Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making

The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in social and administrative pharmacy 2020-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1483-1486
Hauptverfasser: Rutter, Paul M., Harrison, Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1486
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1483
container_title Research in social and administrative pharmacy
container_volume 16
creator Rutter, Paul M.
Harrison, Tim
description The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375510245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551741120300127</els_id><sourcerecordid>2375510245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiNERUvLTwDlyGWWOMl8lAtC5VOq1Et7jrKOp3iZSYZktlL_PSm7cEWyZMt6X7_yI8RrUBtQ0L3bbYpffvg8b7TSaqN0LfVMnMGlsc0ArXpe57aFprcAp-JlKTulTK_AvhCnRoPtbafPhP_E40iZ4sp-koH9fUyFi-Qo_1z3-CiX7HFlpPfylmeSa5I-pGWVOHFkrLZMvqTI8V76GGQg5MIpytn_rLsLcTL6qdCrYz8Xd18-3159a65vvn6_-njdoAW9Nh5RD4NuwaM2W6QRuqHvYdTKhqC7HsB0Q-iwGwmsHkZtzWXdK7M1LbZgzLl4e7i75PRrT2V1MxekafKR0r44bfqKQ2nbVml7kGJOpWQa3ZJ59vnRgXJPdN3OHem6J7pO6Vqq-t4cI_bbmcI_11-cVfDhIKD66ANTdgWZIlLgTLi6kPg_Eb8BCHWNyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375510245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rutter, Paul M. ; Harrison, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutter, Paul M. ; Harrison, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32147462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical reasoning ; Community pharmacy ; Community pharmacy practice ; Differential diagnosis ; Minor illness management ; Self-care</subject><ispartof>Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2020-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1483-1486</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741120300127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</title><title>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</title><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><description>The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.</description><subject>Clinical reasoning</subject><subject>Community pharmacy</subject><subject>Community pharmacy practice</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Minor illness management</subject><subject>Self-care</subject><issn>1551-7411</issn><issn>1934-8150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiNERUvLTwDlyGWWOMl8lAtC5VOq1Et7jrKOp3iZSYZktlL_PSm7cEWyZMt6X7_yI8RrUBtQ0L3bbYpffvg8b7TSaqN0LfVMnMGlsc0ArXpe57aFprcAp-JlKTulTK_AvhCnRoPtbafPhP_E40iZ4sp-koH9fUyFi-Qo_1z3-CiX7HFlpPfylmeSa5I-pGWVOHFkrLZMvqTI8V76GGQg5MIpytn_rLsLcTL6qdCrYz8Xd18-3159a65vvn6_-njdoAW9Nh5RD4NuwaM2W6QRuqHvYdTKhqC7HsB0Q-iwGwmsHkZtzWXdK7M1LbZgzLl4e7i75PRrT2V1MxekafKR0r44bfqKQ2nbVml7kGJOpWQa3ZJ59vnRgXJPdN3OHem6J7pO6Vqq-t4cI_bbmcI_11-cVfDhIKD66ANTdgWZIlLgTLi6kPg_Eb8BCHWNyA</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Rutter, Paul M.</creator><creator>Harrison, Tim</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</title><author>Rutter, Paul M. ; Harrison, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-acc288251ac23bcef168771f204dd26711368d6c6fe1428f2439d2603b35c5133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical reasoning</topic><topic>Community pharmacy</topic><topic>Community pharmacy practice</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Minor illness management</topic><topic>Self-care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutter, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutter, Paul M.</au><au>Harrison, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making</atitle><jtitle>Research in social and administrative pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>Res Social Adm Pharm</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1483</spage><epage>1486</epage><pages>1483-1486</pages><issn>1551-7411</issn><eissn>1934-8150</eissn><abstract>The delivery of healthcare in most developed countries is under increasing pressure. Ageing populations with increasingly complex needs, coupled with financial constraints and imbalances in workforce, mean that healthcare policies look to contain cost and utilise resource as effectively as possible. Self-care is now widely advocated as a mechanism to manage acute presentations with pharmacy identified as a key resource to support such policy. Pharmacy teams are ideally positioned to facilitate the management of patients who present with acute illness. However, current evidence suggests that patient assessment and establishing a differential diagnosis could be better. It appears that how pharmacists are taught at Schools of Pharmacy adopts a protocol driven approach, which assumes presentation of low acuity conditions, and we argue that this method must be replaced with a curriculum that adopts clinical reasoning. This paper sets out the process of clinical reasoning and how the profession could embrace this as a better model in establishing a diagnosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32147462</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7411
ispartof Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2020-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1483-1486
issn 1551-7411
1934-8150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2375510245
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Clinical reasoning
Community pharmacy
Community pharmacy practice
Differential diagnosis
Minor illness management
Self-care
title Differential diagnosis in pharmacy practice: Time to adopt clinical reasoning and decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A47%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20diagnosis%20in%20pharmacy%20practice:%20Time%20to%20adopt%20clinical%20reasoning%20and%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20social%20and%20administrative%20pharmacy&rft.au=Rutter,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1483&rft.epage=1486&rft.pages=1483-1486&rft.issn=1551-7411&rft.eissn=1934-8150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375510245%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375510245&rft_id=info:pmid/32147462&rft_els_id=S1551741120300127&rfr_iscdi=true