Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review
Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and v...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal health research reviews 2019-12, Vol.20 (2), p.128-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | Animal health research reviews |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Wisener, Lee V Sargeant, Jan M O'Connor, Annette M O'Sullivan, Terri L McEwen, Scott A Nwosu, Andrea Rossi, Tanya M |
description | Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1466252319000252 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2379013379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2359222150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkbtOxDAQRS0EgmXhA2iQJRqagB9xvKFDiJeEoADqyJlMwKusHewExN_jZRcKqOZ17tVohpADzk444_r0kedFIZSQvGSMpWSDTHiuVSYKlW8u86LIlvMdshvjnCWNmOXbZEcKNuNc8AmZ33uXGTfY2vrBAjV9H7yBV4y09YE2NqKJSPuA75go76hxDQXvhuA7ah2tEdvv3juaLnG-GWHJnVFDI_jeuheaxBY_9shWa7qI--s4Jc9Xl08XN9ndw_XtxfldBlKLIStz3YIQOlclKgmQYwkClAIpdSp56kBdS5aD1iJxvGiatjDNjJd1DSjllByvfNMybyPGoVrYCNh1xqEfYyWkLhlPbmVCj_6gcz8Gl7ZLlCqTPVcsUXxFQfAxBmyrPtiFCZ8VZ9XyEdW_RyTN4dp5rBfY_Cp-Li-_AOwogzI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2359222150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Wisener, Lee V ; Sargeant, Jan M ; O'Connor, Annette M ; O'Sullivan, Terri L ; McEwen, Scott A ; Nwosu, Andrea ; Rossi, Tanya M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wisener, Lee V ; Sargeant, Jan M ; O'Connor, Annette M ; O'Sullivan, Terri L ; McEwen, Scott A ; Nwosu, Andrea ; Rossi, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><description>Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-2523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32081121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antimicrobial Stewardship ; Bacterial infections ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - prevention & control ; Clinical trials ; Commonality ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Feed additives ; Food ; Food additives ; Illnesses ; Infections ; Intervention ; Literature reviews ; Livestock ; Medical importance ; Medical research ; Morbidity ; Pathogens ; Researchers ; Respiratory diseases ; Vaccines ; Veal ; Veterinary medicine ; Viral infections</subject><ispartof>Animal health research reviews, 2019-12, Vol.20 (2), p.128-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5203-2341 ; 0000-0003-2420-1766 ; 0000-0003-0604-7822</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32081121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wisener, Lee V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargeant, Jan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Terri L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwosu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><title>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</title><title>Animal health research reviews</title><addtitle>Anim Health Res Rev</addtitle><description>Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial Stewardship</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Commonality</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food additives</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medical importance</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Veal</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><issn>1466-2523</issn><issn>1475-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkbtOxDAQRS0EgmXhA2iQJRqagB9xvKFDiJeEoADqyJlMwKusHewExN_jZRcKqOZ17tVohpADzk444_r0kedFIZSQvGSMpWSDTHiuVSYKlW8u86LIlvMdshvjnCWNmOXbZEcKNuNc8AmZ33uXGTfY2vrBAjV9H7yBV4y09YE2NqKJSPuA75go76hxDQXvhuA7ah2tEdvv3juaLnG-GWHJnVFDI_jeuheaxBY_9shWa7qI--s4Jc9Xl08XN9ndw_XtxfldBlKLIStz3YIQOlclKgmQYwkClAIpdSp56kBdS5aD1iJxvGiatjDNjJd1DSjllByvfNMybyPGoVrYCNh1xqEfYyWkLhlPbmVCj_6gcz8Gl7ZLlCqTPVcsUXxFQfAxBmyrPtiFCZ8VZ9XyEdW_RyTN4dp5rBfY_Cp-Li-_AOwogzI</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Wisener, Lee V</creator><creator>Sargeant, Jan M</creator><creator>O'Connor, Annette M</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Terri L</creator><creator>McEwen, Scott A</creator><creator>Nwosu, Andrea</creator><creator>Rossi, Tanya M</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-2341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-1766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-7822</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</title><author>Wisener, Lee V ; Sargeant, Jan M ; O'Connor, Annette M ; O'Sullivan, Terri L ; McEwen, Scott A ; Nwosu, Andrea ; Rossi, Tanya M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-947fc227459e53cc4e9c2c55c3373cc1cc4cbb304c77222716ddf6ad819bbce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial Stewardship</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Commonality</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food additives</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medical importance</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Veal</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wisener, Lee V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargeant, Jan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Annette M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Terri L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nwosu, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal health research reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wisener, Lee V</au><au>Sargeant, Jan M</au><au>O'Connor, Annette M</au><au>O'Sullivan, Terri L</au><au>McEwen, Scott A</au><au>Nwosu, Andrea</au><au>Rossi, Tanya M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Animal health research reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Health Res Rev</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>128-142</pages><issn>1466-2523</issn><eissn>1475-2654</eissn><abstract>Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32081121</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1466252319000252</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-2341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-1766</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-7822</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1466-2523 |
ispartof | Animal health research reviews, 2019-12, Vol.20 (2), p.128-142 |
issn | 1466-2523 1475-2654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2379013379 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Animal Husbandry - methods Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Antimicrobial Stewardship Bacterial infections Beef Beef cattle Cattle Cattle Diseases - prevention & control Clinical trials Commonality Disease control Disease prevention Feed additives Food Food additives Illnesses Infections Intervention Literature reviews Livestock Medical importance Medical research Morbidity Pathogens Researchers Respiratory diseases Vaccines Veal Veterinary medicine Viral infections |
title | Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T17%3A41%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-antibiotic%20approaches%20for%20disease%20prevention%20and%20control%20in%20beef%20and%20veal%20production:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Animal%20health%20research%20reviews&rft.au=Wisener,%20Lee%20V&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=128-142&rft.issn=1466-2523&rft.eissn=1475-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1466252319000252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2359222150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2359222150&rft_id=info:pmid/32081121&rfr_iscdi=true |