Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA. An institut...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S359-S363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S363 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | S359 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Bigart, Kevin C. Nahhas, Cindy R. Ruzich, Gregory P. Culvern, Chris N. Salzano, Michael B. Della Valle, Craig J. Nam, Denis |
description | Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA.
An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test.
The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04).
Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2383512454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540320302096</els_id><sourcerecordid>2383512454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS0EoqHwBTggH7ns4r-7joSEopRQpKJWVTlbXntMHHbjxXaQ8u1xlNJj5zLS6L2neT-E3lPSUkK7T7vWpLJtGWGkJawlQr1ACyo5a5Qg3Uu0IErxRgrCL9CbnHeEUCqleI0uOGNkyVS_QONVhIw3MMVkRvwjpnkbx_jriO8SuGALLlvA9yH_xtHjO0hhTjHXWwkWb5Kx5ZAAr3yBhNcwwb6MkDN-iKWmXYcZr-qHKc6jyeX45S165c2Y4d3jvkQ_N18f1tfNze237-vVTWO57ErTqd4x6Zf9IAgZ-k5Y7od-cKSnTrJeDUAoOOhdHemdNcI633V8abwUTip-iT6ec-uzfw6Qi55CtjCOZg_xkDXjikvKhBRVys5SW3vlBF7PKUwmHTUl-kRZ7_SJsj5R1oTpSrmaPjzmH4YJ3JPlP9Yq-HwWQG35N0DS2QbY24o0gS3axfBc_j-W8o_y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2383512454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bigart, Kevin C. ; Nahhas, Cindy R. ; Ruzich, Gregory P. ; Culvern, Chris N. ; Salzano, Michael B. ; Della Valle, Craig J. ; Nam, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Bigart, Kevin C. ; Nahhas, Cindy R. ; Ruzich, Gregory P. ; Culvern, Chris N. ; Salzano, Michael B. ; Della Valle, Craig J. ; Nam, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA.
An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test.
The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04).
Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32209287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; cementless femoral fixation ; cementless total hip arthroplasty ; early periprosthetic femur fracture ; femoral morphology ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; periprosthetic femur fracture ; Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S359-S363</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bigart, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahhas, Cindy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzich, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culvern, Chris N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzano, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA.
An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test.
The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04).
Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>cementless femoral fixation</subject><subject>cementless total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>early periprosthetic femur fracture</subject><subject>femoral morphology</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>periprosthetic femur fracture</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS0EoqHwBTggH7ns4r-7joSEopRQpKJWVTlbXntMHHbjxXaQ8u1xlNJj5zLS6L2neT-E3lPSUkK7T7vWpLJtGWGkJawlQr1ACyo5a5Qg3Uu0IErxRgrCL9CbnHeEUCqleI0uOGNkyVS_QONVhIw3MMVkRvwjpnkbx_jriO8SuGALLlvA9yH_xtHjO0hhTjHXWwkWb5Kx5ZAAr3yBhNcwwb6MkDN-iKWmXYcZr-qHKc6jyeX45S165c2Y4d3jvkQ_N18f1tfNze237-vVTWO57ErTqd4x6Zf9IAgZ-k5Y7od-cKSnTrJeDUAoOOhdHemdNcI633V8abwUTip-iT6ec-uzfw6Qi55CtjCOZg_xkDXjikvKhBRVys5SW3vlBF7PKUwmHTUl-kRZ7_SJsj5R1oTpSrmaPjzmH4YJ3JPlP9Yq-HwWQG35N0DS2QbY24o0gS3axfBc_j-W8o_y</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Bigart, Kevin C.</creator><creator>Nahhas, Cindy R.</creator><creator>Ruzich, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Culvern, Chris N.</creator><creator>Salzano, Michael B.</creator><creator>Della Valle, Craig J.</creator><creator>Nam, Denis</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</title><author>Bigart, Kevin C. ; Nahhas, Cindy R. ; Ruzich, Gregory P. ; Culvern, Chris N. ; Salzano, Michael B. ; Della Valle, Craig J. ; Nam, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>cementless femoral fixation</topic><topic>cementless total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>early periprosthetic femur fracture</topic><topic>femoral morphology</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>periprosthetic femur fracture</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bigart, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahhas, Cindy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzich, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culvern, Chris N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzano, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bigart, Kevin C.</au><au>Nahhas, Cindy R.</au><au>Ruzich, Gregory P.</au><au>Culvern, Chris N.</au><au>Salzano, Michael B.</au><au>Della Valle, Craig J.</au><au>Nam, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>S359</spage><epage>S363</epage><pages>S359-S363</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA.
An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test.
The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04).
Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32209287</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S359-S363 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2383512454 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects cementless femoral fixation cementless total hip arthroplasty early periprosthetic femur fracture femoral morphology Femur - diagnostic imaging Femur - surgery Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects Humans periprosthetic femur fracture Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology Prosthesis Design Retrospective Studies total hip arthroplasty |
title | Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A39%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Femoral%20Morphology%20Predict%20the%20Risk%20of%20Periprosthetic%20Fracture%20After%20Cementless%20Total%20Hip%20Arthroplasty?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Bigart,%20Kevin%20C.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=S359&rft.epage=S363&rft.pages=S359-S363&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2383512454%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2383512454&rft_id=info:pmid/32209287&rft_els_id=S0883540320302096&rfr_iscdi=true |