Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences

Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in psychology 2020-02, Vol.11, p.176-176
Hauptverfasser: Arnulf, Jan Ketil, Larsen, Kai R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue
container_start_page 176
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 11
creator Arnulf, Jan Ketil
Larsen, Kai R
description Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2371864255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3c7adff31d364b6399c50217880ccdc1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2371864255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxS1ERau2d07IRy4J_lrbywEJUkorBSFROFuOPU5ceXeDvVuU_x4nKVXri603b372-CH0lpI557r9ELZlt54zwsicEKrkK3RGpRQzSpR-_ex8ii5LuSd1ieol7A065Yxy1gp9hvJiSuOUAX9Jsfd4CdZDLpu4xT-hgM1u8xHfDH_xHXS2H6OzKe3wFYyQu9iDx3dTfoCq2NHi73aHr21MeBwOFjfiI90mfBVDgAy9g3KBToJNBS4f93P0-_rrr8XNbPnj2-3i83LmhGTjjIfGS9EG7ohizYoJ7xRfaQDtQkO50sq2e1UQYnktCtEIIVRoiPaSUcvP0e2R6wd7b7Y5djbvzGCjOQhDXhub60gJDHfK-hA49VyKleRt6xrCqNKaOOcdraxPR9Z2WnXgHfRjneoF9GWljxuzHh6M2n86kxXw_hGQhz8TlNF0sThIyfYwTMUwrqiWgjVNtZKj1eWhlAzh6RpKzD55c0je7JM3h-Rry7vnz3tq-J8z_wf8Nqs7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2371864255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arnulf, Jan Ketil ; Larsen, Kai R</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnulf, Jan Ketil ; Larsen, Kai R</creatorcontrib><description>Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32132948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>cross-cultural studies ; latent semantic analysis ; Likert scales ; organizational behavior ; Psychology ; semantic versus empirical problems</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2020-02, Vol.11, p.176-176</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Arnulf and Larsen.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Arnulf and Larsen. 2020 Arnulf and Larsen</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040226/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040226/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Kai R</creatorcontrib><title>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.</description><subject>cross-cultural studies</subject><subject>latent semantic analysis</subject><subject>Likert scales</subject><subject>organizational behavior</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>semantic versus empirical problems</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxS1ERau2d07IRy4J_lrbywEJUkorBSFROFuOPU5ceXeDvVuU_x4nKVXri603b372-CH0lpI557r9ELZlt54zwsicEKrkK3RGpRQzSpR-_ex8ii5LuSd1ieol7A065Yxy1gp9hvJiSuOUAX9Jsfd4CdZDLpu4xT-hgM1u8xHfDH_xHXS2H6OzKe3wFYyQu9iDx3dTfoCq2NHi73aHr21MeBwOFjfiI90mfBVDgAy9g3KBToJNBS4f93P0-_rrr8XNbPnj2-3i83LmhGTjjIfGS9EG7ohizYoJ7xRfaQDtQkO50sq2e1UQYnktCtEIIVRoiPaSUcvP0e2R6wd7b7Y5djbvzGCjOQhDXhub60gJDHfK-hA49VyKleRt6xrCqNKaOOcdraxPR9Z2WnXgHfRjneoF9GWljxuzHh6M2n86kxXw_hGQhz8TlNF0sThIyfYwTMUwrqiWgjVNtZKj1eWhlAzh6RpKzD55c0je7JM3h-Rry7vnz3tq-J8z_wf8Nqs7</recordid><startdate>20200218</startdate><enddate>20200218</enddate><creator>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</creator><creator>Larsen, Kai R</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200218</creationdate><title>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</title><author>Arnulf, Jan Ketil ; Larsen, Kai R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>cross-cultural studies</topic><topic>latent semantic analysis</topic><topic>Likert scales</topic><topic>organizational behavior</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>semantic versus empirical problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Kai R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</au><au>Larsen, Kai R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-02-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>176</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>176-176</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32132948</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2020-02, Vol.11, p.176-176
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2371864255
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects cross-cultural studies
latent semantic analysis
Likert scales
organizational behavior
Psychology
semantic versus empirical problems
title Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A42%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Culture%20Blind%20Leadership%20Research:%20How%20Semantically%20Determined%20Survey%20Data%20May%20Fail%20to%20Detect%20Cultural%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Arnulf,%20Jan%20Ketil&rft.date=2020-02-18&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=176-176&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2371864255%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2371864255&rft_id=info:pmid/32132948&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3c7adff31d364b6399c50217880ccdc1&rfr_iscdi=true