Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective

The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada currently endorse a fracture risk prediction tool called CAROC. It has been used in Canada since 2005 with an update in 2010. It is an integral part of bone mineral densitometry reporting across the country. New osteoporosis guidelines...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian Association of Radiologists journal 2021-08, Vol.72 (3), p.483-489
Hauptverfasser: Siminoski, Kerry, O’Keeffe, Margaret, Akincioglu, Cigdem, Ganguli, S. Nimu, Levesque, Jacques, Raaphorst, Peter, Tarulli, Giuseppe, Thurston, Wendy, Lyons, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 489
container_issue 3
container_start_page 483
container_title Canadian Association of Radiologists journal
container_volume 72
creator Siminoski, Kerry
O’Keeffe, Margaret
Akincioglu, Cigdem
Ganguli, S. Nimu
Levesque, Jacques
Raaphorst, Peter
Tarulli, Giuseppe
Thurston, Wendy
Lyons, David
description The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada currently endorse a fracture risk prediction tool called CAROC. It has been used in Canada since 2005 with an update in 2010. It is an integral part of bone mineral densitometry reporting across the country. New osteoporosis guidelines from Osteoporosis Canada (OC) are expected in the near future. There has been pressure on radiologists to report fracture risk using an alternative fracture risk prediction platform called FRAX. In addition, OC collaborated in the development of the Canadian FRAX model and has been copromoting both FRAX and CAROC, raising the prospect that new guidelines may seek to replace CAROC with FRAX for fracture risk determination. A number of concerns have been raised about FRAX, including: (1) FRAX has not released its algorithms to the public domain with the consequence that it is impossible to verify results for an individual patient; (2) FRAX has incorrectly claimed that it was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has used this affiliation to promote itself until recently ordered by the WHO to desist; (3) FRAX requires collection of additional clinical information beyond that needed for CAROC, and this patient-reported medical data is prone to substantial error; and (4) despite claims to the contrary, there are no valid studies comparing FRAX to CAROC. We believe it is important that radiologists be aware of these issues in order to provide input into future Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting of the Canadian Association of Radiologists.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0846537120907655
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2376731599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0846537120907655</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2376731599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-f7a31763d7bcb6d33161a950cde38d85a5edb2539873498c78bd95e72929602e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb1vFDEQxS0EIkegp0KWaGgW_HH-ojsuhEQKAiVQUK2869ngcGcfY28kev7w7HKBSJFwM5Lfb97M6BHynLPXnBvzhtmlVtJwwRwzWqkHZMGX1jZCav6QLGa5mfUD8qSUK8bYUhr3mBxIwbVQUizI73VOFfM1YIlQ6MWImMcUYrqk9TvQdx-P6DnsMtb556L6FDwGOmT8Ix9BBdzG5GvMieaBctZ8A4901ZW8GSvQY_R9HRHoeSw_3tIVXfvkQ_SJfp5G7qCv8RqekkeD3xR4dlsPydfj91_WJ83Zpw-n69VZ00tuazMYL7nRMpiu73SQkmvunWJ9AGmDVV5B6KaznDVy6WxvbBecAiOccJoJkIfk1d53h_nnCKW221h62Gx8gjyWVkijjeTKuQl9eQ-9yiOmabtWqOk5bvVMsT3VYy4FYWh3GLcef7WctXNC7f2EppYXt8Zjt4Xwr-FvJBPQ7IHiL-Fu6n8NbwCMNpeX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555591869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Siminoski, Kerry ; O’Keeffe, Margaret ; Akincioglu, Cigdem ; Ganguli, S. Nimu ; Levesque, Jacques ; Raaphorst, Peter ; Tarulli, Giuseppe ; Thurston, Wendy ; Lyons, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Siminoski, Kerry ; O’Keeffe, Margaret ; Akincioglu, Cigdem ; Ganguli, S. Nimu ; Levesque, Jacques ; Raaphorst, Peter ; Tarulli, Giuseppe ; Thurston, Wendy ; Lyons, David</creatorcontrib><description>The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada currently endorse a fracture risk prediction tool called CAROC. It has been used in Canada since 2005 with an update in 2010. It is an integral part of bone mineral densitometry reporting across the country. New osteoporosis guidelines from Osteoporosis Canada (OC) are expected in the near future. There has been pressure on radiologists to report fracture risk using an alternative fracture risk prediction platform called FRAX. In addition, OC collaborated in the development of the Canadian FRAX model and has been copromoting both FRAX and CAROC, raising the prospect that new guidelines may seek to replace CAROC with FRAX for fracture risk determination. A number of concerns have been raised about FRAX, including: (1) FRAX has not released its algorithms to the public domain with the consequence that it is impossible to verify results for an individual patient; (2) FRAX has incorrectly claimed that it was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has used this affiliation to promote itself until recently ordered by the WHO to desist; (3) FRAX requires collection of additional clinical information beyond that needed for CAROC, and this patient-reported medical data is prone to substantial error; and (4) despite claims to the contrary, there are no valid studies comparing FRAX to CAROC. We believe it is important that radiologists be aware of these issues in order to provide input into future Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting of the Canadian Association of Radiologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0846-5371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0846537120907655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32162532</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biomedical materials ; Densitometers ; Densitometry ; Fractures ; Guidelines ; Osteoporosis ; Patients ; Public domain ; Risk ; Risk assessment</subject><ispartof>Canadian Association of Radiologists journal, 2021-08, Vol.72 (3), p.483-489</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-f7a31763d7bcb6d33161a950cde38d85a5edb2539873498c78bd95e72929602e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0846537120907655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0846537120907655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siminoski, Kerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Keeffe, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akincioglu, Cigdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguli, S. Nimu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raaphorst, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarulli, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurston, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, David</creatorcontrib><title>Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective</title><title>Canadian Association of Radiologists journal</title><addtitle>Can Assoc Radiol J</addtitle><description>The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada currently endorse a fracture risk prediction tool called CAROC. It has been used in Canada since 2005 with an update in 2010. It is an integral part of bone mineral densitometry reporting across the country. New osteoporosis guidelines from Osteoporosis Canada (OC) are expected in the near future. There has been pressure on radiologists to report fracture risk using an alternative fracture risk prediction platform called FRAX. In addition, OC collaborated in the development of the Canadian FRAX model and has been copromoting both FRAX and CAROC, raising the prospect that new guidelines may seek to replace CAROC with FRAX for fracture risk determination. A number of concerns have been raised about FRAX, including: (1) FRAX has not released its algorithms to the public domain with the consequence that it is impossible to verify results for an individual patient; (2) FRAX has incorrectly claimed that it was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has used this affiliation to promote itself until recently ordered by the WHO to desist; (3) FRAX requires collection of additional clinical information beyond that needed for CAROC, and this patient-reported medical data is prone to substantial error; and (4) despite claims to the contrary, there are no valid studies comparing FRAX to CAROC. We believe it is important that radiologists be aware of these issues in order to provide input into future Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting of the Canadian Association of Radiologists.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Densitometers</subject><subject>Densitometry</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Public domain</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><issn>0846-5371</issn><issn>1488-2361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kb1vFDEQxS0EIkegp0KWaGgW_HH-ojsuhEQKAiVQUK2869ngcGcfY28kev7w7HKBSJFwM5Lfb97M6BHynLPXnBvzhtmlVtJwwRwzWqkHZMGX1jZCav6QLGa5mfUD8qSUK8bYUhr3mBxIwbVQUizI73VOFfM1YIlQ6MWImMcUYrqk9TvQdx-P6DnsMtb556L6FDwGOmT8Ix9BBdzG5GvMieaBctZ8A4901ZW8GSvQY_R9HRHoeSw_3tIVXfvkQ_SJfp5G7qCv8RqekkeD3xR4dlsPydfj91_WJ83Zpw-n69VZ00tuazMYL7nRMpiu73SQkmvunWJ9AGmDVV5B6KaznDVy6WxvbBecAiOccJoJkIfk1d53h_nnCKW221h62Gx8gjyWVkijjeTKuQl9eQ-9yiOmabtWqOk5bvVMsT3VYy4FYWh3GLcef7WctXNC7f2EppYXt8Zjt4Xwr-FvJBPQ7IHiL-Fu6n8NbwCMNpeX</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Siminoski, Kerry</creator><creator>O’Keeffe, Margaret</creator><creator>Akincioglu, Cigdem</creator><creator>Ganguli, S. Nimu</creator><creator>Levesque, Jacques</creator><creator>Raaphorst, Peter</creator><creator>Tarulli, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Thurston, Wendy</creator><creator>Lyons, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective</title><author>Siminoski, Kerry ; O’Keeffe, Margaret ; Akincioglu, Cigdem ; Ganguli, S. Nimu ; Levesque, Jacques ; Raaphorst, Peter ; Tarulli, Giuseppe ; Thurston, Wendy ; Lyons, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-f7a31763d7bcb6d33161a950cde38d85a5edb2539873498c78bd95e72929602e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Densitometers</topic><topic>Densitometry</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Public domain</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siminoski, Kerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Keeffe, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akincioglu, Cigdem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguli, S. Nimu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raaphorst, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarulli, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thurston, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, David</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian Association of Radiologists journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siminoski, Kerry</au><au>O’Keeffe, Margaret</au><au>Akincioglu, Cigdem</au><au>Ganguli, S. Nimu</au><au>Levesque, Jacques</au><au>Raaphorst, Peter</au><au>Tarulli, Giuseppe</au><au>Thurston, Wendy</au><au>Lyons, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Association of Radiologists journal</jtitle><addtitle>Can Assoc Radiol J</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>483-489</pages><issn>0846-5371</issn><eissn>1488-2361</eissn><abstract>The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada currently endorse a fracture risk prediction tool called CAROC. It has been used in Canada since 2005 with an update in 2010. It is an integral part of bone mineral densitometry reporting across the country. New osteoporosis guidelines from Osteoporosis Canada (OC) are expected in the near future. There has been pressure on radiologists to report fracture risk using an alternative fracture risk prediction platform called FRAX. In addition, OC collaborated in the development of the Canadian FRAX model and has been copromoting both FRAX and CAROC, raising the prospect that new guidelines may seek to replace CAROC with FRAX for fracture risk determination. A number of concerns have been raised about FRAX, including: (1) FRAX has not released its algorithms to the public domain with the consequence that it is impossible to verify results for an individual patient; (2) FRAX has incorrectly claimed that it was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has used this affiliation to promote itself until recently ordered by the WHO to desist; (3) FRAX requires collection of additional clinical information beyond that needed for CAROC, and this patient-reported medical data is prone to substantial error; and (4) despite claims to the contrary, there are no valid studies comparing FRAX to CAROC. We believe it is important that radiologists be aware of these issues in order to provide input into future Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting of the Canadian Association of Radiologists.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32162532</pmid><doi>10.1177/0846537120907655</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0846-5371
ispartof Canadian Association of Radiologists journal, 2021-08, Vol.72 (3), p.483-489
issn 0846-5371
1488-2361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2376731599
source Access via SAGE
subjects Algorithms
Biomedical materials
Densitometers
Densitometry
Fractures
Guidelines
Osteoporosis
Patients
Public domain
Risk
Risk assessment
title Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A47%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controversies%20Surrounding%20the%20BMD%20Reporting%20Standard%20for%20the%20Determination%20of%2010-Year%20Absolute%20Fracture%20Risk:%20A%20Canadian%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Association%20of%20Radiologists%20journal&rft.au=Siminoski,%20Kerry&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=483-489&rft.issn=0846-5371&rft.eissn=1488-2361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0846537120907655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2376731599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555591869&rft_id=info:pmid/32162532&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0846537120907655&rfr_iscdi=true