Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait
Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2020-05, Vol.104, p.109718-109718, Article 109718 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109718 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109718 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Chakraborty, Saikat Nandy, Anup Yamaguchi, Takazumi Bonnet, Vincent Venture, Gentiane |
description | Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375922167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929020301342</els_id><sourcerecordid>2375922167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhiMEokPhFSpLbNhk8KWx4x1VxaVSJTawts7YJzNOY3uwHaQ8Rt-YjKZlwYaVpaPv_Mf6v6a5YnTLKJMfx-248ymgPWw55aehVqx_0WxYr0TLRU9fNhtKOWs11_SieVPKSClV10q_bi4EZx0Tqt80jzfWzhnsQtJAfIA9EgcVSKkZIZyGQALkB8wTlkJCqj5FYuFY54ykLKViID4ShxVz8NHHPakHJFOyMBG3RAjermmw85OvC4HoyJh8rOTBRwxQvS2nK4c5QCR78PVt82qAqeC7p_ey-fnl84_bb-399693tzf3rRVa1nawQ8-dVYx2emCu07KDQbFOU2klYwBrKyvCONWIYkDH-A4USsGoFMqBuGw-nHOPOf2asVQTfLE4TRAxzcVwoTrNOZNqRd__g45pznH9neHXvJN933d6peSZsjmVknEwx7w2mhfDqDlJM6N5lmZO0sxZ2rp49RQ_7wK6v2vPllbg0xnAtY_fHrMp1mO06HxGW41L_n83_gBNla1G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425688859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chakraborty, Saikat ; Nandy, Anup ; Yamaguchi, Takazumi ; Bonnet, Vincent ; Venture, Gentiane</creator><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Saikat ; Nandy, Anup ; Yamaguchi, Takazumi ; Bonnet, Vincent ; Venture, Gentiane</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32151378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body kinematics ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficients ; Cost analysis ; Data transmission ; Dynamic stability ; Dynamical systems ; Extended Kalman filter ; Gait ; Gait recognition ; Humans ; Inverse kinematics ; Kinect v2 ; Kinematics ; Liapunov exponents ; Local dynamic stability ; Maximal Lyapunov exponent ; Motion capture ; Motion stability ; Parameters ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Root-mean-square errors ; Software ; Stability analysis ; Time series ; Tracking systems ; Treadmills ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2020-05, Vol.104, p.109718-109718, Article 109718</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3909-9303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929020301342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32151378$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Saikat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandy, Anup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venture, Gentiane</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body kinematics</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Data transmission</subject><subject>Dynamic stability</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Extended Kalman filter</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait recognition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inverse kinematics</subject><subject>Kinect v2</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Liapunov exponents</subject><subject>Local dynamic stability</subject><subject>Maximal Lyapunov exponent</subject><subject>Motion capture</subject><subject>Motion stability</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Tracking systems</subject><subject>Treadmills</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhiMEokPhFSpLbNhk8KWx4x1VxaVSJTawts7YJzNOY3uwHaQ8Rt-YjKZlwYaVpaPv_Mf6v6a5YnTLKJMfx-248ymgPWw55aehVqx_0WxYr0TLRU9fNhtKOWs11_SieVPKSClV10q_bi4EZx0Tqt80jzfWzhnsQtJAfIA9EgcVSKkZIZyGQALkB8wTlkJCqj5FYuFY54ykLKViID4ShxVz8NHHPakHJFOyMBG3RAjermmw85OvC4HoyJh8rOTBRwxQvS2nK4c5QCR78PVt82qAqeC7p_ey-fnl84_bb-399693tzf3rRVa1nawQ8-dVYx2emCu07KDQbFOU2klYwBrKyvCONWIYkDH-A4USsGoFMqBuGw-nHOPOf2asVQTfLE4TRAxzcVwoTrNOZNqRd__g45pznH9neHXvJN933d6peSZsjmVknEwx7w2mhfDqDlJM6N5lmZO0sxZ2rp49RQ_7wK6v2vPllbg0xnAtY_fHrMp1mO06HxGW41L_n83_gBNla1G</recordid><startdate>20200507</startdate><enddate>20200507</enddate><creator>Chakraborty, Saikat</creator><creator>Nandy, Anup</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</creator><creator>Bonnet, Vincent</creator><creator>Venture, Gentiane</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3909-9303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200507</creationdate><title>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</title><author>Chakraborty, Saikat ; Nandy, Anup ; Yamaguchi, Takazumi ; Bonnet, Vincent ; Venture, Gentiane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-fcf82dc71059f1d5965af715906c611aa020cf81209ee3fed12ba7e6310637da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body kinematics</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Data transmission</topic><topic>Dynamic stability</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Extended Kalman filter</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait recognition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inverse kinematics</topic><topic>Kinect v2</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Liapunov exponents</topic><topic>Local dynamic stability</topic><topic>Maximal Lyapunov exponent</topic><topic>Motion capture</topic><topic>Motion stability</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Tracking systems</topic><topic>Treadmills</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Saikat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandy, Anup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venture, Gentiane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chakraborty, Saikat</au><au>Nandy, Anup</au><au>Yamaguchi, Takazumi</au><au>Bonnet, Vincent</au><au>Venture, Gentiane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2020-05-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><spage>109718</spage><epage>109718</epage><pages>109718-109718</pages><artnum>109718</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Assessment of gait parameters is commonly performed through the high-end motion tracking systems, which limits the measurement to sophisticated laboratory settings due to its excessive cost. Recently, Microsoft Kinect (v2) sensor has become popular in clinical gait analysis due to its low-cost. But, determining the accuracy of its RGB-D image data stream in measuring the joint kinematics and local dynamic stability remains an unsolved problem. This study examined the suitability of Kinect(v2) RGB-D image data stream in assessing those gait parameters. Fifteen healthy participants walked on a treadmill during which lower body kinematics were measured by a Kinect(v2) sensor and a optophotogrametric tracking system, simultaneously. Extended Kalman filter was used to extract the lower extremity joint angles from Kinect, while inverse kinematics was used for the gold standard system. For both systems, local dynamic stability was assessed using maximal Lyapunov exponent. Sprague’s validation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE were computed to confirm the difference between the joint angles time series of the two systems while relative agreement between them was investigated through Pearson’s correlation coefficient (pr). Fisher’s Exact Test was performed on maximal Lyapunov exponent to investigate the data independence while reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. This study concludes that the RGB-D data stream of Kinect sensor is efficient in estimating joint kinematics, but not suitable for measuring the local dynamic stability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32151378</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3909-9303</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2020-05, Vol.104, p.109718-109718, Article 109718 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375922167 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Biomechanical Phenomena Body kinematics Correlation analysis Correlation coefficients Cost analysis Data transmission Dynamic stability Dynamical systems Extended Kalman filter Gait Gait recognition Humans Inverse kinematics Kinect v2 Kinematics Liapunov exponents Local dynamic stability Maximal Lyapunov exponent Motion capture Motion stability Parameters Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Root-mean-square errors Software Stability analysis Time series Tracking systems Treadmills Walking |
title | Accuracy of image data stream of a markerless motion capture system in determining the local dynamic stability and joint kinematics of human gait |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T13%3A33%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20image%20data%20stream%20of%20a%20markerless%20motion%20capture%20system%20in%20determining%20the%20local%20dynamic%20stability%20and%20joint%20kinematics%20of%20human%20gait&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Chakraborty,%20Saikat&rft.date=2020-05-07&rft.volume=104&rft.spage=109718&rft.epage=109718&rft.pages=109718-109718&rft.artnum=109718&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375922167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425688859&rft_id=info:pmid/32151378&rft_els_id=S0021929020301342&rfr_iscdi=true |