Systematic review: The diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver fibrosis staging
•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in staging liver fibrosis.•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had the highest sensitivity for staging F4 subset.•A prospective study with large sample in patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy. To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2020-04, Vol.125, p.108857-108857, Article 108857 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108857 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108857 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Yang, Dawei Li, Dan Li, Jinshui Yang, Zhenghan Wang, Zhenchang |
description | •Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in staging liver fibrosis.•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had the highest sensitivity for staging F4 subset.•A prospective study with large sample in patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.
To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the staging of liver fibrosis by meta-analysis.
PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies were included according to their eligibility and the exclusion criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the methodologic quality. The bivariate random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled summary estimates, heterogeneity, and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Meta-regression was performed to discover the source of heterogeneity and compare certain some subsets for their capacity to stage hepatic fibrosis by AUROC comparison.
A total of 20 original articles (1936 patients) were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias and minimal concerns regarding applicability. The summary AUROC values of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in staging the liver fibrosis ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 subsets were 0.92, 0.87, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively. Studies with populations equal to or more than 100 had a significantly higher sensitivity (84 %) and specificity (91 %) than those with populations less than 100 (70 % and 77 %, respectively, P < 0.01). Studies of a prospective design exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity (94 %) and specificity (94 %) than those of a retrospective design (75 % and 84 %, respectively, P < 0.01).
Our meta-analysis shows the high diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the staging of liver fibrosis. A prospective study with more than one hundred patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108857 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369400995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X20300462</els_id><sourcerecordid>2369400995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-371b3a49c3f2a1b719b8920c0910fbd16f043b042f1550838cc7198490bf572b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtrGzEURkVpqB23v6BQtOxm3CtpxhoFsighD4NLIHGhO6HHlS1jz6TSOIn_fWbqJMuuLnyc-zqEfGUwZcBmPzZT3CTjpxz4kNR1JT-QMaslL6Tk8iMZg-RQQFn_GZHTnDcAUJWKfyIjwRkTrBJj4u8PucOd6aKjCR8jPp3R5Rqpj2bVtHmIMYTojDvQNtCV8e0zDqlx0RfYrE3j0NNfd3Ma2kS38RETDdGmNsdMc2dWsVl9JifBbDN-ea0T8vvqcnlxUyxur-cXPxeFK3nVFUIyK0ypnAjcMCuZsrXi4EAxCNazWYBSWCh5YFUFtaid65m6VGBDJbkVE_L9OPchtX_3mDu9i9nhdmsabPdZczFTJYBSVY-KI-r6S3PCoB9S3Jl00Az0oFdv9D-9etCrj3r7rm-vC_Z2h_69581nD5wfAezf7G0mnV3EQVFM6Drt2_jfBS-564vJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369400995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review: The diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver fibrosis staging</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yang, Dawei ; Li, Dan ; Li, Jinshui ; Yang, Zhenghan ; Wang, Zhenchang</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dawei ; Li, Dan ; Li, Jinshui ; Yang, Zhenghan ; Wang, Zhenchang</creatorcontrib><description>•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in staging liver fibrosis.•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had the highest sensitivity for staging F4 subset.•A prospective study with large sample in patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.
To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the staging of liver fibrosis by meta-analysis.
PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies were included according to their eligibility and the exclusion criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the methodologic quality. The bivariate random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled summary estimates, heterogeneity, and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Meta-regression was performed to discover the source of heterogeneity and compare certain some subsets for their capacity to stage hepatic fibrosis by AUROC comparison.
A total of 20 original articles (1936 patients) were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias and minimal concerns regarding applicability. The summary AUROC values of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in staging the liver fibrosis ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 subsets were 0.92, 0.87, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively. Studies with populations equal to or more than 100 had a significantly higher sensitivity (84 %) and specificity (91 %) than those with populations less than 100 (70 % and 77 %, respectively, P < 0.01). Studies of a prospective design exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity (94 %) and specificity (94 %) than those of a retrospective design (75 % and 84 %, respectively, P < 0.01).
Our meta-analysis shows the high diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the staging of liver fibrosis. A prospective study with more than one hundred patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108857</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32113153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Diagnostic accuracy ; Gadoxetic acid ; Liver fibrosis ; Meta-analysis ; MRI</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2020-04, Vol.125, p.108857-108857, Article 108857</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-371b3a49c3f2a1b719b8920c0910fbd16f043b042f1550838cc7198490bf572b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-371b3a49c3f2a1b719b8920c0910fbd16f043b042f1550838cc7198490bf572b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2958-8851 ; 0000-0001-8190-6469 ; 0000-0002-1868-2746</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108857$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32113153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinshui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenchang</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review: The diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver fibrosis staging</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in staging liver fibrosis.•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had the highest sensitivity for staging F4 subset.•A prospective study with large sample in patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.
To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the staging of liver fibrosis by meta-analysis.
PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies were included according to their eligibility and the exclusion criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the methodologic quality. The bivariate random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled summary estimates, heterogeneity, and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Meta-regression was performed to discover the source of heterogeneity and compare certain some subsets for their capacity to stage hepatic fibrosis by AUROC comparison.
A total of 20 original articles (1936 patients) were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias and minimal concerns regarding applicability. The summary AUROC values of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in staging the liver fibrosis ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 subsets were 0.92, 0.87, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively. Studies with populations equal to or more than 100 had a significantly higher sensitivity (84 %) and specificity (91 %) than those with populations less than 100 (70 % and 77 %, respectively, P < 0.01). Studies of a prospective design exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity (94 %) and specificity (94 %) than those of a retrospective design (75 % and 84 %, respectively, P < 0.01).
Our meta-analysis shows the high diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the staging of liver fibrosis. A prospective study with more than one hundred patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.</description><subject>Diagnostic accuracy</subject><subject>Gadoxetic acid</subject><subject>Liver fibrosis</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>MRI</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtrGzEURkVpqB23v6BQtOxm3CtpxhoFsighD4NLIHGhO6HHlS1jz6TSOIn_fWbqJMuuLnyc-zqEfGUwZcBmPzZT3CTjpxz4kNR1JT-QMaslL6Tk8iMZg-RQQFn_GZHTnDcAUJWKfyIjwRkTrBJj4u8PucOd6aKjCR8jPp3R5Rqpj2bVtHmIMYTojDvQNtCV8e0zDqlx0RfYrE3j0NNfd3Ma2kS38RETDdGmNsdMc2dWsVl9JifBbDN-ea0T8vvqcnlxUyxur-cXPxeFK3nVFUIyK0ypnAjcMCuZsrXi4EAxCNazWYBSWCh5YFUFtaid65m6VGBDJbkVE_L9OPchtX_3mDu9i9nhdmsabPdZczFTJYBSVY-KI-r6S3PCoB9S3Jl00Az0oFdv9D-9etCrj3r7rm-vC_Z2h_69581nD5wfAezf7G0mnV3EQVFM6Drt2_jfBS-564vJ</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Yang, Dawei</creator><creator>Li, Dan</creator><creator>Li, Jinshui</creator><creator>Yang, Zhenghan</creator><creator>Wang, Zhenchang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-8851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-6469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1868-2746</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Systematic review: The diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver fibrosis staging</title><author>Yang, Dawei ; Li, Dan ; Li, Jinshui ; Yang, Zhenghan ; Wang, Zhenchang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-371b3a49c3f2a1b719b8920c0910fbd16f043b042f1550838cc7198490bf572b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Diagnostic accuracy</topic><topic>Gadoxetic acid</topic><topic>Liver fibrosis</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>MRI</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinshui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhenchang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Dawei</au><au>Li, Dan</au><au>Li, Jinshui</au><au>Yang, Zhenghan</au><au>Wang, Zhenchang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review: The diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver fibrosis staging</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><spage>108857</spage><epage>108857</epage><pages>108857-108857</pages><artnum>108857</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in staging liver fibrosis.•Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had the highest sensitivity for staging F4 subset.•A prospective study with large sample in patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.
To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the staging of liver fibrosis by meta-analysis.
PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies were included according to their eligibility and the exclusion criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the methodologic quality. The bivariate random-effects model was used to obtain the pooled summary estimates, heterogeneity, and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Meta-regression was performed to discover the source of heterogeneity and compare certain some subsets for their capacity to stage hepatic fibrosis by AUROC comparison.
A total of 20 original articles (1936 patients) were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias and minimal concerns regarding applicability. The summary AUROC values of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in staging the liver fibrosis ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 subsets were 0.92, 0.87, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively. Studies with populations equal to or more than 100 had a significantly higher sensitivity (84 %) and specificity (91 %) than those with populations less than 100 (70 % and 77 %, respectively, P < 0.01). Studies of a prospective design exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity (94 %) and specificity (94 %) than those of a retrospective design (75 % and 84 %, respectively, P < 0.01).
Our meta-analysis shows the high diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in the staging of liver fibrosis. A prospective study with more than one hundred patients showed higher diagnostic efficacy.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32113153</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108857</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-8851</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-6469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1868-2746</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2020-04, Vol.125, p.108857-108857, Article 108857 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2369400995 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Diagnostic accuracy Gadoxetic acid Liver fibrosis Meta-analysis MRI |
title | Systematic review: The diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for liver fibrosis staging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A39%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review:%20The%20diagnostic%20efficacy%20of%20gadoxetic%20acid-enhanced%20MRI%20for%20liver%20fibrosis%20staging&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Yang,%20Dawei&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=125&rft.spage=108857&rft.epage=108857&rft.pages=108857-108857&rft.artnum=108857&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108857&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2369400995%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369400995&rft_id=info:pmid/32113153&rft_els_id=S0720048X20300462&rfr_iscdi=true |