Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program

Introduction Pharmacotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) and its complications. However, therapeutic agents with evidence-based efficacy for the treatment of CVD are limited. Sulodexide (registered as Vessel Due F in Russia) has confirmed therapeutic effica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2020-05, Vol.37 (5), p.2071-2082
Hauptverfasser: Chupin, Andrey V., Katorkin, Sergey E., Katelnitsky, Ivan I., Katelnitskaya, Oksana V., Prostov, Igor I., Petrikov, Alexey S., Koshevoi, Alexander P., Lyudkova, Larisa F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2082
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2071
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 37
creator Chupin, Andrey V.
Katorkin, Sergey E.
Katelnitsky, Ivan I.
Katelnitskaya, Oksana V.
Prostov, Igor I.
Petrikov, Alexey S.
Koshevoi, Alexander P.
Lyudkova, Larisa F.
description Introduction Pharmacotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) and its complications. However, therapeutic agents with evidence-based efficacy for the treatment of CVD are limited. Sulodexide (registered as Vessel Due F in Russia) has confirmed therapeutic efficacy in patients with moderately severe or late-stage CVD, but real-world evidence of its use in Russian patients with initial manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains scarce. Methods Data concerning the use of sulodexide in Russian patients with CVD in routine clinical practice were collected and assessed within the framework of the ACVEDUCT program. This observational, prospective, non-controlled multicenter program included patients routinely prescribed sulodexide, as a solution for injections and/or soft capsules, by their physician in accordance with the registered Russian Federation instructions for use. Results In total, 2263 patients took part in the program. The majority of patients were diagnosed as having CEAP class C3 (38.4%) or class C4 (35.6%) CVD. Sulodexide was associated with decreased symptom severity in 56.4% of patients and a decreased number of symptoms in 42.8%. Thus, improvements were observed in 99.2% overall, with the drug effects being apparent as early as 15–20 days after starting treatment. The highest rate of CVD symptom regression was observed in patients aged 30–40 years. There was a significant positive correlation between sulodexide efficacy and treatment duration and the use of capsules during follow-up. A negative correlation was found between treatment efficacy and patient age at diagnosis, CEAP class, the total number of symptoms, and a combination of risk factors. Conclusions Sulodexide was an effective, safe, well-tolerated, and pathogenetically substantiated pharmacologic agent for the treatment of patients with lower limb CVD, and therefore should be recommended in patients with early-stage CVD. Patients with venous trophic ulcers require higher doses and prolonged administration of the drug.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12325-020-01270-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369436395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369436395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e0d0d0ed7d3792f49a769e7342843c0c6b3c9da808b530ba4ed13b237c1550953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq0KVIZpX6AL5CUbg3-SOGY3SikggUAwoO4sx7lhPEqcqZ1I5e3xMMASWVde3PN90j0I_WL0hFEqTyPjgueEckoo45IS9Q3NWFnkJA3fQzMqM0a4KP8eoMMY1zSRMi-_owPBGeNcqhkaH6ZuaOC_awA7j8cV4GUAM_bgRzy0uFqFwTuLn8APU8RXPk5t66wDb1_O8D3EqRvjFtwmF11H7qcYnfH4Ji2cTS0Q8KJ6Ov_9WC3xXRieg-l_oP3WdBF-vv9z9PjnfFldkuvbi6tqcU2syORIgDbpQSMbIRVvM2VkoUCKjJeZsNQWtbCqMSUt61zQ2mTQMFFzIS3Lc6pyMUfHu95NGP5NEEfdu2ih64yHdI3molCZKMQbyneoDUOMAVq9Ca434UUzqre29c62Tg71m22tUujovX-qe2g-Ix96EyB2QEwr_wxBr4cp-HTzV7Wvz0eKcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369436395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Chupin, Andrey V. ; Katorkin, Sergey E. ; Katelnitsky, Ivan I. ; Katelnitskaya, Oksana V. ; Prostov, Igor I. ; Petrikov, Alexey S. ; Koshevoi, Alexander P. ; Lyudkova, Larisa F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chupin, Andrey V. ; Katorkin, Sergey E. ; Katelnitsky, Ivan I. ; Katelnitskaya, Oksana V. ; Prostov, Igor I. ; Petrikov, Alexey S. ; Koshevoi, Alexander P. ; Lyudkova, Larisa F.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Pharmacotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) and its complications. However, therapeutic agents with evidence-based efficacy for the treatment of CVD are limited. Sulodexide (registered as Vessel Due F in Russia) has confirmed therapeutic efficacy in patients with moderately severe or late-stage CVD, but real-world evidence of its use in Russian patients with initial manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains scarce. Methods Data concerning the use of sulodexide in Russian patients with CVD in routine clinical practice were collected and assessed within the framework of the ACVEDUCT program. This observational, prospective, non-controlled multicenter program included patients routinely prescribed sulodexide, as a solution for injections and/or soft capsules, by their physician in accordance with the registered Russian Federation instructions for use. Results In total, 2263 patients took part in the program. The majority of patients were diagnosed as having CEAP class C3 (38.4%) or class C4 (35.6%) CVD. Sulodexide was associated with decreased symptom severity in 56.4% of patients and a decreased number of symptoms in 42.8%. Thus, improvements were observed in 99.2% overall, with the drug effects being apparent as early as 15–20 days after starting treatment. The highest rate of CVD symptom regression was observed in patients aged 30–40 years. There was a significant positive correlation between sulodexide efficacy and treatment duration and the use of capsules during follow-up. A negative correlation was found between treatment efficacy and patient age at diagnosis, CEAP class, the total number of symptoms, and a combination of risk factors. Conclusions Sulodexide was an effective, safe, well-tolerated, and pathogenetically substantiated pharmacologic agent for the treatment of patients with lower limb CVD, and therefore should be recommended in patients with early-stage CVD. Patients with venous trophic ulcers require higher doses and prolonged administration of the drug.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01270-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32112279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Endocrinology ; Health technology assessment ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Rheumatology</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2020-05, Vol.37 (5), p.2071-2082</ispartof><rights>Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e0d0d0ed7d3792f49a769e7342843c0c6b3c9da808b530ba4ed13b237c1550953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e0d0d0ed7d3792f49a769e7342843c0c6b3c9da808b530ba4ed13b237c1550953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-020-01270-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12325-020-01270-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32112279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chupin, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katorkin, Sergey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katelnitsky, Ivan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katelnitskaya, Oksana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prostov, Igor I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrikov, Alexey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koshevoi, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyudkova, Larisa F.</creatorcontrib><title>Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction Pharmacotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) and its complications. However, therapeutic agents with evidence-based efficacy for the treatment of CVD are limited. Sulodexide (registered as Vessel Due F in Russia) has confirmed therapeutic efficacy in patients with moderately severe or late-stage CVD, but real-world evidence of its use in Russian patients with initial manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains scarce. Methods Data concerning the use of sulodexide in Russian patients with CVD in routine clinical practice were collected and assessed within the framework of the ACVEDUCT program. This observational, prospective, non-controlled multicenter program included patients routinely prescribed sulodexide, as a solution for injections and/or soft capsules, by their physician in accordance with the registered Russian Federation instructions for use. Results In total, 2263 patients took part in the program. The majority of patients were diagnosed as having CEAP class C3 (38.4%) or class C4 (35.6%) CVD. Sulodexide was associated with decreased symptom severity in 56.4% of patients and a decreased number of symptoms in 42.8%. Thus, improvements were observed in 99.2% overall, with the drug effects being apparent as early as 15–20 days after starting treatment. The highest rate of CVD symptom regression was observed in patients aged 30–40 years. There was a significant positive correlation between sulodexide efficacy and treatment duration and the use of capsules during follow-up. A negative correlation was found between treatment efficacy and patient age at diagnosis, CEAP class, the total number of symptoms, and a combination of risk factors. Conclusions Sulodexide was an effective, safe, well-tolerated, and pathogenetically substantiated pharmacologic agent for the treatment of patients with lower limb CVD, and therefore should be recommended in patients with early-stage CVD. Patients with venous trophic ulcers require higher doses and prolonged administration of the drug.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq0KVIZpX6AL5CUbg3-SOGY3SikggUAwoO4sx7lhPEqcqZ1I5e3xMMASWVde3PN90j0I_WL0hFEqTyPjgueEckoo45IS9Q3NWFnkJA3fQzMqM0a4KP8eoMMY1zSRMi-_owPBGeNcqhkaH6ZuaOC_awA7j8cV4GUAM_bgRzy0uFqFwTuLn8APU8RXPk5t66wDb1_O8D3EqRvjFtwmF11H7qcYnfH4Ji2cTS0Q8KJ6Ov_9WC3xXRieg-l_oP3WdBF-vv9z9PjnfFldkuvbi6tqcU2syORIgDbpQSMbIRVvM2VkoUCKjJeZsNQWtbCqMSUt61zQ2mTQMFFzIS3Lc6pyMUfHu95NGP5NEEfdu2ih64yHdI3molCZKMQbyneoDUOMAVq9Ca434UUzqre29c62Tg71m22tUujovX-qe2g-Ix96EyB2QEwr_wxBr4cp-HTzV7Wvz0eKcA</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Chupin, Andrey V.</creator><creator>Katorkin, Sergey E.</creator><creator>Katelnitsky, Ivan I.</creator><creator>Katelnitskaya, Oksana V.</creator><creator>Prostov, Igor I.</creator><creator>Petrikov, Alexey S.</creator><creator>Koshevoi, Alexander P.</creator><creator>Lyudkova, Larisa F.</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program</title><author>Chupin, Andrey V. ; Katorkin, Sergey E. ; Katelnitsky, Ivan I. ; Katelnitskaya, Oksana V. ; Prostov, Igor I. ; Petrikov, Alexey S. ; Koshevoi, Alexander P. ; Lyudkova, Larisa F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-e0d0d0ed7d3792f49a769e7342843c0c6b3c9da808b530ba4ed13b237c1550953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chupin, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katorkin, Sergey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katelnitsky, Ivan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katelnitskaya, Oksana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prostov, Igor I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrikov, Alexey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koshevoi, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyudkova, Larisa F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chupin, Andrey V.</au><au>Katorkin, Sergey E.</au><au>Katelnitsky, Ivan I.</au><au>Katelnitskaya, Oksana V.</au><au>Prostov, Igor I.</au><au>Petrikov, Alexey S.</au><au>Koshevoi, Alexander P.</au><au>Lyudkova, Larisa F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2071</spage><epage>2082</epage><pages>2071-2082</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction Pharmacotherapy is a mainstay of treatment for lower limb chronic venous disease (CVD) and its complications. However, therapeutic agents with evidence-based efficacy for the treatment of CVD are limited. Sulodexide (registered as Vessel Due F in Russia) has confirmed therapeutic efficacy in patients with moderately severe or late-stage CVD, but real-world evidence of its use in Russian patients with initial manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains scarce. Methods Data concerning the use of sulodexide in Russian patients with CVD in routine clinical practice were collected and assessed within the framework of the ACVEDUCT program. This observational, prospective, non-controlled multicenter program included patients routinely prescribed sulodexide, as a solution for injections and/or soft capsules, by their physician in accordance with the registered Russian Federation instructions for use. Results In total, 2263 patients took part in the program. The majority of patients were diagnosed as having CEAP class C3 (38.4%) or class C4 (35.6%) CVD. Sulodexide was associated with decreased symptom severity in 56.4% of patients and a decreased number of symptoms in 42.8%. Thus, improvements were observed in 99.2% overall, with the drug effects being apparent as early as 15–20 days after starting treatment. The highest rate of CVD symptom regression was observed in patients aged 30–40 years. There was a significant positive correlation between sulodexide efficacy and treatment duration and the use of capsules during follow-up. A negative correlation was found between treatment efficacy and patient age at diagnosis, CEAP class, the total number of symptoms, and a combination of risk factors. Conclusions Sulodexide was an effective, safe, well-tolerated, and pathogenetically substantiated pharmacologic agent for the treatment of patients with lower limb CVD, and therefore should be recommended in patients with early-stage CVD. Patients with venous trophic ulcers require higher doses and prolonged administration of the drug.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>32112279</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-020-01270-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2020-05, Vol.37 (5), p.2071-2082
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369436395
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Cardiology
Endocrinology
Health technology assessment
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Original Research
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Rheumatology
title Sulodexide in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Results of the All-Russian Multicenter ACVEDUCT Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A30%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sulodexide%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Chronic%20Venous%20Insufficiency:%20Results%20of%20the%20All-Russian%20Multicenter%20ACVEDUCT%20Program&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Chupin,%20Andrey%20V.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2071&rft.epage=2082&rft.pages=2071-2082&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-020-01270-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369436395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369436395&rft_id=info:pmid/32112279&rfr_iscdi=true