Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery
Metal/Air batteries are being developed and soon could become competitive with other battery technologies already in the market, such as Li-ion battery. The main problem to be addressed is the cyclability, although some progress has been recently achieved. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the manufa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2020-07, Vol.250, p.126273-126273, Article 126273 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126273 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 126273 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 250 |
creator | Santos, F. Urbina, A. Abad, J. López, R. Toledo, C. Fernández Romero, A.J. |
description | Metal/Air batteries are being developed and soon could become competitive with other battery technologies already in the market, such as Li-ion battery. The main problem to be addressed is the cyclability, although some progress has been recently achieved. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the manufacturing process of a Zn/Air battery is presented in this article, including raw extraction and process of materials and battery assembly at laboratory scale (cradle to gate approach). The results indicate that Zn/Air battery can be fabricated with low environmental impacts in most categories and only four deserve attention (still being low impacts), such as Human Toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Resource Depletion (the later one depending mainly on Zn use, which is not a critical material, but has a strong impact on this category). Cathode fabrication arises as the subassembly with higher impacts, followed by membrane, then anode and finally electrolyte. An economic cost calculation indicates that if cyclability of Zn/Air batteries is achieved, they can become competitive with other technologies already in the market.
[Display omitted]
•A cradle-to-gate LCA of a laboratory-synthesized Zn/air battery has been carried out.•The power cost of Zn/air batteries is the lowest of current technologies.•The cathode production presents the highest environmental impacts.•Zn/Air battery should be competitive if cyclability is moderately improved.•A capital cost for energy storage around 100 $/kWh/cycles was obtained. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2370536738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653520304665</els_id><sourcerecordid>2370536738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-17ad4d7847272e218b7f2535b6c93c801eaf802b168b45e6e328e6e4b1eb5aee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwF1DYWNL6I4mdEVWFIlVigYXFsp2L6iqxi51U6r8nUQtiZPHJd-97Hw9CDwTPCSbFYjc3W2h93G8hwJxiOuRpQTm7QFMieJkSWopLNMU4y9MiZ_kE3cS4w3gw5-U1mjBKKCYZn6L1yh1s8K4F16kmUa5KwHjnW2vGb4wQ41hLah8SlcQ-dso6pRtIPt1C2ZBo1XUQjrfoqlZNhLtznKGP59X7cp1u3l5el0-b1DDOu5RwVWUVFxmnnAIlQvOaDhvqwpTMCExA1QJTTQqhsxwKYFQMb6YJ6FwBsBl6PPXdB__VQ-xka6OBplEOfB8lZRznrOBMDNLyJDXBxxiglvtgWxWOkmA5gpQ7-QekHEHKE8jBe38e0-sWql_nD7lBsDwJYDj2YCHIaCw4A5UNYDpZefuPMd8bvoqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2370536738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Santos, F. ; Urbina, A. ; Abad, J. ; López, R. ; Toledo, C. ; Fernández Romero, A.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, F. ; Urbina, A. ; Abad, J. ; López, R. ; Toledo, C. ; Fernández Romero, A.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Metal/Air batteries are being developed and soon could become competitive with other battery technologies already in the market, such as Li-ion battery. The main problem to be addressed is the cyclability, although some progress has been recently achieved. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the manufacturing process of a Zn/Air battery is presented in this article, including raw extraction and process of materials and battery assembly at laboratory scale (cradle to gate approach). The results indicate that Zn/Air battery can be fabricated with low environmental impacts in most categories and only four deserve attention (still being low impacts), such as Human Toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Resource Depletion (the later one depending mainly on Zn use, which is not a critical material, but has a strong impact on this category). Cathode fabrication arises as the subassembly with higher impacts, followed by membrane, then anode and finally electrolyte. An economic cost calculation indicates that if cyclability of Zn/Air batteries is achieved, they can become competitive with other technologies already in the market.
[Display omitted]
•A cradle-to-gate LCA of a laboratory-synthesized Zn/air battery has been carried out.•The power cost of Zn/air batteries is the lowest of current technologies.•The cathode production presents the highest environmental impacts.•Zn/Air battery should be competitive if cyclability is moderately improved.•A capital cost for energy storage around 100 $/kWh/cycles was obtained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32120147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Energy storage ; Environmental impact ; Life cycle assessment ; Zn/air battery</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.250, p.126273-126273, Article 126273</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-17ad4d7847272e218b7f2535b6c93c801eaf802b168b45e6e328e6e4b1eb5aee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-17ad4d7847272e218b7f2535b6c93c801eaf802b168b45e6e328e6e4b1eb5aee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126273$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120147$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbina, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández Romero, A.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>Metal/Air batteries are being developed and soon could become competitive with other battery technologies already in the market, such as Li-ion battery. The main problem to be addressed is the cyclability, although some progress has been recently achieved. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the manufacturing process of a Zn/Air battery is presented in this article, including raw extraction and process of materials and battery assembly at laboratory scale (cradle to gate approach). The results indicate that Zn/Air battery can be fabricated with low environmental impacts in most categories and only four deserve attention (still being low impacts), such as Human Toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Resource Depletion (the later one depending mainly on Zn use, which is not a critical material, but has a strong impact on this category). Cathode fabrication arises as the subassembly with higher impacts, followed by membrane, then anode and finally electrolyte. An economic cost calculation indicates that if cyclability of Zn/Air batteries is achieved, they can become competitive with other technologies already in the market.
[Display omitted]
•A cradle-to-gate LCA of a laboratory-synthesized Zn/air battery has been carried out.•The power cost of Zn/air batteries is the lowest of current technologies.•The cathode production presents the highest environmental impacts.•Zn/Air battery should be competitive if cyclability is moderately improved.•A capital cost for energy storage around 100 $/kWh/cycles was obtained.</description><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Zn/air battery</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwF1DYWNL6I4mdEVWFIlVigYXFsp2L6iqxi51U6r8nUQtiZPHJd-97Hw9CDwTPCSbFYjc3W2h93G8hwJxiOuRpQTm7QFMieJkSWopLNMU4y9MiZ_kE3cS4w3gw5-U1mjBKKCYZn6L1yh1s8K4F16kmUa5KwHjnW2vGb4wQ41hLah8SlcQ-dso6pRtIPt1C2ZBo1XUQjrfoqlZNhLtznKGP59X7cp1u3l5el0-b1DDOu5RwVWUVFxmnnAIlQvOaDhvqwpTMCExA1QJTTQqhsxwKYFQMb6YJ6FwBsBl6PPXdB__VQ-xka6OBplEOfB8lZRznrOBMDNLyJDXBxxiglvtgWxWOkmA5gpQ7-QekHEHKE8jBe38e0-sWql_nD7lBsDwJYDj2YCHIaCw4A5UNYDpZefuPMd8bvoqQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Santos, F.</creator><creator>Urbina, A.</creator><creator>Abad, J.</creator><creator>López, R.</creator><creator>Toledo, C.</creator><creator>Fernández Romero, A.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery</title><author>Santos, F. ; Urbina, A. ; Abad, J. ; López, R. ; Toledo, C. ; Fernández Romero, A.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-17ad4d7847272e218b7f2535b6c93c801eaf802b168b45e6e328e6e4b1eb5aee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Zn/air battery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbina, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández Romero, A.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, F.</au><au>Urbina, A.</au><au>Abad, J.</au><au>López, R.</au><au>Toledo, C.</au><au>Fernández Romero, A.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>250</volume><spage>126273</spage><epage>126273</epage><pages>126273-126273</pages><artnum>126273</artnum><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>Metal/Air batteries are being developed and soon could become competitive with other battery technologies already in the market, such as Li-ion battery. The main problem to be addressed is the cyclability, although some progress has been recently achieved. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the manufacturing process of a Zn/Air battery is presented in this article, including raw extraction and process of materials and battery assembly at laboratory scale (cradle to gate approach). The results indicate that Zn/Air battery can be fabricated with low environmental impacts in most categories and only four deserve attention (still being low impacts), such as Human Toxicity (cancer and non-cancer), Freshwater Ecotoxicity and Resource Depletion (the later one depending mainly on Zn use, which is not a critical material, but has a strong impact on this category). Cathode fabrication arises as the subassembly with higher impacts, followed by membrane, then anode and finally electrolyte. An economic cost calculation indicates that if cyclability of Zn/Air batteries is achieved, they can become competitive with other technologies already in the market.
[Display omitted]
•A cradle-to-gate LCA of a laboratory-synthesized Zn/air battery has been carried out.•The power cost of Zn/air batteries is the lowest of current technologies.•The cathode production presents the highest environmental impacts.•Zn/Air battery should be competitive if cyclability is moderately improved.•A capital cost for energy storage around 100 $/kWh/cycles was obtained.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32120147</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126273</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.250, p.126273-126273, Article 126273 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2370536738 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Energy storage Environmental impact Life cycle assessment Zn/air battery |
title | Environmental and economical assessment for a sustainable Zn/air battery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20and%20economical%20assessment%20for%20a%20sustainable%20Zn/air%20battery&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Santos,%20F.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=250&rft.spage=126273&rft.epage=126273&rft.pages=126273-126273&rft.artnum=126273&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2370536738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2370536738&rft_id=info:pmid/32120147&rft_els_id=S0045653520304665&rfr_iscdi=true |