Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults

Background The United Kingdom Working Party’s (UKWP) criteria were developed to improve epidemiological research in atopic dermatitis (AD), but have not been validated in an exclusively adult European population. Objective To validate the UKWP criteria for AD in adults. Methods In this cross‐section...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2020-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1764-1772
Hauptverfasser: Thyssen, J.P., Andersen, Y., Halling, A.‐S., Williams, H.C., Egeberg, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1772
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1764
container_title Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
container_volume 34
creator Thyssen, J.P.
Andersen, Y.
Halling, A.‐S.
Williams, H.C.
Egeberg, A.
description Background The United Kingdom Working Party’s (UKWP) criteria were developed to improve epidemiological research in atopic dermatitis (AD), but have not been validated in an exclusively adult European population. Objective To validate the UKWP criteria for AD in adults. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, three independent samples of adult individuals were drawn and interviewed: patients with a hospital diagnosis of AD or plaque psoriasis in adulthood, and general population controls. Various versions of the UKWP criteria for AD were utilized. Results A total of 3490 (general population), 3834 (AD) and 4016 (psoriasis) adult individuals were enrolled in the study. The best combination of the UKWP criteria leads to a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.96 in the general population. The criteria better captured ‘AD ever’ compared with ‘AD within the past 12 months’ and had a higher sensitivity in patients with moderate (87.2–97.7%) or severe (95.8–100%) AD at the time of interview compared with those who where asymptomatic (12.6–36.8%). The UKWP criteria also captured high proportions of psoriasis patients (19.7–47.7%) when applied in a cohort of unique psoriasis patients. Conclusions It remains a challenge to accurately diagnose a history of AD in adulthood since symptoms are shared with other skin conditions and AD may have resolved or can be waxing and waning, in turn leading to recall bias. The UKWP criteria performed well in the general population for the purpose of determining the prevalence, but should be used cautiously when studying comorbidity.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jdv.16364
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2377686315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2377686315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-e353c8cca6a1b7e7901ee7480c98a0cb71b8327e99a3ff715e4bb6eaf25984433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQQC0EglI48APIRzik2HHi5YjYFwkkKBwjx5m0LklcbBfUvyfQwo25zEjz9A4PoQNKRrSfk1n1MaKc8WwDDWjGZcKIZJtoQFTKE6VytYN2Q5gRQijN5TbaYSkVnMl8gOqn6KGbxGnAuqtwY1sbdbSuC9jVOE4BjzsbocJ3tptUrsWvzr_1J37UPi6x8f3TW41r57GObm4NrsC3vSLagG2HdbVoYthDW7VuAuyv9xCNLy-ez66T-4erm7PT-8QwTrIEWM6MNEZzTUsBQhEKIDJJjJKamFLQUrJUgFKa1bWgOWRlyUHXaa5kljE2REcr79y79wWEWLQ2GGga3YFbhCJlQnDJGc179HiFGu9C8FAXc29b7ZcFJcV31qLPWvxk7dnDtXZRtlD9kb8de-BkBXzaBpb_m4rb85eV8gvSeIK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377686315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Thyssen, J.P. ; Andersen, Y. ; Halling, A.‐S. ; Williams, H.C. ; Egeberg, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thyssen, J.P. ; Andersen, Y. ; Halling, A.‐S. ; Williams, H.C. ; Egeberg, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The United Kingdom Working Party’s (UKWP) criteria were developed to improve epidemiological research in atopic dermatitis (AD), but have not been validated in an exclusively adult European population. Objective To validate the UKWP criteria for AD in adults. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, three independent samples of adult individuals were drawn and interviewed: patients with a hospital diagnosis of AD or plaque psoriasis in adulthood, and general population controls. Various versions of the UKWP criteria for AD were utilized. Results A total of 3490 (general population), 3834 (AD) and 4016 (psoriasis) adult individuals were enrolled in the study. The best combination of the UKWP criteria leads to a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.96 in the general population. The criteria better captured ‘AD ever’ compared with ‘AD within the past 12 months’ and had a higher sensitivity in patients with moderate (87.2–97.7%) or severe (95.8–100%) AD at the time of interview compared with those who where asymptomatic (12.6–36.8%). The UKWP criteria also captured high proportions of psoriasis patients (19.7–47.7%) when applied in a cohort of unique psoriasis patients. Conclusions It remains a challenge to accurately diagnose a history of AD in adulthood since symptoms are shared with other skin conditions and AD may have resolved or can be waxing and waning, in turn leading to recall bias. The UKWP criteria performed well in the general population for the purpose of determining the prevalence, but should be used cautiously when studying comorbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-9959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16364</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32176385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dermatitis, Atopic - diagnosis ; Dermatitis, Atopic - epidemiology ; Eczema ; Humans ; Prevalence ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2020-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1764-1772</ispartof><rights>2020 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</rights><rights>2020 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-e353c8cca6a1b7e7901ee7480c98a0cb71b8327e99a3ff715e4bb6eaf25984433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-e353c8cca6a1b7e7901ee7480c98a0cb71b8327e99a3ff715e4bb6eaf25984433</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8257-1816 ; 0000-0003-3770-1743 ; 0000-0003-0166-6560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjdv.16364$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjdv.16364$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32176385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thyssen, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halling, A.‐S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egeberg, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults</title><title>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</title><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>Background The United Kingdom Working Party’s (UKWP) criteria were developed to improve epidemiological research in atopic dermatitis (AD), but have not been validated in an exclusively adult European population. Objective To validate the UKWP criteria for AD in adults. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, three independent samples of adult individuals were drawn and interviewed: patients with a hospital diagnosis of AD or plaque psoriasis in adulthood, and general population controls. Various versions of the UKWP criteria for AD were utilized. Results A total of 3490 (general population), 3834 (AD) and 4016 (psoriasis) adult individuals were enrolled in the study. The best combination of the UKWP criteria leads to a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.96 in the general population. The criteria better captured ‘AD ever’ compared with ‘AD within the past 12 months’ and had a higher sensitivity in patients with moderate (87.2–97.7%) or severe (95.8–100%) AD at the time of interview compared with those who where asymptomatic (12.6–36.8%). The UKWP criteria also captured high proportions of psoriasis patients (19.7–47.7%) when applied in a cohort of unique psoriasis patients. Conclusions It remains a challenge to accurately diagnose a history of AD in adulthood since symptoms are shared with other skin conditions and AD may have resolved or can be waxing and waning, in turn leading to recall bias. The UKWP criteria performed well in the general population for the purpose of determining the prevalence, but should be used cautiously when studying comorbidity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Atopic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Atopic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Eczema</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMlOwzAQQC0EglI48APIRzik2HHi5YjYFwkkKBwjx5m0LklcbBfUvyfQwo25zEjz9A4PoQNKRrSfk1n1MaKc8WwDDWjGZcKIZJtoQFTKE6VytYN2Q5gRQijN5TbaYSkVnMl8gOqn6KGbxGnAuqtwY1sbdbSuC9jVOE4BjzsbocJ3tptUrsWvzr_1J37UPi6x8f3TW41r57GObm4NrsC3vSLagG2HdbVoYthDW7VuAuyv9xCNLy-ez66T-4erm7PT-8QwTrIEWM6MNEZzTUsBQhEKIDJJjJKamFLQUrJUgFKa1bWgOWRlyUHXaa5kljE2REcr79y79wWEWLQ2GGga3YFbhCJlQnDJGc179HiFGu9C8FAXc29b7ZcFJcV31qLPWvxk7dnDtXZRtlD9kb8de-BkBXzaBpb_m4rb85eV8gvSeIK0</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Thyssen, J.P.</creator><creator>Andersen, Y.</creator><creator>Halling, A.‐S.</creator><creator>Williams, H.C.</creator><creator>Egeberg, A.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8257-1816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-1743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0166-6560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults</title><author>Thyssen, J.P. ; Andersen, Y. ; Halling, A.‐S. ; Williams, H.C. ; Egeberg, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3604-e353c8cca6a1b7e7901ee7480c98a0cb71b8327e99a3ff715e4bb6eaf25984433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Atopic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Atopic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Eczema</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thyssen, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halling, A.‐S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egeberg, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thyssen, J.P.</au><au>Andersen, Y.</au><au>Halling, A.‐S.</au><au>Williams, H.C.</au><au>Egeberg, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1764</spage><epage>1772</epage><pages>1764-1772</pages><issn>0926-9959</issn><eissn>1468-3083</eissn><abstract>Background The United Kingdom Working Party’s (UKWP) criteria were developed to improve epidemiological research in atopic dermatitis (AD), but have not been validated in an exclusively adult European population. Objective To validate the UKWP criteria for AD in adults. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, three independent samples of adult individuals were drawn and interviewed: patients with a hospital diagnosis of AD or plaque psoriasis in adulthood, and general population controls. Various versions of the UKWP criteria for AD were utilized. Results A total of 3490 (general population), 3834 (AD) and 4016 (psoriasis) adult individuals were enrolled in the study. The best combination of the UKWP criteria leads to a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.96 in the general population. The criteria better captured ‘AD ever’ compared with ‘AD within the past 12 months’ and had a higher sensitivity in patients with moderate (87.2–97.7%) or severe (95.8–100%) AD at the time of interview compared with those who where asymptomatic (12.6–36.8%). The UKWP criteria also captured high proportions of psoriasis patients (19.7–47.7%) when applied in a cohort of unique psoriasis patients. Conclusions It remains a challenge to accurately diagnose a history of AD in adulthood since symptoms are shared with other skin conditions and AD may have resolved or can be waxing and waning, in turn leading to recall bias. The UKWP criteria performed well in the general population for the purpose of determining the prevalence, but should be used cautiously when studying comorbidity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>32176385</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdv.16364</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8257-1816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-1743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0166-6560</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-9959
ispartof Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2020-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1764-1772
issn 0926-9959
1468-3083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2377686315
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dermatitis, Atopic - diagnosis
Dermatitis, Atopic - epidemiology
Eczema
Humans
Prevalence
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title Strengths and limitations of the United Kingdom Working Party criteria for atopic dermatitis in adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T19%3A17%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strengths%20and%20limitations%20of%20the%20United%20Kingdom%20Working%20Party%20criteria%20for%20atopic%20dermatitis%20in%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20European%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology%20and%20Venereology&rft.au=Thyssen,%20J.P.&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1764&rft.epage=1772&rft.pages=1764-1772&rft.issn=0926-9959&rft.eissn=1468-3083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdv.16364&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2377686315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377686315&rft_id=info:pmid/32176385&rfr_iscdi=true