Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review

Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal health research reviews 2019-12, Vol.20 (2), p.128-142
Hauptverfasser: Wisener, Lee V, Sargeant, Jan M, O'Connor, Annette M, O'Sullivan, Terri L, McEwen, Scott A, Nwosu, Andrea, Rossi, Tanya M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 2
container_start_page 128
container_title Animal health research reviews
container_volume 20
creator Wisener, Lee V
Sargeant, Jan M
O'Connor, Annette M
O'Sullivan, Terri L
McEwen, Scott A
Nwosu, Andrea
Rossi, Tanya M
description Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1466252319000252
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2379013379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359222150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkbtOxDAQRS0EgmXhA2iQJRqagB9xvKFDiJeEoADqyJlMwKusHewExN_jZRcKqOZ17tVohpADzk444_r0kedFIZSQvGSMpWSDTHiuVSYKlW8u86LIlvMdshvjnCWNmOXbZEcKNuNc8AmZ33uXGTfY2vrBAjV9H7yBV4y09YE2NqKJSPuA75go76hxDQXvhuA7ah2tEdvv3juaLnG-GWHJnVFDI_jeuheaxBY_9shWa7qI--s4Jc9Xl08XN9ndw_XtxfldBlKLIStz3YIQOlclKgmQYwkClAIpdSp56kBdS5aD1iJxvGiatjDNjJd1DSjllByvfNMybyPGoVrYCNh1xqEfYyWkLhlPbmVCj_6gcz8Gl7ZLlCqTPVcsUXxFQfAxBmyrPtiFCZ8VZ9XyEdW_RyTN4dp5rBfY_Cp-Li-_AOwogzI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359222150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Wisener, Lee V ; Sargeant, Jan M ; O'Connor, Annette M ; O'Sullivan, Terri L ; McEwen, Scott A ; Nwosu, Andrea ; Rossi, Tanya M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wisener, Lee V ; Sargeant, Jan M ; O'Connor, Annette M ; O'Sullivan, Terri L ; McEwen, Scott A ; Nwosu, Andrea ; Rossi, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><description>Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-2523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32081121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antimicrobial Stewardship ; Bacterial infections ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Clinical trials ; Commonality ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Feed additives ; Food ; Food additives ; Illnesses ; Infections ; Intervention ; Literature reviews ; Livestock ; Medical importance ; Medical research ; Morbidity ; Pathogens ; Researchers ; Respiratory diseases ; Vaccines ; Veal ; Veterinary medicine ; Viral infections</subject><ispartof>Animal health research reviews, 2019-12, Vol.20 (2), p.128-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5203-2341 ; 0000-0003-2420-1766 ; 0000-0003-0604-7822</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32081121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wisener, Lee V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargeant, Jan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Terri L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwosu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><title>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</title><title>Animal health research reviews</title><addtitle>Anim Health Res Rev</addtitle><description>Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial Stewardship</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Commonality</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medical importance</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Veal</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><issn>1466-2523</issn><issn>1475-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkbtOxDAQRS0EgmXhA2iQJRqagB9xvKFDiJeEoADqyJlMwKusHewExN_jZRcKqOZ17tVohpADzk444_r0kedFIZSQvGSMpWSDTHiuVSYKlW8u86LIlvMdshvjnCWNmOXbZEcKNuNc8AmZ33uXGTfY2vrBAjV9H7yBV4y09YE2NqKJSPuA75go76hxDQXvhuA7ah2tEdvv3juaLnG-GWHJnVFDI_jeuheaxBY_9shWa7qI--s4Jc9Xl08XN9ndw_XtxfldBlKLIStz3YIQOlclKgmQYwkClAIpdSp56kBdS5aD1iJxvGiatjDNjJd1DSjllByvfNMybyPGoVrYCNh1xqEfYyWkLhlPbmVCj_6gcz8Gl7ZLlCqTPVcsUXxFQfAxBmyrPtiFCZ8VZ9XyEdW_RyTN4dp5rBfY_Cp-Li-_AOwogzI</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Wisener, Lee V</creator><creator>Sargeant, Jan M</creator><creator>O'Connor, Annette M</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Terri L</creator><creator>McEwen, Scott A</creator><creator>Nwosu, Andrea</creator><creator>Rossi, Tanya M</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-2341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-1766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-7822</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</title><author>Wisener, Lee V ; Sargeant, Jan M ; O'Connor, Annette M ; O'Sullivan, Terri L ; McEwen, Scott A ; Nwosu, Andrea ; Rossi, Tanya M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial Stewardship</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Commonality</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medical importance</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Veal</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wisener, Lee V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargeant, Jan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Terri L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwosu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal health research reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wisener, Lee V</au><au>Sargeant, Jan M</au><au>O'Connor, Annette M</au><au>O'Sullivan, Terri L</au><au>McEwen, Scott A</au><au>Nwosu, Andrea</au><au>Rossi, Tanya M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Animal health research reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Health Res Rev</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>128-142</pages><issn>1466-2523</issn><eissn>1475-2654</eissn><abstract>Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32081121</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1466252319000252</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-2341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-1766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-7822</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1466-2523
ispartof Animal health research reviews, 2019-12, Vol.20 (2), p.128-142
issn 1466-2523
1475-2654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2379013379
source MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals
subjects Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Antimicrobial Stewardship
Bacterial infections
Beef
Beef cattle
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - prevention & control
Clinical trials
Commonality
Disease control
Disease prevention
Feed additives
Food
Food additives
Illnesses
Infections
Intervention
Literature reviews
Livestock
Medical importance
Medical research
Morbidity
Pathogens
Researchers
Respiratory diseases
Vaccines
Veal
Veterinary medicine
Viral infections
title Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T17%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-antibiotic%20approaches%20for%20disease%20prevention%20and%20control%20in%20beef%20and%20veal%20production:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Animal%20health%20research%20reviews&rft.au=Wisener,%20Lee%20V&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=128-142&rft.issn=1466-2523&rft.eissn=1475-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1466252319000252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2359222150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359222150&rft_id=info:pmid/32081121&rfr_iscdi=true