Kapicioglu, M. I. Safa</au><au>Bozkurt, Murat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of component fit in subtle knee pain after total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><stitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</stitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2015</spage><epage>2022</epage><pages>2015-2022</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Purpose To determine the component fit by radiography or computed tomography after total knee arthroplasty and the relation of imaging with clinical examination of residual knee pain. Methods The study was conducted in 172 patients with residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The patients were examined to determine whether they experienced pain upon palpation at nine regions surrounding the tibial and femoral components, and the results were noted. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain scale score forms were completed for all patients. Radiologic evaluation was performed using computed tomography and anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs to determine component overhang/underhang status at these nine regions. Overhang, underhang, and cortical fit groups were created based on the position of the component at the bone margin. A statistical relationship was sought between the clinical scores and the values measured to determine which imaging method showed the best correlation with clinical scores. Consistency of CT and Rx measurements was compared using the McNemar–Bowker test. Comparisons between groups were made using Student’s t test for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results Computed tomography and radiographic measurements were similar in the medial, anterior, and lateral tibial regions. However, no similarities were observed in the anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial and distal-lateral aspects of the femur. Statistical relationships among decreased clinical scores, pain with palpation, and the presence of overhang/underhang were only observed in the medial tibial region for imaging using radiography. A statistically significant relationship was observed in the medial, posteromedial, and posterolateral tibial regions, and in the distal-medial region of the femur for imaging based on computed tomography. Conclusions Radiography could only aid in assessing the component fit in the anteromedial, medial, and lateral regions of the tibia in patients with residual knee pain following knee arthroplasty, but it was not sufficient in comparison with computed tomography in six other regions. Level of evidence Prospective study, level of evidence II.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32221640</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-020-05940-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8160-5375</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0942-2056
ispartof Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-06, Vol.28 (6), p.2015-2022
issn 0942-2056
1433-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2384204069
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Arthritis
Arthroplasty (knee)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Biomedical materials
Computed tomography
Correlation analysis
Evaluation
Female
Femoral components
Femur
Femur - surgery
Humans
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee - surgery
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Pain
Pain - diagnostic imaging
Pain - surgery
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Radiographs
Radiography
Statistical analysis
Statistics
Surgical implants
Tibia
Tibia - surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Radiographs are not sufficient for evaluation of component fit in subtle knee pain after total knee arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographs%20are%20not%20sufficient%20for%20evaluation%20of%20component%20fit%20in%20subtle%20knee%20pain%20after%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Simsek,%20Mehmet%20Emin&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2015&rft.epage=2022&rft.pages=2015-2022&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-020-05940-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2384204069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407214185&rft_id=info:pmid/32221640&rfr_iscdi=true