A “Step–Ramp–Step” Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State

The oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) closely identifies with the maximal metabolic steady state. However, the power output (PO) at RCP cannot be determined from contemporary ramp-incremental exercise protocols. PURPOSEThis study aimed to test the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2020-09, Vol.52 (9), p.2011-2019
Hauptverfasser: IANNETTA, DANILO, INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE, POGLIAGHI, SILVIA, MURIAS, JUAN M., KEIR, DANIEL A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2019
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2011
container_title Medicine and science in sports and exercise
container_volume 52
creator IANNETTA, DANILO
INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE
POGLIAGHI, SILVIA
MURIAS, JUAN M.
KEIR, DANIEL A.
description The oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) closely identifies with the maximal metabolic steady state. However, the power output (PO) at RCP cannot be determined from contemporary ramp-incremental exercise protocols. PURPOSEThis study aimed to test the efficacy of a “step–ramp–step” (SRS) cycling protocol for estimating the PO at RCP and the validity of RCP as a maximal metabolic steady-state surrogate. METHODSTen heathy volunteers (5 women; age30 ± 7 yr; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max54 ± 6 mL·kg·min) performed in the following seriesa moderate step transition to 100 W (MOD), ramp (30 W·min), and after 30 min of recovery, step transition to ~50% POpeak (HVY). Ventilatory and gas exchange data from the ramp were used to identify the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 at lactate threshold (LT) and RCP. The PO at LT was determined by the linear regression of the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 versus PO relationship after adjusting ramp data by the difference between the ramp PO at the steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 from MOD and 100 W. Linear regression between the V[Combining Dot Above]O2–PO values associated with LT and HVY provided, by extrapolation, the PO at RCP. Participants then performed 30-min constant-power tests at the SRS-estimated RCP and 5% above this PO. RESULTSAll participants completed 30 min of constant-power exercise at the SRS-estimated RCP achieving steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 of 3176 ± 595 mL·min that was not different (P = 0.80) from the ramp-identified RCP (3095 ± 570 mL·min) and highly consistent within participants (bias = −26 mL·min, r = 0.97, coefficient of variation = 2.3% ± 2.8%). At 5% above the SRS-estimated RCP, four participants could not complete 30 min and all, but two exhibited non–steady-state responses in blood lactate and V[Combining Dot Above]O2. CONCLUSIONSIn healthy individuals cycling at their preferred cadence, the SRS protocol and the RCP are capable of accurately predicting the PO associated with maximal metabolic steady state.
doi_str_mv 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002343
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2382663824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382663824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5183-2c58ab1b90e1dae63f5fd6819b1484a3a7d27e6f84415b379d9ef2c0a7e12a423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWg9vILKX3qxmcthNLot4Aoti9XrJ7s7SatrUTUrtXd_BW305n8SUqogXOpD5Gfj-GfITsg_0CJjQx71-_4j-KMYFXyMdkJymlINcJx0KWqYaOGyRbe8fIpRzDptkizNGZZarDrntJu-L137Ayfvi5daMlrKa3pKb1gVXOZsEl1zWOA7DZp6EASY98zwcGZv0MJjS2WGVRIup51FMwF2y0Rjrce9Td8j92endyUV6dX1-edK9SisJiqesksqUUGqKUBvMeCObOlOgSxBKGG7ymuWYNUoIkCXPda2xYRU1OQIzgvEdcrjaO2nd0xR9KEZDX6G1Zoxu6gvGFcuy2ERExQqtWud9i00xaeMP2nkBtFimWcQ0i99pRtvB54VpOcL62_QVXwTUCpg5G7D1j3Y6w7YYoLFh8N9u8Yd1ick8UymjjFIdpzQ-0PwDYRmTQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382663824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A “Step–Ramp–Step” Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>IANNETTA, DANILO ; INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE ; POGLIAGHI, SILVIA ; MURIAS, JUAN M. ; KEIR, DANIEL A.</creator><creatorcontrib>IANNETTA, DANILO ; INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE ; POGLIAGHI, SILVIA ; MURIAS, JUAN M. ; KEIR, DANIEL A.</creatorcontrib><description>The oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) closely identifies with the maximal metabolic steady state. However, the power output (PO) at RCP cannot be determined from contemporary ramp-incremental exercise protocols. PURPOSEThis study aimed to test the efficacy of a “step–ramp–step” (SRS) cycling protocol for estimating the PO at RCP and the validity of RCP as a maximal metabolic steady-state surrogate. METHODSTen heathy volunteers (5 women; age30 ± 7 yr; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max54 ± 6 mL·kg·min) performed in the following seriesa moderate step transition to 100 W (MOD), ramp (30 W·min), and after 30 min of recovery, step transition to ~50% POpeak (HVY). Ventilatory and gas exchange data from the ramp were used to identify the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 at lactate threshold (LT) and RCP. The PO at LT was determined by the linear regression of the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 versus PO relationship after adjusting ramp data by the difference between the ramp PO at the steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 from MOD and 100 W. Linear regression between the V[Combining Dot Above]O2–PO values associated with LT and HVY provided, by extrapolation, the PO at RCP. Participants then performed 30-min constant-power tests at the SRS-estimated RCP and 5% above this PO. RESULTSAll participants completed 30 min of constant-power exercise at the SRS-estimated RCP achieving steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 of 3176 ± 595 mL·min that was not different (P = 0.80) from the ramp-identified RCP (3095 ± 570 mL·min) and highly consistent within participants (bias = −26 mL·min, r = 0.97, coefficient of variation = 2.3% ± 2.8%). At 5% above the SRS-estimated RCP, four participants could not complete 30 min and all, but two exhibited non–steady-state responses in blood lactate and V[Combining Dot Above]O2. CONCLUSIONSIn healthy individuals cycling at their preferred cadence, the SRS protocol and the RCP are capable of accurately predicting the PO associated with maximal metabolic steady state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002343</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32205678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anaerobic Threshold - physiology ; Energy Metabolism ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020-09, Vol.52 (9), p.2011-2019</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2020 American College of Sports Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5183-2c58ab1b90e1dae63f5fd6819b1484a3a7d27e6f84415b379d9ef2c0a7e12a423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5183-2c58ab1b90e1dae63f5fd6819b1484a3a7d27e6f84415b379d9ef2c0a7e12a423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00005768-202009000-00019$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00005768-202009000-00019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32205678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>IANNETTA, DANILO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POGLIAGHI, SILVIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURIAS, JUAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEIR, DANIEL A.</creatorcontrib><title>A “Step–Ramp–Step” Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><description>The oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) closely identifies with the maximal metabolic steady state. However, the power output (PO) at RCP cannot be determined from contemporary ramp-incremental exercise protocols. PURPOSEThis study aimed to test the efficacy of a “step–ramp–step” (SRS) cycling protocol for estimating the PO at RCP and the validity of RCP as a maximal metabolic steady-state surrogate. METHODSTen heathy volunteers (5 women; age30 ± 7 yr; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max54 ± 6 mL·kg·min) performed in the following seriesa moderate step transition to 100 W (MOD), ramp (30 W·min), and after 30 min of recovery, step transition to ~50% POpeak (HVY). Ventilatory and gas exchange data from the ramp were used to identify the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 at lactate threshold (LT) and RCP. The PO at LT was determined by the linear regression of the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 versus PO relationship after adjusting ramp data by the difference between the ramp PO at the steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 from MOD and 100 W. Linear regression between the V[Combining Dot Above]O2–PO values associated with LT and HVY provided, by extrapolation, the PO at RCP. Participants then performed 30-min constant-power tests at the SRS-estimated RCP and 5% above this PO. RESULTSAll participants completed 30 min of constant-power exercise at the SRS-estimated RCP achieving steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 of 3176 ± 595 mL·min that was not different (P = 0.80) from the ramp-identified RCP (3095 ± 570 mL·min) and highly consistent within participants (bias = −26 mL·min, r = 0.97, coefficient of variation = 2.3% ± 2.8%). At 5% above the SRS-estimated RCP, four participants could not complete 30 min and all, but two exhibited non–steady-state responses in blood lactate and V[Combining Dot Above]O2. CONCLUSIONSIn healthy individuals cycling at their preferred cadence, the SRS protocol and the RCP are capable of accurately predicting the PO associated with maximal metabolic steady state.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anaerobic Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0195-9131</issn><issn>1530-0315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWg9vILKX3qxmcthNLot4Aoti9XrJ7s7SatrUTUrtXd_BW305n8SUqogXOpD5Gfj-GfITsg_0CJjQx71-_4j-KMYFXyMdkJymlINcJx0KWqYaOGyRbe8fIpRzDptkizNGZZarDrntJu-L137Ayfvi5daMlrKa3pKb1gVXOZsEl1zWOA7DZp6EASY98zwcGZv0MJjS2WGVRIup51FMwF2y0Rjrce9Td8j92endyUV6dX1-edK9SisJiqesksqUUGqKUBvMeCObOlOgSxBKGG7ymuWYNUoIkCXPda2xYRU1OQIzgvEdcrjaO2nd0xR9KEZDX6G1Zoxu6gvGFcuy2ERExQqtWud9i00xaeMP2nkBtFimWcQ0i99pRtvB54VpOcL62_QVXwTUCpg5G7D1j3Y6w7YYoLFh8N9u8Yd1ick8UymjjFIdpzQ-0PwDYRmTQw</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>IANNETTA, DANILO</creator><creator>INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE</creator><creator>POGLIAGHI, SILVIA</creator><creator>MURIAS, JUAN M.</creator><creator>KEIR, DANIEL A.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>American College of Sports Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>A “Step–Ramp–Step” Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State</title><author>IANNETTA, DANILO ; INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE ; POGLIAGHI, SILVIA ; MURIAS, JUAN M. ; KEIR, DANIEL A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5183-2c58ab1b90e1dae63f5fd6819b1484a3a7d27e6f84415b379d9ef2c0a7e12a423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anaerobic Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>IANNETTA, DANILO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POGLIAGHI, SILVIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURIAS, JUAN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEIR, DANIEL A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>IANNETTA, DANILO</au><au>INGLIS, ERIN CALAINE</au><au>POGLIAGHI, SILVIA</au><au>MURIAS, JUAN M.</au><au>KEIR, DANIEL A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A “Step–Ramp–Step” Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><addtitle>Med Sci Sports Exerc</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2011</spage><epage>2019</epage><pages>2011-2019</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><eissn>1530-0315</eissn><abstract>The oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) closely identifies with the maximal metabolic steady state. However, the power output (PO) at RCP cannot be determined from contemporary ramp-incremental exercise protocols. PURPOSEThis study aimed to test the efficacy of a “step–ramp–step” (SRS) cycling protocol for estimating the PO at RCP and the validity of RCP as a maximal metabolic steady-state surrogate. METHODSTen heathy volunteers (5 women; age30 ± 7 yr; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max54 ± 6 mL·kg·min) performed in the following seriesa moderate step transition to 100 W (MOD), ramp (30 W·min), and after 30 min of recovery, step transition to ~50% POpeak (HVY). Ventilatory and gas exchange data from the ramp were used to identify the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 at lactate threshold (LT) and RCP. The PO at LT was determined by the linear regression of the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 versus PO relationship after adjusting ramp data by the difference between the ramp PO at the steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 from MOD and 100 W. Linear regression between the V[Combining Dot Above]O2–PO values associated with LT and HVY provided, by extrapolation, the PO at RCP. Participants then performed 30-min constant-power tests at the SRS-estimated RCP and 5% above this PO. RESULTSAll participants completed 30 min of constant-power exercise at the SRS-estimated RCP achieving steady-state V[Combining Dot Above]O2 of 3176 ± 595 mL·min that was not different (P = 0.80) from the ramp-identified RCP (3095 ± 570 mL·min) and highly consistent within participants (bias = −26 mL·min, r = 0.97, coefficient of variation = 2.3% ± 2.8%). At 5% above the SRS-estimated RCP, four participants could not complete 30 min and all, but two exhibited non–steady-state responses in blood lactate and V[Combining Dot Above]O2. CONCLUSIONSIn healthy individuals cycling at their preferred cadence, the SRS protocol and the RCP are capable of accurately predicting the PO associated with maximal metabolic steady state.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>32205678</pmid><doi>10.1249/MSS.0000000000002343</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9131
ispartof Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2020-09, Vol.52 (9), p.2011-2019
issn 0195-9131
1530-0315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2382663824
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Anaerobic Threshold - physiology
Energy Metabolism
Exercise Test - methods
Female
Humans
Lactic Acid - blood
Male
Oxygen Consumption
Young Adult
title A “Step–Ramp–Step” Protocol to Identify the Maximal Metabolic Steady State
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A36%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%9CStep%E2%80%93Ramp%E2%80%93Step%E2%80%9D%20Protocol%20to%20Identify%20the%20Maximal%20Metabolic%20Steady%20State&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=IANNETTA,%20DANILO&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2011&rft.epage=2019&rft.pages=2011-2019&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft.eissn=1530-0315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002343&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2382663824%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382663824&rft_id=info:pmid/32205678&rfr_iscdi=true