Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA. An institut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S359-S363
Hauptverfasser: Bigart, Kevin C., Nahhas, Cindy R., Ruzich, Gregory P., Culvern, Chris N., Salzano, Michael B., Della Valle, Craig J., Nam, Denis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S363
container_issue 6
container_start_page S359
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 35
creator Bigart, Kevin C.
Nahhas, Cindy R.
Ruzich, Gregory P.
Culvern, Chris N.
Salzano, Michael B.
Della Valle, Craig J.
Nam, Denis
description Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA. An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test. The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04). Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2383512454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540320302096</els_id><sourcerecordid>2383512454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS0EoqHwBTggH7ns4r-7joSEopRQpKJWVTlbXntMHHbjxXaQ8u1xlNJj5zLS6L2neT-E3lPSUkK7T7vWpLJtGWGkJawlQr1ACyo5a5Qg3Uu0IErxRgrCL9CbnHeEUCqleI0uOGNkyVS_QONVhIw3MMVkRvwjpnkbx_jriO8SuGALLlvA9yH_xtHjO0hhTjHXWwkWb5Kx5ZAAr3yBhNcwwb6MkDN-iKWmXYcZr-qHKc6jyeX45S165c2Y4d3jvkQ_N18f1tfNze237-vVTWO57ErTqd4x6Zf9IAgZ-k5Y7od-cKSnTrJeDUAoOOhdHemdNcI633V8abwUTip-iT6ec-uzfw6Qi55CtjCOZg_xkDXjikvKhBRVys5SW3vlBF7PKUwmHTUl-kRZ7_SJsj5R1oTpSrmaPjzmH4YJ3JPlP9Yq-HwWQG35N0DS2QbY24o0gS3axfBc_j-W8o_y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2383512454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Bigart, Kevin C. ; Nahhas, Cindy R. ; Ruzich, Gregory P. ; Culvern, Chris N. ; Salzano, Michael B. ; Della Valle, Craig J. ; Nam, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Bigart, Kevin C. ; Nahhas, Cindy R. ; Ruzich, Gregory P. ; Culvern, Chris N. ; Salzano, Michael B. ; Della Valle, Craig J. ; Nam, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA. An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test. The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04). Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32209287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; cementless femoral fixation ; cementless total hip arthroplasty ; early periprosthetic femur fracture ; femoral morphology ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Humans ; periprosthetic femur fracture ; Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S359-S363</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bigart, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahhas, Cindy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzich, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culvern, Chris N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzano, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA. An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test. The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04). Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>cementless femoral fixation</subject><subject>cementless total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>early periprosthetic femur fracture</subject><subject>femoral morphology</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>periprosthetic femur fracture</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9vEzEQxS0EoqHwBTggH7ns4r-7joSEopRQpKJWVTlbXntMHHbjxXaQ8u1xlNJj5zLS6L2neT-E3lPSUkK7T7vWpLJtGWGkJawlQr1ACyo5a5Qg3Uu0IErxRgrCL9CbnHeEUCqleI0uOGNkyVS_QONVhIw3MMVkRvwjpnkbx_jriO8SuGALLlvA9yH_xtHjO0hhTjHXWwkWb5Kx5ZAAr3yBhNcwwb6MkDN-iKWmXYcZr-qHKc6jyeX45S165c2Y4d3jvkQ_N18f1tfNze237-vVTWO57ErTqd4x6Zf9IAgZ-k5Y7od-cKSnTrJeDUAoOOhdHemdNcI633V8abwUTip-iT6ec-uzfw6Qi55CtjCOZg_xkDXjikvKhBRVys5SW3vlBF7PKUwmHTUl-kRZ7_SJsj5R1oTpSrmaPjzmH4YJ3JPlP9Yq-HwWQG35N0DS2QbY24o0gS3axfBc_j-W8o_y</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Bigart, Kevin C.</creator><creator>Nahhas, Cindy R.</creator><creator>Ruzich, Gregory P.</creator><creator>Culvern, Chris N.</creator><creator>Salzano, Michael B.</creator><creator>Della Valle, Craig J.</creator><creator>Nam, Denis</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</title><author>Bigart, Kevin C. ; Nahhas, Cindy R. ; Ruzich, Gregory P. ; Culvern, Chris N. ; Salzano, Michael B. ; Della Valle, Craig J. ; Nam, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-687d25f97b400b764c3fb7bd071d5278be01ede7dddd5fdca4cdf6639af54d583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>cementless femoral fixation</topic><topic>cementless total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>early periprosthetic femur fracture</topic><topic>femoral morphology</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>periprosthetic femur fracture</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bigart, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nahhas, Cindy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruzich, Gregory P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culvern, Chris N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzano, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Della Valle, Craig J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bigart, Kevin C.</au><au>Nahhas, Cindy R.</au><au>Ruzich, Gregory P.</au><au>Culvern, Chris N.</au><au>Salzano, Michael B.</au><au>Della Valle, Craig J.</au><au>Nam, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>S359</spage><epage>S363</epage><pages>S359-S363</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Periprosthetic femur fracture remains a leading mode of early failure following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to determine if a specific femoral morphology is associated with an increased risk of acute, periprosthetic fracture after cementless THA. An institutional arthroplasty registry was used to identify 32 primary, cementless THAs revised for acute, postoperative periprosthetic fracture (“fracture” cohort) within 3 months of the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:2 to 64 THAs without fracture (“control” cohort) for age, body mass index, gender, and stem design. Preoperative radiographic measurements performed on anteroposterior pelvis and femur radiographs included the neck-shaft angle, endosteal width at 4 locations, and external cortical diameter at 2 locations. These measurements were used to calculate the morphological cortical index, canal flare index, canal calcar ratio, and canal bone ratio. Postoperative measurements included canal fill and stem alignment. Statistical analyses included clustered regressions, Fisher’s exact test, and Student’s t-test. The mean endosteal width at 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter was greater in fracture patients, although not statistically significant (P = .1). However, this resulted in differences in the canal flare index (P = .03), canal calcar ratio (P = .03), and canal bone ratio (P = .03) between the 2 cohorts. These ratios indicate decreased meta-diaphyseal taper in fracture patients. Preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle was more varus in fracture patients (P = .04). Patients sustaining an acute, periprosthetic fracture with cementless femoral fixation after THA had thinner distal cortices and a decreased meta-diaphyseal taper.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32209287</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2020-06, Vol.35 (6), p.S359-S363
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2383512454
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects
cementless femoral fixation
cementless total hip arthroplasty
early periprosthetic femur fracture
femoral morphology
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - surgery
Hip Prosthesis - adverse effects
Humans
periprosthetic femur fracture
Periprosthetic Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology
Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
total hip arthroplasty
title Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A39%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Femoral%20Morphology%20Predict%20the%20Risk%20of%20Periprosthetic%20Fracture%20After%20Cementless%20Total%20Hip%20Arthroplasty?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Bigart,%20Kevin%20C.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=S359&rft.epage=S363&rft.pages=S359-S363&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2383512454%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2383512454&rft_id=info:pmid/32209287&rft_els_id=S0883540320302096&rfr_iscdi=true