Practical example of multiple antibody screening for evaluation of malaria control strategies

Background Ongoing efforts to fight Plasmodium falciparum malaria has reduced malaria in many areas, but new tools are needed to monitor further progress, including indicators of decreasing exposure to parasite infection. Sero-surveillance is considered promising to monitor exposure, transmission an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Malaria journal 2020-03, Vol.19 (1), p.117-117, Article 117
Hauptverfasser: Varela, Marie-Louise, Koffi, David, White, Michael, Niang, Makhtar, Mbengue, Babacar, Sarr, Fatoumata, Toure, Andre Offianan, Perraut, Ronald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title Malaria journal
container_volume 19
creator Varela, Marie-Louise
Koffi, David
White, Michael
Niang, Makhtar
Mbengue, Babacar
Sarr, Fatoumata
Toure, Andre Offianan
Perraut, Ronald
description Background Ongoing efforts to fight Plasmodium falciparum malaria has reduced malaria in many areas, but new tools are needed to monitor further progress, including indicators of decreasing exposure to parasite infection. Sero-surveillance is considered promising to monitor exposure, transmission and immunity. Methods IgG responses to three antigen biomarkers were evaluated in a retrospective study involving: (i) surveys of 798 asymptomatic villagers from 2 Senegalese endemic settings conducted before 2002 and after the 2013 intensification of control measures, and (ii) in 105 symptomatic individuals from different settings in Cote d'Ivoire. Response to up to eight P. falciparum antigens, including recombinant MSP1p9 antigen and LSA1(41) peptide, were analysed using multiplex technology and responses to whole P. falciparum schizont extract (SE, local strain adapted to culture) were measured by ELISA. Results MSP1p9 and LSA1(41) IgG responses were shown to be relevant indicators monitoring immune status in the different study sites both from Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal. Between 2002 and 2013, individuals participating in both studies showed higher decline of sero-positivity in young (< 15 years: range 12% to 50%) than older (> 15 years: no decline to 15%) individuals from Dielmo and Ndiop. A mathematical sero-catalytic model from the complete Dielmo/Ndiop survey was used to reconstruct declining levels of sero-positivity in more detail, demonstrating that anti-SE seroprevalence levels most accurately reflected malaria exposure in the two villages. Conclusion For standard screening of population immune status at sites envisaging elimination, the use of ELISA-based assays targeting selected antigens can contribute to provide important epidemiologic surveillance data to aid malaria control programmes.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12936-020-03186-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2381624688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A618753516</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5b8fa6dab73d4fcdaf85882b75e946ba</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A618753516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-64afe7e8f04514fa453dd782ff407ae1d5b745a06b41822d8d216011ebea06d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzigSFyQUIrt-GsvSNWKj0qV4ABHZE3s8eJVNl7spKX_Hme3LF3EAftga_zMa4_nrarnlJxTquWbTNmilQ1hpCFtCTSLB9Up5Uo0TCvx8N7-pHqS85oQqrRij6uTltEFE5SfVt8-J7BjsNDX-BM22x7r6OvN1I9h3sMwhi662zrbhDiEYVX7mGq8hn6CMcRhR0MPKUBt4zCm2Nd5TDDiKmB-Wj3y0Gd8dreeVV_fv_uy_Nhcffpwuby4aqyQ7dhIDh4Vak94eZQHLlrnlGbec6IAqROd4gKI7DjVjDntGJWEUuywBB1vz6rLva6LsDbbFDaQbk2EYHaBmFYGUqmyRyM67UE66FTruLcOvBZas04JXHDZQdF6u9faTt0GncVSFPRHoscnQ_huVvHaKKJLP0QReHUnkOKPCfNoNiFb7HsYME7ZsFZTybjUuqAv_0LXcUpD-aqZarkq4OIPtYJSQBh8LPfaWdRcSFra2woqC3X-D6pMh5tQWoM-lPhRAtsn2BRzTugPNVJiZoOZvcFMMZjZGczMb3lx_3cOKb8dVYDXe-AGu-izDThYPGCEEMEo14rMgxZa_z-9DOPOc8s4DWP7C7WC7Ls</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2383471629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical example of multiple antibody screening for evaluation of malaria control strategies</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Varela, Marie-Louise ; Koffi, David ; White, Michael ; Niang, Makhtar ; Mbengue, Babacar ; Sarr, Fatoumata ; Toure, Andre Offianan ; Perraut, Ronald</creator><creatorcontrib>Varela, Marie-Louise ; Koffi, David ; White, Michael ; Niang, Makhtar ; Mbengue, Babacar ; Sarr, Fatoumata ; Toure, Andre Offianan ; Perraut, Ronald</creatorcontrib><description>Background Ongoing efforts to fight Plasmodium falciparum malaria has reduced malaria in many areas, but new tools are needed to monitor further progress, including indicators of decreasing exposure to parasite infection. Sero-surveillance is considered promising to monitor exposure, transmission and immunity. Methods IgG responses to three antigen biomarkers were evaluated in a retrospective study involving: (i) surveys of 798 asymptomatic villagers from 2 Senegalese endemic settings conducted before 2002 and after the 2013 intensification of control measures, and (ii) in 105 symptomatic individuals from different settings in Cote d'Ivoire. Response to up to eight P. falciparum antigens, including recombinant MSP1p9 antigen and LSA1(41) peptide, were analysed using multiplex technology and responses to whole P. falciparum schizont extract (SE, local strain adapted to culture) were measured by ELISA. Results MSP1p9 and LSA1(41) IgG responses were shown to be relevant indicators monitoring immune status in the different study sites both from Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal. Between 2002 and 2013, individuals participating in both studies showed higher decline of sero-positivity in young (&lt; 15 years: range 12% to 50%) than older (&gt; 15 years: no decline to 15%) individuals from Dielmo and Ndiop. A mathematical sero-catalytic model from the complete Dielmo/Ndiop survey was used to reconstruct declining levels of sero-positivity in more detail, demonstrating that anti-SE seroprevalence levels most accurately reflected malaria exposure in the two villages. Conclusion For standard screening of population immune status at sites envisaging elimination, the use of ELISA-based assays targeting selected antigens can contribute to provide important epidemiologic surveillance data to aid malaria control programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-2875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03186-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32192514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Springer Nature</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antigens ; Biomarkers ; Consent ; Control ; ELISA ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Epidemiology ; Health aspects ; Human diseases ; IgG ; Immune status ; Immunity ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulins ; Indicators ; Infectious Diseases ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Malaria ; Methods ; Multiple antigens ; Multiplex ; Parasite antigens ; Parasites ; Parasitology ; Plasmodium falciparum ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Proteins ; Recombinants ; Science &amp; Technology ; Serologic tests ; Serology ; Statistics ; Studies ; Surveillance ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Tropical Medicine ; Vector control ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Malaria journal, 2020-03, Vol.19 (1), p.117-117, Article 117</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>5</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000521487000001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-64afe7e8f04514fa453dd782ff407ae1d5b745a06b41822d8d216011ebea06d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-64afe7e8f04514fa453dd782ff407ae1d5b745a06b41822d8d216011ebea06d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082935/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082935/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,27929,27930,28253,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32192514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varela, Marie-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koffi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niang, Makhtar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbengue, Babacar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarr, Fatoumata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toure, Andre Offianan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perraut, Ronald</creatorcontrib><title>Practical example of multiple antibody screening for evaluation of malaria control strategies</title><title>Malaria journal</title><addtitle>MALARIA J</addtitle><addtitle>Malar J</addtitle><description>Background Ongoing efforts to fight Plasmodium falciparum malaria has reduced malaria in many areas, but new tools are needed to monitor further progress, including indicators of decreasing exposure to parasite infection. Sero-surveillance is considered promising to monitor exposure, transmission and immunity. Methods IgG responses to three antigen biomarkers were evaluated in a retrospective study involving: (i) surveys of 798 asymptomatic villagers from 2 Senegalese endemic settings conducted before 2002 and after the 2013 intensification of control measures, and (ii) in 105 symptomatic individuals from different settings in Cote d'Ivoire. Response to up to eight P. falciparum antigens, including recombinant MSP1p9 antigen and LSA1(41) peptide, were analysed using multiplex technology and responses to whole P. falciparum schizont extract (SE, local strain adapted to culture) were measured by ELISA. Results MSP1p9 and LSA1(41) IgG responses were shown to be relevant indicators monitoring immune status in the different study sites both from Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal. Between 2002 and 2013, individuals participating in both studies showed higher decline of sero-positivity in young (&lt; 15 years: range 12% to 50%) than older (&gt; 15 years: no decline to 15%) individuals from Dielmo and Ndiop. A mathematical sero-catalytic model from the complete Dielmo/Ndiop survey was used to reconstruct declining levels of sero-positivity in more detail, demonstrating that anti-SE seroprevalence levels most accurately reflected malaria exposure in the two villages. Conclusion For standard screening of population immune status at sites envisaging elimination, the use of ELISA-based assays targeting selected antigens can contribute to provide important epidemiologic surveillance data to aid malaria control programmes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Human diseases</subject><subject>IgG</subject><subject>Immune status</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple antigens</subject><subject>Multiplex</subject><subject>Parasite antigens</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitology</subject><subject>Plasmodium falciparum</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Recombinants</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Serologic tests</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tropical Medicine</subject><subject>Vector control</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>1475-2875</issn><issn>1475-2875</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzigSFyQUIrt-GsvSNWKj0qV4ABHZE3s8eJVNl7spKX_Hme3LF3EAftga_zMa4_nrarnlJxTquWbTNmilQ1hpCFtCTSLB9Up5Uo0TCvx8N7-pHqS85oQqrRij6uTltEFE5SfVt8-J7BjsNDX-BM22x7r6OvN1I9h3sMwhi662zrbhDiEYVX7mGq8hn6CMcRhR0MPKUBt4zCm2Nd5TDDiKmB-Wj3y0Gd8dreeVV_fv_uy_Nhcffpwuby4aqyQ7dhIDh4Vak94eZQHLlrnlGbec6IAqROd4gKI7DjVjDntGJWEUuywBB1vz6rLva6LsDbbFDaQbk2EYHaBmFYGUqmyRyM67UE66FTruLcOvBZas04JXHDZQdF6u9faTt0GncVSFPRHoscnQ_huVvHaKKJLP0QReHUnkOKPCfNoNiFb7HsYME7ZsFZTybjUuqAv_0LXcUpD-aqZarkq4OIPtYJSQBh8LPfaWdRcSFra2woqC3X-D6pMh5tQWoM-lPhRAtsn2BRzTugPNVJiZoOZvcFMMZjZGczMb3lx_3cOKb8dVYDXe-AGu-izDThYPGCEEMEo14rMgxZa_z-9DOPOc8s4DWP7C7WC7Ls</recordid><startdate>20200319</startdate><enddate>20200319</enddate><creator>Varela, Marie-Louise</creator><creator>Koffi, David</creator><creator>White, Michael</creator><creator>Niang, Makhtar</creator><creator>Mbengue, Babacar</creator><creator>Sarr, Fatoumata</creator><creator>Toure, Andre Offianan</creator><creator>Perraut, Ronald</creator><general>Springer Nature</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200319</creationdate><title>Practical example of multiple antibody screening for evaluation of malaria control strategies</title><author>Varela, Marie-Louise ; Koffi, David ; White, Michael ; Niang, Makhtar ; Mbengue, Babacar ; Sarr, Fatoumata ; Toure, Andre Offianan ; Perraut, Ronald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-64afe7e8f04514fa453dd782ff407ae1d5b745a06b41822d8d216011ebea06d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Human diseases</topic><topic>IgG</topic><topic>Immune status</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple antigens</topic><topic>Multiplex</topic><topic>Parasite antigens</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitology</topic><topic>Plasmodium falciparum</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Recombinants</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Serologic tests</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tropical Medicine</topic><topic>Vector control</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varela, Marie-Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koffi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niang, Makhtar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mbengue, Babacar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarr, Fatoumata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toure, Andre Offianan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perraut, Ronald</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Malaria journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varela, Marie-Louise</au><au>Koffi, David</au><au>White, Michael</au><au>Niang, Makhtar</au><au>Mbengue, Babacar</au><au>Sarr, Fatoumata</au><au>Toure, Andre Offianan</au><au>Perraut, Ronald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical example of multiple antibody screening for evaluation of malaria control strategies</atitle><jtitle>Malaria journal</jtitle><stitle>MALARIA J</stitle><addtitle>Malar J</addtitle><date>2020-03-19</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>117-117</pages><artnum>117</artnum><issn>1475-2875</issn><eissn>1475-2875</eissn><abstract>Background Ongoing efforts to fight Plasmodium falciparum malaria has reduced malaria in many areas, but new tools are needed to monitor further progress, including indicators of decreasing exposure to parasite infection. Sero-surveillance is considered promising to monitor exposure, transmission and immunity. Methods IgG responses to three antigen biomarkers were evaluated in a retrospective study involving: (i) surveys of 798 asymptomatic villagers from 2 Senegalese endemic settings conducted before 2002 and after the 2013 intensification of control measures, and (ii) in 105 symptomatic individuals from different settings in Cote d'Ivoire. Response to up to eight P. falciparum antigens, including recombinant MSP1p9 antigen and LSA1(41) peptide, were analysed using multiplex technology and responses to whole P. falciparum schizont extract (SE, local strain adapted to culture) were measured by ELISA. Results MSP1p9 and LSA1(41) IgG responses were shown to be relevant indicators monitoring immune status in the different study sites both from Cote d'Ivoire and Senegal. Between 2002 and 2013, individuals participating in both studies showed higher decline of sero-positivity in young (&lt; 15 years: range 12% to 50%) than older (&gt; 15 years: no decline to 15%) individuals from Dielmo and Ndiop. A mathematical sero-catalytic model from the complete Dielmo/Ndiop survey was used to reconstruct declining levels of sero-positivity in more detail, demonstrating that anti-SE seroprevalence levels most accurately reflected malaria exposure in the two villages. Conclusion For standard screening of population immune status at sites envisaging elimination, the use of ELISA-based assays targeting selected antigens can contribute to provide important epidemiologic surveillance data to aid malaria control programmes.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Springer Nature</pub><pmid>32192514</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12936-020-03186-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-2875
ispartof Malaria journal, 2020-03, Vol.19 (1), p.117-117, Article 117
issn 1475-2875
1475-2875
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2381624688
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Antigens
Biomarkers
Consent
Control
ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Epidemiology
Health aspects
Human diseases
IgG
Immune status
Immunity
Immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulins
Indicators
Infectious Diseases
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Malaria
Methods
Multiple antigens
Multiplex
Parasite antigens
Parasites
Parasitology
Plasmodium falciparum
Polls & surveys
Proteins
Recombinants
Science & Technology
Serologic tests
Serology
Statistics
Studies
Surveillance
Surveying
Surveys
Tropical Medicine
Vector control
Vector-borne diseases
title Practical example of multiple antibody screening for evaluation of malaria control strategies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T11%3A34%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20example%20of%20multiple%20antibody%20screening%20for%20evaluation%20of%20malaria%20control%20strategies&rft.jtitle=Malaria%20journal&rft.au=Varela,%20Marie-Louise&rft.date=2020-03-19&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=117-117&rft.artnum=117&rft.issn=1475-2875&rft.eissn=1475-2875&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12936-020-03186-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA618753516%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2383471629&rft_id=info:pmid/32192514&rft_galeid=A618753516&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5b8fa6dab73d4fcdaf85882b75e946ba&rfr_iscdi=true