Role of endoscopic surgical biopsy in diagnoses of intraventricular/periventricular tumors: review of literature including a monocentric case series

The intra- and periventricular location tumor (IPVT) of a brain remains a hard challenge for the neurosurgeon because of the deep location and eloquent anatomic associations. Due to this high risk of iatrogenic injury, many surgeons elect to perform biopsies of such lesions to establish a diagnosis....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta neurologica Belgica 2020-06, Vol.120 (3), p.517-530
Hauptverfasser: D’Angelo, Luca, Armocida, Daniele, Sampirisi, Luigi, Paglia, Francesco, Berra, Luigi Valentino, Santoro, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 530
container_issue 3
container_start_page 517
container_title Acta neurologica Belgica
container_volume 120
creator D’Angelo, Luca
Armocida, Daniele
Sampirisi, Luigi
Paglia, Francesco
Berra, Luigi Valentino
Santoro, Antonio
description The intra- and periventricular location tumor (IPVT) of a brain remains a hard challenge for the neurosurgeon because of the deep location and eloquent anatomic associations. Due to this high risk of iatrogenic injury, many surgeons elect to perform biopsies of such lesions to establish a diagnosis. On the one hand, stereotaxic needle biopsy (SNB) is a minimally invasive procedure but with a significant risk of complications and a high risk of lack of tissue for molecular analyses for this region [Fukushima in Neurosurgery 2:110–113 (1978)]; on the other hand, the use of endoscopic intraventricular biopsy (EIB) allows for diagnosis with minimal surgical intervention [Iwamoto et al. in Ann Neurol 64(suppl. 6):628–634 (2008)]. IPVTs and related CSF pathway obstructions can be safely and effectively treated with endoscopic techniques. It is not possible to compare EIB with diagnoses made by any other method or with the established treatment. We aim to analyze the accuracy of EIB results by comparing them with results of biopsies performed later, in other methods and thereby evaluating the treatment evolution considering our personal experience. The difficulties and complications encountered are presented and compared with those reported in the literature to obtain the best review possible for this topic. A systematic review of literature was done using MEDLINE, the NIH Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar yielded 1.951 cases for EIB and 1912 for SNB, according to standard systemic review techniques. Review was conducted on 50 studies describing surgical procedures for lesions intra- and para-ventricular. The primary outcome measure was a diagnostic success. We also consider 20 patients with IPVT treated in our department. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated and a systematic review of the literature was performed. Overall, all our biopsies were diagnostic, with a positive histologic sample in 100% of our patients. 8 patients underwent a concurrent endoscopic third ventriculostomy. 4 patients underwent a concurrent ventriculostomy combined with septostomy. For 1 patient was necessary the only septostomy combined with biopsy. Every case has obtained a histological diagnosis. The percentage of complications was very low with only 1 case of post-operative infection and 1 case of hemorrhage. It was impossible to create a specific comparison from literature data of IPVTs between a stereotactic and endoscopic procedure, it presents only the co
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13760-020-01299-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369402083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369402083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-736273f4e8bf1d774624e19127ca122820bc41e6ad8f304483702ea29ac7334b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9qFTEQxoMo9lD7Al5ILr1ZO_nDZtc7KVqFQkH0OmSzs4eU3WTNbCp9Dx_YHLcWrwwkw5Df98HMx9hrAe8EgLkkoUwLDch6hez7RjxjByk1NLVRz9kBFEDTA_Rn7ILoDurRrRSmfcnOlBRgjDAH9utrmpGniWMcE_m0Bs-p5GPwbuZDSCs98BD5GNwxJkI6oSFu2d1jfYMvs8uXK-bwT8-3sqRM73nG-4A_T5I5bJjdVjJWtZ_LGOKRO76kmPwu5N4RcqpOSK_Yi8nNhBeP9Zx9__Tx29Xn5ub2-svVh5vGK222xqhWGjVp7IZJjMbU8TSKXkjjnZCykzB4LbB1Yzcp0LpTBiQ62TtvlNKDOmdvd981px8FabNLII_z7CKmQlaqttd1w52qqNxRnxNRxsmuOSwuP1gB9hSI3QOxFbd_ArGiit48-pdhwfFJ8nf9FVA7QPUrHjHbu1RyrDP_z_Y3PESZDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369402083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of endoscopic surgical biopsy in diagnoses of intraventricular/periventricular tumors: review of literature including a monocentric case series</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>D’Angelo, Luca ; Armocida, Daniele ; Sampirisi, Luigi ; Paglia, Francesco ; Berra, Luigi Valentino ; Santoro, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, Luca ; Armocida, Daniele ; Sampirisi, Luigi ; Paglia, Francesco ; Berra, Luigi Valentino ; Santoro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>The intra- and periventricular location tumor (IPVT) of a brain remains a hard challenge for the neurosurgeon because of the deep location and eloquent anatomic associations. Due to this high risk of iatrogenic injury, many surgeons elect to perform biopsies of such lesions to establish a diagnosis. On the one hand, stereotaxic needle biopsy (SNB) is a minimally invasive procedure but with a significant risk of complications and a high risk of lack of tissue for molecular analyses for this region [Fukushima in Neurosurgery 2:110–113 (1978)]; on the other hand, the use of endoscopic intraventricular biopsy (EIB) allows for diagnosis with minimal surgical intervention [Iwamoto et al. in Ann Neurol 64(suppl. 6):628–634 (2008)]. IPVTs and related CSF pathway obstructions can be safely and effectively treated with endoscopic techniques. It is not possible to compare EIB with diagnoses made by any other method or with the established treatment. We aim to analyze the accuracy of EIB results by comparing them with results of biopsies performed later, in other methods and thereby evaluating the treatment evolution considering our personal experience. The difficulties and complications encountered are presented and compared with those reported in the literature to obtain the best review possible for this topic. A systematic review of literature was done using MEDLINE, the NIH Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar yielded 1.951 cases for EIB and 1912 for SNB, according to standard systemic review techniques. Review was conducted on 50 studies describing surgical procedures for lesions intra- and para-ventricular. The primary outcome measure was a diagnostic success. We also consider 20 patients with IPVT treated in our department. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated and a systematic review of the literature was performed. Overall, all our biopsies were diagnostic, with a positive histologic sample in 100% of our patients. 8 patients underwent a concurrent endoscopic third ventriculostomy. 4 patients underwent a concurrent ventriculostomy combined with septostomy. For 1 patient was necessary the only septostomy combined with biopsy. Every case has obtained a histological diagnosis. The percentage of complications was very low with only 1 case of post-operative infection and 1 case of hemorrhage. It was impossible to create a specific comparison from literature data of IPVTs between a stereotactic and endoscopic procedure, it presents only the collection of pineal gland tumor [Kelly in Neurosurgery 25(02):185–194 (1989); Quick-Weller in World Neurosurgery 96:124–128 (2016)] or unknown location of the lesion in major review [Marenco-Hillembrand et al. in Front Oncol 8:558 (2018)]. The present study aims to report our experience with the surgical management of IPVTs. The EIB sample yields an accurate histologic diagnosis tumor, with a positive histologic sample in 87, 95% of patients. The choice of the appropriate procedure should consider not only the preference and the experience of the neurosurgeon but also the several other variables as the location. While some periventricular lesions are better approached by endoscopic techniques, others are more suited for stereotactic-guided approaches. The ability to perform an EIB and relieve tumor-associated hydrocephalus by neuroendoscopy is considered to be a benefit of this procedure since this is less invasive than other treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2240-2993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13760-020-01299-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32107717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biopsy - methods ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine/Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuroendoscopy - methods ; Neurology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Review Article ; Ventriculostomy - methods</subject><ispartof>Acta neurologica Belgica, 2020-06, Vol.120 (3), p.517-530</ispartof><rights>Belgian Neurological Society 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-736273f4e8bf1d774624e19127ca122820bc41e6ad8f304483702ea29ac7334b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-736273f4e8bf1d774624e19127ca122820bc41e6ad8f304483702ea29ac7334b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6550-5534</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13760-020-01299-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13760-020-01299-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armocida, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampirisi, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paglia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berra, Luigi Valentino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Role of endoscopic surgical biopsy in diagnoses of intraventricular/periventricular tumors: review of literature including a monocentric case series</title><title>Acta neurologica Belgica</title><addtitle>Acta Neurol Belg</addtitle><addtitle>Acta Neurol Belg</addtitle><description>The intra- and periventricular location tumor (IPVT) of a brain remains a hard challenge for the neurosurgeon because of the deep location and eloquent anatomic associations. Due to this high risk of iatrogenic injury, many surgeons elect to perform biopsies of such lesions to establish a diagnosis. On the one hand, stereotaxic needle biopsy (SNB) is a minimally invasive procedure but with a significant risk of complications and a high risk of lack of tissue for molecular analyses for this region [Fukushima in Neurosurgery 2:110–113 (1978)]; on the other hand, the use of endoscopic intraventricular biopsy (EIB) allows for diagnosis with minimal surgical intervention [Iwamoto et al. in Ann Neurol 64(suppl. 6):628–634 (2008)]. IPVTs and related CSF pathway obstructions can be safely and effectively treated with endoscopic techniques. It is not possible to compare EIB with diagnoses made by any other method or with the established treatment. We aim to analyze the accuracy of EIB results by comparing them with results of biopsies performed later, in other methods and thereby evaluating the treatment evolution considering our personal experience. The difficulties and complications encountered are presented and compared with those reported in the literature to obtain the best review possible for this topic. A systematic review of literature was done using MEDLINE, the NIH Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar yielded 1.951 cases for EIB and 1912 for SNB, according to standard systemic review techniques. Review was conducted on 50 studies describing surgical procedures for lesions intra- and para-ventricular. The primary outcome measure was a diagnostic success. We also consider 20 patients with IPVT treated in our department. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated and a systematic review of the literature was performed. Overall, all our biopsies were diagnostic, with a positive histologic sample in 100% of our patients. 8 patients underwent a concurrent endoscopic third ventriculostomy. 4 patients underwent a concurrent ventriculostomy combined with septostomy. For 1 patient was necessary the only septostomy combined with biopsy. Every case has obtained a histological diagnosis. The percentage of complications was very low with only 1 case of post-operative infection and 1 case of hemorrhage. It was impossible to create a specific comparison from literature data of IPVTs between a stereotactic and endoscopic procedure, it presents only the collection of pineal gland tumor [Kelly in Neurosurgery 25(02):185–194 (1989); Quick-Weller in World Neurosurgery 96:124–128 (2016)] or unknown location of the lesion in major review [Marenco-Hillembrand et al. in Front Oncol 8:558 (2018)]. The present study aims to report our experience with the surgical management of IPVTs. The EIB sample yields an accurate histologic diagnosis tumor, with a positive histologic sample in 87, 95% of patients. The choice of the appropriate procedure should consider not only the preference and the experience of the neurosurgeon but also the several other variables as the location. While some periventricular lesions are better approached by endoscopic techniques, others are more suited for stereotactic-guided approaches. The ability to perform an EIB and relieve tumor-associated hydrocephalus by neuroendoscopy is considered to be a benefit of this procedure since this is less invasive than other treatments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine/Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroendoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Ventriculostomy - methods</subject><issn>0300-9009</issn><issn>2240-2993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9qFTEQxoMo9lD7Al5ILr1ZO_nDZtc7KVqFQkH0OmSzs4eU3WTNbCp9Dx_YHLcWrwwkw5Df98HMx9hrAe8EgLkkoUwLDch6hez7RjxjByk1NLVRz9kBFEDTA_Rn7ILoDurRrRSmfcnOlBRgjDAH9utrmpGniWMcE_m0Bs-p5GPwbuZDSCs98BD5GNwxJkI6oSFu2d1jfYMvs8uXK-bwT8-3sqRM73nG-4A_T5I5bJjdVjJWtZ_LGOKRO76kmPwu5N4RcqpOSK_Yi8nNhBeP9Zx9__Tx29Xn5ub2-svVh5vGK222xqhWGjVp7IZJjMbU8TSKXkjjnZCykzB4LbB1Yzcp0LpTBiQ62TtvlNKDOmdvd981px8FabNLII_z7CKmQlaqttd1w52qqNxRnxNRxsmuOSwuP1gB9hSI3QOxFbd_ArGiit48-pdhwfFJ8nf9FVA7QPUrHjHbu1RyrDP_z_Y3PESZDg</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>D’Angelo, Luca</creator><creator>Armocida, Daniele</creator><creator>Sampirisi, Luigi</creator><creator>Paglia, Francesco</creator><creator>Berra, Luigi Valentino</creator><creator>Santoro, Antonio</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-5534</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Role of endoscopic surgical biopsy in diagnoses of intraventricular/periventricular tumors: review of literature including a monocentric case series</title><author>D’Angelo, Luca ; Armocida, Daniele ; Sampirisi, Luigi ; Paglia, Francesco ; Berra, Luigi Valentino ; Santoro, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-736273f4e8bf1d774624e19127ca122820bc41e6ad8f304483702ea29ac7334b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine/Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroendoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Ventriculostomy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D’Angelo, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armocida, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampirisi, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paglia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berra, Luigi Valentino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta neurologica Belgica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D’Angelo, Luca</au><au>Armocida, Daniele</au><au>Sampirisi, Luigi</au><au>Paglia, Francesco</au><au>Berra, Luigi Valentino</au><au>Santoro, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of endoscopic surgical biopsy in diagnoses of intraventricular/periventricular tumors: review of literature including a monocentric case series</atitle><jtitle>Acta neurologica Belgica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Neurol Belg</stitle><addtitle>Acta Neurol Belg</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>517-530</pages><issn>0300-9009</issn><eissn>2240-2993</eissn><abstract>The intra- and periventricular location tumor (IPVT) of a brain remains a hard challenge for the neurosurgeon because of the deep location and eloquent anatomic associations. Due to this high risk of iatrogenic injury, many surgeons elect to perform biopsies of such lesions to establish a diagnosis. On the one hand, stereotaxic needle biopsy (SNB) is a minimally invasive procedure but with a significant risk of complications and a high risk of lack of tissue for molecular analyses for this region [Fukushima in Neurosurgery 2:110–113 (1978)]; on the other hand, the use of endoscopic intraventricular biopsy (EIB) allows for diagnosis with minimal surgical intervention [Iwamoto et al. in Ann Neurol 64(suppl. 6):628–634 (2008)]. IPVTs and related CSF pathway obstructions can be safely and effectively treated with endoscopic techniques. It is not possible to compare EIB with diagnoses made by any other method or with the established treatment. We aim to analyze the accuracy of EIB results by comparing them with results of biopsies performed later, in other methods and thereby evaluating the treatment evolution considering our personal experience. The difficulties and complications encountered are presented and compared with those reported in the literature to obtain the best review possible for this topic. A systematic review of literature was done using MEDLINE, the NIH Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar yielded 1.951 cases for EIB and 1912 for SNB, according to standard systemic review techniques. Review was conducted on 50 studies describing surgical procedures for lesions intra- and para-ventricular. The primary outcome measure was a diagnostic success. We also consider 20 patients with IPVT treated in our department. Clinical characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated and a systematic review of the literature was performed. Overall, all our biopsies were diagnostic, with a positive histologic sample in 100% of our patients. 8 patients underwent a concurrent endoscopic third ventriculostomy. 4 patients underwent a concurrent ventriculostomy combined with septostomy. For 1 patient was necessary the only septostomy combined with biopsy. Every case has obtained a histological diagnosis. The percentage of complications was very low with only 1 case of post-operative infection and 1 case of hemorrhage. It was impossible to create a specific comparison from literature data of IPVTs between a stereotactic and endoscopic procedure, it presents only the collection of pineal gland tumor [Kelly in Neurosurgery 25(02):185–194 (1989); Quick-Weller in World Neurosurgery 96:124–128 (2016)] or unknown location of the lesion in major review [Marenco-Hillembrand et al. in Front Oncol 8:558 (2018)]. The present study aims to report our experience with the surgical management of IPVTs. The EIB sample yields an accurate histologic diagnosis tumor, with a positive histologic sample in 87, 95% of patients. The choice of the appropriate procedure should consider not only the preference and the experience of the neurosurgeon but also the several other variables as the location. While some periventricular lesions are better approached by endoscopic techniques, others are more suited for stereotactic-guided approaches. The ability to perform an EIB and relieve tumor-associated hydrocephalus by neuroendoscopy is considered to be a benefit of this procedure since this is less invasive than other treatments.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32107717</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13760-020-01299-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-5534</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9009
ispartof Acta neurologica Belgica, 2020-06, Vol.120 (3), p.517-530
issn 0300-9009
2240-2993
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369402083
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Biopsy - methods
Brain Neoplasms - diagnosis
Cerebral Ventricle Neoplasms - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine/Public Health
Middle Aged
Neuroendoscopy - methods
Neurology
Neuroradiology
Neurosciences
Review Article
Ventriculostomy - methods
title Role of endoscopic surgical biopsy in diagnoses of intraventricular/periventricular tumors: review of literature including a monocentric case series
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T19%3A23%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20endoscopic%20surgical%20biopsy%20in%20diagnoses%20of%20intraventricular/periventricular%20tumors:%20review%20of%20literature%20including%20a%20monocentric%20case%20series&rft.jtitle=Acta%20neurologica%20Belgica&rft.au=D%E2%80%99Angelo,%20Luca&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=517-530&rft.issn=0300-9009&rft.eissn=2240-2993&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13760-020-01299-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369402083%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369402083&rft_id=info:pmid/32107717&rfr_iscdi=true