Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait

Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2020-05, Vol.104, p.109718-109718, Article 109718
Hauptverfasser: Chakraborty, Saikat, Nandy, Anup, Yamaguchi, Takazumi, Bonnet, Vincent, Venture, Gentiane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109718
container_issue
container_start_page 109718
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 104
creator Chakraborty, Saikat
Nandy, Anup
Yamaguchi, Takazumi
Bonnet, Vincent
Venture, Gentiane
description Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375922167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929020301342</els_id><sourcerecordid>2375922167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhiMEokPhFSpLbNhk8KWx4x1VxaVSJTawts7YJzNOY3uwHaQ8Rt-YjKZlwYaVpaPv_Mf6v6a5YnTLKJMfx-248ymgPWw55aehVqx_0WxYr0TLRU9fNhtKOWs11_SieVPKSClV10q_bi4EZx0Tqt80jzfWzhnsQtJAfIA9EgcVSKkZIZyGQALkB8wTlkJCqj5FYuFY54ykLKViID4ShxVz8NHHPakHJFOyMBG3RAjermmw85OvC4HoyJh8rOTBRwxQvS2nK4c5QCR78PVt82qAqeC7p_ey-fnl84_bb-399693tzf3rRVa1nawQ8-dVYx2emCu07KDQbFOU2klYwBrKyvCONWIYkDH-A4USsGoFMqBuGw-nHOPOf2asVQTfLE4TRAxzcVwoTrNOZNqRd__g45pznH9neHXvJN933d6peSZsjmVknEwx7w2mhfDqDlJM6N5lmZO0sxZ2rp49RQ_7wK6v2vPllbg0xnAtY_fHrMp1mO06HxGW41L_n83_gBNla1G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425688859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chakraborty, Saikat ; Nandy, Anup ; Yamaguchi, Takazumi ; Bonnet, Vincent ; Venture, Gentiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Saikat ; Nandy, Anup ; Yamaguchi, Takazumi ; Bonnet, Vincent ; Venture, Gentiane</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32151378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body kinematics ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficients ; Cost analysis ; Data transmission ; Dynamic stability ; Dynamical systems ; Extended Kalman filter ; Gait ; Gait recognition ; Humans ; Inverse kinematics ; Kinect v2 ; Kinematics ; Liapunov exponents ; Local dynamic stability ; Maximal Lyapunov exponent ; Motion capture ; Motion stability ; Parameters ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Root-mean-square errors ; Software ; Stability analysis ; Time series ; Tracking systems ; Treadmills ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2020-05, Vol.104, p.109718-109718, Article 109718</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3909-9303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929020301342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32151378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Saikat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandy, Anup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venture, Gentiane</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body kinematics</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Dynamic stability</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Extended Kalman filter</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait recognition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inverse kinematics</subject><subject>Kinect v2</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Liapunov exponents</subject><subject>Local dynamic stability</subject><subject>Maximal Lyapunov exponent</subject><subject>Motion capture</subject><subject>Motion stability</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Tracking systems</subject><subject>Treadmills</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhiMEokPhFSpLbNhk8KWx4x1VxaVSJTawts7YJzNOY3uwHaQ8Rt-YjKZlwYaVpaPv_Mf6v6a5YnTLKJMfx-248ymgPWw55aehVqx_0WxYr0TLRU9fNhtKOWs11_SieVPKSClV10q_bi4EZx0Tqt80jzfWzhnsQtJAfIA9EgcVSKkZIZyGQALkB8wTlkJCqj5FYuFY54ykLKViID4ShxVz8NHHPakHJFOyMBG3RAjermmw85OvC4HoyJh8rOTBRwxQvS2nK4c5QCR78PVt82qAqeC7p_ey-fnl84_bb-399693tzf3rRVa1nawQ8-dVYx2emCu07KDQbFOU2klYwBrKyvCONWIYkDH-A4USsGoFMqBuGw-nHOPOf2asVQTfLE4TRAxzcVwoTrNOZNqRd__g45pznH9neHXvJN933d6peSZsjmVknEwx7w2mhfDqDlJM6N5lmZO0sxZ2rp49RQ_7wK6v2vPllbg0xnAtY_fHrMp1mO06HxGW41L_n83_gBNla1G</recordid><startdate>20200507</startdate><enddate>20200507</enddate><creator>Chakraborty, Saikat</creator><creator>Nandy, Anup</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</creator><creator>Bonnet, Vincent</creator><creator>Venture, Gentiane</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3909-9303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200507</creationdate><title>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</title><author>Chakraborty, Saikat ; Nandy, Anup ; Yamaguchi, Takazumi ; Bonnet, Vincent ; Venture, Gentiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body kinematics</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Dynamic stability</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Extended Kalman filter</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait recognition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inverse kinematics</topic><topic>Kinect v2</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Liapunov exponents</topic><topic>Local dynamic stability</topic><topic>Maximal Lyapunov exponent</topic><topic>Motion capture</topic><topic>Motion stability</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Tracking systems</topic><topic>Treadmills</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Saikat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandy, Anup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venture, Gentiane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chakraborty, Saikat</au><au>Nandy, Anup</au><au>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</au><au>Bonnet, Vincent</au><au>Venture, Gentiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2020-05-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><spage>109718</spage><epage>109718</epage><pages>109718-109718</pages><artnum>109718</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32151378</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3909-9303</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2020-05, Vol.104, p.109718-109718, Article 109718
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375922167
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Biomechanical Phenomena
Body kinematics
Correlation analysis
Correlation coefficients
Cost analysis
Data transmission
Dynamic stability
Dynamical systems
Extended Kalman filter
Gait
Gait recognition
Humans
Inverse kinematics
Kinect v2
Kinematics
Liapunov exponents
Local dynamic stability
Maximal Lyapunov exponent
Motion capture
Motion stability
Parameters
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Root-mean-square errors
Software
Stability analysis
Time series
Tracking systems
Treadmills
Walking
title Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T13%3A33%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20image%20data%20stream%20of%20a%20markerless%20motion%20capture%20system%20in%20determining%20the%20local%20dynamic%20stability%20and%20joint%20kinematics%20of%20human%20gait&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Chakraborty,%20Saikat&rft.date=2020-05-07&rft.volume=104&rft.spage=109718&rft.epage=109718&rft.pages=109718-109718&rft.artnum=109718&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375922167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425688859&rft_id=info:pmid/32151378&rft_els_id=S0021929020301342&rfr_iscdi=true