Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2020-09, Vol.29 (9), p.2143-2163
Hauptverfasser: Jensen, Rikke Krüger, Jensen, Tue Secher, Koes, Bart, Hartvigsen, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2163
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2143
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 29
creator Jensen, Rikke Krüger
Jensen, Tue Secher
Koes, Bart
Hartvigsen, Jan
description Purpose To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2364047487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441670046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8169060af4b3ce95ff311b4cb2a7f669737889cecbe7a06cb68790bd90f885073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhkmjaa_VP-DCkLhxQ3sYuHy4M40fTZrUha4Jwz3T0MzACDM299-X9lZNXHQFB57zcMJLyFsOZxxAn1eArVEMOmCghLCMH5ENl6JjYEX3gmzASmBKc3tCXtV6C8C3FtQxOREd2LY1G5K_F_ztR0wBaR7ouE69L7TOMfmR1gVTrrHSmOgNJiztzKcdDWNMMbRizvM6-iXmVD9ST-u-dUytDrRZI9490hMunvnm2zfVa_Jy8GPFN0_rKfn55fOPi2_s6vrr5cWnKxYktwszXLVJwQ-yFwHtdhgE570Mfef1oJTVQhtjA4YetQcVemW0hX5nYTBmC1qckg8H71zyrxXr4qZYA46jT5jX6jqhJEgtzQP6_j_0Nq-lzdsoKbnSAFI1qjtQoeRaCw5uLnHyZe84uIc43CEO1-Jwj3E43prePanXfsLd35Y__98AcQBqu0o3WP69_Yz2Hk6alhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441670046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Jensen, Rikke Krüger ; Jensen, Tue Secher ; Koes, Bart ; Hartvigsen, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Rikke Krüger ; Jensen, Tue Secher ; Koes, Bart ; Hartvigsen, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32095908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bias ; Diagnosis ; Estimates ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Neurosurgery ; Population ; Primary care ; Review Article ; Spinal stenosis ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2020-09, Vol.29 (9), p.2143-2163</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8169060af4b3ce95ff311b4cb2a7f669737889cecbe7a06cb68790bd90f885073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8169060af4b3ce95ff311b4cb2a7f669737889cecbe7a06cb68790bd90f885073</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7528-3234</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Rikke Krüger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tue Secher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koes, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartvigsen, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Spinal stenosis</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhkmjaa_VP-DCkLhxQ3sYuHy4M40fTZrUha4Jwz3T0MzACDM299-X9lZNXHQFB57zcMJLyFsOZxxAn1eArVEMOmCghLCMH5ENl6JjYEX3gmzASmBKc3tCXtV6C8C3FtQxOREd2LY1G5K_F_ztR0wBaR7ouE69L7TOMfmR1gVTrrHSmOgNJiztzKcdDWNMMbRizvM6-iXmVD9ST-u-dUytDrRZI9490hMunvnm2zfVa_Jy8GPFN0_rKfn55fOPi2_s6vrr5cWnKxYktwszXLVJwQ-yFwHtdhgE570Mfef1oJTVQhtjA4YetQcVemW0hX5nYTBmC1qckg8H71zyrxXr4qZYA46jT5jX6jqhJEgtzQP6_j_0Nq-lzdsoKbnSAFI1qjtQoeRaCw5uLnHyZe84uIc43CEO1-Jwj3E43prePanXfsLd35Y__98AcQBqu0o3WP69_Yz2Hk6alhU</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Jensen, Rikke Krüger</creator><creator>Jensen, Tue Secher</creator><creator>Koes, Bart</creator><creator>Hartvigsen, Jan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-3234</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Jensen, Rikke Krüger ; Jensen, Tue Secher ; Koes, Bart ; Hartvigsen, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8169060af4b3ce95ff311b4cb2a7f669737889cecbe7a06cb68790bd90f885073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Spinal stenosis</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Rikke Krüger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Tue Secher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koes, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartvigsen, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, Rikke Krüger</au><au>Jensen, Tue Secher</au><au>Koes, Bart</au><au>Hartvigsen, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2143</spage><epage>2163</epage><pages>2143-2163</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose To estimate the prevalence of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in adults, identified by clinical symptoms and/or radiological criteria. Methods Systematic review of the literature. Pooled prevalence estimates by care setting and clinical or radiological diagnostic criteria were calculated and plotted [PROSPERO ID: CRD42018109640]. Results In total, 41 papers reporting on 55 study samples were included. The overall risk of bias was considered high in two-thirds of the papers. The mean prevalence, based on a clinical diagnosis of LSS in the general population, was 11% (95% CI 4–18%), 25% (95% CI 19–32%) in patients from primary care, 29% (95% CI 22–36%) in patients from secondary care and 39% (95% CI 39–39%) in patients from mixed primary and secondary care. Evaluating the presence of LSS based on radiological diagnosis, the pooled prevalence was 11% (95% CI 5–18%) in the asymptomatic population, 38% (95% CI − 10 to 85%) in the general population, 15% (95% CI 13–18%) in patients from primary care, 32% (95% CI 22–41%) in patients from secondary care and 21% (95% CI 16–26%) in a mixed population from primary and secondary care. Conclusions The mean prevalence estimates based on clinical diagnoses vary between 11 and 39%, and the estimates based on radiological diagnoses similarly vary between 11 and 38%. The results are based on studies with high risk of bias, and the pooled prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution. With an growing elderly population, there is a need for future low risk-of-bias research clarifying clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria of lumbar spinal stenosis. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32095908</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-3234</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2020-09, Vol.29 (9), p.2143-2163
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2364047487
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Bias
Diagnosis
Estimates
Literature reviews
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Neurosurgery
Population
Primary care
Review Article
Spinal stenosis
Surgical Orthopedics
Systematic review
title Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis in general and clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A26%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20lumbar%20spinal%20stenosis%20in%20general%20and%20clinical%20populations:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Jensen,%20Rikke%20Kr%C3%BCger&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2143&rft.epage=2163&rft.pages=2143-2163&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441670046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441670046&rft_id=info:pmid/32095908&rfr_iscdi=true