Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences
Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in psychology 2020-02, Vol.11, p.176-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Arnulf, Jan Ketil Larsen, Kai R |
description | Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2371864255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3c7adff31d364b6399c50217880ccdc1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2371864255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxS1ERau2d07IRy4J_lrbywEJUkorBSFROFuOPU5ceXeDvVuU_x4nKVXri603b372-CH0lpI557r9ELZlt54zwsicEKrkK3RGpRQzSpR-_ex8ii5LuSd1ieol7A065Yxy1gp9hvJiSuOUAX9Jsfd4CdZDLpu4xT-hgM1u8xHfDH_xHXS2H6OzKe3wFYyQu9iDx3dTfoCq2NHi73aHr21MeBwOFjfiI90mfBVDgAy9g3KBToJNBS4f93P0-_rrr8XNbPnj2-3i83LmhGTjjIfGS9EG7ohizYoJ7xRfaQDtQkO50sq2e1UQYnktCtEIIVRoiPaSUcvP0e2R6wd7b7Y5djbvzGCjOQhDXhub60gJDHfK-hA49VyKleRt6xrCqNKaOOcdraxPR9Z2WnXgHfRjneoF9GWljxuzHh6M2n86kxXw_hGQhz8TlNF0sThIyfYwTMUwrqiWgjVNtZKj1eWhlAzh6RpKzD55c0je7JM3h-Rry7vnz3tq-J8z_wf8Nqs7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2371864255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arnulf, Jan Ketil ; Larsen, Kai R</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnulf, Jan Ketil ; Larsen, Kai R</creatorcontrib><description>Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32132948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>cross-cultural studies ; latent semantic analysis ; Likert scales ; organizational behavior ; Psychology ; semantic versus empirical problems</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2020-02, Vol.11, p.176-176</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Arnulf and Larsen.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Arnulf and Larsen. 2020 Arnulf and Larsen</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040226/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040226/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Kai R</creatorcontrib><title>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.</description><subject>cross-cultural studies</subject><subject>latent semantic analysis</subject><subject>Likert scales</subject><subject>organizational behavior</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>semantic versus empirical problems</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1vEzEQxS1ERau2d07IRy4J_lrbywEJUkorBSFROFuOPU5ceXeDvVuU_x4nKVXri603b372-CH0lpI557r9ELZlt54zwsicEKrkK3RGpRQzSpR-_ex8ii5LuSd1ieol7A065Yxy1gp9hvJiSuOUAX9Jsfd4CdZDLpu4xT-hgM1u8xHfDH_xHXS2H6OzKe3wFYyQu9iDx3dTfoCq2NHi73aHr21MeBwOFjfiI90mfBVDgAy9g3KBToJNBS4f93P0-_rrr8XNbPnj2-3i83LmhGTjjIfGS9EG7ohizYoJ7xRfaQDtQkO50sq2e1UQYnktCtEIIVRoiPaSUcvP0e2R6wd7b7Y5djbvzGCjOQhDXhub60gJDHfK-hA49VyKleRt6xrCqNKaOOcdraxPR9Z2WnXgHfRjneoF9GWljxuzHh6M2n86kxXw_hGQhz8TlNF0sThIyfYwTMUwrqiWgjVNtZKj1eWhlAzh6RpKzD55c0je7JM3h-Rry7vnz3tq-J8z_wf8Nqs7</recordid><startdate>20200218</startdate><enddate>20200218</enddate><creator>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</creator><creator>Larsen, Kai R</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200218</creationdate><title>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</title><author>Arnulf, Jan Ketil ; Larsen, Kai R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3f5d649f3c0725b24dc73b8ee8cf513787a9b24d400a34dc4454447f508d621a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>cross-cultural studies</topic><topic>latent semantic analysis</topic><topic>Likert scales</topic><topic>organizational behavior</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>semantic versus empirical problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Kai R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnulf, Jan Ketil</au><au>Larsen, Kai R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-02-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>176</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>176-176</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Likert scale surveys are frequently used in cross-cultural studies on leadership. Recent publications using digital text algorithms raise doubt about the source of variation in statistics from such studies to the extent that they are semantically driven. The Semantic Theory of Survey Response (STSR) predicts that in the case of semantically determined answers, the response patterns may also be predictable across languages. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was applied to 11 different ethnic samples in English, Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese. Semantic algorithms predicted responses significantly across all conditions, although to varying degree. Comparisons of Norwegian, German, Urdu and Chinese samples in native versus English language versions suggest that observed differences are not culturally dependent but caused by different translations and understanding. The maximum variance attributable to culture was a 5% unique overlap of variation in the two Chinese samples. These findings question the capability of traditional surveys to detect cultural differences. It also indicates that cross-cultural leadership research may risk lack of practical relevance.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32132948</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2020-02, Vol.11, p.176-176 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2371864255 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | cross-cultural studies latent semantic analysis Likert scales organizational behavior Psychology semantic versus empirical problems |
title | Culture Blind Leadership Research: How Semantically Determined Survey Data May Fail to Detect Cultural Differences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A42%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Culture%20Blind%20Leadership%20Research:%20How%20Semantically%20Determined%20Survey%20Data%20May%20Fail%20to%20Detect%20Cultural%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Arnulf,%20Jan%20Ketil&rft.date=2020-02-18&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=176-176&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2371864255%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2371864255&rft_id=info:pmid/32132948&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3c7adff31d364b6399c50217880ccdc1&rfr_iscdi=true |