Does the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form enable accurate triage of new NHS orthodontic patients? A service evaluation
Introduction This study was designed to investigate the accuracy of clinical information provided by referring general dental practitioners (GDPs) following the introduction of a standardised referral form across Wales (the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form [AWUORF]) and to see whether t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British dental journal 2020-03, Vol.228 (5), p.355-360 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 360 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 355 |
container_title | British dental journal |
container_volume | 228 |
creator | Ashley, Juliet V. Ireland, Robert S. Plunkett, David J. |
description | Introduction
This study was designed to investigate the accuracy of clinical information provided by referring general dental practitioners (GDPs) following the introduction of a standardised referral form across Wales (the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form [AWUORF]) and to see whether the information given could be reliably used to screen the referrals.
Aim
To evaluate whether priority cases were being readily identified and whether inappropriate referrals could be minimised, thereby potentially reducing waiting lists.
Method
A service evaluation involving the retrospective study of 200 consecutive referrals to a specialist practice over a three-month period. A descriptive data analysis was undertaken.
Results
The GDPs had successfully identified the main complaint in 156 (78%) of the referrals. Of the 44 (22%) clinically inaccurate referrals, there was no impact on the patient in terms of referral pathway in 32 (16%) cases, but in the remaining 12 (6%), 5 (2.5%) cases were prioritised unnecessarily and the remaining 7 (3.5%) would have been seen more quickly had the GDP provided the relevant clinical information. The appropriateness of referral in terms of eligibility of the patient to receive NHS-funded orthodontic treatment was high with only 18 (9%) patients failing to meet the criteria.
Conclusion
The AWUORF successfully guides the GDP to make appropriate referrals and enables accurate triage in the majority of cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41415-020-1315-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2377349884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2377349884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bf9d4d9f9d050a57ab16a8335374377866e281e4db610bb4b146dd8732e12df63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMoOo7-ADcScOOmmleTzkqG8Qmi4AOXJW1vtZJJxiQdce0fN8P4QnCT5N585ySXg9AOJQeU8OIwCCponhFGMsrTga2gARVKZjlXfBUNCCEqI5KSDbQZwjMhVAgi19EGZ1QRlssBej92EHB8Ajw2Bj9ok6p7283BB23wtY9PrnE2djW-gRa8T81T56cYrK4MYF3XvdcRcPSdfgTsWmzhFV-d32L3SzvTsQMbwxEe4wB-3tWAYa5Nn_rObqG1VpsA25_7EN2fntxNzrPL67OLyfgyq7liMavaUSOaUVpJTnSudEWlLjhPwwquVCElsIKCaKo0cVWJigrZNIXiDChrWsmHaH_pO_PupYcQy2kXajBGW3B9KFly4WJUFCKhe3_QZ9d7m363oORISE5VouiSqr0LwUNbznw31f6tpKRcJFQuEypTQuUioSQeot1P576aQvOt-IokAWwJhHRlH8H_PP2_6weMEZti</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376946317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form enable accurate triage of new NHS orthodontic patients? A service evaluation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ashley, Juliet V. ; Ireland, Robert S. ; Plunkett, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashley, Juliet V. ; Ireland, Robert S. ; Plunkett, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
This study was designed to investigate the accuracy of clinical information provided by referring general dental practitioners (GDPs) following the introduction of a standardised referral form across Wales (the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form [AWUORF]) and to see whether the information given could be reliably used to screen the referrals.
Aim
To evaluate whether priority cases were being readily identified and whether inappropriate referrals could be minimised, thereby potentially reducing waiting lists.
Method
A service evaluation involving the retrospective study of 200 consecutive referrals to a specialist practice over a three-month period. A descriptive data analysis was undertaken.
Results
The GDPs had successfully identified the main complaint in 156 (78%) of the referrals. Of the 44 (22%) clinically inaccurate referrals, there was no impact on the patient in terms of referral pathway in 32 (16%) cases, but in the remaining 12 (6%), 5 (2.5%) cases were prioritised unnecessarily and the remaining 7 (3.5%) would have been seen more quickly had the GDP provided the relevant clinical information. The appropriateness of referral in terms of eligibility of the patient to receive NHS-funded orthodontic treatment was high with only 18 (9%) patients failing to meet the criteria.
Conclusion
The AWUORF successfully guides the GDP to make appropriate referrals and enables accurate triage in the majority of cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-1315-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32170256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Dentists ; Humans ; Orthodontics ; Patients ; Professional Role ; Referral and Consultation ; Retrospective Studies ; State Medicine ; Triage ; Wales</subject><ispartof>British dental journal, 2020-03, Vol.228 (5), p.355-360</ispartof><rights>British Dental Association 2020</rights><rights>2020© British Dental Association 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bf9d4d9f9d050a57ab16a8335374377866e281e4db610bb4b146dd8732e12df63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bf9d4d9f9d050a57ab16a8335374377866e281e4db610bb4b146dd8732e12df63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41415-020-1315-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41415-020-1315-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashley, Juliet V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Does the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form enable accurate triage of new NHS orthodontic patients? A service evaluation</title><title>British dental journal</title><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><description>Introduction
This study was designed to investigate the accuracy of clinical information provided by referring general dental practitioners (GDPs) following the introduction of a standardised referral form across Wales (the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form [AWUORF]) and to see whether the information given could be reliably used to screen the referrals.
Aim
To evaluate whether priority cases were being readily identified and whether inappropriate referrals could be minimised, thereby potentially reducing waiting lists.
Method
A service evaluation involving the retrospective study of 200 consecutive referrals to a specialist practice over a three-month period. A descriptive data analysis was undertaken.
Results
The GDPs had successfully identified the main complaint in 156 (78%) of the referrals. Of the 44 (22%) clinically inaccurate referrals, there was no impact on the patient in terms of referral pathway in 32 (16%) cases, but in the remaining 12 (6%), 5 (2.5%) cases were prioritised unnecessarily and the remaining 7 (3.5%) would have been seen more quickly had the GDP provided the relevant clinical information. The appropriateness of referral in terms of eligibility of the patient to receive NHS-funded orthodontic treatment was high with only 18 (9%) patients failing to meet the criteria.
Conclusion
The AWUORF successfully guides the GDP to make appropriate referrals and enables accurate triage in the majority of cases.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional Role</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>State Medicine</subject><subject>Triage</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>0007-0610</issn><issn>1476-5373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMoOo7-ADcScOOmmleTzkqG8Qmi4AOXJW1vtZJJxiQdce0fN8P4QnCT5N585ySXg9AOJQeU8OIwCCponhFGMsrTga2gARVKZjlXfBUNCCEqI5KSDbQZwjMhVAgi19EGZ1QRlssBej92EHB8Ajw2Bj9ok6p7283BB23wtY9PrnE2djW-gRa8T81T56cYrK4MYF3XvdcRcPSdfgTsWmzhFV-d32L3SzvTsQMbwxEe4wB-3tWAYa5Nn_rObqG1VpsA25_7EN2fntxNzrPL67OLyfgyq7liMavaUSOaUVpJTnSudEWlLjhPwwquVCElsIKCaKo0cVWJigrZNIXiDChrWsmHaH_pO_PupYcQy2kXajBGW3B9KFly4WJUFCKhe3_QZ9d7m363oORISE5VouiSqr0LwUNbznw31f6tpKRcJFQuEypTQuUioSQeot1P576aQvOt-IokAWwJhHRlH8H_PP2_6weMEZti</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Ashley, Juliet V.</creator><creator>Ireland, Robert S.</creator><creator>Plunkett, David J.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Does the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form enable accurate triage of new NHS orthodontic patients? A service evaluation</title><author>Ashley, Juliet V. ; Ireland, Robert S. ; Plunkett, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bf9d4d9f9d050a57ab16a8335374377866e281e4db610bb4b146dd8732e12df63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional Role</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>State Medicine</topic><topic>Triage</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashley, Juliet V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashley, Juliet V.</au><au>Ireland, Robert S.</au><au>Plunkett, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form enable accurate triage of new NHS orthodontic patients? A service evaluation</atitle><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle><stitle>Br Dent J</stitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>228</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>355-360</pages><issn>0007-0610</issn><eissn>1476-5373</eissn><abstract>Introduction
This study was designed to investigate the accuracy of clinical information provided by referring general dental practitioners (GDPs) following the introduction of a standardised referral form across Wales (the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form [AWUORF]) and to see whether the information given could be reliably used to screen the referrals.
Aim
To evaluate whether priority cases were being readily identified and whether inappropriate referrals could be minimised, thereby potentially reducing waiting lists.
Method
A service evaluation involving the retrospective study of 200 consecutive referrals to a specialist practice over a three-month period. A descriptive data analysis was undertaken.
Results
The GDPs had successfully identified the main complaint in 156 (78%) of the referrals. Of the 44 (22%) clinically inaccurate referrals, there was no impact on the patient in terms of referral pathway in 32 (16%) cases, but in the remaining 12 (6%), 5 (2.5%) cases were prioritised unnecessarily and the remaining 7 (3.5%) would have been seen more quickly had the GDP provided the relevant clinical information. The appropriateness of referral in terms of eligibility of the patient to receive NHS-funded orthodontic treatment was high with only 18 (9%) patients failing to meet the criteria.
Conclusion
The AWUORF successfully guides the GDP to make appropriate referrals and enables accurate triage in the majority of cases.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32170256</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41415-020-1315-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0610 |
ispartof | British dental journal, 2020-03, Vol.228 (5), p.355-360 |
issn | 0007-0610 1476-5373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2377349884 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Dentistry Dentists Humans Orthodontics Patients Professional Role Referral and Consultation Retrospective Studies State Medicine Triage Wales |
title | Does the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form enable accurate triage of new NHS orthodontic patients? A service evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20All%20Wales%20Universal%20Orthodontic%20Referral%20Form%20enable%20accurate%20triage%20of%20new%20NHS%20orthodontic%20patients?%20A%20service%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=British%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Ashley,%20Juliet%20V.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=228&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=355-360&rft.issn=0007-0610&rft.eissn=1476-5373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41415-020-1315-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2377349884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376946317&rft_id=info:pmid/32170256&rfr_iscdi=true |