Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy
This article addresses the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in reproductive health by exploring the processes involved in translating Zambian abortion policy from paperwork to practice in a predominantly rural province. Central to these processes are rural health bureaucrats, who are task...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2020-04, Vol.251, p.112909-8, Article 112909 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112909 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 251 |
creator | Haaland, Marte E.S. Haukanes, Haldis Zulu, Joseph Mumba Moland, Karen Marie Blystad, Astrid |
description | This article addresses the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in reproductive health by exploring the processes involved in translating Zambian abortion policy from paperwork to practice in a predominantly rural province. Central to these processes are rural health bureaucrats, who are tasked with administering and monitoring a myriad of reproductive health policies and programmes. The articles is based on eleven months of ethnographic fieldwork in Zambia from September 2017 to August 2018, including in-depth interviews with rural health bureaucrats and participant observation in health management and policy meetings. It examines how health bureaucrats deal with the abortion-related challenges they face. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of reproductive health politics and moral double-binds and give insight into the gap between Zambia's seemingly liberal abortion policy and the lack of access to abortion services in rural areas. Despite the bureaucrats' knowledge about abortion policy, none of the hospitals in the study province offer legal abortion services. While many bureaucrats consider abortion to be a public health issue and see the need to offer legal services to abortion-seeking women, they often bypass abortion-related issues and treat them with silence in policy meetings and public settings. The silence corresponds with the lack of data on abortion and post-abortion care in district and provincial health offices and should be understood in relation to both the dominant moral regime of the Zambian state and global pressure towards specific reproductive health targets. This article calls for increased focus on politics and power dynamics in the state apparatus in order to understand the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in sexual and reproductive health.
•Health bureaucrats play key roles in implementing reproductive health policies.•Implementation of abortion policies is governed through subtle power mechanisms.•Global targets on maternal health may divert attention away from abortion policies.•Political commitment is crucial to implementation of abortion policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112909 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2378000466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953620301283</els_id><sourcerecordid>2378000466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8b3eb64a849d8d7dbb165d2e86d50de9d4e44b28ace3ce1c4ab3dd2ceb089bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3DAURq2qVRkef6GN1A2bDH4lcbpDCGilkZAKLMrG8uMiPE3swY6L-Pd4mqELNqyu5Hu-z_ZB6CvBS4JJe7JepmCScSPYJcW0nBLa4_4DWhDRsbphvPuIFph2Xd03rN1D-ymtMcYEC_YZ7TFKup61zQL9vnYD-KnahMFNzqRKeVtl_8eHJ1_5PGqI6Xv1K0c1VA-ghumh0jmCyiaqaabv1Kid8pXSIU4u-H9d5vkQfbpXQ4Kj3TxAtxfnN2c_6tXV5c-z01VtOBdTrYRmoFuuBO-tsJ3VmrSNpSBa22ALveXAuaZCGWAGiOFKM2upAY1Fry07QMdz7yaGxwxpkqNLBoZBeQg5Sco6UX7O27ag396g65CjL6-TlBPKCtlsqW6mTAwpRbiXm-hGFZ8lwXJrX67lf_tya1_O9kvyy64_6-3uNfequwCnMwBFyF8HUZYW8Aasi2AmaYN795IXtjWbyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2412337856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Haaland, Marte E.S. ; Haukanes, Haldis ; Zulu, Joseph Mumba ; Moland, Karen Marie ; Blystad, Astrid</creator><creatorcontrib>Haaland, Marte E.S. ; Haukanes, Haldis ; Zulu, Joseph Mumba ; Moland, Karen Marie ; Blystad, Astrid</creatorcontrib><description>This article addresses the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in reproductive health by exploring the processes involved in translating Zambian abortion policy from paperwork to practice in a predominantly rural province. Central to these processes are rural health bureaucrats, who are tasked with administering and monitoring a myriad of reproductive health policies and programmes. The articles is based on eleven months of ethnographic fieldwork in Zambia from September 2017 to August 2018, including in-depth interviews with rural health bureaucrats and participant observation in health management and policy meetings. It examines how health bureaucrats deal with the abortion-related challenges they face. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of reproductive health politics and moral double-binds and give insight into the gap between Zambia's seemingly liberal abortion policy and the lack of access to abortion services in rural areas. Despite the bureaucrats' knowledge about abortion policy, none of the hospitals in the study province offer legal abortion services. While many bureaucrats consider abortion to be a public health issue and see the need to offer legal services to abortion-seeking women, they often bypass abortion-related issues and treat them with silence in policy meetings and public settings. The silence corresponds with the lack of data on abortion and post-abortion care in district and provincial health offices and should be understood in relation to both the dominant moral regime of the Zambian state and global pressure towards specific reproductive health targets. This article calls for increased focus on politics and power dynamics in the state apparatus in order to understand the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in sexual and reproductive health.
•Health bureaucrats play key roles in implementing reproductive health policies.•Implementation of abortion policies is governed through subtle power mechanisms.•Global targets on maternal health may divert attention away from abortion policies.•Political commitment is crucial to implementation of abortion policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112909</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32179365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence ; Bureaucrats ; Disease management ; Female ; Health bureaucrats ; Health Policy ; Health services ; Health Services Accessibility ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Legal services ; Politics ; Power structure ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Reproductive health ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural Health ; Sexual and reproductive health ; Sexual behavior ; State power ; Women ; Womens health ; Zambia</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2020-04, Vol.251, p.112909-8, Article 112909</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8b3eb64a849d8d7dbb165d2e86d50de9d4e44b28ace3ce1c4ab3dd2ceb089bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8b3eb64a849d8d7dbb165d2e86d50de9d4e44b28ace3ce1c4ab3dd2ceb089bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620301283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,33753,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32179365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haaland, Marte E.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haukanes, Haldis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulu, Joseph Mumba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moland, Karen Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blystad, Astrid</creatorcontrib><title>Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This article addresses the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in reproductive health by exploring the processes involved in translating Zambian abortion policy from paperwork to practice in a predominantly rural province. Central to these processes are rural health bureaucrats, who are tasked with administering and monitoring a myriad of reproductive health policies and programmes. The articles is based on eleven months of ethnographic fieldwork in Zambia from September 2017 to August 2018, including in-depth interviews with rural health bureaucrats and participant observation in health management and policy meetings. It examines how health bureaucrats deal with the abortion-related challenges they face. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of reproductive health politics and moral double-binds and give insight into the gap between Zambia's seemingly liberal abortion policy and the lack of access to abortion services in rural areas. Despite the bureaucrats' knowledge about abortion policy, none of the hospitals in the study province offer legal abortion services. While many bureaucrats consider abortion to be a public health issue and see the need to offer legal services to abortion-seeking women, they often bypass abortion-related issues and treat them with silence in policy meetings and public settings. The silence corresponds with the lack of data on abortion and post-abortion care in district and provincial health offices and should be understood in relation to both the dominant moral regime of the Zambian state and global pressure towards specific reproductive health targets. This article calls for increased focus on politics and power dynamics in the state apparatus in order to understand the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in sexual and reproductive health.
•Health bureaucrats play key roles in implementing reproductive health policies.•Implementation of abortion policies is governed through subtle power mechanisms.•Global targets on maternal health may divert attention away from abortion policies.•Political commitment is crucial to implementation of abortion policies.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health bureaucrats</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Legal services</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power structure</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural Health</subject><subject>Sexual and reproductive health</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Zambia</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtP3DAURq2qVRkef6GN1A2bDH4lcbpDCGilkZAKLMrG8uMiPE3swY6L-Pd4mqELNqyu5Hu-z_ZB6CvBS4JJe7JepmCScSPYJcW0nBLa4_4DWhDRsbphvPuIFph2Xd03rN1D-ymtMcYEC_YZ7TFKup61zQL9vnYD-KnahMFNzqRKeVtl_8eHJ1_5PGqI6Xv1K0c1VA-ghumh0jmCyiaqaabv1Kid8pXSIU4u-H9d5vkQfbpXQ4Kj3TxAtxfnN2c_6tXV5c-z01VtOBdTrYRmoFuuBO-tsJ3VmrSNpSBa22ALveXAuaZCGWAGiOFKM2upAY1Fry07QMdz7yaGxwxpkqNLBoZBeQg5Sco6UX7O27ag396g65CjL6-TlBPKCtlsqW6mTAwpRbiXm-hGFZ8lwXJrX67lf_tya1_O9kvyy64_6-3uNfequwCnMwBFyF8HUZYW8Aasi2AmaYN795IXtjWbyA</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Haaland, Marte E.S.</creator><creator>Haukanes, Haldis</creator><creator>Zulu, Joseph Mumba</creator><creator>Moland, Karen Marie</creator><creator>Blystad, Astrid</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy</title><author>Haaland, Marte E.S. ; Haukanes, Haldis ; Zulu, Joseph Mumba ; Moland, Karen Marie ; Blystad, Astrid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-a8b3eb64a849d8d7dbb165d2e86d50de9d4e44b28ace3ce1c4ab3dd2ceb089bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health bureaucrats</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Legal services</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power structure</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural Health</topic><topic>Sexual and reproductive health</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Zambia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haaland, Marte E.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haukanes, Haldis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zulu, Joseph Mumba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moland, Karen Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blystad, Astrid</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haaland, Marte E.S.</au><au>Haukanes, Haldis</au><au>Zulu, Joseph Mumba</au><au>Moland, Karen Marie</au><au>Blystad, Astrid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>251</volume><spage>112909</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>112909-8</pages><artnum>112909</artnum><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>This article addresses the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in reproductive health by exploring the processes involved in translating Zambian abortion policy from paperwork to practice in a predominantly rural province. Central to these processes are rural health bureaucrats, who are tasked with administering and monitoring a myriad of reproductive health policies and programmes. The articles is based on eleven months of ethnographic fieldwork in Zambia from September 2017 to August 2018, including in-depth interviews with rural health bureaucrats and participant observation in health management and policy meetings. It examines how health bureaucrats deal with the abortion-related challenges they face. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of reproductive health politics and moral double-binds and give insight into the gap between Zambia's seemingly liberal abortion policy and the lack of access to abortion services in rural areas. Despite the bureaucrats' knowledge about abortion policy, none of the hospitals in the study province offer legal abortion services. While many bureaucrats consider abortion to be a public health issue and see the need to offer legal services to abortion-seeking women, they often bypass abortion-related issues and treat them with silence in policy meetings and public settings. The silence corresponds with the lack of data on abortion and post-abortion care in district and provincial health offices and should be understood in relation to both the dominant moral regime of the Zambian state and global pressure towards specific reproductive health targets. This article calls for increased focus on politics and power dynamics in the state apparatus in order to understand the gaps between knowledge, policy and practice in sexual and reproductive health.
•Health bureaucrats play key roles in implementing reproductive health policies.•Implementation of abortion policies is governed through subtle power mechanisms.•Global targets on maternal health may divert attention away from abortion policies.•Political commitment is crucial to implementation of abortion policies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32179365</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112909</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2020-04, Vol.251, p.112909-8, Article 112909 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2378000466 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Abortion Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence Bureaucrats Disease management Female Health bureaucrats Health Policy Health services Health Services Accessibility Hospitals Humans Knowledge Legal services Politics Power structure Pregnancy Public health Reproductive health Rural areas Rural communities Rural Health Sexual and reproductive health Sexual behavior State power Women Womens health Zambia |
title | Silent politics and unknown numbers: Rural health bureaucrats and Zambian abortion policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A12%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silent%20politics%20and%20unknown%20numbers:%20Rural%20health%20bureaucrats%20and%20Zambian%20abortion%20policy&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Haaland,%20Marte%20E.S.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=251&rft.spage=112909&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=112909-8&rft.artnum=112909&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112909&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2378000466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2412337856&rft_id=info:pmid/32179365&rft_els_id=S0277953620301283&rfr_iscdi=true |