Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers

AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bloomberg businessweek (Online) 1989-10 (3131), p.156
1. Verfasser: Lewyn, Mark
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3131
container_start_page 156
container_title Bloomberg businessweek (Online)
container_volume
creator Lewyn, Mark
description AT&T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_236697269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1401011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2366972693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jUzNY9gYeA0MDAw1zU3NDblYOAtLs4Ccg0sLEyNjAw5GZSDUsvyc0oU_NMUQvOSc1IVghNz1YsVAhILUosUAkqLM1KLinkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4O6m2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcbyRsZmZpbmRmaUx8SoBMJAzHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>236697269</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lewyn, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewyn, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>AT&amp;T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&amp;T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&amp;T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-7135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-657X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BWITEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Bloomberg Finance LP</publisher><subject>Automation ; Bureaucrats ; Communications networks ; Competition ; Government agencies ; Government contracts ; Marketing ; Service introduction ; Strategic planning ; Telephone companies ; Telephone service ; Telephones</subject><ispartof>Bloomberg businessweek (Online), 1989-10 (3131), p.156</ispartof><rights>Copyright McGraw Hill Publications Company Oct 30, 1989</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewyn, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</title><title>Bloomberg businessweek (Online)</title><description>AT&amp;T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&amp;T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&amp;T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Communications networks</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Government contracts</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Service introduction</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Telephone companies</subject><subject>Telephone service</subject><subject>Telephones</subject><issn>0007-7135</issn><issn>2162-657X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQz0jUzNY9gYeA0MDAw1zU3NDblYOAtLs4Ccg0sLEyNjAw5GZSDUsvyc0oU_NMUQvOSc1IVghNz1YsVAhILUosUAkqLM1KLinkYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4O6m2uIs4duQVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcbyRsZmZpbmRmaUx8SoBMJAzHg</recordid><startdate>19891030</startdate><enddate>19891030</enddate><creator>Lewyn, Mark</creator><general>Bloomberg Finance LP</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19891030</creationdate><title>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</title><author>Lewyn, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2366972693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Communications networks</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Government contracts</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Service introduction</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Telephone companies</topic><topic>Telephone service</topic><topic>Telephones</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewyn, Mark</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Bloomberg businessweek (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewyn, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers</atitle><jtitle>Bloomberg businessweek (Online)</jtitle><date>1989-10-30</date><risdate>1989</risdate><issue>3131</issue><spage>156</spage><pages>156-</pages><issn>0007-7135</issn><eissn>2162-657X</eissn><coden>BWITEU</coden><abstract>AT&amp;T Co. and US Sprint Communications Co. were hailed in December 1988 as the winners in a battle for one of the largest nonmilitary government projects in US history - replacing the federal government's old telephone network. It was said that the $25-billion, 10-year contract could be very profitable for the companies. However, the project, called FTS-2000, may not be profitable after all. AT&amp;T and Sprint hope to derive more than half the $25 billion from selling such expensive options as electronic mail and videoconferencing. Such services are commonplace to business customers, but they are high technology to risk-averse bureaucrats. To overcome the bureaucrats' resistance to change, AT&amp;T and Sprint have assembled many salespeople and engineers to mount a hard sell. At the moment, however, government procurement officials still are confused over what the system can do and why they should buy it. When completed, the system should save the government an estimated $200 million a year in phone bills.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Bloomberg Finance LP</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-7135
ispartof Bloomberg businessweek (Online), 1989-10 (3131), p.156
issn 0007-7135
2162-657X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_236697269
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Automation
Bureaucrats
Communications networks
Competition
Government agencies
Government contracts
Marketing
Service introduction
Strategic planning
Telephone companies
Telephone service
Telephones
title Revolt Of Uncle Sam's Paper Pushers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revolt%20Of%20Uncle%20Sam's%20Paper%20Pushers&rft.jtitle=Bloomberg%20businessweek%20(Online)&rft.au=Lewyn,%20Mark&rft.date=1989-10-30&rft.issue=3131&rft.spage=156&rft.pages=156-&rft.issn=0007-7135&rft.eissn=2162-657X&rft.coden=BWITEU&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1401011%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=236697269&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true