Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers
AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bloomberg businessweek (Online) 1989-10 (3131), p.156 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3131 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | Bloomberg businessweek (Online) |
container_volume | |
creator | Lewyn, Mark |
description | AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_236697269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1401011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2366972693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jUzNY9gYeA0MDAw1zU3NDblYOAtLs4Ccg0sLEyNjAw5GZSDUsvyc0oU_NMUQvOSc1IVghNz1YsVAhILUosUAkqLM1KLinkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4O6m2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcbyRsZmZpbmRmaUx8SoBMJAzHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>236697269</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lewyn, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewyn, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-7135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-657X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BWITEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Bloomberg Finance LP</publisher><subject>Automation ; Bureaucrats ; Communications networks ; Competition ; Government agencies ; Government contracts ; Marketing ; Service introduction ; Strategic planning ; Telephone companies ; Telephone service ; Telephones</subject><ispartof>Bloomberg businessweek (Online), 1989-10 (3131), p.156</ispartof><rights>Copyright McGraw Hill Publications Company Oct 30, 1989</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewyn, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</title><title>Bloomberg businessweek (Online)</title><description>AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Communications networks</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Government contracts</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Service introduction</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Telephone companies</subject><subject>Telephone service</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><issn>0007-7135</issn><issn>2162-657X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jUzNY9gYeA0MDAw1zU3NDblYOAtLs4Ccg0sLEyNjAw5GZSDUsvyc0oU_NMUQvOSc1IVghNz1YsVAhILUosUAkqLM1KLinkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4O6m2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcbyRsZmZpbmRmaUx8SoBMJAzHg</recordid><startdate>19891030</startdate><enddate>19891030</enddate><creator>Lewyn, Mark</creator><general>Bloomberg Finance LP</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19891030</creationdate><title>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</title><author>Lewyn, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2366972693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Communications networks</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Government contracts</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Service introduction</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Telephone companies</topic><topic>Telephone service</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewyn, Mark</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Bloomberg businessweek (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewyn, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</atitle><jtitle>Bloomberg businessweek (Online)</jtitle><date>1989-10-30</date><risdate>1989</risdate><issue>3131</issue><spage>156</spage><pages>156-</pages><issn>0007-7135</issn><eissn>2162-657X</eissn><coden>BWITEU</coden><abstract>AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Bloomberg Finance LP</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-7135 |
ispartof | Bloomberg businessweek (Online), 1989-10 (3131), p.156 |
issn | 0007-7135 2162-657X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_236697269 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Automation Bureaucrats Communications networks Competition Government agencies Government contracts Marketing Service introduction Strategic planning Telephone companies Telephone service Telephones |
title | Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revolt%20Of%20Uncle%20Sam's%20Paper%20Pushers&rft.jtitle=Bloomberg%20businessweek%20(Online)&rft.au=Lewyn,%20Mark&rft.date=1989-10-30&rft.issue=3131&rft.spage=156&rft.pages=156-&rft.issn=0007-7135&rft.eissn=2162-657X&rft.coden=BWITEU&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1401011%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236697269&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |