Content and construct validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I for children
Objective To perform the content and construct validation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I, for children 7‐11 years old. Materials and Methods A Delphi process was used to perform the content validity of the DC/TMD Axis I. One hundred eighty‐nine 7‐ to 11‐ye...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2020-07, Vol.47 (7), p.809-819 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To perform the content and construct validation of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) Axis I, for children 7‐11 years old.
Materials and Methods
A Delphi process was used to perform the content validity of the DC/TMD Axis I. One hundred eighty‐nine 7‐ to 11‐year‐old children were assessed with the adapted instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to investigate construct validity of the DC/TMD for children. A baseline one‐factor model was compared against a two‐factor (Model 2) and a seven‐factor (Model 3) models based on the original DC/TMD. Root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), chi‐square, change in chi‐square and Cronbach's α were used to analyse the data. All analyses were performed in STATA© version 13.0.
Results
Items of the DC/TMD were reduced, “history time” was changed to 2 weeks, pain intensity was assessed through a face scale, and language was adapted to be better understood by children. The amount of muscle pressure was maintained as in the original DC/TMD Axis I. The CFA led to a two‐ and a seven‐factor model, with good fit. The internal consistency of Model 2 was .91 and of Model 3, .94.
Conclusion
The results of this study provide evidence to support a seven‐factor representation of the DC/TMD Axis I for 7‐ to 11‐year‐old children, as well as a two‐factor structure. Such findings will begin to provide researchers with confidence in the properties of this instrument when considering its inclusion in clinical research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
DOI: | 10.1111/joor.12957 |