RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices?
Objective Educational track choices have far‐reaching consequences because they are associated with long‐term life success. Theoretical approaches and previous empirical research have nearly exclusively identified family background and achievement as determinants of these choices. Although students’...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality 2020-10, Vol.88 (5), p.1007-1024 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1024 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1007 |
container_title | Journal of personality |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Usslepp, Nele Hübner, Nicolas Stoll, Gundula Spengler, Marion Trautwein, Ulrich Nagengast, Benjamin |
description | Objective
Educational track choices have far‐reaching consequences because they are associated with long‐term life success. Theoretical approaches and previous empirical research have nearly exclusively identified family background and achievement as determinants of these choices. Although students’ educational track choices might fit their personality, individual differences in personality have not been explored. We investigated the effects of two personality aspects—RIASEC interests and Big Five traits—on hierarchically ranked track choices (vocational vs. general educational track), alongside family background and achievement.
Method
We used two German data sets (TOSCA 10 study: N = 473; TOSCA study: N = 4,218) focusing on choices between the general educational track (leading to higher educational attainment) and the vocational track (leading to work life) at two different stages in educational careers. We ran several multiple (logistic) regressions.
Results
The results showed that certain aspects of students’ personality matter for educational track choices. Accordingly, across both studies, students with high Investigative or Enterprising interests more often chose the general educational track, whereas students with high Social or Conventional interests more often chose the vocational track—after the Big Five personality traits, achievement, and family background were controlled for. The Big Five traits showed no or only small significant associations with educational track choices.
Conclusion
These findings underscore the importance of considering individual differences when investigating important life outcomes such as track choices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jopy.12547 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2374345151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2439637727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fe5ef4a3dd4a94dbe401db1b1612b843055e68bfa35f0d47dfc5267eb2e453c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1rFDEYB_Agil2rFz-ABLyIMG1enkx2T9Iura0UKr4cPA2Z5InNOrvZJjPK3Dz6AfyEfpJm3FrEg88lEH75k4c_IU85O-BlDldxOx5woUDfIzMOta5qWMB9MmNMiEoqVu-RRzmvWBkJ-iHZk4JDuYYZ-fHu_Oj9yZKGTY8Jc5-p2TjaXyE9Dp_pafiKdIspx43pQj_SPplQzNr0hVMfE-2CR5oHazHnX99_Hg89dXEKGKnpEho3_q3RDdb0YYqbsuwXaq9iKG9fPSYPvOkyPrk998nH05MPy7Pq4vL1-fLoorJyIXXlUaEHI50DswDXIjDuWt7ymot2DpIphfW89UYqzxxo560StcZWIChp53KfvNjlblO8HsrGzTpki11nNhiH3AipQYLiihf6_B-6ikMqXy8K5KKWWgtd1MudsinmnNA32xTWJo0NZ83UTzP10_zup-Bnt5FDu0Z3R_8UUgDfgW-hw_E_Uc2by7efdqE3WDGdQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439637727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Usslepp, Nele ; Hübner, Nicolas ; Stoll, Gundula ; Spengler, Marion ; Trautwein, Ulrich ; Nagengast, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Usslepp, Nele ; Hübner, Nicolas ; Stoll, Gundula ; Spengler, Marion ; Trautwein, Ulrich ; Nagengast, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Educational track choices have far‐reaching consequences because they are associated with long‐term life success. Theoretical approaches and previous empirical research have nearly exclusively identified family background and achievement as determinants of these choices. Although students’ educational track choices might fit their personality, individual differences in personality have not been explored. We investigated the effects of two personality aspects—RIASEC interests and Big Five traits—on hierarchically ranked track choices (vocational vs. general educational track), alongside family background and achievement.
Method
We used two German data sets (TOSCA 10 study: N = 473; TOSCA study: N = 4,218) focusing on choices between the general educational track (leading to higher educational attainment) and the vocational track (leading to work life) at two different stages in educational careers. We ran several multiple (logistic) regressions.
Results
The results showed that certain aspects of students’ personality matter for educational track choices. Accordingly, across both studies, students with high Investigative or Enterprising interests more often chose the general educational track, whereas students with high Social or Conventional interests more often chose the vocational track—after the Big Five personality traits, achievement, and family background were controlled for. The Big Five traits showed no or only small significant associations with educational track choices.
Conclusion
These findings underscore the importance of considering individual differences when investigating important life outcomes such as track choices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12547</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32145064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Big Five traits ; Educational attainment ; educational track choice ; family background ; Five factor model ; Individual differences ; Personality ; Personality traits ; Social background ; Students ; Therapists ; vocational interests</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality, 2020-10, Vol.88 (5), p.1007-1024</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fe5ef4a3dd4a94dbe401db1b1612b843055e68bfa35f0d47dfc5267eb2e453c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fe5ef4a3dd4a94dbe401db1b1612b843055e68bfa35f0d47dfc5267eb2e453c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4465-9435 ; 0000-0001-9868-8322 ; 0000-0003-1129-983X ; 0000-0003-3528-8086 ; 0000-0003-0647-0057 ; 0000-0002-6438-5275</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjopy.12547$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjopy.12547$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32145064$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Usslepp, Nele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Gundula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spengler, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautwein, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagengast, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices?</title><title>Journal of personality</title><addtitle>J Pers</addtitle><description>Objective
Educational track choices have far‐reaching consequences because they are associated with long‐term life success. Theoretical approaches and previous empirical research have nearly exclusively identified family background and achievement as determinants of these choices. Although students’ educational track choices might fit their personality, individual differences in personality have not been explored. We investigated the effects of two personality aspects—RIASEC interests and Big Five traits—on hierarchically ranked track choices (vocational vs. general educational track), alongside family background and achievement.
Method
We used two German data sets (TOSCA 10 study: N = 473; TOSCA study: N = 4,218) focusing on choices between the general educational track (leading to higher educational attainment) and the vocational track (leading to work life) at two different stages in educational careers. We ran several multiple (logistic) regressions.
Results
The results showed that certain aspects of students’ personality matter for educational track choices. Accordingly, across both studies, students with high Investigative or Enterprising interests more often chose the general educational track, whereas students with high Social or Conventional interests more often chose the vocational track—after the Big Five personality traits, achievement, and family background were controlled for. The Big Five traits showed no or only small significant associations with educational track choices.
Conclusion
These findings underscore the importance of considering individual differences when investigating important life outcomes such as track choices.</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Big Five traits</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>educational track choice</subject><subject>family background</subject><subject>Five factor model</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Social background</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>vocational interests</subject><issn>0022-3506</issn><issn>1467-6494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1rFDEYB_Agil2rFz-ABLyIMG1enkx2T9Iura0UKr4cPA2Z5InNOrvZJjPK3Dz6AfyEfpJm3FrEg88lEH75k4c_IU85O-BlDldxOx5woUDfIzMOta5qWMB9MmNMiEoqVu-RRzmvWBkJ-iHZk4JDuYYZ-fHu_Oj9yZKGTY8Jc5-p2TjaXyE9Dp_pafiKdIspx43pQj_SPplQzNr0hVMfE-2CR5oHazHnX99_Hg89dXEKGKnpEho3_q3RDdb0YYqbsuwXaq9iKG9fPSYPvOkyPrk998nH05MPy7Pq4vL1-fLoorJyIXXlUaEHI50DswDXIjDuWt7ymot2DpIphfW89UYqzxxo560StcZWIChp53KfvNjlblO8HsrGzTpki11nNhiH3AipQYLiihf6_B-6ikMqXy8K5KKWWgtd1MudsinmnNA32xTWJo0NZ83UTzP10_zup-Bnt5FDu0Z3R_8UUgDfgW-hw_E_Uc2by7efdqE3WDGdQw</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Usslepp, Nele</creator><creator>Hübner, Nicolas</creator><creator>Stoll, Gundula</creator><creator>Spengler, Marion</creator><creator>Trautwein, Ulrich</creator><creator>Nagengast, Benjamin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-9435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-8322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1129-983X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-8086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-5275</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices?</title><author>Usslepp, Nele ; Hübner, Nicolas ; Stoll, Gundula ; Spengler, Marion ; Trautwein, Ulrich ; Nagengast, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-fe5ef4a3dd4a94dbe401db1b1612b843055e68bfa35f0d47dfc5267eb2e453c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Big Five traits</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>educational track choice</topic><topic>family background</topic><topic>Five factor model</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Social background</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>vocational interests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Usslepp, Nele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Gundula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spengler, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautwein, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagengast, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Usslepp, Nele</au><au>Hübner, Nicolas</au><au>Stoll, Gundula</au><au>Spengler, Marion</au><au>Trautwein, Ulrich</au><au>Nagengast, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1007</spage><epage>1024</epage><pages>1007-1024</pages><issn>0022-3506</issn><eissn>1467-6494</eissn><abstract>Objective
Educational track choices have far‐reaching consequences because they are associated with long‐term life success. Theoretical approaches and previous empirical research have nearly exclusively identified family background and achievement as determinants of these choices. Although students’ educational track choices might fit their personality, individual differences in personality have not been explored. We investigated the effects of two personality aspects—RIASEC interests and Big Five traits—on hierarchically ranked track choices (vocational vs. general educational track), alongside family background and achievement.
Method
We used two German data sets (TOSCA 10 study: N = 473; TOSCA study: N = 4,218) focusing on choices between the general educational track (leading to higher educational attainment) and the vocational track (leading to work life) at two different stages in educational careers. We ran several multiple (logistic) regressions.
Results
The results showed that certain aspects of students’ personality matter for educational track choices. Accordingly, across both studies, students with high Investigative or Enterprising interests more often chose the general educational track, whereas students with high Social or Conventional interests more often chose the vocational track—after the Big Five personality traits, achievement, and family background were controlled for. The Big Five traits showed no or only small significant associations with educational track choices.
Conclusion
These findings underscore the importance of considering individual differences when investigating important life outcomes such as track choices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32145064</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopy.12547</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-9435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-8322</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1129-983X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-8086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-0057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-5275</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3506 |
ispartof | Journal of personality, 2020-10, Vol.88 (5), p.1007-1024 |
issn | 0022-3506 1467-6494 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2374345151 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Achievement Big Five traits Educational attainment educational track choice family background Five factor model Individual differences Personality Personality traits Social background Students Therapists vocational interests |
title | RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A39%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RIASEC%20interests%20and%20the%20Big%20Five%20personality%20traits%20matter%20for%20life%20success%E2%80%94But%20do%20they%20already%20matter%20for%20educational%20track%20choices?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality&rft.au=Usslepp,%20Nele&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1007&rft.epage=1024&rft.pages=1007-1024&rft.issn=0022-3506&rft.eissn=1467-6494&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopy.12547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439637727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439637727&rft_id=info:pmid/32145064&rfr_iscdi=true |