Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making
The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in social and administrative pharmacy 2020-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1483-1486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1486 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1483 |
container_title | Research in social and administrative pharmacy |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rutter, Paul M. Harrison, Tim |
description | The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375510245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551741120300127</els_id><sourcerecordid>2375510245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiNERUvLTwDlyGWWOMl8lAtC5VOq1Et7jrKOp3iZSYZktlL_PSm7cEWyZMt6X7_yI8RrUBtQ0L3bbYpffvg8b7TSaqN0LfVMnMGlsc0ArXpe57aFprcAp-JlKTulTK_AvhCnRoPtbafPhP_E40iZ4sp-koH9fUyFi-Qo_1z3-CiX7HFlpPfylmeSa5I-pGWVOHFkrLZMvqTI8V76GGQg5MIpytn_rLsLcTL6qdCrYz8Xd18-3159a65vvn6_-njdoAW9Nh5RD4NuwaM2W6QRuqHvYdTKhqC7HsB0Q-iwGwmsHkZtzWXdK7M1LbZgzLl4e7i75PRrT2V1MxekafKR0r44bfqKQ2nbVml7kGJOpWQa3ZJ59vnRgXJPdN3OHem6J7pO6Vqq-t4cI_bbmcI_11-cVfDhIKD66ANTdgWZIlLgTLi6kPg_Eb8BCHWNyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375510245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rutter, Paul M. ; Harrison, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutter, Paul M. ; Harrison, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32147462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical reasoning ; Community pharmacy ; Community pharmacy practice ; Differential diagnosis ; Minor illness management ; Self-care</subject><ispartof>Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2020-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1483-1486</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741120300127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</title><title>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</title><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><description>The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.</description><subject>Clinical reasoning</subject><subject>Community pharmacy</subject><subject>Community pharmacy practice</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Minor illness management</subject><subject>Self-care</subject><issn>1551-7411</issn><issn>1934-8150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiNERUvLTwDlyGWWOMl8lAtC5VOq1Et7jrKOp3iZSYZktlL_PSm7cEWyZMt6X7_yI8RrUBtQ0L3bbYpffvg8b7TSaqN0LfVMnMGlsc0ArXpe57aFprcAp-JlKTulTK_AvhCnRoPtbafPhP_E40iZ4sp-koH9fUyFi-Qo_1z3-CiX7HFlpPfylmeSa5I-pGWVOHFkrLZMvqTI8V76GGQg5MIpytn_rLsLcTL6qdCrYz8Xd18-3159a65vvn6_-njdoAW9Nh5RD4NuwaM2W6QRuqHvYdTKhqC7HsB0Q-iwGwmsHkZtzWXdK7M1LbZgzLl4e7i75PRrT2V1MxekafKR0r44bfqKQ2nbVml7kGJOpWQa3ZJ59vnRgXJPdN3OHem6J7pO6Vqq-t4cI_bbmcI_11-cVfDhIKD66ANTdgWZIlLgTLi6kPg_Eb8BCHWNyA</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Rutter, Paul M.</creator><creator>Harrison, Tim</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</title><author>Rutter, Paul M. ; Harrison, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical reasoning</topic><topic>Community pharmacy</topic><topic>Community pharmacy practice</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Minor illness management</topic><topic>Self-care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutter, Paul M.</au><au>Harrison, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</atitle><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1486</epage><pages>1483-1486</pages><issn>1551-7411</issn><eissn>1934-8150</eissn><abstract>The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32147462</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1551-7411 |
ispartof | Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2020-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1483-1486 |
issn | 1551-7411 1934-8150 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375510245 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Clinical reasoning Community pharmacy Community pharmacy practice Differential diagnosis Minor illness management Self-care |
title | Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A47%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20diagnosis%20in%20pharmacy%20practice:%20Time%20to%20adopt%20clinical%20reasoning%20and%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20social%20and%20administrative%20pharmacy&rft.au=Rutter,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1486&rft.pages=1483-1486&rft.issn=1551-7411&rft.eissn=1934-8150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375510245%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375510245&rft_id=info:pmid/32147462&rft_els_id=S1551741120300127&rfr_iscdi=true |